Login | Register

A driver-vehicle model for impaired motorists and strategies for planning autonomous vehicles


A driver-vehicle model for impaired motorists and strategies for planning autonomous vehicles

Le, Thanh Phuc (2013) A driver-vehicle model for impaired motorists and strategies for planning autonomous vehicles. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

Text (application/pdf)
Le_PhD_S2013.pdf - Accepted Version


Vehicle drivers play an important role in transportation safety and vehicle design. Understanding the driver’s behavior, especially the impaired driver’s behavior, is crucial to improve the vehicle safety. The proposed impaired driver model is based on the optimal preview control and the linear quadratic regulator. Two important parameters that could be counted for in a mathematical model of the driver are the reaction time and the preview time. For the impaired driver model, the value of reaction time is increased while the value of preview time is decreased. The simulation results for the model of the impaired driver and the vehicle produce a larger lateral deviation than the one of a normal driver, as revealed in the experiments conducted by the previous studies. The investigation on vehicle parameters reveals that the changes of parameters may improve the overall performance of the impaired driver-vehicle system. The controller for autonomous vehicles developed from the studies of the driver model may eliminate the negative effect of impaired drivers. The preview capability of driver is introduced to the design of the controller by using the preview control theory. The preview information of the path in terms of the lateral position and the velocity profile enhances the performance of the autonomous vehicle. The neural network is presented as a feasible alternative approach to implement the future path in design of autonomous vehicle controller. The neural network weights the path data and provides the adjustment as the preparation to the vehicle.

Divisions:Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:Le, Thanh Phuc
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Mechanical Engineering
Date:15 February 2013
Thesis Supervisor(s):Stiharu, Ion
Keywords:Driver model, vehicle model, non-linear vehicle, optimal preview control, impaired driver, linear quadratic regulator, autonomous vehicles, neural networks
ID Code:976890
Deposited By: PHUC LE THANH
Deposited On:17 Jun 2013 19:41
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:43


1. Traffic Injury Research Foundation of Canada. Alcohol-crash problem in Canada: 2008. Transport Canada, 2010.
2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The driver drowsy system field operational test: data collection method. US Department of Transportation Technical Report, 2008
3. Rajamani R, Tan H, Law B et al. Demonstration of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for the operation of automated vehicle in platoons. IEEE Transaction on control system technology Jul. 2000; 8 (4): 695-708.
4. Ackermann J, Odenthal D, and Bunte T. Advantages of active steering for vehicle dynamics control, Proc. 32nd Int. Symp. Autom. Technol. Autom. 1999, pp. 263-270.
5. Han D and Yi K. A driver-adaptive range policy for adaptive cruise control. Journal of automobile engineering 2006; 220: 321-334.
6. Bose A, and Ioannou P. Analysis of traffic flow with mixed manual and intelligent cruise control vehicles: theory and experiments. California PATH research report, UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-13, 2001.
7. Wong JY. Theory of ground vehicle 3rd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.
8. Jazar RN. Vehicle dynamics: Theory and application. Springer, 2008.
9. Abe M. Vehicle handling dynamics: Theory and application. Oxford: Elsevier, 2009.
10. Shim T and Ghike C. Understanding the limitations of different vehicle models for dynamics study. Vehicle system dynamics Mar. 2007; 45(3): 191-216.
11. Sayers W and Han D. A generic vehicle model for simulation handling and braking. Vehicle system dynamics 2006; 25: 599-613.
12. Pacejka HB. Tyre modeling for use in vehicle dynamics studies, SAE Paper No. 870421, 1987
13. UMTRI, Rollover of heavy commercial vehicles. UMTRI research review Dec. 2000; 31(4):1-21.
14. Allen R and McRuer D. The man/machine control interface pursuit control. Automatica 1979; 15: 683-686.
15. Hess RA. Modeling the effects of display quality upon human pilot dynamics and perceived vehicle handling qualities. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics 1995; 25(2): 338-344.
16. Weir DH and McRuer DT. Dynamics of driver vehicle steering control. Automatica 1970; 6: 87-98.
17. McRuer D and Jex HR. A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE transactions on human factors in electronics 1967; HFE-8(3): 231-249.
18. McRuer D. Human dynamics in man-machine systems. Automatica 1980; 16: 237-253.
19. McRuer D and Krendel ES. Mathematical models of human pilot behavior. Report No. 146, Systems technology, INC, CA, US, 1974.
20. McRuer D, Weir DH, Jex HR et al. Measurement of driver-vehicle multi-loop response properties with a single disturbance input. IEEE transactions on system, man, and cybernetics 1975; SMC-5(5): 490-497.
21. Hess RA and Moditahedzadel A. A control theoretic model of driver steering behavior. IEEE international conference on system, man and cybernetics 1990, pp. 504-509.
22. Sherian TB. Three models of preview control. IEEE Transaction on human factors in electronics 1966; HFE. 7(2): 91-102.
23. Cho YH and Kim J. Stability analysis of the human controlled vehicle moving along a curved path. Vehicle system dynamics 1996; 25: 51-69.
24. Hess RA and Modjtahedzadeh A. A preview control model of driver steering behavior. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1989, pp. 504-509.
25. Plochl M and Edelmann J. Driver models in automobile dynamics application. Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 2007; 45(7-8): 699-741.
26. MacAdam C. An optimal preview control for linear systems. Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control 1980; 102: 188-190.
27. MacAdam C. Application of an optimal preview control for simulation of closed-loop automobile driving. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics 1981; 11(6): 393-399.
28. MacAdam C. Understanding and modeling human driver. Vehicle system dynamics 2003; 40: 101-134.
29. MacAdam C. Development of driver/vehicle steering interaction models for dynamic analysis. Technical report for the US army tank automotive command, Report No. UMTRI-88-53, University of Michigan 1998.
30. Gou K and Guan H. Modeling of driver/vehicle directional control system. Vehicle system dynamics 1993; 22: 141-184.
31. Yang X. A closed-loop driver/vehicle directional dynamics predictor. PhD Thesis, Concordia University, Canada, 1999.
32. Sharp RS. Optimal linear time-invariant preview steering control for motorcycles. Vehicle system dynamics 44(S1): 329-340.
33. Thomyppillai M, Evangelou S and Sharp RS. Car driving at the limit by adaptive optimal preview control. Vehicle system dynamics 2009; 47(12): 1535-1550.
34. Sharp R and Valtetsiotis V. Optimal preview car steering control, Vehicle system dynamics supplement 2001; 35: 101-117.
35. Sharp RS. Driver steering control and a new perspective on car handling qualities, Proc. IMechE Vol. 219 Part C: J. Mechanical engineering science 2005; 219(10): 1041-1051.
36. Pick AJ and Cole DJ. A mathematical model of driver steering control including neuromuscular dynamics. Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control 2008; 130: 1-9.
37. Pick AJ and Cole DJ. Driver steering and muscle activity during a lane-change maneuver. Vehicle system dynamics 2007; 45(9): 781-805.
38. Pick AJ and Cole DJ. Dynamic properties of a driver’s arm holding a steering wheel. Journal of automobile engineering 2007; 221: 1475-1486.
39. Pick AJ and Cole DJ. Neuro dynamics in the driver-vehicle system. Vehicle system dynamics 2006; 44(S1): 624-631.
40. Pick AJ. Neuromuscular dynamics and the vehicle steering task. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2004.
41. Ungoren AY and Peng H. An adaptive lateral preview driver model. Vehicle system dynamics 2005; 43(4): 245-259.
42. Peng H. Evaluation of driver assistance systems–a human centered approach. AVEC proceedings, 2002.
43. Hessburg T, Peng H, Tomizuka M et al. An experimental study on lateral control of a vehicle. American control conference, 1991.
44. Peng H and Tomizuka M. Lateral control of front-wheel-steering rubber-tire vehicles. PATH report UCB-ITS-PRR-90-5, University of California at Berkeley, US, 1990.
45. Peng H and Tomizuka M. Vehicle lateral control for highway automation. American control conference, 1990.
46. MacAdam C and Johnson G. Application of elementary neural networks and preview sensors for representing driver steering control behavior. Vehicle system dynamics 1996; 25: 3-30.
47. Gou K, Cheng Y and Ding H. Analytical method for modeling driver in vehicle directional control. Vehicle system dynamics 2004; 41(S1): 401-410.
48. Lin Y, Tang P, Zhang WJ et al. Artificial neuron network modelling of driver handling behaviour in a driver-vehicle-environment system. International journal of vehicle design 2005; 37(1): 24-45.
49. Moskowitz H and Robinson D. Effects of low dose alcohol on driving related skills: A review of evidence. NHTSA Report, U.S Department of Transportation, Jul. 1988.
50. Moskowitz H and Fiorentino D. A review of the literature on the effects of low dose of alcohol on driving-related skills. NHTSA Report, U.S Department of Transportation, Apr. 2000.
51. Fillmore M, Carcadden J and Vogel-Sprott M. Alcohol, cognitive impairment an expectancies, Journal of studies on alcohol 1998; 59: 174-179.
52. Liu Y and Fu S. Changes in driver behaviour and cognitive performance with different breath alcohol concentration levels. Traffic injury prevention 2007; 8: 153-161.
53. Linoila M, Erwin C, Ramm D et al. Effects of age and alcohol on psychomotor performance of men. Journal of studies on alcohol 1980; 41(5): 488-495.
54. Andre JT, Tyrrell RA, Leibowitz HW et al. Measuring and predicting the effects of alcohol consumption on contrast sensitivity for stationary and moving gratings. Perception and psychophysics; 56(3): 261-267.
55. Hill J and Toffolon G, The effect of alcohol on sensory and sensorimotor visual functions. Journal of studies on alcohol 1990: 51(2): 108-113.
56. Rohrbaugh J, Stapleton J, Parasuraman R et al, Alcohol intoxication reduces visual sustained attention. Psychopharmacology 1998; 96: 442-446.
57. Frazzoli E, Dahleh M and Feron E. Real-time motion planning for agile autonomous vehicles. Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics 2002; 25(1): 116-129.
58. Shiller Z, and Gwo Y. Dynamic motion planning of autonomous vehicles. IEEE transaction on robotics and automation 1991; 7(2): 241-249.
59. Shladover S, Desoer C, Hedrick J et al. Automatic vehicle control developments in the PATH Program, IEEE transactions on vehicular technology February 1991; 40(1): 114-130.
60. Hedrick J, MacMahon D, Narendran V et al. Longitudinal vehicle controller design for IVHS system. Proceeding of the 1992 American control conference, Chicago, 1992, pp. 3107-3112.
61. Hedrick J, Tomizuka M and Varaiya P. Control issues in automated highway systems. IEEE Control Syst. Mag 1994; 14(6):21-32.
62. Peng H, Hessburg T, Tomizuka M et al, A theoretical and experimental study on vehicle lateral control. Proceeding of the 1992 American control conference, Chicago, 1992, pp. 1738-1742.
63. Pham H, Hedrick K and Tomizuka M. Combined lateral and longitudinal control of vehicles. Proceeding of the American control conference, Baltimore, Maryland, 1994, pp: 1205-1206.
64. Vahidi A and Eskandarian A. Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems September 2003; 4(3): 143-153.
65. Fritz H. Neural speed control for autonomous road vehicle. Control Engineering Practice 1996; 4(4): 507-512.
66. Holzmann H, Halfmann C, Germann S et al, Longitudinal and lateral control and supervision of autonomous intelligent vehicles. Control Engineering Practice 1997; 5(11): 1599-1605.
67. Guo K, Ding H, Zhang J et al. Development of a longitudinal and lateral driver model for autonomous vehicle control. Int. J. Vehicle Design 2004; 36(1): 50-65.
68. Sharp RS, Casanova D and Symonds P. A mathematical model for driver steering control, with design, turning and performance results. Vehicle system dynamics 2000; 33: 289-326.
69. Baluja S. Evolution of an artificial neural network based autonomous land vehicle controller. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, part B: Cybernetics 1996; 26(3): 450-463.
70. Rosenblum M and Davis L. An improved radial basis function network for visual autonomous road following. IEEE transactions on Neural Networks 1996; 7(5): 1111-1120.
71. Dougherty M, A review of Neural Networks applied to transport. Transportation research Part C: Engineering technologies 1995; 34(3): 247-260.
72. Kumarawadu S and Lee T. Neuroadaptive combined lateral and longitudinal control of highway vehicles using RBF networks. IEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 2006; 7(4): 500-5012.
73. Cole DJ, Pick AJ and Odhams MC. Predictive and linear quadratic methods for potential application to modeling driver steering control. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2006; 44(3): 259-284.
74. Naidu DS. Optimal Control Systems. CRC Press 2003.
75. Yang X, Rakheja S and Stiharu I. Structure of the driver model for articulated vehicle. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 2002, 9(1), 27-51.
76. Yang X, Rakheja S and Stiharu I. Study of control characteristics of an articulated vehicle driver. Heavy Vehicle Systems, 1997, 4(2-4), 1-25.
77. McLean JR and Hoffmann ER. The effects of restricted preview on driver steering control and performance. Human Factor 1973; 15(4): 421-430.
78. Green M. “How long does it take to stop?” Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transportation Human Factors 2000; 2(3): 195-216.
79. Odenthal D, Bunte T and Ackermann J. Nonlinear steering and braking control for vehicle rollover avoidance. European control conference, Germany 1999.
80. Zheng S, Tang H, Han Z and Zhang Y. Controller design for vehicle stability enhancement. Control Engineering Practice 2006; 14(12): 1413-1421.
81. Tekin G and Unlosoy YS. Design and simulation of an integrated active yaw control for road vehicle system. Int. J. Vehicle Design 2010; 52 (1-4): 5-19.
82. Lewis F L. Optimal Control. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
83. Basin M and Gonzalez JR. A closed-form optimal control for linear systems with equal state and input delays. Automatica 2005; 41(5): 915-920.
84. Chyung DH. Discrete systems with delays in control. IEEE transactions on automatic control 1969; 14(2): 196-197.
85. Fujinaka T and Araki M. Discrete-time optimal control of systems with unilateral time-delays. Automatica 1987; 23(6): 763-765.
86. Drouin M, Abou-Kandil H and Bertrand P. Feedback control for linear discrete-time systems with time delays. Automatica 1985; 21(3): 323-327.
87. Mariani L and Nicoletti B. Optimal discrete systems with pure delays. IEEE transactions on automatic control 1973; 18(3): 311-313.
88. Hinmarch I, Kerr JS and Sherwood N. The effects of alcohol and other drugs on psychomotor performance and cognitive function. Alcohol and Alcoholism 1991; 26(1): 71-79.
89. Brookhuis KA, De Waard D and Fairclough S. Criteria for driver impairment. Ergonomics 2003; 46(5): 433-445.
90. Ogden E and Moskowitz H. Effects of alcohol and other drugs on driver performance. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2004; 5: 185-198.
91. Wilkinson I, Kim R and Purnell M. Alcohol and human eye movement. Brain 1974; 97: 785-792.
92. O’Hanlon JF, Haak TW, and Blaauw GJ. Diazepam impairs lateral position control in highway driving. Science 1982, 217: 79-81.
93. Mets MAJ, Kuipers E, Domis L et al. Effects of alcohol on highway driving in the STISIM driving simulator. Hum. Psychopharmacol Clin. Exp. 2011; 26: 434-439.
94. Rajamani R, Zhu C. Semi-autonomous adaptive cruise control systems. Proceedings of the American control conference 1999, San Diego, California US, pp. 1491-1495.
95. Falcone P, Borrelli F, Asgari J et al. Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology May 2007; 15(3): 566-580.
96. Falcone P, Borrelli F, Asgari J et al. A model predictive control approach for combined braking and steering in autonomous vehicles. Mediterranean conference on control and automation 2007, pp. 1-6.
97. Han D and Yi K. A Driver-adaptive range policy for adaptive cruise control. Journal of Automobile Engineering 2006; 220: 321-334.
98. Wang C, Hu Z, and Uchimura K. Precise curvature estimation by cooperating with digital road map. IEEE Intellegent Vehicle Symposium 2008, pp. 859-864.
99. Lee T, Kang J and Yi K. Integration of longitudinal and lateral human driver models for evaluation of the vehicle active safety systems. SAE Paper No. 2010-01-0084, 2010.
100. Lee T, Kang J, Yi K et al. An investigation on the integrated human driver model for closed-loop simulation of intelligent safety systems. Journal of mechanical and technology 2010; 24(3): 761-767.
101. Dorf RC and Bishop RH. Modern control systems 11th edition. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.
102. Sinha A. Linear systems: Optimal and robust control. New York: CRC press, 2007.
103. Maybeck P. Stochastic models estimation and control Volume 1. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
104. Stengel R. Optimal control and estimation. New York: Dover Publication Inc. 1994.
105. He J, Crolla DA, Levesley MC et al. Integrated active steering and variable torque distribution control for improving vehicle handling and stability. SAE technical paper No. 2004-01-1071, 2004.
106. Cabrera JA, Ortiz A, Carabias E et al. An alternative method to determine the Magic tyre model parameters using genetic algorithms. Vehicle system dynamics 2004; 41(2): 109-127.
107. Lee H and Tomizuka M. Coordinated longitudinal and lateral control of vehicles for IVHS. Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control 2001; 123: 535-543.
108. Pomerleau DA. ALVINN: An autonomous land vehicle in a Neural Network. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, January 1992.
109. Pomerleau DA. Neural network perception for mobile robot guidance. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, February 1992.
110. Pomerleau DA. Progress in Neural Network-based vision for autonomous robot driving. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 1992, pp. 391-396.
111. Kehtarnavaz N, Griswold N, Miller K et al. A transportable Neural-Network approach to autonomous ve
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Back to top Back to top