Login | Register

The impact of institutional investors’ cross-ownership in takeover process, empirical results in SIC 7300 industry


The impact of institutional investors’ cross-ownership in takeover process, empirical results in SIC 7300 industry

Zhang, Yushi (2015) The impact of institutional investors’ cross-ownership in takeover process, empirical results in SIC 7300 industry. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Zhang_MSc_S2015.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Zhang_MSc_S2015.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.


Institutional investors exert an important influence in the takeover process. Several relationships are identified in this paper. Institutional ownership increases the probability of firms becoming takeover targets. The cross-holders’ (institutional investors owning shares in both acquirers and targets) shares before takeover bids are negatively related to the likelihood of takeover success, offer price and total acquirers’ premiums. Institutional investors and cross-holders achieve insignificant positive excess returns around the announcement period, compared to heavy loss of total acquirer stockholders. Higher excess returns during event window (-1, +1) will raise the possibility that acquiring firms becoming new targets in following three years. The empirical results are derived from 7300 industry (Business Service Industry) from 1985 to 2010.

Divisions:Concordia University > John Molson School of Business > Finance
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Zhang, Yushi
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M. Sc.
Program:Administration (Finance option)
Date:12 February 2015
Thesis Supervisor(s):Betton, Sandra
Keywords:Key words: Institutional investors; Cross-ownership; Takeovers; Takeover gains
ID Code:979717
Deposited By: YUSHI ZHANG
Deposited On:13 Jul 2015 16:30
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:49


Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. N. (1987). Managerial incentives and corporate investment and financing decisions. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 823-837.
Aktas, N., De Bodt, E., & Roll, R. (2013). MicroHoo: Deal failure, industry rivalry, and sources of overbidding. Journal of Corporate Finance, 19, 20-35.
Ambrose, B. W., & Megginson, W. L. (1992). The role of asset structure, ownership structure, and takeover defenses in determining acquisition likelihood. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(04), 575-589.
Andrade, G., Mitchell, M. L., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers.
Baxter, N. D. (1985). Is Bigger Better? Banking Expansion Reporter, (March 18, 1985: Harcourt Brace Jov-anovich, Publishers).
Berkovitch, E., & Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28 (03), 347-362.
Betton, S., & Eckbo, B. E. (2000). Toeholds, bid jumps, and expected payoffs in takeovers. Review of financial studies, 13(4), 841-882.
Betton, S., Eckbo, B. E., & Thorburn, K. S. (2009). Merger negotiations and the toehold puzzle. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(2), 158-178.
Black, B. S. (1999). First International Merger Wave (and the Fifth and Last US Wave), The. U. Miami L. Rev., 54, 799.
Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of financial Economics, 21(1), 3-40.
Branch, B., Wang, J., & Yang, T. (2008). A note on takeover success prediction. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(5), 1186-1193.
Bris, A. (2002). Toeholds, takeover premium, and the probability of being acquired. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(3), 227-253.
Bugeja, M., & Walter, T. (1995). An empirical analysis of some determinants of the target shareholder premium in takeovers. Accounting & Finance, 35(2), 33-60.
Bulow, J., Huang, M., & Klemperer, P. (1999). Toeholds and takeovers. Journal of
Carleton, W. T., Guilkey, D. K., Harris, R. S., & Stewart, J. F. (1983). An empirical analysis of the role of the medium of exchange in mergers. The Journal of Finance, 38(3), 813-826.
Chatterjee, S. (1992). Sources of value in takeovers: synergy or restructuring–implications for target and bidder firms. Strategic management journal, 13(4), 267-286.
Coffee, J. C. (1991). Liquidity versus control: The institutional investor as corporate monitor. Columbia Law Review, 1277-1368.
Fee, C. E., & Thomas, S. (2004). Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(3), 423-460.
Goldman, E., & Qian, J. (2005). Optimal toeholds in takeover contests. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 321-346.
Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis. Granite Hill Publishers.
Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: some theory and implications. The economic journal, 678-
The impact of institutional investors’ cross-ownership in takeover process
- 75 -
Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic management journal, 13(2), 135-144.
Hausman, J. A. and McFadden, D. (1984), “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model,” Econometrica, 52, 1219–1240.
Hensher, D. A. (1986). Sequential and full information maximum likelihood estimation of a nested logit model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 657-667.
Hensher, D. A. (1991). Efficient estimation of hierarchical logit mode choice models. (425), 17-28.
Howe, W. J. (1986). The business services industry sets pace in employment growth. Monthly Labor Review, 29-36.
Huang, Y. S., & Walkling, R. A. (1987). Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcements: Payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2), 329-349.
Jarrell, G. A., Brickley, J. A., & Netter, J. M. (1988). The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 49-68.
Jarrell, G. A., & Poulsen, A. B. (1987). Shark repellents and stock prices: The effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(1), 127-168.
Jarrell, G. A., & Poulsen, A. B. (1989). The returns to acquiring firms in tender offers: Evidence from three decades. Financial Management, 12-19.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 323-329.
Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1), 5-50.
Jovanovic, B., & Braguinsky, S. (2002). Bidder discounts and target premia in takeovers (No. w9009). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata press.
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasseman, W. (1996). Applied Linear Statistical Models.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89 (1), 20-43.
McFadden, D. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of public economics, 3(4), 303-328.
Mitchell, M. L., & Lehn, K. (1990). Do bad bidders become good targets? Journal of Political Economy, 372-398.
Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 201-228.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, (1988), Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers, in A. J.
Mowery, D. C. (1995). International Computer Software Industry. Oxford University Press, Inc..
Palepu, K. G. (1986). Predicting takeover targets: A methodological and empirical analysis. Journal
The impact of institutional investors’ cross-ownership in takeover process
- 76 -
of accounting and economics, 8(1), 3-35.
Patell, J. M. (1976). Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical test. Journal of accounting research, 246-276.
Ravid, S. A., & Spiegel, M. (1999). Toehold strategies, takeover laws and rival bidders. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(8), 1219-1242.
Romano, R. (2001). Less is more: making institutional investor activism a valuable mechanism of corporate governance. Yale J. on Reg., 18, 174.
Ruback, R. S. (1987). An overview of takeover defenses. In Mergers and acquisitions (pp. 49-68). University of Chicago Press.
Servaes, H. (1991). Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 409-419.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy, 461-488.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2003). Stock market driven acquisitions.Journal of financial Economics, 70(3), 295-311.
Singh, R. (1998). Takeover Bidding with Toeholds: The Case of the Owner's Curse. Review of Financial Studies, 679-704.
Stimmelmayr, M., Liberini, F., & Russo, A (2014). The Role of Toeholds and Capital Gain Taxes for Corporate Acquisition Strategies.
Stulz, R. M., Walkling, R. A., & Song, M. H. (1990). The distribution of target ownership and the division of gains in successful takeovers. The Journal of Finance, 45(3), 817-833.
Travlos, N. G. (1987). Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms' stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 943-963.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top