Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0403.pdf

Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 18, 146-162.

Beatty, I. D., Leonard, W. J., Gerace, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006a). Question driven instruction: Teaching science (well) with an audience response system. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases (pp. 96–115). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. 

Beatty, I., Gerace, W., Leonard, W., & Dufresne, R. (2006b). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31-39.

Bennett. C., Foreman-Peck L., & Higgins, C. (1996). Researching into Teaching Methods in Colleges and Universities. London: Kogan Page. 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139-148. 

Bligh, D. (1998). What’s the use of lectures? Exeter: Intellect.

Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc. 

Bode, M., Drane, D., Kolikant, Y. B., & Schuller, M. (2009). A clicker approach to teaching calculus. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 56(2), 253-256.

Boyle, J., & Nicol, D. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 11(3), 43-57.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989).  Situated cognition and the culture of learning.  Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.

Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.

Campbell, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). Questioning as an instructional method: Does it affect learning from lectures? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 747-759.

Carnaghan, C., & Webb, A. (2007). Investigating the effects of group response systems on student satisfaction, learning, and engagement in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 391-409.

Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.

Collins, L. (2007). Livening up the classroom: Using audience response systems to promote active learning. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 26(1), 81-88. 
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977. 

Crouch, C. H., Watkins, J., Fagen, A. P., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?DocID=241&ID=4990

Cutts, Q., Carbone, A., & van Haaster, K. (2004). Using an electronic voting system to promote active reflection on coursework feedback. Retrieved from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~quintin/papers/ICCE04QC.pdf

Cutts, Q., Kennedy, G., Mitchell, M., & Draper, S. (2004). Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems. Retrieved from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~quintin/papers/cate2004.pdf

Dangel, H. L., & Wang, C. X. (2008). Student response systems in higher education: Moving beyond linear teaching and surface learning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 1(1), 93-104.

DeBourgh, G. A. (2008). Use of classroom "clickers" to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(2), 76-87.

Draper, S. W. (1998). Niche-based success in CAL. Computers and Education, 30, 5-8.

Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 81-94.

Dufresne, R. J., Wenk, L., Mestre, J. P., Gerace, W.  J., & Leonard, W. J. (1996).  Classtalk:  A  classroom  communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3-47.

Duncan, D. (2006). Clickers: A new teaching aid with exceptional promise. Astronomy Education Review, 5(1), 70-88.
Dweck, C. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Elwood.  J., & Klenowski, V. (2002).  Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching.  Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (3), 243–256. 

Fan, K. Y. D., & van Blink, C. D. (2006). A comparison and evaluation of personal response systems in introductory computer programming. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/Resources/Acomparisonandevaluationofpers/162634

Fisher, C. M. (2006). Automated classroom response systems: Implications for sexuality education and research. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 1(4), 23-31.

Frand, J. L. (2000). The Information-Age mindset. EDUCAUSE Review, 35 (5), 14-20.

Freeman, M., & Blayney, P. (2005). Promoting interactive in-class learning environments: A comparison of an electronic response system with a traditional alternative. Retrieved from http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/199/1/03%20Freeman%20Blayney.pdf

Freeman, M., Blayney, P., & Ginns, P. (2006). Anonymity and in class learning: The case for electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 568-580. 

Gauci, S. A., Dantas, A. M., Williams, D. A., & Kemm, R. E. (2009). Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 60-71.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning? Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.

Gibbs. G., & Jenkins, A. (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Kogan Page. 

Graham, C. R., Tripp, T. R., Seawright, L., & Joeckel, G. L. (2007). Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 233-258.

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.

Harlen, W., & Crick, R. D. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 169-207.
Henderson, C., & Rosenthal, A. (2006). Reading questions: Encouraging students to read the text before coming to class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35 (7), 46-50. 

Hobson, E. H. (2004). Getting students to read: Fourteen tips. IDEA Paper, 40, 1-6.  Retrieved from http://www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/Idea_Paper_40.pdf

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhammer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158.

Hoekstra, A. (2008). Vibrant student voices: Exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses. Learning, Media, & Technology, 33(4), 329-341.

Homme, J., Asay, G., & Morgenstern, B. (2004). Utilisation of an audience response system. Medical Education, 38 (5), 575.

Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 98–108.

Jackson, M. H. & Trees, A. R. (2003). Clicker implementation and assessment.  Retrieved from http://www-plan.cs.colorado.edu/pltools/pubs/F03clickers.pdf

James, M. C. (2006). The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in peer instruction. American Journal of Physics, 74(8), 689-691.

James, M. C., Barbieri, F., & Garcia, P. (2008). What are they talking about? Lessons learned from a study of peer instruction. Astronomy Education Review, 7(1).

Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.

Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.

Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53, 819-827.

Kelly, K. G. (2009). Student response systems (“clickers”) in the psychology classroom: A beginner’s guide. Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/otrp/resources/kelly09.pdf

Kennedy, G. E., & Cutts, Q. I. (2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 260-268.

King, D. B., & Joshi, S. (2008). Gender differences in the use and effectiveness of personal response devices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 544-552.

Lang, J. M. (2008). On course: A week-by-week guide to your first semester of college teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lasry, N. (2008). Clickers or flashcards: Is there really a difference? The Physics Teacher 46(4), 242-244.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd  ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Lucas, A. (2009). Using peer instruction and i>clickers to enhance student participation in calculus. PRIMUS, 19(3), 219-231.

MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Dunning, J. B., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., Evans, E., … Lichti, S. M. (2008). The influence of learning characteristics on evaluation of audience response technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(2), 25-46.

Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., … Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 51-57. 

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.

Miller, R. L., Santana-Vega, E., & Terrell, M. S. (2006). Can good questions and peer discussion improve calculus instruction? PRIMUS, 16(3).

Mollborn, S., & Hoekstra, A. (2010). “A meeting of minds”: Using clickers for critical thinking and discussion in large sociology classes. Teaching Sociology, 38(1), 18-27.

Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (2008). Efficacy of personal response systems ("clickers") in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 45-50.

Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473. 

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218.

Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending active learning with web technology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Oblinger, D. G. (2003). Boomers & gen-Xers, millennials: Understanding the “new students”. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4), 37–47.

Pelton, T., Pelton, L. F., & Sanseverino, M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: A large-class study at the University of Victoria. Retrieved from http://webhome.csc.uvic.ca/~msanseve/class_clickers/

Perkins, K. K., & Turpen, C. (2009). Student perspectives on using clickers in upper-division physics courses. Retrieved from http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/SEI_research/files/Physics/Perkins_StudentPerpectivesOnUsingClickersL.pdf

Poirier, C. R., & Feldman, R. S. (2007). Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 194-196.

Preszler, R., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 29–41.

Reay, N. W., Li, P., & Bao, L. (2008). Testing a new voting machine question methodology. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 171–178.

Roos, B., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Formative assessment: A cybernetic viewpoint. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 7-20.

Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). Classroom response and communication systems: Research review and theory. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, 2004. Retrieved from http://ubiqcomputing.org/CATAALYST_AERA_Proposal.pdf

Salemi, M. (2009). Clickenomics: Using a classroom response system to increase student engagement in a large-enrollment principles of economics course. Journal of Economic Education, 40(4), 385-404.

Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Gulid, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122-124.

Specht, L. B., & Sandlin, P. K. (1991). The differential effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 196-210.

Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 253-258.

Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven. (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, 39-83.

Thornton, R. K. (1999). Using the results of research in science education to improve science learning. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.114.1832

Trees, A. R., & Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 21-40. 

Turpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2007). Understanding How Physics Faculty Use Peer Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/physics/EducationIssues/papers/Turpen_etal/Faculty_Peer_Instruction.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development (M. Lopez-Morillas, Trans.). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Willoughby, S. D., & Gustafson, E. (2009). Technology talks: Clickers and grading incentive in the large lecture hall. American Journal of Physics, 77(2), 180-183.

Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be… The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3(2), 14-20.

Witte, J. P. (2007). Why the tail wags the dog: The pernicious influence of product-oriented discourse on the provision of educational technology support. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 203–215.

Yourstone, S. A., Kraye, H. S., & Albaum, G. (2008). Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 75-88.