Breadcrumb

 
 

Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination

Title:

Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination

Duy, Joanna and Vaughan, Liwen (2006) Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32 (5). 512 -517. ISSN 0099-1333

[img]
Preview
PDF (Post-print: final draft post-refereeing)
120Kb

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.05.005

Abstract

Citation and print journal use data have been used to measure quality and usefulness of library journal titles. This study examined relationships among different measurements and found that electronic usage correlates with print usage and local citation data are a valid reflection of total journal usage but Impact Factors are not as valid.

Divisions:Concordia University > Libraries
Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Authors:Duy, Joanna and Vaughan, Liwen
Journal or Publication:The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Date:2006
Keywords:electronic, journal, use, usage, citation, data, impact factors
ID Code:5589
Deposited By:KUMIKO VEZINA
Deposited On:02 Sep 2009 13:03
Last Modified:08 Dec 2010 20:08
Related URLs:
References:
Blecic, D. 1999. Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 87: 20-25.

Broadus, R. 1985. A proposed method for eliminating titles from periodical subscription lists. College and Research Libraries, 46: 30-35.

Colquhoun, D. 2003. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors. Nature correspondence. Nature, 423: 479.

Davis, P. 2002. Where to spend our e-journal money? Defining a university library’s core collection through citation analysis. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2: 155-166.

Duy, J. and Vaughan, L. 2003. Usage data for electronic resources: a comparison between locally-collected and vendor-provided statistics. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29: 16-22.

Duy, J. and Vaughan, L. 2005. Are citation data a valid measure of journal use? An empirical examination in an academic context. In Proceedings of ISSI 2005, 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics, ed. Ingwerson, P. and Larsen, B, 390-397. Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.

Hahn, K. and Faulkner, L. 2002. Evaluative usage-based metrics for the selection of e-journals. College and Research Libraries, May 2002: 215-227.

Kleinberg, J. 2004. Analysing the scientific literature in its online context. Nature Web Focus: Access to the Literature. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/18.html. (accessed April 4, 2004).

Kurtz, M., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Murray, S., Martimbeau, N. and Elwell, B. 2003. The bibliographic properties of article readership information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56: 111-128.

Liu, M. 1993. Progress in documentation; the complexities of citation practice: a review of citation studies. Journal of documentation, 49: 370-408.

Nisonger, T. 2004. The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries. The Serials Librarian, 47: 57-75.

Pan, E. 1978. Journal citation as a predictor of journal usage in libraries. Collection Management, 2: 29-38.

Rice, B. 1983. Selection and evaluation of chemistry periodicals. Science and Technology Libraries, 4: 43-59.

Saha, S. Saint, S, Christakis D.A. 2003. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91: 43.

Scales, P. 1976. Citation analysis as indicators of the use of serials: a comparison of ranked title lists produced by citation counting and from use data. Journal of Documentation, 32: 17-25.

Schmidt, D., Davis, E., Jahr, R. 1994. Biology journal use at an academic library: a comparison of use studies. Serials Review (Summer 1994): 45-64.

Shim, J., McClure, C., Fraser, B., Bertot, J., Dagli, A. and Leahy, E. 2001. Measures and statistics for research library networked services: procedures and issues: ARL E-Metrics Phase II Report, 2001. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Available: http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/phasetwo.pdf. (accessed on January 3, 2005).

Sridhar, M.S. 1990. A study of correlation of use, citation and publishing of journal papers by Indian space technologists. Collection Management, 12: 147-152.

Stankus, T. and Rice, B. 1982. Handle with care: use and citation data for science journal management. Collection Management, 4 :95-110.

Tsay, M. 1998. The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86: 31-39.

White, H.D., and McCain, K.W. 1989. Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24: 119-186, p.119.

Wulff, J. and Nixon, N. 2004. Quality markers and use of electronic journals in an academic health sciences library. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92: 315-322.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...

Concordia University - Footer