Reilly, Rosemary C. (2006) Humor as a Social Lubricant in an Expert Thinking System. The International Journal of Learning, 13 (2). pp. 149-158. ISSN 1447-9494
PDF (publisher's version)
- Published Version
Official URL: http://ijl.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.30/prod.992
The affective state of the thinker is an important dimension when addressing a chosen problem. Inducing positive affect has favorable effects on the ability to problem solve. Humor is one of the most common ways that individuals produce positive affect. It is embedded in the social processes between individuals, relevant to context and audience, producing affect that reduces tension and anxiety, allowing individuals to be spontaneous and less rigid. This paper discusses the research results of an instrumental case study that charted the role that humor played in the formation of working relationships in a system of four novice group facilitators. The participants engaged in an intensive collaborative process of meaning making, i.e. understanding patterns of group development, melding theory to practice, and illuminating the impact of intervention on a group's developmental trajectory. This promoted qualitative changes in their levels of expert cognitive and metacognitive thinking skills. Humor facilitated the development of these skills in unexpected ways. Data sets included videotaped debriefing and planning sessions, individual and group interviews, and written reflection diaries, covering the entire lifespan of the team. Two primary humor processes were fostered within this system: Use of Humor-affective, which were humorous statements directed to the emotional dynamics within the team; and Use of Humor-cognitive, which were directed more to the meaning-making processes of the participants. A public safe space is necessary to interface embodied, narrative, relational knowledge and professional knowledge expressed in practice. This blending of epistemic sources is key to expert thinking. Communities of practice are not immune to issues of power, and can be places where hegemony precipitates alienation. This inquiry suggests that humor served to diffuse power constructions, and facilitated the evolution of ease within the social relationships, fostering challenge and risk-taking. An ethic of care sculpted humor into a positive system characteristic.
|Divisions:||Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Applied Human Sciences|
|Authors:||Reilly, Rosemary C.|
|Journal or Publication:||The International Journal of Learning|
|Keywords:||Humor and Expertise Development in the Workplace, Metacognition and Humor, Humor and Social Learning Relationships|
|Deposited By:||ROSEMARY REILLY|
|Deposited On:||18 Nov 2009 22:07|
|Last Modified:||02 Nov 2012 20:00|
Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377-392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
Connelly, F., & Clandinin, D. (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Secret, sacred, and cover stories. In D. Clandinin & F. Connelly (Eds.), Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes (pp. 3-15). New York: Teachers College Press.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego: Academic.
Farr-Petterson, A. (1996). In the trenches: A five-case, qualitative study in collaboration. (Doctoral dissertation, The Union Institute, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 56(7-A), 2483.
Firestien, R., & McCowan, R. (1988). Creative problem-solving and communication behavior in small groups. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 106-114.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Getz, I., & Lubart, T. (1999). The emotional resonance model of creativity: Theoretical and practical extensions. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (pp. 41-56). Philadelphia: Brunner / Mazel.
Glaser, R., & Chi, M. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv-xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gruber, H., & Wallace, D. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative
people at work. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93--115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Isen, A. (1999). On the relationship between affect and creative problem solving. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (pp. 3-17). Philadelphia: Brunner / Mazel.
Knapp, J. (2000). Red-eye Milton and the loom of learning: English professor expertise. (John Milton). (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61(5-A), 1742.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Martin, R. (1997). Recruiting a library leader for the 21st century. Journal of Library Administration, 24(3), 47-58.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
O’Quin, K., & Derks, P. (1997). Humor and creativity: A review of the empirical literature. In M. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1) (pp. 227-256). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Reilly, R. C. (2005). The use of public reflection to promote workplace learning and expert thinking skills. International Journal of Learning, in press.
Russ, S. (1999). Introduction. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (pp. xix-xxiii). Philadelphia: Brunner / Mazel.
Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sternberg, R. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11-20.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Verner, K. (2001). A qualitative study of effective teacher behaviors: Focus on select 'teacher of the year' honorees and finalists in Illinois. (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61(8-A), 3058.
Vosburg, S., & Kaufmann, G. (1999). Mood and creativity research: The view from a conceptual organizing perspective. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (pp. 19-39). Philadelphia: Brunner / Mazel.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1987). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Young, K. (2005). Direct from the source: The value of “think-aloud” data in understanding learning. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6(1), 19-33.
Repository Staff Only: item control page