Login | Register

The Effectiveness of Listing Strategies in the Housing Market

Title:

The Effectiveness of Listing Strategies in the Housing Market

Wu, Yanting (2017) The Effectiveness of Listing Strategies in the Housing Market. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[img]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Wu_MSc_Fall2017.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
2MB

Abstract

Abstract
This thesis examines the impact of asking price on the final sale price based on a unique dataset of more than 30,000 transactions of single-family houses in Montreal from 2011 to 2016. We construct different proxies for reference points, including predicted selling price, regional average (and median) asking price, regional average (and median) selling price, and assessment value, used by sellers in setting their asking prices. We explore the effectiveness of high-price strategy and low-price strategy based on these reference points. We find that higher asking prices are associated with higher selling pricing, suggesting buyers anchor to the asking price. Our results support the high-price strategy and reject the low-price strategy in both cold and hot markets, even controlling for unobserved quality. In addition, the anchor effect of the asking price on the final sale price does not differ between the two markets.

Divisions:Concordia University > John Molson School of Business > Finance
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Wu, Yanting
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M. Sc.
Program:Administration (Finance option)
Date:August 2017
Thesis Supervisor(s):Zhou, Tingyu
Keywords:Listing Strategies Housing Market Anchoring Effect
ID Code:982769
Deposited By: YANTING WU
Deposited On:17 Nov 2017 15:58
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:55

References:

References
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 73–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535153
Benjamin, J. D., & Chinloy, P. T. (2000). Pricing, exposure and residential listing strategies. Journal of Real Estate Research, 20(1–2), 61–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.5555/rees.20.1-2.5ut3022564381227
Beracha, E., & Seiler, M. J. (2014). The effect of listing price strategy on transaction selling prices. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 49(2), 237–255. doi:10.1007/s11146-013-9424-1
Bucchianeri, G. W., & Minson, J. A. (2013). A homeowner’s dilemma: Anchoring in residential real estate transactions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 76–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.01.010
Cardella, E., & Seiler, M. J. (2016). The effect of listing price strategy on real estate negotiations: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 71–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.001
Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1233–1260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265561
Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saiz, A. (2008). Housing supply and housing bubbles. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 198–217. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.07.007
Gordon, B. L., & Winkler, D. T. (2016). The effect of listing price changes on the selling price of single-family residential homes. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1–31. doi:10.1007/s11146-016-9558-z
Green, D., Jacowitz, K. E., Kahneman, D., & McFadden, D. (1998). Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Economics, 20(2), 85–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00031-6
Han, L., & Strange, W. C. (2016). What is the role of the asking price for a house? Journal of Urban Economics, 93, 115–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.03.008
Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 21(11), 1161–1166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111004
Ku, G., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2006). Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 975–986. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.975
Liu, C. H., Nowak, A., & Rosenthal, S. S. (2016). Housing price bubbles, new supply, and within-city dynamics. Journal of Urban Economics, 96, 55–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.08.002
Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 84–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-X
Schweinsberg, M., Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2012). Starting high and ending with nothing: The role of anchors and power in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 226–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.005
Simonson, I., & Drolet, A. (n.d.). Anchoring effects on consumers’ willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 681–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/425103
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In Wendt, D., & Vlek, C. (Eds.), Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making. Theory and Decision Library (An International Series in the Philosophy and Methodology of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 11 (pp. 141–162). Springer: Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8
Wolinsky, A. (1983). Prices as signals of product quality. The Review of Economic Studies, 50(4), 647–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2297767
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Back to top Back to top