Login | Register

Impact of Reflective Writing and Labatorials on Student Understanding of Force and Motion in Introductory Physics

Title:

Impact of Reflective Writing and Labatorials on Student Understanding of Force and Motion in Introductory Physics

Kalman, Calvin S., Lattery, Mark and Sobhanzadeh, Mandana (2018) Impact of Reflective Writing and Labatorials on Student Understanding of Force and Motion in Introductory Physics. Creative Education, 9 (4). pp. 575-596. ISSN 2151-4755

[img]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Kalman-CE-2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
367kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.94041

Abstract

In this paper, we examine a way to deal with alternative student conceptions about force and motion in a university level introductory physics course. The course combines Reflective Writing, an activity that engages students in textual material metacognitively, and Labatorials, an in-class active learning intervention. Semi-structured interviews and student writing provide evidence of conceptual change.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Physics
Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Authors:Kalman, Calvin S. and Lattery, Mark and Sobhanzadeh, Mandana
Journal or Publication:Creative Education
Date:April 2018
Funders:
  • Concordia Open Access Author Fund
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.4236/ce.2018.94041
Keywords:Inquiry, Reflective Writing, Critical Thinking, Incommensurability, Conceptual Change
ID Code:983780
Deposited By: DANIELLE DENNIE
Deposited On:18 Apr 2018 18:41
Last Modified:18 Apr 2018 18:41

References:

[1] Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Two Kinds and Four Sub-Types of Misconceived Knowledge, Ways to Change It, and the Learning Outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Conceptual Change (2nd ed., pp. 49-70). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch3

[2] Confrey, J. (1990). Chapter 1: A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3-56. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X016001003

[3] Driver, R. & Easley. J. (1978). Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267808559857

[4] Driver, R., Rushworth, P., Squires, A., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making Sense of Secondary Science: Support Materials for Teachers. London: Routledge.

[5] Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography STCSE: Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education. Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.

[6] Feyerabend, P. K. (1962). Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism. In H. Feigl, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 3, pp. 28-97). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

[7] Gadamer, H.-G. (1975/1960) Truth and Method. In Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. III). Crossroads, New York: University of Minneapolis Press.

[8] Kalman, C. S. (2011). Enhancing Students’ Conceptual Understanding by Engaging Science Text with Reflective Writing as a Hermeneutical Circle. Science & Education, 20, 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9298-z

[9] Kalman, C. S., & Rohar, S. (2010). Toolbox of Activities to Support Students in a Physics Gateway Course. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 6, Article ID: 020111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020111

[10] Kalman, C. S., Shore, B. M., Aulls, M. W., Antimirova, T., Magon, J. K., Lee, G., Coelho, R., Coban, G. U., Huang, X., Ibrahim, A., Wang, X., Tan, D. D. M., Fu, G., & Khanam, W. (2017). Changing Students’ Approach to Learning Physics in Postsecondary Gateway Courses. International Research in Higher Education, 2 (3), 17-33.

[11] Kalman, C., Milner-Bolotin, M., Aulls, M. W., Charles, E. S., Coban, G. U., Shore, B., Antimirova, T., Kaur Magon, J., Xiang, H., Ibrahim, A., Wang, X., Lee, G., Coelho, R. L., Tan, D. D. N., & Fu, G. (2014). Understanding the Nature of Science and Nonscientific Modes of Thinking in Gateway Science Courses. In M. F. Tasar (Ed.), Proceedings of the World Conference on Physics Education (pp. 1291-1299). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

[12] Kuhn, T. (1987/2000). What Are Scientific Revolutions? In J. Conant, & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 6-27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (A Collection of Kuhn’s Last Philosophical Essays).

[13] Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[14] Lattery. M. J. (2017). Deep Learning in Introductory Physics: Exploratory Studies of Modeling-Based Reasoning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

[15] McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 67, 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19122

[16] McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (1998). Tutorials in Introductory Physics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[17] Novak, J. D. (1977). A Theory of Education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

[18] Oberheim, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2009). The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

[19] Ram, A., Nersessian, N. J., & Keil, F. C. (1997). Guest Editors’ Introduction. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0601_1

[20] Sobhanzadeh, M., Kalman, C. S., & Thompson, R. I. (2017). Labatorials in Introductory Physics Courses. European Journal of Physics, 38, Article ID: 065702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa8757
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Back to top Back to top