Login | Register

Not Without Joy: A Reflective Practice Journey To Encouraging Literacy Through The Arts


Not Without Joy: A Reflective Practice Journey To Encouraging Literacy Through The Arts

McCann, Lauren A. (2014) Not Without Joy: A Reflective Practice Journey To Encouraging Literacy Through The Arts. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of McCann_PhD_S2014_pdfa.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
McCann_PhD_S2014_pdfa.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.


Not Without Joy: A Reflective Practice Journey To Encouraging Literacy Through The Arts
This thesis chronicles my journey as a kindergarten teacher-researcher as I apply the arts to inform early literacy skills. It is the teacher’s role to drive the curriculum and it is his or her past experiences that will determine its delivery. After researching into my past, and gaining insight into my teaching philosophy, I discovered my passion for educating through the arts. To improve my teaching practice, and uncover the impact of my art driven curriculum, I recorded my actions, wrote daily field notes and collected the works of my students in order to discover the impact my lessons had on their self-perceptions as they became readers.
Using the method of reflective practice, I question how teaching through the arts can support my students in visualizing themselves as readers while learning to read. The dissertation focuses on my daily reflections in regards to art activities intended to teach early literacy skills according to the International Reading Associations’ three reading standards. Reflections from these lessons are examined in parallel to the bi-monthly reading-self-portraits created by the students. Themes such as home and school emerge and, as the school year progresses, personal connections to reading are made as the children mature. Their reading-self-portraits evolve to illustrate lessons learned in class and conclusively depict independent reading. By expanding the definition of “literacy” to include new literacies and multimodality, and by validating the views of a reflective practitioner, I connect my teaching methods to my students’ improvement. Through reflective practice, I discover the key ingredient of a successful academic curriculum – joy.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Fine Arts > Art Education
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:McCann, Lauren A.
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Art Education
Date:February 2014
Thesis Supervisor(s):Blair, Lorrie
Keywords:kindergarten, early childhood, art education, reflective practice, literacy, multomodality
ID Code:978567
Deposited By: LAUREN MC CANN
Deposited On:16 Jun 2014 13:54
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:47


Anholt, L. (1994). Camille and the sunflowers. London, UK: Frances Lincoln Ltd.

Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Art Works for Students. (2013). Retrieved, March 17, 2013, from http://www.pz.gse.harvard.edu/art_works_for_schools.php

Ayers, W. (1989). The good preschool teacher: Six teachers reflect on their lives. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Bender,L. (1952). Child psychiatric techniques. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston,MA: Pearson.

Binder, M., & Kotsopoulos, S. (2011). Multimodal literacy narratives: Weaving the thread of young children’s identity through the arts. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(4), 339-363.

Block, C.C. (2006). Comprehension instruction: Research-based practices. In C. Cummins (Ed.), Understanding and implementing reading first initiatives: The changing role of administrators (pp. 72-89). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Block, C.C., Lacina, J. (2009). Comprehension instruction in kindergarten through grade three. In S. Israel and G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 494-509). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bolton, G. (2004). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Brice Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Brittain, W. L. (Ed.). (1968). Viktor Lowenfeld speaks on art and creativity. Washington, DC: National Art Education Association.

Bullough, R., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Research, 30(3), 13-21.

Burger, K., & Winner, E. (2000). Instruction in visual art: Can it help children learn to read? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 277-293.

Carroll, L. (1865). Alice’s adventures in wonderland. London, UK: Dent & Sons.

Chase, M. (2012). Revision process and practice: A kindergarten experience. Language Arts, 89(3), 166-178.

Cižek, F. (1927). Children’s coloured paper work. New York, NY: G.E. Stechert and Co.

Cole, A.L., & Knowles, J.G. (1993). Teacher development partnership research: A focus on methods and issues. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 473-495.

Cole, A., & Knowles, J.G. (2001). Lives in context: The art of life history research.Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Connelly, M. & Clandinin, D. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Country Springs Elementary Named Blue Ribbon School (2014). Retrieved January 29, 2014, from http://chino.groupfusion.net/modules/cms/pages.phtml?&pageid=25244&sessionid

Cox, S. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(2), 115-125.

Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Dadds, M. (2008). Empathetic validity in practitioner research. Education Action Research, 16(2), 279-290.

Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54(3), 77-80. Retrieved from http://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee Books.

Dolch, E. W. (1945). A manual for remedial reading (2nd ed.). Champaign, Ill: Garrand Press.

Dolch Word List. (1998-2013). Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.kidzone.ws/dolch/kindergarten.htm

Driscoll, A. & Nagel, N. (2008). Early childhood education: Birth-8 (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Dyson, A. H. (2002). Writing and children’s symbolic repertoires: Development unhinged. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 126-141). New York, NY: Guilford.

Edwards, C. Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach- advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.

Einarsdottir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217-232.

Eisner, E. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Evans, L. (2002). Reflective practice in educational research. New York, NY: Continuum.

Fitzgerald, F.S. (1925). The great gatsby. New York, NY: Scribner.

Forman, G., & Fyfe, B. (1998). Negotiated learning through design, documentation, and discourse. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children (pp. 239-260). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

Forman , G. (1998). Multiple symbolization in the long jump project. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach- advanced reflections (2nd ed.), (pp. 171-188). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

Gardner, H. (1973). The arts and human development. New York, NY: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawing. New York,
NY: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (2011). Intelligence, creativity, ethics: Reflections on my evolving research interests. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(4), 302-304.

Gee, J. P. (2000). The new literacy studies: From ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180-196). London, UK: Routledge.

Glaser, G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.

Goertez, J.P., & LeCompte, M.D. (1981). Ethnographic research and the problem of data reduction. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12(1), 51-70.

Goodenough, F. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawing. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Goodnow, J. (1977). Children drawing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Grimmett, P., MacKinnon, A., Erickson, G., & Riecken, T. (1990). Reflective practice in teacher education. In R.T. Clift, W.R. Houston & M.C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education (pp. 20-38). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Gunning, T. G. (2000). Creating literacy instruction for all children. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hamblen, K. (1997). Theories and research that support art instruction for instrumental outcomes. Arts Education Policy Review, 98(3), 27-33.

Hamilton, E. (2012). Video as a metaphorical eye: Images of positionality, pedagogy, and practice. College Teaching, 60(1), 10-16.

Hatfield, T. (1998). The future of art education: Student learning in the visual arts. NASSP Bulletin, 82(597), 9-17.
Hendrick, J. (Ed.). (2004). Next steps toward teaching the Reggio way (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson.

Hopperstad, M.H. (2010). Studying meaning in children’s drawings. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10 (4), 430-452.

Huey, E.B. (2009). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Newark, DE: The International Reading Association. (Original work published 1908)

Johnson, J., Musial, D., Hall, G., Dupuis, V., & Gollnick, D. (2008). Foundation of American education: Perspectives on education in a changing world. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Katz, L. (1993). What can we learn from Reggio Emilia? In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children (pp. 19-40). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

Kellogg, R. (1969). Analyzing children’s art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.

Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., & Lynch, J. (2007). Comprehension in preschool and early elementary children: Skill development and strategy interventions. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 27-46). New York, NYC: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kendrick, M. (2003). Converging worlds: Play, literacy, and culture in early childhood. Bern, CH: European Academic Publishers.

Kendrick, M., & Jones, S. (2008). Girls’ visual representations of literacy and identity in a rural Ugandan community. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 371-404.

Kim, M.S. (2011). Play, drawing and writing: A case study of Korean-Canadian young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19 (4), 483-500.

Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton, Inc.

Kreitler, H., Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London, UK: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2000a). Multimodality. In G. Cope & M. Kalantis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). London, UK: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2000b). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In G. Cope & M. Kalantis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153-161). London, UK: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2008). “Literacy” in a multimodal environment of communication. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts vol. II (pp. 91-100). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lantz, B. (1955). Easel age scale. Los Angeles, CA: California Test Bureau.

Lazear, D. (1991). (2nd ed.). Seven ways of knowing. Palatine, IL: Skylight Publishing, Inc.

Lincoln Y.S., & Gruba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Lionni, L. (1959). Little blue and little yellow. New York, NY: Astor Book.

Lowenfeld, V. (1957). Creative and mental growth (2nd ed.). Galt, ONT: Brett- Macmillan.

Lowenfeld, V., & Michael, J. A. (1982). The Lowenfeld lectures: Viktor Lowenfeld on art education and therapy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

Martin, B. (1989). Chicka chicka boom boom. New York, NY: Beach Lane Books.

Maxwell, J., & Miller, B. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In P. Leavy & S. Hesse-Biber (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461-477). New York, NY: Guilford.

May, W. (1997). Teachers-as-researcher or action research: What it is and what good is it for art education. In S. LaPierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp. 223-239). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

McKay, R., & Kendrick, M. (1999). Young children draw their images of literacy. The Reading Professor, 22(1), 8-34.

McKay, R., & Kendrick, M. (2001a). Children draw their images of reading and writing. Language Arts, 78(6), 529-533.

McKay, R., & Kendrick, M. (2001b). Images of literacy: Young children's drawings about reading and writing. Canadian Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 8(4), 7-22.

McKay, R., & Kendrick, M. (2002). Uncovering literacy narratives through children’s drawings. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(1), 45–60.

McKay, R., & Kendrick, M. (2003). Revisiting Children's Images of Literacy. Language and Literacy, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.langandlit.ualberta.ca/archives/vol51papers/0304_ken_mck/index.htm

McKay, R. & Kendrick, M. (2004). Drawings as an alternative way of understanding young children’s constructions of literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4(1), 109-128.

McKay, R., & Kendrick, M. (2009). Researching literacy with young children’s drawings. In N. Marily (Ed.), Making meaning: Constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning through arts-based early childhood education (pp. 53- 70). New York, NY: Springer.

McNiff, J & Whitehead, J. (2005). Action research for teachers: A practical guide. New York, NY: David Fulton Publishers.

Mirkhil, M. (2010). “I want to play when I go to school”: Children’s views on the transition to school from kindergarten. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(3), 134-139.

Mooney, C. (2000). Theories of childhood. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Mosel, A. (1968). Tikki tikki tembo. New York, NY: Henry Holt.

Munby, H. (April,1995). Gazing in the mirror: Asking questions about validity in self- study research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389726)

Narey, M. (Ed.). (2009). Making meaning: Constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning through arts-based early childhood education. New York, NY: Springer.

Oczkus, L. (2008). Reading comprehension puppets: The fabulous four. Berkeley, CA: Primary Concepts.
Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few: The folly of educational standards. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Page-Smith, A., & Craft, A. (2010). Introduction to part 1. In A. Paige-Smith & A. Craft (Eds.), Developing reflective practice in the early years (pp. 11), Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

Pahl, K. (2007). Creativity in events and practices: A lens for understanding children’s multimodal text. Literacy, 41(2), 86-92.

Piaget, J. (1973a). To understand is to invent. (G. A. Roberts, Trans.). New York, NY: Grossman Publishers. (Original work published 1948)

Piaget, J. (1973b). The child and reality. (A. Rosin, Trans.). New York, NY: Grossman Publishers. (Original work published 1972)

Piasta, S., & Wagner, R. (2010). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(1), 8-38.

Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer.

Postman, N. (1981). The day our children disappear: Predictions of a media ecologist. Phi Delta Kappan, 62(5), 382-386.

Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York, NY: Guilford.

Purcell-Gates, V. (1997). Stories, coupons, and the TV Guide: Relationships between home literacy experiences and emergent literacy knowledge. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 406-428.

Purcell- Gates, V. (Ed.). (2007). Cultural practices of literacy: Case studies of language, literacy, social practice and power. New York, NY: Routledge.

Rasinski, T., Homan, S., & Biggs, M. (2009) Teaching reading fluency to struggling readers: Method, materials, and evidence. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(2-3), 192- 204.

Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350-361.

Resnick, L., & Hampton, S. (2009). Reading and writing grade by grade. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Richardson, V. (1990). The evolution of reflective teaching and teacher education. In R. Clift, W.R. Houston & M. C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education (pp. 3-19). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Rinaldi, C. (1998). Project curriculum constructed through documentation- progettazione: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The Hundred Languages of Children (pp. 113-126). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

Rinaldi, C. (2001). Reggio Emilia: The image of the child and the child
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top