Login | Register

Three Active Learning Strategies to Address Mixed Student Epistemologies and Promote Conceptual Change

Title:

Three Active Learning Strategies to Address Mixed Student Epistemologies and Promote Conceptual Change

Kalman, Calvin S. and Lattery, Mark J. (2018) Three Active Learning Strategies to Address Mixed Student Epistemologies and Promote Conceptual Change. Frontiers in ICT, 5 . ISSN 2297-198X

[img]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Kalman-Frontiers-2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
396kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00019

Abstract

Novice science learners or introductory science students vary greatly in their understanding of the nature of science. For example, many students do not conceive of scientific knowledge as a highly ordered, coherent, knowledge structure that contains a set of interrelated ideas. Such a framework enables the learner to relate new material to prior knowledge and, if warranted, assimilate the new material within the framework. Many students have strong beliefs that knowledge is conveyed by authorities, such as the instructor and the textbook. Also many student's own knowledge structure is fragmented or “in pieces,” as described by diSessa. Fortunately, this portrayal is not valid for all students. Many other students enter the classroom with productive intellectual values and possess, or can quickly develop with little prompting, alternative, and coherent conceptions that conflict with target ideas. These students are able to relate new material to prior knowledge and, if warranted, assimilate new material into pre-existing conceptions. The challenge of contemporary science education reform is therefore to address the diverse needs of a “mixed student epistemology” classroom. In this paper we review three instructional strategies that show promise to address this challenge in the context of an introductory physics classroom: (1) the Reflective Writing and Labatorial interventions of Kalman et al. (2) the Conceptual Conflict Collaborative Group and Critique approaches of Kalman and Rohar, and (3) the integrated Elicit-and-Challenge and Bridging Technique strategies of Lattery. Each approach stresses the need for students to critically examine their own ideas in relation to target course ideas and discuss their ideas with peers. The second and third approaches emphasize the important role of the history and philosophy of science in science teaching. The aim of such efforts is not only to convey subject-matter content knowledge, but also to shape the student mindset, metacognitive practice, and understanding of the nature of science.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Physics
Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Authors:Kalman, Calvin S. and Lattery, Mark J.
Journal or Publication:Frontiers in ICT
Date:2018
Funders:
  • Concordia Open Access Author Fund
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.3389/fict.2018.00019
Keywords:reflective writing, critical thinking, knowledge in pieces, coherent theory, student’s epistemological beliefs, cognitive dissonance theory, principle of counter induction, model-centered instruction
ID Code:984367
Deposited By: KRISTA ALEXANDER
Deposited On:06 Sep 2018 18:15
Last Modified:06 Sep 2018 18:15

References:

Ahrensmeier, D. (2013). A practical application of Physics Education Research-informed teaching interventions in a first-year physics service course. J. Tech. Educ. 1, S166–S178.

Chi, M. T. H. (2013). “Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcomes,” in International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, 2nd Edn, ed S. Vosniadou (New York, NY: Routledge Press), 49–70.

Clement, J., and Rea-Ramirez, M. (eds.). (2008). Model Based Learning and Instruction in Science. Dordrecht: Springer.

Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners' responses to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Sci. Educ. 15, 463–494. doi: 10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7

Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive Dissonance: 50 Years of a Classic Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction; ten years of experience and results. Am. J. Phys. 69, 970–977. doi: 10.1119/1.1374249

diSessa, A. (1996). “What do just plain folk know about physics?,” in The Handbook of Education and Human Development: New Models of Learning, Teaching, and Schooling, eds D. Olson and N. Torrance (Cambridge: Blackwell), 709–730.

Elby, A. (2001). Helping students learn how to learn. Am. J. Phys. Educ. Res. Suppl. 69, S454–S464. doi: 10.1119/1.1377283

El-Helou, J., and Kalman, C. S. (2018). Reflective writing for a better understanding of scientific concepts in high school. Phys. Teach. 56, 88–91. doi: 10.1119/1.5021434

Festinger, L. A. (1957). Cognitive dissonance. Sci. Am. 207:93.

Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against Method, 3rd Edn. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.

Feyerabend, P. K. (1962). “Explanation, reduction and empiricism,” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, eds H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press), 28–59.

Gadamer, H. G. (1975/1960). Truth and Method, eds G. Barden and J. Cumming (New York, NY: Crossroads).

Harmon-Jones, E., and Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Z. Sozialpsychol. 38, 7–16. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.7

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. Phys. Teach. 30, 141–158. doi: 10.1119/1.2343497
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 378–405. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026

Huang, X., and Kalman, C. S. (2012). A case study on reflective writing. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 42, 92–99.

Jackson, J., Dukerich, L., and Hestenes, D. (2008). Modeling instruction: an effective model for science education. Sci. Educ. 17, 10–17.

Kalman, C. S. (2002). Developing critical thinking in undergraduate courses: a philosophical approach. Sci. Educ. 11, 83–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1013071130538

Kalman, C. S. (2009). The need to emphasize epistemology in teaching and research. Sci. Educ. 18, 325–348. doi: 10.1007/s11191-007-9135-1

Kalman, C. S. (2010). Enabling students to develop a scientific mindset. Sci. Educ. 19, 147–163. doi: 10.1007/s11191-009-9186-6

Kalman, C. S. (2011). Enhancing students' understanding of concepts by getting students to approach text in the manner of a hermeneutical circle. Sci. Educ. 20, 159–172. doi: 10.1007/s11191-010-9298-z

Kalman, C. S. (2017). Successful Science and Engineering Teaching: Theoretical and Learning Perspectives, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Springer.

Kalman, C. S., and Aulls, M. W. (2003). Can an analysis of the contrast between pre-Galilean and Newtonian theoretical frameworks help students develop a scientific mindset? Sci. Educ. 12, 761–772. doi: 10.1023/B:SCED.0000004554.35266.7a

Kalman, C. S., Milner-Bolotin, M., and Antimirova, T. (2010). Comparison of the effectiveness of collaborative groups and peer instruction in a large introductory physics course for science majors. Can. J. Phys. 88, 325–332. doi: 10.1139/P10-024

Kalman, C. S., Morris, S., Cottin, C., and Gordon, R. (1999). Promoting conceptual change using collaborative groups in quantitative gateway courses. Am. J. Phys. 67, S45–S51. doi: 10.1119/1.19080

Kalman, C. S., and Rohar, S. (2010). Toolbox of activities to support students in a physics gateway course. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res. 6:020111. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020111

Kalman, C. S., Rohar, S., and Wells, D. (2004). Enhancing conceptual change using argumentative essays. Am. J. Phys. 72, 715–717. doi: 10.1119/1.1645285

Kalman, C. S., Sobhanzadeh, M., Thompson, R., Ibrahim, A., and Wang, X. (2015). Combination of interventions can change students' epistemological beliefs. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res. 11:020136. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020136

Khanam, N., and Kalman, S. (2017). Implementation and evaluation of the course dossier methodology. Can. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. 8, 1–20. doi: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.1.7

Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1981/2000). “What are scientific revolutions?,” in The Road Since Structure, eds Conant and J. Haugeland (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), 13–32.

Lakatos, I. (1970). “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds I. Lakatos and A. Musgrove (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 91–196.

Lasry, N., Mazur, E., and Watkins, J. (2008). Peer instruction: from harvard to the two-year college. Am. J. Phys. 76, 1066–1069. doi: 10.1119/1.2978182

Lattery, M. J. (2017). Deep Learning in Introductory Physics: Exploratory Studies of Modeling-Based Reasoning (Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing), 279.

Linenberger, K. J., and Bretz, S. L. (2012). Generating cognitive dissonance in student interviews through multiple representations. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 13, 172–178. doi: 10.1039/C1RP90064A

Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., and Sayre, E. C. (2015). How physics instruction impacts students' beliefs about learning physics. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res. 11:010115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010115

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction; A User's Manual. Upper Saddle Hill, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McDermott, L. C., and Shaffer, P. S. (2001). Tutorials in Introductory Physics and Homework Package. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

McKinnon, J. W., and Renner, J. W. (1971). Are colleges concerned with intellectual development. Am. J. Phys. 39, 1047–1052. doi: 10.1119/1.1986367

Nelson, C. (1994). “Critical thinking and collaborative learning,” in Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques, eds K. Bosworth and S. J. Hamilton (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series), 45–48.

Newton, I. (1686). Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Royal Society.

Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations, 2nd Rev. Edn. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., and Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Sci. Educ. 66, 211–227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207

Renner, J. W., and Paske, W. C. (1977). Comparing two forms of instruction in college physics. Am. J. Phys. 45, 851–859. doi: 10.1119/1.11061

Sobhanzadeh, M., Kalman, C. S., and Thompson, R. I. (2017). Labatorials in introductory physics courses. Eur. J. Phys. 38, 1–18. doi: 10.1088/1361-6404/aa8757

Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., and Skopeliti, I. (2008). “The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change,” in International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, ed S. Vosniadou (New York, NY: Routledge).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind Insociety: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., and Novak, J. (1994). “Research on alternative student conceptions in science,” in Handbook of Research on Science teaching and Learning, ed D. Gabel (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster and Prentice Hall International), 177–210.

Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Psychol. Psychiatry 17, 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Back to top Back to top