Login | Register

The Impact of Applying Open Innovation Practices on Performance of Firms in Nanotechnology Industry

Title:

The Impact of Applying Open Innovation Practices on Performance of Firms in Nanotechnology Industry

Sadreddin, Arman (2015) The Impact of Applying Open Innovation Practices on Performance of Firms in Nanotechnology Industry. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[img]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Sadreddin_MASc_F2015.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
3MB

Abstract

A distributed innovation process based on purposively managed knowledge flows across organization boundaries, using pecuniary and non-pecuniary mechanism in line with each organization’s business model is called Open Innovation according to Chesbrough. This thesis has two main objectives. First is to investigate the application of Open Innovation business model in nanotechnology sector both in Canada and worldwide and to compare it from different aspects. The second objective involves finding a causal relation between applying different Open Innovation practices and having better performance of firms. The thesis’ methodology involves an extensive online survey run in several countries whose results were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. Moreover, based on the gathered data a simulation model was created and several scenarios tested. The findings revealed that it is mostly large companies which implement Open Innovation practices, while the level of implementation is much lower among the small and medium enterprises. In Canada, these types of practices are more common in Quebec than in other provinces. European countries are known to be pioneers in Open Innovation business model, the results revealed a higher frequency of applying Open Innovation practices in European firms than Canadian firms mostly in collaborating with universities. The results of inferential statistical analysis suggest that applying both Outside-In, which is opening up company’s own innovation to other companies for any kinds of contribution, and Inside-Out, which is unused and unutilized ideas and technologies to be used by other firms and companies for their businesses, pecuniary Open Innovation practices together has a significant effect on the performance of firms in terms of an increase in technological and scientific outcomes (measured by the number of patents and articles). However, if only one type of pecuniary Open Innovation practice (either Outside-In or Inside-Out type) is applied then there is no such positive impact detected. The simulation model built in Vensim has considered four different scenarios and confirmed these findings as well and predicted the close future of the firms in this industry by applying the proposed scenarios. It is thus suggested to embrace the Open Innovation model in its entirety instead of focusing on the implementation of isolated practices.

Divisions:Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science
Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Sadreddin, Arman
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M.A. Sc.
Program:Quality Systems Engineering
Date:21 July 2015
Thesis Supervisor(s):Schiffauerova, Andrea
Keywords:Open Innovation, Business Model, Nanotechnology, Survey Analysis
ID Code:980308
Deposited By: ARMAN SADREDDIN
Deposited On:03 Nov 2015 15:50
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:51

References:

Al-Debei, M. M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Avison, D. (2008). Defining the business model in the new world of digital business. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), , 2008 1-11.
Alencar, M., Porter, A., & Antunes, A. (2007). Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9), 1661-1680.
Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more Hyperion.
Anderson, C. (2008). Free! Why $0.00 is the Future of Business.Wired, 16.03,
Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The future of a radical price Random House.
Batista, G. E., & Monard, M. C. (2003). An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 17(5-6), 519-533.
Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: Knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93-117.
Bogers, M., Bekkers, R., & Granstrand, O. (2012). Intellectual property and licensing strategies in open collaborative innovation. Open Innovation at Firms and Public Administrations: Technologies for Value Creation, , 37-58.
Buzea, C., Pacheco, I. I., & Robbie, K. (2007). Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases, 2(4), MR17-MR71.
Carlsson, S., Corvello, V., Inauen, M., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2011). The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 496-520.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34-41.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology Harvard Business Press.
Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation.Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming, , 3-28.
Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2013). Managing open innovation in large firms Fraunhofer Verlag.
Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&d Management, 36(3), 229-236.
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from xerox corporation's technology spin‐off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2014). New frontiers in open innovation Oxford University Press.
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709.
De Vaus, D. A. (2002). Surveys in social research Psychology Press.
Drexler, K. E. (1992). Nanosystems: Molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2015). How to receive more funding for your research? get connected to the right people! PLoS ONE,
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
Eslami, H., Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2013). Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: The case of biotechnology in canada. Scientometrics, 97(1), 99-119.
Evans, D. (2003). Managing the maze of multisided markets. Strategy and Business, 32
Evans, D. S., Hagiu, A., & Schmalensee, R. (2006). Invisible engines: How software platforms drive innovation and transform industries MIT Press Cambridge.
Fitzgibbons, K., & McNiven, C. (2006). Towards a nanotechnology statistical framework. Blue Sky Indicators Conference II,
Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2‐3), 245-256.
Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conference, , 6
Hagel, J., & Singer, M. (1999). Unbundling the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 77, 133-144.
Hoffmann, W. H., & Schlosser, R. (2001). Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises—An empirical survey. Long Range Planning, 34(3), 357-381.
Khan, A. S., Khan, M., Sharif, S., & Irfan, M. (2015). Open innovation in SME’s of southern punjab pakistan.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas,
Lakhani, K. R., & Panetta, J. A. (2007). The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations, 2(3), 97-112.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
Michelino, F., Lamberti, E., Cammarano, A., & Caputo, M. (2014). Measuring open innovation in the Bio‐Pharmaceutical industry. Creativity and Innovation Management,
Moazami, A., Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2015). A network perspective of academia-industry nanotechnology collaboration: Comparison of canada and the united states. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9
Mogoutov, A., & Kahane, B. (2007). Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy, 36(6), 893-903.
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152.
Nador, A., & Gray, B. (2005). Nanotechnology in canada. Nanotech.L.& Bus., 2, 199.
Noyons, E., Buter, R., Van Raan, A., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., & Rangnow, R. (2003). Mapping excellence in science and technology across europe: Life sciences. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers author: Alexander osterwalder, yves." Wiley.
Palmberg, C., Dernis, H., & Miguet, C. (2009). Nanotechnology: An overview based on indicators and statistics.
Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high‐tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283-309.
Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715-728.
Roco, M. C. (2011). The long view of nanotechnology development: The national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020 (pp. 1-28) Springer.
Roco, M. C., Mirkin, C. A., & Hersam, M. C. (2011). Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: Retrospective and outlook Springer Science & Business Media.
Samara, E., Georgiadis, P., & Bakouros, I. (2012). The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technovation, 32(11), 624-638.
Sargent Jr, J. F. (2013). The national nanotechnology initiative: Overview, reauthorization, and appropriations issues.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world Irwin/McGraw-Hill Boston.
Tayaran, E. (2011). Investigation of the Critical Factors in the Early Stage of the Innovation Process in Biotechnology: A System Dynamics Approach,
Tayaran, E., & Schiffauerova, A. (2012). The role of internal and external sources of knowledge in the product lifecycle in biotechnology sector. Product lifecycle management. towards knowledge-rich enterprises (pp. 46-57) Springer.
Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1997). The discipline of market leaders: Choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market Basic Books.
Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423-437.
Van der Meer, H. (2007). Open innovation–the dutch treat: Challenges in thinking in business models. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2), 192-202.
Victoria, N. (2005). Nanotechnology and the business community: A study of business' understanding of and attitudes towards nanotechnology.
Warris, C. (2004). Nanotechnology benchmarking project. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra,
West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831.
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open‐source software. R&d Management, 36(3), 319-331.
West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2005). Open innovation: A research Agenda1.
Xue, A. (2011). Nanotechnology funding: Corporations grab the reins.
Yuna, J. J., Wonb, D., Hwangc, B., Jungd, W., Kange, J., & Kimf, D.Exploration of the effects of open innovation policies on national innovation systems through system dynamics simulation: Applying the results to cambodia.
Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2006). Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1513-1531.
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (2005). Socio-Economic Impact of Nanoscale Science: Initial Results and Nanobank,
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top