Login | Register

Mismatch between calf paternity and observed copulations between male and female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): are female reindeer polyandrous?

Title:

Mismatch between calf paternity and observed copulations between male and female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): are female reindeer polyandrous?

Coombs, Keenin R. (2020) Mismatch between calf paternity and observed copulations between male and female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): are female reindeer polyandrous? Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Coombs_MSc_F2020.pdf]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Coombs_MSc_F2020.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
464kB

Abstract

In polygynous systems, such as that exhibited by reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), mate choice can be difficult to disentangle from male intrasexual competition because male behaviour may constrain female choice. Polyandry may provide an avenue for female mate choice, though it is difficult to identify using behavioural estimators alone. Molecular techniques address this issue by affording ecologists an opportunity to reassess mating systems from a genetic perspective. We assessed the frequency and possible explanations for polyandry in reindeer using a genetic approach to determine the success of observed copulations in a semi-domesticated herd in Kaamanen, Finland. Behavioural and genetic data were synthesized with population characteristics over a seven-year period to test the hypothesis that, if present, polyandry in reindeer is driven by sexual harassment from sub-dominant males. Finally, we test for prevailing patterns in the mating order of females to address the feasibility of polyandry as a mechanism for defense against male infertility or post-copulatory selection. We observed polyandry in 42% of females, with as many as 60% exhibiting polyandry in certain years. We found no evidence that polyandry resulted from sexual harassment by sub-dominant males, suggesting that it is likely a deliberate strategy among females. Female preference for larger males persisted despite polyandrous behaviour, however, we found no influence of male body mass on mating order, or of mating order on match/mismatch. Consequently, neither post-copulatory selection nor defense against infertility can be ruled out as a driver of polyandry among female reindeer.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Biology
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Coombs, Keenin R.
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M. Sc.
Program:Biology
Date:4 August 2020
Thesis Supervisor(s):Weladji, Robert
Keywords:Polyandry, sexual selection, reindeer, mating systems
ID Code:987349
Deposited By: Keenin Coombs
Deposited On:25 Nov 2020 15:48
Last Modified:25 Nov 2020 15:48

References:

Bergerud, A.T. 1974. Rutting behaviour of Newfoundland caribou. In: (eds. Geist, V. and F. Walther) The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management. IUCN, Morges, Switzerland, 395-435.
Birkhead, T.R. and Møller, A.P. Sexual selection and the temporal separation of reproductive events: sperm storage data from reptiles, birds, and mammals. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 50(4): 295-311.
Black, J.M. and Hulme, M. 1996. Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bro-Jorgenson, J. 2011. Intra- and intersexual conflicts and cooperation in the evolution of mating strategies: lessons learnt from ungulates. Evolutionary Biology, 38: 28-41.
Charlton, B.D., Reby, D., and McComb, K. 2007. Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males. Biology Letter, 3(4): 382-385.
Clutton-Brock, T. and McAuliffe, K. 2009. Female mate choice in mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 84(1): 3-27.
Clutton-Brock, T. and McComb, K. 1993. Experimental tests of copying and mate choice in fallow deer (Dama dama). Behavioral Ecology, 4(3): 191-193.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1989. Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 236: 339-372.
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Rose, K.E., and Guinness, F.E. 1997. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biology, 264: 1509-1516.
Coltman. D.W., Bancroft, D.R., Robertson, A., Smith, J.A., Clutton-Brock, T.H., and Pemberton, J.M. 1999. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Molecular Ecology, 8(7): 1199-1209.
Crete, M. and Huot, J. 1993. Regulation of a large herd of caribou: summer nutrition affects calf growth and body reserves of dams. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71(11): 2291-2296.
Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Volume 1. John Murray. https://doi.org/10.1037/12293-000
DeYoung, R.W., Demarais, S., Gonzales, R.A., Honeycutt, R.L., and Gee, K.L. 2002. Multiple paternity in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianis) revealed by DNA microsatellites. Journal of Mammalogy, 83(3): 884-892.
Djakovic, N. 2012. Female mating strategy in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): the importance of male age structure and availability in the social organisation, behaviour and mate choice. Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
Eisenberg, J.F. 1966. The social organization of mammals. Handbook of ecology, 8: 1-92.
Eloranta, E. and Nieminen, M. 1986. Calving of the experimental reindeer herd in Kaamanen during 1970-85. Rangifer, 115-121.
Espmark, Y.O. 1964. Rutting behaviour in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). Animal Behaviour, 12(1): 159-160.
Ginsberg, J.R. and Rubenstein, D.I. 1990. Sperm competition and variation in zebra mating behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26(6): 427-434.
Gozlan, R.E., Burnard, D., Britton, J.R., and Andreou, D. 2014. Evidence of female preference for hidden sex signals in distant fish species. Behavioural Ecology, 25(1): 53-57.
Hill, G.E. 2006. Female mate choice for ornamental coloration. Bird coloration, 2:137-200.
Hirotani, A. 1994. Domincance rank, copulatory behaviour and estimated reproductive success in male reindeer. Animal Behaviour, 48: 929-936.
Hogg, J.T. 1987. Intrasexual competition and mate choice in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Ethology, 75(2): 119-144.
Holand, Ø., Gjostein, H., Losvar, A., and Kumpula, J. 2004. Social rank in female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): effects of body mass, antler size and age. Journal of Zoology, 263(4): 365-372.
Holand, Ø., Røed, K.H., Mysterud, A., Kumpula, J., Nieminen, M., and Smith, M.E. 2003. The effect of sex ratio and male age structure on reindeer calving. Journal of Wildlife Management, 67(1): 25-33.
Holmand, L. and Kokko, H. 2013. The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1613): 2012200553
Jamieson, I.G. and Colgan, P.W. 1989. Eggs in the nests of males and their effect on mate choice in the three-spined stickleback. Animal Behaviour, 38(5): 859-865.
Jones, A.G. and Ratterman, N.L. 2009. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(1): 10001-10008.
Kie, J.G., Bruce, K.J., Noyes, J.H., William, C.L., Dick, B.L., Rhodes, O.E., Stussy, R.J., and Bowyer, R.T. 2013. Reproductive in North American elk Cervus elaphus: paternity of calves sired by males of mixed age classes. Wild Biology, 19(3): 302:310.
Kodric-Brown, A. and Brown, J.H. 1984. Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. The American Naturalist, 124(3): 309-323.
Kraaijeveld-Smit, F.J.L., Ward, S.J., Temple-Smith, P.D. 2002. Multiple paternity in a field population of a small carnivorous marsupial, the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis.
Kraak, S.B.M. and Weissing, F.J. 1996. Female preference for nests with many eggs: a cost-benefit analysis of female choice in fish with paternal care. Behavioural Ecology, 7(3): 353-361.
Lacy, R.C. 1997. Importance of genetic variation to the viability of mammalian populations. Journal of Mammalogy, 78(2): 320-335.
L’Italien, L., Weladji, R.B., Holand, Ø., Røed, K.H., Nieminen, M., and Cote, S.D. 2012. Mating group size and stability in reindeer Rangifer tarandus: the effects of male characteristics, sex ratio, and age structure. Ethology, 118(8): 783-792.
Mahoney, S.P., Abbott, H., Russell, L.H., and Porter, B.R. 1990. Woodland caribou calf mortality in insular Newfoundland. Trans 19th IUGB Congress, 592-599.
Mahoney, S.P., Lewis, K.P., Weir, J.N., Morrison, S.F., Luther, J.G., Schaefer, J.A., Pouliot, D., and Latifovic, Rasim. 2016. Woodland caribou calf mortality in Newfoundland: insights into the role of climate, predation and population density over three decades of study. Population Ecology, 58(1): 91-103.
Mallory, C.D. and Boyce, M.S. 2018. Observed and predicted effects of climate change on Artic caribou and reindeer. Environmental Reviews, 26: 13-25.
McComb, K.E. 1991. Female choice for high roaring rates in red deer, Cervus elaphus. Animal Behaviour, 41: 79-88.
McEachern, M.B., McElreath, R.L., Van Vuren, D.H., and Eadie, J.M. 2009. Another genetically promiscuous ‘polygynous’ mammal: mating system variation in Neotoma fuscipes. Animal Behaviour, 77: 449-455.
McEllington, A.G., Gammell, M.P., Harty, H.C., Paini, D.R., Murphy, D.T., Walsh, J.T., and Hayden, T.J. 2001. Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 49: 266-272.
McEwan, E.H. and Whitehead, P.E. 1972. Reproduction in female reindeer and caribou. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 50(1): 43-46.
Møller, A.P. 1989. Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm production in mammals. Functional Ecology, 3: 91-96.
Noonan, K.C. 1983. Female mate choice in the cichlid fish Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Animal Behaviour, 31(4): 1005-1010.
Orr, T.J. and Zuk, M. 2014. Reproductive delays in mammals: an unexplored avenue for post-copulatory selection. Biological Reviews, 89: 899-912.
Paoli, A., Weladji, R.B., Holand, Ø., and Kumpula, J. 2020. The onset in spring and the end in autumn of the thermal and vegetative growing season affect calving time and reproductive success in reindeer. Current Zoology, 66(2): 123-134.
Preston, B.T. and Stevenson, I.R. 2001. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature, 409: 682-683.
Reale, D., Bousses, P., and Chapuis. 1996. Female-biased mortality induced by male sexual harassment in a feral sheep population. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 74: 1812-1818.
Retzius, G. 1900. Zur Kenntnis der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Renntieres un des Rehes. Biologische Undersuchungen, 9: 65-66.
Ringberg, T. and Aakwaag, A. 1982. The diagnosis of early pregnancy and missed abortion in European and Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus and Rangifer tarandus platyrhyncus). Rangifer, 2(1): 26-30.
Røed, K.H., Holand, Ø., Gjøstein, H., and Hansen, H. 2005. Variation in male reproductive success in a wild population of reindeer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69(3): 1163-1170.
Røed, K.H., Holand, Ø., Smith, M.E., Gjøstein, H., Kumpula, J., and Nieminen, M. 2002. Reproductive success in reindeer males in a herd with varying sex ratio. Molecular Ecology, 11: 1239-1243.
Searcy, W.A. 1992. Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. American Zoologist, 32(1): 71-80.
Sorin, A.B. 2004. Paternity assignment for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): mating across age classes and multiple paternity. Journal of Mammalogy, 85(2): 356-362.
Tennenhouse, E.M., Weladji, R.B., Holand, Ø., and Nieminen, M. 2012. Timing of reproductive effort differs between young and old dominant male reindeer. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 49(3): 152-160.
Tomkins, P., Saaristo, M., Bertram, M.G., Michelangeli, M., Tomkins, R.B., and Wong, B.B.M. 2018. An endocrine-disrupting agricultural contaminant impacts sequential female mate choice in fish. Environmental Pollution, 237: 103-110.
Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man, 1981-1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Uccheddu, S., Body, G., Weladji, R.B., Holand, Ø., Nieminen, M. 2015. Foraging competition in larger groups overrides harassment avoidance benefits in female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Oecologia, 179: 711-718.
Unger, L.M. and Sargent, R.C. 1988. Allopaternal care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: females prefer males with eggs. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 23(1): 27-32.
Wacker, S., Ostlund-Nilsson, S., Forsgren, E., Newport, C., and Amundsen, T. 2016. Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish. Behavioural Ecology, 27(5): 1331-1342.
Weladji, R.B. and Holand, Ø. 2003. Global climate change and reindeer: effects of winter weather on the autumn weight and growth of calves. Oecologia, 136(2): 317-323.
Weladji, R.B., Body, G., Holand, Ø., Meng, X., and Nieminen, M. 2017. Termporal variation in the operational sex ratio and male mating behaviours in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Behavioural processes, 140: 96-103.
Wolff, J.O. and Macdonald, D.W. 2004. Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19(3): 127-134.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top