Meusnier, Isabelle and Singer, Gregory AC and Landry, Jean-François and Hickey, Donal A. and Hebert, Paul DN and Hajibabaei, Mehrdad (2008) A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis. BMC Genomics, 9 (1). p. 214. ISSN 1471-2164
- Published Version
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-214
The goal of DNA barcoding is to develop a species-specific sequence library for all eukaryotes. A 650 bp fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1) gene has been used successfully for species-level identification in several animal groups. It may be difficult in practice, however, to retrieve a 650 bp fragment from archival specimens, (because of DNA degradation) or from environmental samples (where universal primers are needed).
We used a bioinformatics analysis using all CO1 barcode sequences from GenBank and calculated the probability of having species-specific barcodes for varied size fragments. This analysis established the potential of much smaller fragments, mini-barcodes, for identifying unknown specimens. We then developed a universal primer set for the amplification of mini-barcodes. We further successfully tested the utility of this primer set on a comprehensive set of taxa from all major eukaryotic groups as well as archival specimens.
In this study we address the important issue of minimum amount of sequence information required for identifying species in DNA barcoding. We establish a novel approach based on a much shorter barcode sequence and demonstrate its effectiveness in archival specimens. This approach will significantly broaden the application of DNA barcoding in biodiversity studies.
|Divisions:||Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Biology|
|Authors:||Meusnier, Isabelle and Singer, Gregory AC and Landry, Jean-François and Hickey, Donal A. and Hebert, Paul DN and Hajibabaei, Mehrdad|
|Journal or Publication:||BMC Genomics|
|Date:||12 May 2008|
|Deposited By:||DANIELLE DENNIE|
|Deposited On:||11 May 2011 21:58|
|Last Modified:||24 Aug 2016 21:26|
1.Marshall E: Taxonomy. Will DNA bar codes breathe life into classification? Science 2005, 307(5712):1037.
2.Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR: Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 2003, 270(1512):313-321.
3.Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM: Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology 2004, 2(10):E312.
4.Hajibabaei M, Singer GA, Clare EL, Hebert PDN: Design and applicability of DNA arrays and DNA barcodes in biodiversity monitoring. BMC Biol 2007, 5:24.
5.Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD: DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005, 360(1462):1847-1857.
6.Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN: DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(4):968-971.
7.Goldstein PZ, Desalle R: Calibrating phylogenetic species formation in a threatened insect using DNA from historical specimens. Molecular Ecology 2003, 12(7):1993-1998.
8.Hajibabaei M, Smith MA, Janzen DH, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Hebert PDN: A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Molecular Ecology Notes 2006, 6:959-964.
9.Wandeler P, Hoeck PE, Keller LF: Back to the future: museum specimens in population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 2007, 22(12):634-642.
10.Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 2000, 132:365-386.
11.The Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding [http://www.dnabarcoding.ca/pa/ge/research/protocols/amplification]
12.Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4(4):406-425.
13.Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of molecular evolution 1980, 16(2):111-120.
Repository Staff Only: item control page