Nemiroff, L. and Despland, Emma (2007) Consistent individual differences in the foraging behaviour of forest tent caterpillars (Malacosoma disstria). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85 (11). pp. 1117-1124. ISSN 0008-4301
- Published Version
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/Z07-081
Outbreaking insects are often considered identical units despite recent work in behavioural ecology that shows repeatable differences can exist between individuals and can have important implications for individual fitness and population processes. However, although entomologists have neglected the hypothesis that differences between individuals can play an important role in the ecology of a species, it is not new. Wellington (1957. Can. J. Zool. 35: 293–323) suggested that consistent individual differences in behaviour may play a role in the population dynamics of Malacosoma (Hübner, 1820) species (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). We used a novel approach to determine if individual larval Malacosoma disstria Hübner, 1820 exhibit distinct and repeatable behavioural traits. Second-instar caterpillars were placed on individual arenas for 1 h on 4 consecutive days, and the proportion of time spent walking, searching, quiescent, and eating was documented. Active and sluggish behavioural types were distinguished and stable differences in individual activity were observed. Activity was positively correlated with growth during the 4 days of the experiment, but no significant relationship was detected between behaviour during the experiment and overall larval performance in the laboratory setting. These findings demonstrate consistent variation in the foraging behaviour of forest tent caterpillars and lay the basis for further investigatison of its role in colony function and population dynamics.
|Divisions:||Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Biology|
|Authors:||Nemiroff, L. and Despland, Emma|
|Journal or Publication:||Canadian Journal of Zoology|
|Date:||20 November 2007|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||10.1139/Z07-081|
|Deposited By:||DANIELLE DENNIE|
|Deposited On:||08 Jun 2010 19:42|
|Last Modified:||24 Aug 2016 21:26|
Addy, N.D. 1969. Rearing the forest tent caterpillar on an artificial diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 62: 270–271.
Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 14: 200–281.
Beshers, S.N., and Fewell, J.H. 2001. Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 413–440.
Colasurdo, N., and Despland, E. 2005. Social cues and following behaviour in the forest tent caterpillar. J. Insect Behav. 18: 77–87.
DeAngelis, D.L., and Mooij, W.M. 2005. Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 147–168.
de Bono, M. 2003. Molecular approaches to aggregation behavior and social attachment. J. Neurobiol. 54: 78–92.
Despland, E. 2004. Locust transformation: from solitarious Dr. Jekyll to swarming Mr. Hyde. Biologist, 51: 18–22.
Despland, E., and Hamzeh, S. 2004. Ontogenetic changes in social behaviour in the forest tent caterpillar Malacosoma disstria. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56: 177–184.
Despland, E., and Le Huu, A. 2007. Pros and cons of group-living in the forest tent caterpillar: separating the roles of silk and of grouping. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 122: 181–189.
Edgerly, J.S., and Fitzgerald, T.D. 1982. An investigation of behavioral variability within colonies of the eastern tent caterpillar Malacosoma americanum (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 55: 145–155.
Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., and Leese, M. 2001. Cluster analysis. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, London.
Fitzgerald, T.D. 1995. The tent caterpillars. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. pp. 64–80.
Fitzgerald, T.D. 2003. Role of trail pheromone in foraging and processionary behavior of pine processionary caterpillars Thaumetopoea pityocampa. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 513–532.
Fitzgerald, T.D., and Webster, F.X. 1993. Identification and behavioral assays of the trail pheromone of the forest tent caterpillar Malacosoma disstria Hübner (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Can. J. Zool. 71: 1511–1515.
Greenblatt, J.A., and Witter, J.A. 1976. Behavioral studies on Malacosoma disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Can. Entomol. 108: 1225–1228.
Grisdale, D. 1985. Malacosoma disstria. In Handbook of insect rearing. Vol. 2. Edited by P. Singh and R.F. Moore. Elsevier, New York. pp. 369–379.
Iwao, S., and Wellington, W.G. 1970. The western tent caterpillar: qualitative differences and the action of natural enemies. Res. Popul. Ecol. 12: 81–99.
Lessells, C.M., and Boag, P.T. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk, 104: 116–121.
Myers, J.H. 1978. A search for behavioural variation in first and last laid eggs of western tent caterpillar and an attempt to prevent a population decline. Can. J. Zool. 56: 2359–2363.
Noldus Information Technology Inc. 2003. Pocket Noldus Observer. Version 2.0.19 [computer program]. Noldus Information Technology Inc., Leesburg, Va.
Ohnishi, S. 1979. Relationship between larval feeding behavior and viability in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav. Genet. 9: 129–134.
Robertson, F.W. 1963. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. Genet. Res. 4: 74–92.
Robison, D.J. 1993. The feeding ecology of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria Hübner, among hybird poplar clones, Populus spp. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Schoonhoven, L.M. 1987. What makes a caterpillar eat? The sensory code underlying feeding behaviour. In Perspectives in chemoreception and behaviour. Edited by R.F. Chapman, E.A. Bernays, and J.G. Stoffolano. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 69–97.
Sih, A., and Watters, J.V. 2005. The mix matters: behavioural types and group dynamics in water striders. Behaviour, 142: 1417–1431.
Sih, A., Bell, A.M., and Johnson, J.C. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 372–378.
Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, J.F. 1981. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
Sokolowski, M.B. 1985. Genetic aspects to differences in foraging behavior. Behav. Brain Sci. 8: 348–349.
Sokolowski, M.B. 2001. Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 879–890.
SPSS Inc. 2003. SPSS®. Version 12.0.1 [computer program]. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
Underwood, D.L.A., and Shapiro, A.M. 1999. Evidence for division of labor in the social caterpillar Eucheira socialis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 228–236.
van Oers, K., de Jong, G., van Noordwijk, A.J., Kampenaers, B., and Drent, P.J. 2005. Contributions of genetics to the study of animal personalities: a review of case studies. Behaviour, 142: 1185–1206.
Weinstein, P., and Maelzer, D.A. 1997. Leadership behaviour in sawfly larvae Perga dorsalis (Hymenoptera: Pergidae). Oikos, 79: 450–455.
Wellington, W.G. 1957. Individual differences as a factor in population dynamics: the development of a problem. Can. J. Zool. 35: 293–323.
Wellington, W.G. 1960. Qualitative changes in natural populations during changes in abundance. Can. J. Zool. 38: 289–314.
Wellington, W.G. 1965. Some maternal influences on progeny quality in the western tent caterpillar, Malacosoma pluviale (Dyar). Can. Entomol. 97: 1–14.
Wellington, W.G. 1977. Returning the insect to insect ecology: some consequences for pest management. Environ. Entomol. 6: 1–8.
Wilson, D.S., Coleman, K., Clarke, A.B., and Biederman, L. 1994. Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 442–446.
Repository Staff Only: item control page