Login | Register

Against Boghossian, Wright and Broome on Inference

Title:

Against Boghossian, Wright and Broome on Inference

Hlobil, Ulf (2014) Against Boghossian, Wright and Broome on Inference. Philosophical Studies, 167 (2). pp. 419-429.

[img]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
HLOABW.1.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
192kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0104-z

Abstract

I argue that the accounts of inference recently presented (in this journal) by Paul Boghossian, John Broome, and Crispin Wright are unsatisfactory. I proceed in two steps: First, in Sects. 1 and 2, I argue that we should not accept what Boghossian calls the “Taking Condition on inference” as a condition of adequacy for accounts of inference. I present a different condition of adequacy and argue that it is superior to the one offered by Boghossian. More precisely, I point out that there is an analog of Moore’s Paradox for inference; and I suggest that explaining this phenomenon is a condition of adequacy for accounts of inference. Boghossian’s Taking Condition derives its plausibility from the fact that it apparently explains the analog of Moore’s Paradox. Second, in Sect. 3, I show that neither Boghossian’s, nor Broome’s, nor Wright’s account of inference meets my condition of adequacy. I distinguish two kinds of mistake one is likely to make if one does not focus on my condition of adequacy; and I argue that all three—Boghossian, Broome, and Wright—make at least one of these mistakes.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Philosophy
Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Authors:Hlobil, Ulf
Journal or Publication:Philosophical Studies
Date:2014
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1007/s11098-013-0104-z
Keywords:Inference; Reasoning; Moore’s Paradox; Boghossian; Broome; Wright;
ID Code:983498
Deposited By: ULF HLOBIL
Deposited On:08 Feb 2018 15:00
Last Modified:08 Feb 2018 15:00

References:

Anscombe, G. E. M. (2000). Intention (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Boghossian, P. A. (2003). Blind reasoning. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 77(1), 225–248.

Boghossian, P. A. (2012). What is inference? Philosophical Studies. doi: 10.1007/s11098-012-9903-x.

Broome, J. (2012). Comments on Boghossian. Philosophical Studies. doi: 10.1007/s11098-012-9894-7.

Harman, G. H. (1986). Change in view: principles of reasoning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Sellars, W. (1973). Actions and events. Noûs, 7(2), 179–202.

Wright, C. (2012). Comment on Paul Boghossian, “The nature of inference”. Philosophical Studies, doi: 10.1007/s11098-012-9892-9.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Back to top Back to top