1.	Desai RH, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, et al. Social participation of adults aging with long-term physical disabilities: A cross-sectional study investigating the role of transportation mode and urban vs rural living. Disability and Health Journal. 2023;16(4):101503. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101503
2.	Harris F, Yang HY, Sanford J. Physical Environmental Barriers to Community Mobility in Older and Younger Wheelchair Users. Wolters Kluwer. 2015;31(1):42-51. doi:10.1097/TGR.0000000000000043
3.	Chen K, Zhao P, Qin K, Kwan MP, Wang N. Towards healthcare access equality: Understanding spatial accessibility to healthcare services for wheelchair users. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2024;108:102069. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.102069
4.	Unsworth CA, Rawat V, Sullivan J, Tay R, Naweed A, Gudimetla P. “I’m very visible but seldom seen”: consumer choice and use of mobility aids on public transport. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2017;14(2):122-132. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1407829
5.	Meikle J. People with disabilities treated like second-class citizens, says watchdog. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jul/19/people-with-disabilities-treated-like-second-class-citizens-says-watchdog. July 19, 2016. Accessed February 1, 2024.
6.	Human Rights Watch Council. Iran: People with Disabilities Face Discrimination and Abuse | Human Rights Watch. Published online June 26, 2018. Accessed August 29, 2024. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/06/26/iran-people-disabilities-face-discrimination-and-abuse
7.	Gómez-Zúñiga B, Pousada M, Armayones M. Loneliness and disability: A systematic review of loneliness conceptualization and intervention strategies. Front Psychol. 2023;13:1040651. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1040651
8.	Babik I, Gardner ES. Factors Affecting the Perception of Disability: A Developmental Perspective. Front Psychol. 2021;12:702166. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702166
9.	Barlew L, Secrest J, Guo Z, Fell N, Haban G. The Experience of Being Grounded: A Phenomenological Study of Living with a Wheelchair. Rehabilitation Nursing Journal. 2013;38(4):193. doi:10.1002/rnj.96
10.	Costa V de SP, Melo MRAC, Garanhani ML, Fujisawa DS. Social Representations of the Wheelchair for People with Spinal Cord Injury. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2010;18:755-762. doi:10.1590/S0104-11692010000400014
11.	Edberg AK, Persson D. The Experience of Active Wheelchair Provision and Aspects of Importance Concerning the Wheelchair Among Experienced Users in Sweden. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal (RDS). 2011;7(2). Accessed March 22, 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/58484
12.	Barker DJ, Reid D, Cott C. Acceptance and Meanings of Wheelchair Use in Senior Stroke Survivors. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2004;58(2):221-230. doi:10.5014/ajot.58.2.221
13.	Emerson E, Fortune N, Llewellyn G, Stancliffe R. Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study. Disabil Health J. 2021;14(1):100965. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965
14.	Lidwell W, Holden K, Butler J. Universal Principles of Design: 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Teach through Design; [25 Additional Design Principles]. rev. and updated. Rockport Publ; 2010.
15.	Oh CS, Bailenson JN, Welch GF. A Systematic Review of Social Presence: Definition, Antecedents, and Implications. Front Robot AI. 2018;5. doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
16.	Ku B, Lupton E. Health Design Thinking: Creating Products and Services for Better Health. 1st edition. MIT Press; 2020.
17.	United Nation News. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: 5 fast facts | UN News. June 8, 2024. Accessed September 14, 2024. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/06/1150836
18.	C.  Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. Published online September 4, 2018. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
19.	Rasoulivalajoozi M, Cucuzzella C, Farhoudi M. Domains of Wheelchair Users’ Socio-Emotional Experiences: Design Insights from a Scoping Review. Published online September 17, 2024. doi:DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/35WC8
20.	Chan T. LibGuides: Database Search Tips: Boolean operators. 2023. Accessed August 30, 2024. https://libguides.mit.edu/c.php?g=175963&p=1158594
21.	Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information. 2018;34(4):285-291. doi:10.3233/EFI-180221
22.	Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019;111:49-59.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008
23.	Souto RQ, Khanassov V, Hong QN, Bush PL, Vedel I, Pluye P. Systematic mixed studies reviews: Updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the mixed methods appraisal tool. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;52(1):500-501. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.010
24.	Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010;5(1):69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
25.	Abu–Sadat R. Accessibility to the faculty of educational studies building at the University of Education, Winneba: Experience of two wheelchair users. Equity in Education & Society. Published online October 20, 2023:27526461231207400. doi:10.1177/27526461231207400
26.	Barbareschi G, Carew MT, Johnson EA, Kopi N, Holloway C. “When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”-Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):4272. doi:10.3390/ijerph18084272
27.	Barker DJ, Reid D, Cott C. The Experience of Senior Stroke Survivors: Factors in Community Participation among Wheelchair Users. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73(1):18-25. doi:10.2182/cjot.05.0002
28.	Blach Rossen C, Sørensen B, Würtz Jochumsen B, Wind G. Everyday life for users of electric wheelchairs – a qualitative interview study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2012;7(5):399-407. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.665976
29.	Böttger T, Dennhardt S, Knape J, Marotzki U. “Back into Life—With a Power Wheelchair”: Learning from People with Severe Stroke through a Participatory Photovoice Study in a Metropolitan Area in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(17):10465. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710465
30.	Pettersson C, Iwarsson S, Brandt Å, Norin L, Månsson Lexell E. Men’s and women’s perspectives on using a powered mobility device: Benefits and societal challenges. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2014;21(6):438-446. doi:10.3109/11038128.2014.905634
31.	Costa V de SP, Melo MRAC, Garanhani ML, Fujisawa DS. Social representations of the wheelchair for people with spinal cord injury. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2010;18(4):755-762. doi:10.1590/s0104-11692010000400014
32.	Edberg AK, Persson D. The Experience of Active Wheelchair Provision and Aspects of Importance Concerning the Wheelchair Among Experienced Users in Sweden. Published online 2011. Accessed April 13, 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/58484
33.	Evans S, Frank AO, Neophytou C, de Souza L. Older adults’ use of, and satisfaction with, electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. Age and Ageing. 2007;36(4):431-435. doi:10.1093/ageing/afm034
34.	Evans R. The Effect of Electrically Powered Indoor/Outdoor Wheelchairs on Occupation: A Study of Users’ Views. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2000;63(11):547-553. doi:10.1177/030802260006301108
35.	Fortin-Bédard N, de Serres-Lafontaine A, Best KL, et al. Experiences of Social Participation for Canadian Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Disabilities. 2022;2(3):398-414. doi:10.3390/disabilities2030028
36.	Frank A, Neophytou C, Frank J, de Souza L. Electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): users’ views of influence on family, friends and carers. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2010;5(5):327-338. doi:10.3109/17483101003746352
37.	Henje C, Stenberg G, Lundälv J, Carlsson A. Obstacles and risks in the traffic environment for users of powered wheelchairs in Sweden. Accid Anal Prev. 2021;159:106259. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106259
38.	Hjelle KM, Vik K. The ups and downs of social participation: experiences of wheelchair users in Norway. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2011;33(25-26):2479-2489. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.575525
39.	Korotchenko A, Hurd Clarke L. Power mobility and the built environment: the experiences of older Canadians. Disability & Society. 2014;29(3):431-443. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.816626
40.	Kristiansen L. Wanting a Life in Decency!—A Qualitative Study from Experienced Electric Wheelchairs Users’ perspective. Open Journal of Nursing. 2018;8(7):419-433. doi:10.4236/ojn.2018.87033
41.	Labbé D, Mortenson WB, Rushton PW, Demers L, Miller WC. Mobility and participation among ageing powered wheelchair users: using a lifecourse approach. Ageing & Society. 2018;40(3):626-642. doi:10.1017/S0144686X18001228
42.	Lindström M, Bäckström AC, Henje C, Stenberg G. ‘When I use the electric wheelchair, I can be myself’ – real-life stories about occupational identity construction. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2022;0(0):1-15. doi:10.1080/11038128.2022.2093268
43.	Mattie J, Aitken-Mundhenk L, Bicknell L, Mortenson WB, Borisoff J. Exploring the lived experience of people using ultralight wheelchairs with on-the-fly adjustable seating function. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2019;15(8):878-884. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1626920
44.	Giacobbi PRJ, Levy CE, Dietrich FD, Winkler SH, Tillman MD, Chow JW. Wheelchair Users’ Perceptions of and Experiences with Power Assist Wheels. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2010;89(3):225. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c9d7df
45.	Pfeiffer JL, Bower W, Rumrill P. Investigating the challenges of air travel in the United States: a qualitative study of the lived experiences of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury or disorder. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2024;10(1):1-7. doi:10.1038/s41394-024-00641-6
46.	Qiao G, Hou S, Chen Q, Xiang G, Prideaux B. Role of Body in Travel: Wheelchair Users’ Experience From a Multi-Sensory Perspective. Journal of Travel Research. Published online May 30, 2024:00472875241249391. doi:10.1177/00472875241249391
47.	Reid D, Angus J, McKeever P, Miller KL. Home Is Where Their Wheels Are: Experiences of Women Wheelchair Users. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2003;57(2):186-195. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.2.186
48.	Rogers A, Musselwhite C. Maintaining identity and relationships when using mobility aids. Journal of Transport & Health. 2023;28:101545. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2022.101545
49.	Rousseau-Harrison K, Rochette A, Routhier F, Dessureault D, Thibault F, Cote O. Perceived impacts of a first wheelchair on social participation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2012;7(1):37-44. doi:10.3109/17483107.2011.562957
50.	Rushton PW, Kairy D, Archambault P, et al. The potential impact of intelligent power wheelchair use on social participation: perspectives of users, caregivers and clinicians. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2014;10(3):191-197. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.907366
51.	Stenberg G, Henje C, Levi R, Lindström M. Living with an electric wheelchair – the user perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2016;11(5):385-394. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.968811
52.	Torkia C, Reid D, Korner-Bitensky N, et al. Power wheelchair driving challenges in the community: a users’ perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2014;10(3):211-215. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.898159
53.	Widehammar C, Lidström Holmqvist K, Pettersson I, Hermansson LN. Attitudes is the most important environmental factor for use of powered mobility devices – users’ perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2019;27(4):298-308. doi:10.1080/11038128.2019.1573918
54.	Brandt Å, Iwarsson S, Ståhle A. Older people’s use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. 2004;36(2). doi:DOI: 10.1080/16501970310017432
55.	Chan SC, Chan AP. User satisfaction, community participation and quality of life among Chinese wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. Occupational Therapy International. 2007;14(3):123-143. doi:10.1002/oti.228
56.	Davies A, Souza LHD, Frank AO. Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2009;25(6):286-290. doi:10.1080/0963828021000043734
57.	de Groot S, Post MWM, Bongers-Janssen HMH, Bloemen-Vrencken JH, van der Woude LHV. Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord. 2011;49(4):560-565. doi:10.1038/sc.2010.150
58.	Greenhalgh M, Rigot S, Eckstein S, Joseph J, Cooper RM, Cooper RA. A consumer assessment of women who use wheelchairs. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health. 2021;7(2):40-49. doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2020-0019
59.	Pettersson I, Ahlström G, Törnquist K. The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: a follow-up study. Assist Technol. 2010;19(3):143-153. doi:10.1080/10400435.2007.10131871
60.	Lanutti JNL, Medola FO, Gonçalves DD, da Silva LM, Nicholl ARJ, Paschoarelli LC. The Significance of Manual Wheelchairs: A Comparative Study on Male and Female Users. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;3:6079-6085. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.752
61.	Meyers AR, Anderson JJ, Miller DR, Shipp K, Hoenig H. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: sbstantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Social Science & Medicine. 2002;55(8):1435-1446. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00269-6
62.	Mortenson WB, Routhier F, Mahmood A, et al. Predictors of Psychological Distress and Confidence Negotiating Physical and Social Environments Among Mobility Device Users. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2022;101(4):324. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000001816
63.	Örücü Atar M, Köroğlu Ö, Çetinkaya Gezer İ, Özcan F, Şamlı F, Yılmaz B. The use of standing powered wheelchairs from the perspective of individuals with spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2024;0(0):1-5. doi:10.1080/17483107.2024.2359489
64.	Pettersson I, Törnquist K, Ahlström G. The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2009;1(4):235-243. doi:10.1080/17483100600757841
65.	Pousada García T, Groba González B, Nieto Rivero L, Pereira Loureiro J, Díez Villoria E, Pazos Sierra A. Exploring the Psychosocial Impact of Wheelchair and Contextual Factors on Quality of Life of People with Neuromuscular Disorders. Assist Technol. 2015;27(4):246-256. doi:10.1080/10400435.2015.1045996
66.	Ward AL, Hammond S, Holsten S, Bravver E, Brooks BR. Power Wheelchair Use in Persons With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Changes Over Time. Assistive Technology. 2015;27(4):238-245. doi:10.1080/10400435.2015.1040896
67.	Garber SL, Bunzel R, Monga TN. Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(4):521-534.
68.	May M, Rugg S. Electrically Powered Indoor/Outdoor Wheelchairs: Recipients’ Views of Their Effects on Occupational Performance and Quality of Life. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2010;73(1):2-12. doi:10.4276/030802210X12629548272583
69.	Rudman DL, Hebert D, Reid D. Living in a Restricted Occupational World: The Occupational Experiences of Stroke Survivors who are Wheelchair Users and Their Caregivers. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73(3):141-152. doi:10.2182/cjot.05.0014
70.	Salatino C, Andrich R, Converti RM, Saruggia M. An observational study of powered wheelchair provision in Italy. Assistive Technology. 2016;28(1):41-52. doi:10.1080/10400435.2015.1074631
71.	Rogers A, Musselwhite C. Maintaining identity and relationships when using mobility aids. Journal of Transport & Health. 2023;28:101545. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2022.101545
72.	Blach Rossen C, Sørensen B, Würtz Jochumsen B, Wind G. Everyday life for users of electric wheelchairs – a qualitative interview study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2012;7(5):399-407. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.665976
73.	Evans R. The Effect of Electrically Powered Indoor/Outdoor Wheelchairs on Occupation: A Study of Users’ Views. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2000;63(11):547-553. doi:10.1177/030802260006301108
74.	Evans S, Frank AO, Neophytou C, de Souza L. Older adults’ use of, and satisfaction with, electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. Age and Ageing. 2007;36(4):431-435. doi:10.1093/ageing/afm034
75.	Greenhalgh M, Rigot S, Eckstein S, Joseph J, Cooper RM, Cooper RA. A consumer assessment of women who use wheelchairs. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health. 2021;7(2):40-49. doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2020-0019
76.	Americans with Disabilities Act. Guide to Disability Rights Laws | ADA.gov. 2020. Accessed September 10, 2024. https://www.ada.gov/resources/disability-rights-guide/
77.	GOV UK. Definition of disability under the Equality Act 2010. GOV.UK. 2010. Accessed September 10, 2024. https://www.gov.uk/definition-of-disability-under-equality-act-2010
78.	Accessible Canada Act. Accessible Canada Act. 2019. Accessed September 10, 2024. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/a-0.6/page-1.html
79.	Lawson A, Beckett AE. The social and human rights models of disability: towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2021;25(2):348-379. doi:10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533
80.	Markets R and. Global Mobility Aid Devices Market (2021 to 2029) - Featuring Invacare, Sunrise Medical and Pride Mobility Products Among Others. GlobeNewswire News Room. May 25, 2021. Accessed August 15, 2023. https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2021/05/25/2235164/28124/en/Global-Mobility-Aid-Devices-Market-2021-to-2029-Featuring-Invacare-Sunrise-Medical-and-Pride-Mobility-Products-Among-Others.html
81.	Wheelchair Foundation. Worldwide Need. Wheelchair Foundation. 2023. Accessed August 15, 2023. https://www.wheelchairfoundation.org/fth/analysis-of-wheelchair-need/
82.	Rasoulivalajoozi M, Cucuzzella C, Farhoudi M. Perceived Inclusivity in Mobility Aids Use: A Qualitative Study in Iran. Disabilities. 2025;5(1):15. doi:10.3390/disabilities5010015
83.	Candiago A. Lack of Accessibility in the European capital. ENIL. January 31, 2024. Accessed February 13, 2025. https://enil.eu/lack-of-accessibility-in-the-european-capital/
84.	BBC news. Disability: Wheelchair user says life has become a battle.https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-61414495. May 12, 2022. Accessed September 10, 2024.
85.	Sadeghzadeh C. Disabled push for a better life in Iran. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34071843. August 29, 2015. Accessed August 2, 2024.
86.	Galer D. Disabled Capitalists: Exploring the Intersections of Disability and Identity Formation in the World of Work. Disability Studies Quarterly. 2012;32(3). doi:10.18061/dsq.v32i3.3277
87.	Hästbacka E, Nygård M, Nyqvist F. Barriers and facilitators to societal participation of people with disabilities: A scoping review of studies concerning European countries. Alter. 2016;10(3):201-220. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2016.02.002
88.	Müller R, Peter C, Cieza A, Geyh S. The role of social support and social skills in people with spinal cord injury—a systematic review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(2):94-106. doi:10.1038/sc.2011.116
89.	Pollard C, Kennedy P. A longitudinal analysis of emotional impact, coping strategies and post-traumatic psychological growth following spinal cord injury: A 10-year review. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2007;12(3):347-362. doi:10.1348/135910707X197046
90.	McCOLL MA, Friedland J. The effects of age and disability on social support. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 1995;18(4):325.
91.	Government of Canada D of J. Serious Problems Experienced by People with Disabilities Living in Atlantic Canada. December 2, 2021. Accessed September 10, 2024. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/pwdac-phca/findings-conclusions.html
92.	McClure J, Leah C. Is independence enough? Rehabilitation should include autonomy and social engagement to achieve quality of life. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(1):3-12. doi:10.1177/0269215520954344
93.	Domingues I, Pinheiro J, Silveira J, Francisco P, Jutai J, Correia Martins A. Psychosocial Impact of Powered Wheelchair, Users’ Satisfaction and Their Relation to Social Participation. Technologies. 2019;7(4):73. doi:10.3390/technologies7040073
94.	Barbareschi G, Carew MT, Johnson EA, Kopi N, Holloway C. “When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”—Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(8):4272. doi:10.3390/ijerph18084272
95.	Zhang X, Song Z, Huang Q, et al. Shared eHMI: Bridging Human–Machine Understanding in Autonomous Wheelchair Navigation. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(1):463. doi:10.3390/app14010463
96.	Cucuzzella C, Rasoulivalajoozi M, Farzamfar G. Spatial experience of cancer inpatients in the oncology wards: A qualitative study in visual design aspects. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2024;70:102552. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102552
97.	Smith EM, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):361-374. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.989420
98.	Damsté C, Gronholm PC, de Groot T, et al. Social contact as a strategy to reduce stigma in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and expert perspectives. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024;4(3):e0003053. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003053
99.	Strauser DG, Price RA, Brehmer CE, Strauser DR. Exploring Employer’s Successful Hiring and Retention Practices of Individuals with Disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. Published online July 26, 2024:00343552241265319. doi:10.1177/00343552241265319
100.	Saia T, Vogel E, Salazar S. “We need a world we can operate in”: Exploring the relationship between societal stigma and depression among wheelchair users. Disability and Health Journal. 2024;17(3):101624. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101624
101.	Rasoulivalajoozi M, Farhoudi M. Integrating user perceptions of socio-emotional aspects in wheelchair design: A pilot study using Kansei Engineering. Journal of Transport & Health. 2025;42:102002. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102002
102.	Desmet P, Dijkhuis E. A wheelchair can be fun: a case of emotion-driven design. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. DPPI ’03. Association for Computing Machinery; 2003:22-27. doi:10.1145/782896.782903
103.	Carneiro L, Rebelo F, Noriega P. Different Wheelchairs Designs Influence Emotional Reactions from Users and Non-users? In: Rebelo F, Soares MM, Rebelo F, Soares MM, eds. Advances in Ergonomics in Design. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. ; 2018:572-580. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_60
104.	Faraji A, Valajoozi MR. Interactive Foot Orthosis (IFO) for People with Drop Foot. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014;464:129-134. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.464.129
105.	Costa P, Figueredo FM da S and C, Portugal. Function versus emotion in a wheelchair design. In: Advances in Usability Evaluation Part II. CRC Press; 2012.
106.	Bühler D. Universal, Intuitive, and Permanent Pictograms: A Human-Centered Design Process Grounded in Embodied Cognition, Semiotics, and Visual Perception | SpringerLink. 01 ed. Springer Wiesbaden; 2022. Accessed August 16, 2023. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-32310-3