Login | Register

IMPLICATIONS OF TRADE AUTOMATION FOR SMALL-SIZE STOCKS

Title:

IMPLICATIONS OF TRADE AUTOMATION FOR SMALL-SIZE STOCKS

Al-Haji, Ahmad (2012) IMPLICATIONS OF TRADE AUTOMATION FOR SMALL-SIZE STOCKS. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Al-Haji_MScAdministration_2013.pdf]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Al-Haji_MScAdministration_2013.pdf - Accepted Version
2MB

Abstract

Using a comprehensive set of liquidity measures, this study examines the impact of the NYSE Hybrid Market on various stock characteristics. In addition, we test the conjecture that trade automation results in more pronounced liquidity improvements for small stocks. The resulting change in the relationship between size and liquidity is also examined, as well as the change in the explanatory power of the SMB factor. We find evidence that the general state of liquidity improved subsequent to migration to Hybrid. However, results for the size-conditioned test are mixed and inconsistent across liquidity measures. While liquidity improvements in terms of amortized spreads are concentrated in small stocks, the pattern is less obvious when other liquidity measures are considered. Also, while the test involves a NYSE event, changes also exist in NASDAQ, probably due to a competitive spill-over effect. We find that the relationship between size and liquidity characteristics has changed post-Hybrid, particularly on NYSE, and that the SMB factor has less effect on asset pricing when the entire CRSP sample is tested but not for the NYSE and NASDAQ subsamples individually. Nevertheless, firm size seems to play an important role in differentiating the impact of changes in market design.

Divisions:Concordia University > John Molson School of Business > Finance
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Al-Haji, Ahmad
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M. Sc.
Program:Administration (Finance option)
Date:18 July 2012
Thesis Supervisor(s):Kryzanowski, Lawrence
Keywords:Trade Automation, Liquidity, Hybrid System
ID Code:977259
Deposited By: AHMAD AL-HAJI
Deposited On:12 Jun 2013 15:45
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:44

References:

Abramovitz, Moses, 1986. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind, Journal of Economic History 46:2 (June), 385-406.
Amihud, Yakov, 2002. Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects, Journal of Financial Markets 5:1 (January), 31-56.
Amihud, Yakov, and Haim Mendelson, 1986.Asset pricing and the bid-ask Spread, Journal of Financial Economics 17:2 (December), 223-249.
Banz, Rolf, 1981. The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, Journal of Financial Economics 9:1 (March), 3-18.
Bessembinder, Hendrik, 2003. Trade execution costs and market quality after decimalization, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38:4 (December), 747-777.
Black, Fischer, 1971. Toward a fully automated exchange, Financial Analysts Journal 27:4 (July-August), 28-35+44.
Brockman, Paul, Dennis Y. Chung, and Christophe Perignon, 2009. Commonality in liquidity: A global perspective, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44:4 (August), 851-882.
Carhart, Mark M., 1997. On persistence in mutual fund performance, Journal of Finance 52:1 (March), 57-82.
Chalmers, John M.R., and Gregory B. Kadlec, 1998. An empirical examination of the amortized spread, Journal of Finance and Economics 48:2 (May), 159-188.
Chan, Louis K. C., Jason Karceski, and Josef Lakonishok, 2000. New paradigm or same old hype in equity investing?, Financial Analysts Journal 56:4 (August), 23-36.
Christie, William G., and Paul H. Schultz, 1994. Why do NASDAQ market makers avoid odd-eighth quotes?, Journal of Finance 49:5 (December), 1813-1840.
Christie, William G., Jeffrey H. Harris, and Paul H. Schultz, 1994. Why did NASDAQ market makers stop avoiding odd-eighth quotes?, Journal of Finance 49:5 (December), 1841-1860.
Chung, Kee H., and Robert A. Van Ness, 2001. Order handling rules, tick size, and the intraday pattern of bid-ask spreads for NASDAQ stocks, Journal of Financial Markets 4:2 (April), 143-161.
Conrad, Jennifer, Kevin M Johnson, and Sunil Wahal, 2003. Institutional trading and alternative trading systems, Journal of Financial Economics 70:1 (October), 99-134.
Corwin, Shane A., and Paul Schultz, 2011. A simple way to estimate bid-ask spreads from daily high and low prices, Unpublished manuscript , forthcoming Journal of Finance.
Dimson, Elroy, and Paul Marsh, 1999. Murphy's law and market anomalies, Journal of Portfolio Management 25:2, 53-69.
Domowitz, Ian, 2002. Liquidity, transaction costs, and reintermediation in electronic markets, Journal of Financial Services Research 22:1-2, 141-157.
Domowitz, Ian, and Benn Steil, 1999. Automation, trading costs, and the structure of the securities trading industry, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 33-92.
Douglas, Susan P., and Yoram Wind, 1987. The myth of globalization, Columbia Journal of World Business 22:4 (Winter), 19-29.
Easley, David, Marcos M López de Prado, and Maureen O’Hara, 2011. The microstructure of the “flash crash”: flow toxicity, liquidity crashes, and the probability of informed trading, Journal of Portfolio Management 37:2 (January), 118-128.
Edwards, Amy K., Lawrence E. Harris, and Michael S. Piwowar, 2007. Corporate bond market transaction costs and transparency, Journal of Finance 62:3 (June), 1421-1451.
Fang, Lily, and Joel Peress, 2009. Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns, Journal of Finance 64:5 (October), 2023-2053.
Freund, William C., and Michael S. Pagano, 2000. Market efficiency in specialist markets before and after automation, Financial Review 35:3 (August), 79-104.
Frino, Alex, Thomas H McInish, and Martin Toner, 1998. The liquidity of automated exchanges: new evidence from German Bund futures, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 8:3-4 (December), 225-241.
Glosten, Lawrence R, and Lawrence E Harris, 1988. Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread, Journal of Financial Economics 21:1 (May), 123-142.
Gompers, Paul, and Andrew Metrick, 2001. Institutional investors and equity prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116:1 (February), 229-259.
Gutierrez, Jose A., and Yiuman Tse, 2009. NYSE execution quality subsequent to migration to Hybrid, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 33:1 (July), 59-81.
Hasbrouck, Joel, 2009. Trading costs and returns for U.S. equities: estimating effective costs from daily data, Journal of Finance 64:3 (June), 1445-1477.
He, Zhongzhi (Lawrence), and Lawrence Kryzanowski, 2006. The cross section of expected returns and amortized spreads, Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 9:4 (December), 597-638.
Hegde, Shantaram, Hao Lin, and Sanjay Varshney, 2010. Competitive stock markets: evidence from companies’ dual listings on the NYSE and NASDAQ, Financial Analysts Journal 66:1 (January-February), 77-87.
Hendershott, Terrence, and Pamela Moulton, 2011. Automation, speed, and stock market quality: the NYSE's Hybrid, Journal of Financial Markets 14:4 (November), 568-604.
Hsieh, Chang-tseh, and Binshan Lin, 1998. Internet commerce for small businesses, Industrial Management and Data Systems 98:3 (January), 113-119.
Huang, Roger D., 2002. The quality of ECN and NASDAQ market maker quotes, Journal of Finance 57:3 (June), 1285-1319.
Jain, Pankaj K., 2005. Financial market design and the equity premium: electronic versus floor trading, Journal of Finance 60:6 (December), 2955-2985.
Jain, Pankaj K., and William F. Johnson, 2006. Trading technology and stock market liquidity: a global perspective, Unpublished manuscript.
Lesmond, David, Joseph Ogden, and Charles Trzcinka, 1999. A new estimate of transaction costs, Review of Financial Studies 12:5 (Winter), 1113-1141.
Lhabitant, François-Serge, and Greg N. Gregoriou, 2008. Stock Market Liquidity. Implications for Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Li, Jinliang, Robert Mooradian, and W. David Zhang, 2007. Is illiquidity a risk factor? a critical look at commission costs, Financial Analysts Journal 63:4 (July-August), 28-39.
Liu, Weimin, 2006. A liquidity-augmented capital asset pricing model, Journal of Financial Economics 82:3 (December), 631-671.
Lou, Xiaoxia, and Ronnie Sadka, 2011. Liquidity level or liquidity risk? evidence from the financial crisis, Financial Analysts Journal 67:3 (May-June): 51-62.
Merton, Robert C., 1987. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information, Journal of Finance 42:3 (July), 483-510.
Naidu, G.N., and Michael S. Rozeff, 1994. Volume, volatility, liquidity and efficiency of the Singapore Stock Exchange before and after automation, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2:1 (March), 23-42.
Pastor, Lubos, and Robert F. Stambaugh, 2003. Liquidity risk and expected stock returns, Journal of Political Economy 111:3 (June), 642-85.
Petersen, M. A., 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches, Review of Financial Studies 22:1 (January), 435-480.
Roll, Richard, 1984. A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market, Journal of Finance, 39:4 (September), 1127-1139.
Sadka, Ronnie, 2006. Momentum and post-earnings-announcement drift anomalies: the role of liquidity risk, Journal of Financial Economics 80:20 (May), 309-349.
Sioud, Olfa Benouda, and Dorra Mezzez Hmaied, 2003. The effects of automation on liquidity, volatility, stock returns and efficiency: evidence from the Tunisian stock market, Review of Middle East Economics and Finance 1:2 (August), 141-145.
Stoll, H. R., and R. E. Whaley, 1983. Transaction costs and the small firm effect, Journal of Financial Economics 12:1 (June), 57-79.
Stoll, Hans R., 2006. Electronic trading in stock markets, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 1 (Winter), 153-174.
van Dijk, Mathijs, 2011. Is size dead? a review of the size effect in equity returns, Journal of Banking and Finance 35: 12 (December), 3263-3274.
Venkataraman, Kumar, 2001. Automated versus floor trading: an analysis of execution costs on the Paris and New York exchanges, Journal of Finance 56:4 (August), 1445-1485.
Zhang, Huiping, 2010. Measuring liquidity in emerging markets, Unpublished manuscript.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top