Login | Register

Eco-Design Improvement at the Conceptual Design Stage: Methodology and Applications


Eco-Design Improvement at the Conceptual Design Stage: Methodology and Applications

Alemam, Abdulbaset Mohamed Elhabib (2015) Eco-Design Improvement at the Conceptual Design Stage: Methodology and Applications. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Alemam_PhD_F2015.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Alemam_PhD_F2015.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.


While quality tools are familiar to industries for the continuous improvement of products, the associated tools can be adopted to make significant contributions that address environmental concerns. This aligns eco-design with the product improvement process. This thesis proposes an eco-design improvement method, in which the eco-design tools are systematically integrated for the purpose of reducing environmental impacts. In this context, this work focuses on the adaptations of quality tools for supporting the generation of new eco-design concepts.
The developed methodology consists of three major phases. The first phase is concerned with the development of a relational matrices model. This phase is intended to explicitly capture the information of an existing design via relational models. These models are based on the integration of quality function deployment (QFD) and functional analysis (FA). The QFD process requires mapping quality attributes and design attributes to identify the attributes’ relationships to the existing design. The integration approach used is based on developed relational matrices to capture the relationships among environmental requirements, engineering metrics, design functions and physical components. In addition, FA focuses on functional decomposition of a design to support the generation of design concepts. One important feature of this phase is to connect the environmental requirements to the design functions.
The second phase is concerned with the generation of design concepts. In this phase, after identifying the functions that are responsible for reducing environmental impacts, a morphological chart is used to support the synthesis of new design concepts. The third phase considers environmental impact assessments and concept selection. In this phase, two methods are developed: Pugh chart and fuzzy assessment. The Pugh chart is intended to evaluate the newly generated concepts via the delegated engineering metrics. As well, fuzzy assessment is intended to capture the imprecise design information at the conceptual design stage. To address this research problem using fuzzy assessments, the trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are first applied to capture imprecise design information for each design concept. A decision guide is also proposed to suggest a course of action based on the results of fuzzy assessments. This phase is also concerned with ways to incorporate such imprecise information with eco-indicators for decision making.
Finally, for the demonstration and validation, the proposed methodology is applied to three case examples. These examples are in two different contexts. The methodology is first applied to home appliances, which are a coffee maker and hair dryer. Then, the suggested methodology is extended to the forming processes, specifically, the diaphragm forming process (DFP). This application of the diaphragm process is demonstrated through the assessment of the energy consumption of the usage stage. The developed methodology illustrates potential reduction in energy consumption for the generated designs of the applied examples. The results show the applicability of the proposed methodology.

Divisions:Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:Alemam, Abdulbaset Mohamed Elhabib
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Mechanical Engineering
Date:8 July 2015
Thesis Supervisor(s):Li, Simon and Chen, Mingyuan
Keywords:Eco-design, Conceptual design, Quality function deployment, Pugh chart, Morphological chart and Fuzzy set approach
ID Code:980133
Deposited By: Abdulbaset Mohamed Elhabib Alemam
Deposited On:28 Oct 2015 12:43
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:50


Abele, E., Anderl, R., and Birkhofer, H. (2005). Environmentally-friendly product development: methods and tools. Springer.
Afrinaldi, F., and Zhang, H.-C. (2014). A fuzzy logic based aggregation method for life cycle impact assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 67, 159-172.
Akao, Y. (1990). Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press, New York.
Ashby, M. F. (2009). Materials and the environment: eco-informed material choice. Elsevier, Boston.
Bare, J. C., and Gloria, T. P. (2008). Environmental impact assessment taxonomy providing comprehensive coverage of midpoints, endpoints, damages, and areas of protection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(10), 1021-1035.
Benetto, E., Dujet, C., and Rousseaux, P. (2008). Integrating fuzzy multicriteria analysis and uncertainty evaluation in life cycle assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23(12), 1461-1467.
Bersee, H., Lindstedt, S., Niño, G., and Beukers, A. (2007). Diaphragm forming of thermoset composites. The 16th international conference on composite materials, Kyoto International Conference Center, Kyoto, Japan, July. 8-13.
Bigot, R., Leleu, S., and Martin, P. (2003). Forming machine qualification by analysis of manufactured parts geometry: application to aluminium forming process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(7), 476-482.
Bocken, N., Allwood, J., Willey, A., and King, J. (2011). Development of an eco-ideation tool to identify stepwise greenhouse gas emissions reduction options for consumer goods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(12), 1279-1287.
Boclin, A. d. S. C., and de Mello, R. (2006). A decision support method for environmental impact assessment using a fuzzy logic approach. Ecological Economics, 58(1), 170-181.
Bohm, M. R., Haapala, K. R., Poppa, K., Stone, R. B., and Tumer, I. Y. (2010). Integrating life cycle assessment into the conceptual phase of design using a design repository. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091005-091005.
Bovea, M., and Wang, B. (2003). Identifying environmental improvement options by combining life cycle assessment and fuzzy set theory. International Journal of Production Research, 41(3), 593-609.
Brue, G., and Launsby, R. G. (2003). Design for six sigma: McGraw-Hill.
Chen, C., Zhu, J., Yu, J.-Y., and Noori, H. (2012). A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(2), 348-359.
Chen, S.-H. (1985). Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(2), 113-129.
Cheng, C.-H. (1998). A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 95(3), 307-317.
Cristofari, M., Deshmukh, A., and Wang, B. (1996). Green quality function deployment. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on environmentally conscious design and manufacturing, Cleveland, July. 23-25.
Devanathan, S., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., and Ramani, K. (2010). Integration of sustainability into early design through the function impact matrix. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(8), 081004-081001.
Dieter, G., and Schmidt, L. (2009). Engineering Design, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dong, C., Zhang, C., and Wang, B. (2003). Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy multi-attribute utility theory-based cost estimation for environmentally conscious product development. International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing, 11(1), 12-28.
Du, Y., Cao, H., Chen, X., and Wang, B. (2013). Reuse-oriented redesignmethod of used products based on axiomatic design theory and QFD. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39(0), 79-86.
Duflou, J. R., Sutherland, J. W., Dornfeld, D., Herrmann, C., Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., Hauschild, M., and Kellens, K. (2012). Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: a processes and systems approach. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 61(2), 587-609.
Eppinger, S. D., and Ulrich, K. T. (1995). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Facchinetti, G., Ricci, R. G., and Muzzioli, S. (1998). Note on ranking fuzzy triangular numbers. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 13(7), 613-622.
Fiksel, J. (2009). Design for Environment: a guide to sustainable product development, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., and Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1-21.
Fitzgerald, D. P., Herrmann, J. W., and Schmidt, L. C. (2010). A conceptual design tool for resolving conflicts between product functionality and environmental impact. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091006-1.
Fresner, J., and Jantschgi, D. J. (2010). TRIZ to imporve material efficiency and energy efficiency of industrial production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 128-136.
Gibovic, D., and de Ciurana, J. (2008). Introduction and applications of DIN 8580. University of Girona, ISBN, 978-984.
Goedkoop, M., Effting, S., and Collignon, M. (2000). The Eco-indicator 99: A Damage Oriented Method for Life-cycle Impact Assessment: Manual for Designers, PRé Consultants, Netherlands.
Goedkoop, M., and Spriensma, R. (2001). The eco-indicator99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology report.
Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., and Van Zelm, R. (2009). ReCiPe 2008, Ministry of Housing, Spatial, Planning and Environment, Netherlands.
González, B., Adenso-Dıaz, B., and González-Torre, P. (2002). A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 37(1), 61-79.
Graedel, T., Allenby, B., and CΟMRIΕ, P. (1995). Matrix approaches to abridged life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 29(3), 134A-139A.
Güereca, L. P., Agell, N., Gassó, S., and Baldasano, J. M. (2007). Fuzzy approach to life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12(7), 488-496.
Guinta, L. R., and Praizler, N. C. (1993). The QFD book: the team approach to solving problems and satisfying customers through quality function deployment. Amacom.
Gutowski, T., Dahmus, J., and Thiriez, A. (2006). Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. The 13th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Leuven, May. 31 - June. 2.
Haapala, K. R., Catalina, A. V., Johnson, M. L., and Sutherland, J. W. (2012). Development and application of models for steelmaking and casting environmental performance. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 134(5), 051013.
Haapala, K. R., Zhao, F., Camelio, J., Sutherland, J. W., Skerlos, S. J., Dornfeld, D. A., Jawahir, I., Clarens, A. F., and Rickli, J. L. (2013). A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 135(4), 041013.
Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N. H., and Clarkson, P. J. (2013). A matrix-calculation-based algorithm for numerical change propagation analysis. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 60(1), 186-198.
Harper, S. R., and Thurston, D. L. (2008). Incorporating environmental impacts in strategic redesign of an engineered system. Journal of Mechanical Design, 130(3), 031101.
Hauser, J. R., and Clausing, D. (1988). The house of quality. Harverd Business.
Ingarao, G., Di Lorenzo, R., and Micari, F. (2011). Sustainability issues in sheet metal forming processes: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(4), 337-347.
Jacobus, O. D., Henning, V. J., Keith, C. I., and Christiaan, P. P. (2001). Modelling of the off-gas exit temperature and slag foam depth of an electric arc furnace. ISIJ international, 41(4), 399-401.
Jiang, Z., Fan, Z., Sutherland, J. W., Zhang, H., and Zhang, X. (2014). Development of an optimal method for remanufacturing process plan selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 72(9-12), 1551-1558.
Kaebernick, H., Kara, S., and Sun, M. (2003). Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(6), 461-468.
Kellens, K., Dewulf, W., Overcash, M., Hauschild, M. Z., and Duflou, J. R. (2012). Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 2: case studies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(2), 242-251.
Kim, D. B., Shin, S.-J., Shao, G., and Brodsky, A. (2014). A decision-guidance framework for sustainability performance analysis of manufacturing processes. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1-17.
Kirschman, C., and Fadel, G. (1998). Classifying functions for mechanical design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(3), 475-482.
Kishita, Y., Low, B. H., Fukushige, S., Umeda, Y., Suzuki, A., and Kawabe, T. (2010). Checklist-based assessment methodology for sustainable design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091011.
Kobayashi, H. (2006). A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning. Advanced engineering informatics, 20(2), 113-125.
Kuo, T.-C., Chang, S.-H., and Huang, S. H. (2006). Environmentally conscious design by using fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 29(5), 419-425.
Kuo, T.-C., Wu, H.-H., and Shieh, J.-I. (2009). Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7148-7156.
Kutz, M. (2007). Environmentally conscious mechanical design. (Vol. 1). Wiley Online Library, New Jersey.
Lee, K. H. (2006). First course on fuzzy theory and applications. Springer, New York.
Lind, M. (1994). Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial plants. Applied Artificial Intelligence an International Journal, 8(2), 259-283.
Linton, J. D. (2002). DEA: a method for ranking the greeness of design decisions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 124(2), 145-150.
Liou, T.-S., and Wang, M.-J. J. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), 247-255.
Liu, K. F., and Lai, J.-H. (2009). Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: a hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5119-5136.
Lloyd, S. M., and Ries, R. (2007). Characterizing, propagating, andanalyzing uncertainty in life‐cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(1), 161-179.
Lo, C.-H., Tseng, K. C., and Chu, C.-H. (2010). One-Step QFD based 3D morphological charts for concept generation of product variant design. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(11), 7351-7363.
Long, A. C. (2007). Composites forming technologies. Woodhead Publishing limited,Cambridge.
Masui, K., Sakao, T., Kobayashi, M., and Inaba, A. (2003). Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 90-106.
McCarty, T., Jordan, M., and Probst, D. (2011). Six sigma for sustainability. McGraw Hill Professional.
Millet, D., Bistagnino, L., Lanzavecchia, C., Camous, R., and Poldma, T. (2007). Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(4), 335-346.
Oduoza, C. F., and Harris, A. (2011). Knowledge management to support product development in cold roll-forming environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 57(5-8), 585-596.
Otto, K., and Wood, K. (2001). Product design:techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Overcash, M., Twomey, J., and Isaacs, J. (2009). Manufacturing unit process life cycle inventories (Uplci). Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems. Gaithersburg, USA, Sept. 21 - 23.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., and Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3th edition, Springer-Verlag, London.
Paralikas, J., Salonitis, K., and Chryssolouris, G. (2013). Energy efficiency of cold roll forming process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(9-12), 1271-1284.
Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., Choi, J.-K., Kim, H., and Thurston, D. (2010). Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a Review. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091001-091015.
Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., and Ramani, K. (2011). Addressing uncertainties within product redesign for sustainability: a function based framework. Proceedings of the ASME International design engineering technical conferences& computers and information in engineering conference, Washington, DC, USA, August 28-31.
Rathod, G., Vinodh, S., and Madhyasta, U. (2011). Integration of ECQFD and LCA for enabling sustainable product design in an electric vehicle manufacturing organisation. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(3), 202-214.
Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.-P., Suh, S., Weidema, B. P., and Pennington, D. (2004). Life cycle assessment: part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment international, 30(5), 701-720.
Reza, B., Sadiq, R., and Hewage, K. (2013). A fuzzy-based approach for characterization of uncertainties in emergy synthesis: an example of paved road system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 99-110.
Russo, D., Rizzi, C., and Montelisciani, G. (2014). Inventive guidelines for a TRIZ-based eco-design matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 95-105.
Sakao, T. (2007). A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4143-4162.
Shillito, M.L. (1994). Advanced QFD: linking technology to market and company Needs, John wiley & sons, New York.
Shupe, J. A., Mistree, F., and Sobieszanski-Sobieski, J. (1987). Compromise: an effective approach for the hierarchical design of structural systems. Computers & Structures, 26(6), 1027-1037.
Smiley, A., and Pipes, R. (1988). Analysis of the diaphragm forming of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 1(4), 298-321.
Statistics Canada. (2005). Human activity and the environment, Catalogue No. 16-201-XIE.
Stone, R. B., and Wood, K. L. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 359-370.
Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic design: advances and applications, Oxford University Press, New York.
Suiran, Y., Kato, S., and Kimura, F. (2001). Eco-design for product variety: a multi-objective optimisation framework. EcoDesign2001, Tokyo, Japan, 293-298.
Tan, R. R. (2008). Using fuzzy numbers to propagate uncertainty in matrix-based LCI. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(7), 585-592.
Telenko, C., and Seepersad, C. C. (2010). A methodology for identifying environmentally conscious guidelines for product design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091009.
Tucker, C. (1997). Forming of advanced composites. Wiley, New York.
Ullman, D. G. (2003). The mechanical design process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wang, Y.-M., Yang, J.-B., Xu, D.-L., and Chin, K.-S. (2006). On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(7), 919-926.
Weckenmann, A., and Schwan, A. (2001). Environmental life cycle assessment with support of fuzzy-sets. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 6(1), 13-18.
Wood, K. L., Otto, K. N., and Antonsson, E. K. (1992). Engineering design calculations with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 52(1), 1-20.
Xie, M., Goh, T. N., and Tan, K.-C. (2003). Advanced QFD applications. Asq Press.
Yang, J. (2011). Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(4), 444-457.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top