Ayris, P. (2011). Conference report: OAI7 – Raising the bar for current developments in scholarly communication, a personal view. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 21(1). Retrieved from http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/8013/8356 Beasley, G. (2011). The senate resolution on open access at Concordia University. Feliciter 57(3), 101-102. Bergman, C. (2012). Why are there so few efforts to text mine the open access subset of PubMed Central? Retrieved from http://caseybergman.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/why-are-there-so-few-efforts-to-text-mine-the-open-access-subset-of-pubmed-central/ Bjork, B.C., Roosr, A. & Lauri, M. (2008). Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different open access options. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 12, 178-186. Retrieved from http://elpub.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?178_elpub2008 Brinn, T., Jones, M. J. & Pendlebury, M. (2000). Measuring research quality: Peer review 1, citation indices 0. Omega, 28(2), 237-239. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00048-1 Brody, T., Harnad, S. & Carr, L. (2006). Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(8), 1060-1072. doi:10.1002/asi.20373 Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2012). Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: Setting the default to open. Retrieved from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/boai-10-recommendations Bunge, M. (2004). Clarifying some misunderstandings about social systems and their mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(3), 371-381. doi:10.1177/0048393104266860 Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Bunge, M. (1998). Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Concordia University. (2010). Concordia University senate resolution on open access. Retrieved from http://library.concordia.ca/research/openaccess/SenateResolutiononOpenAccess.pdf Davis, P.M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal. doi:10.1096/fj.11-183988 Davis, P.M. (2010). Does open access lead to increased readership and citations? A randomized controlled trial of articles published in APS journals. The Physiologist, 53(6), 197, 200-1. Davis, P.M. (2009). Open access: Increased citations not guaranteed. Science, 325(5938), 266. doi:10.1126/science.325_266a Foster, N.F. & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1), 1-1. doi:10.1045/january2005-foster Fry, J., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Spezi, V. & White, S. (2009). PEER behavioural research: Authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories. LISU: Loughborough University. Retrieved from http://www.peerproject.eu/fileadmin/media/reports/Final_revision_-_behavioural_baseline_report_-_20_01_10.pdf Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T. & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), 1-12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636 Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S., & Brooks, T. (2010). Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics. Scientometrics, 84(2), 345-355. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0111-1 Nature. (2012). Gold in the text? Nature 483(7388). doi: 10.1038/483124a Guedon, J. (2003). Open access archives: From scientific plutocracy to the republic of science. IFLA Journal, 29(2), 129-140. doi:10.1177/034003520302900204 Harnad, S. (2000). The invisible hand of peer review. Exploit Interactive 5. Retrieved from http://www.exploit-lib.org/issue5/peer-review/ Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y. & Hilf, E.R. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310-314. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013 Harnad, S. (2008). Institutional repositories vs subject/central repositories - open access archivangelism. Retrieved from http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/414-guid.html Harnad, S. & McGovern, N. (2009). Topic 4: Institutional repository success is dependent upon mandates. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Technology and Science 35, 27–31. doi:10.1002/bult.2009.1720350410 Harnad, S. (2010.) Gold open access publishing must not be allowed to retard the progress of green open access self-archiving. Logos: The Journal of the World Book Community (21)3-4, 86-93. doi:10.1163/095796511X559972 Harnad, S. (2011). Open access to research: Changing researcher behavior through university and funder mandates. JEDEM Journal of Democracy and Open Government 3(1), 33-41. IEEE. (2011.) Peer review notice. CS Digital library. Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/peerreview Kennan, M.A. (2011). Learning to share: Mandates and open access. Library Management, 32(4), 302-318. doi:10.1108/01435121111132301 Kim, J. (2010). Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(9), 1909-1922. doi:10.1002/asi.21336 Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521-521. doi:10.1038/35079151 Linde, P. (2010). Beyond OA-policy. ScieComInfo: Nordic-Baltic Forum for Scientific Communication 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.sciecom.org/ojs/index.php/sciecominfo/article/view/3623 Lynch, C.A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL, 226. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/arl-br-226.pdf McDonald, D. & Kelly, U. (2012). The value and benefits of text mining. London: Jisc. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2012/value-and-benefits-of-text-mining.aspx Morris, S. & Thorn, S. (2009). Learned society members and open access. Learned Publishing, 22(3), 221-239. doi:10.1087/2009308 Murray-Rust, P. (2012). Towards a manifesto on open mining of scholarship. Retrieved from http://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2012/05/01/towards-a-manifesto-on-open-mining-of-scholarship/ Open Citation Project. (2012). The effect of open access and downloads (‘hits’) on citation impact: A bibliography of studies. Retrieved from http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html Open Access Directory. (2011). Declarations in support of OA. Retrieved from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Declarations_in_support_of_OA Open Access Directory. (2011). Statements by learned societies and professional associations. Retrieved from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Statements_by_learned_societies_and_professional_associations RCUK Administrator. (2012). The benefits of Open Access. Retrieved from http://blogs.rcuk.ac.uk/2012/08/10/the-benefits-of-open-access/ Sale, A. (2006). The acquisition of open access research articles. First Monday, 11(10). Sale, A. (2006). Comparison of content policies for institutional repositories in Australia. First Monday, 11(4). Schonfeld, R.C. & Housewright, R. (2010). Faculty survey 2009: Key strategic insights for libraries, publishers, and society. Ithaka S+R. Retrieved from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/communia2010/sites/communia2010/images/Faculty_Study_2009.pdf Seglen, P.O. (1997). Citations and journal impact factors: Questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy, 52(11), 1050-1056. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00175.x Sieber, J.E. (2006). Quality and value: How can we research peer review? Nature, doi:10.1038/nature05006 OED Online. (2012). Spontaneous. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/187385 Suber, P. (2010.) Thoughts on prestige, quality, and open access. Logos: The Journal of the World Book Community 21(1-2), 115-128. doi: 10.1163/095796510X546959 Suber, P. (2011). Knowledge as a public good. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/sparc/publications/articles/knowledge-public-good.shtml Swan, A. & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: An author study. Truro, England: Key Perspectives. Retrieved from http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/reports/Open%20Access%20II%20(author%20survey%20on%20self%20archiving)%202005.pdf Swan, A. (2010). The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516/ van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Smith, R. & Black, N. (1998). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 234-237. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.234 Wagner, A.B. (2010). Open access citation advantage: An annotated bibliography. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 60, 2-2. doi:10.5062/F4Q81B0W Ware, M. (2008). Peer review: Benefits, perceptions and alternatives. Summary Paper 4. London: Publishing Research Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.publishingresearch.net/PeerReview.htm Willinsky, J. (2010.) Open access and academic reputation. Annals of Library and Information Studies 57 (3), 296-302. Retrieved from http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/10242 Xia, J. (2011). An anthropological emic-etic perspective on open access practices. Journal of Documentation, 67(1), 75-94. doi:10.1108/00220411111105461