Login | Register

The Kindergarten Effect: Exploring the Influence of Communities of Practice on Adult L2 Willingness to Communicate

Title:

The Kindergarten Effect: Exploring the Influence of Communities of Practice on Adult L2 Willingness to Communicate

Taylor, Kym (2016) The Kindergarten Effect: Exploring the Influence of Communities of Practice on Adult L2 Willingness to Communicate. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Taylor_MA_F2016.pdf]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Taylor_MA_F2016.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
1MB

Abstract

Though previous research suggests that adult second language (L2) learners can face a number of struggles (e.g., Gallagher, 2013; Mady & Arnott, 2010), one of the biggest challenges for these learners is finding the confidence to communicate with their interlocutors, often native speakers of the L2. At the center of this challenge is the construct of willingness to communicate (WTC), which is typically operationalized as a measure of a learner’s comfort level in initiating communication with native speakers (MacIntyre, Babin, & Clément, 1999). One example of a rich, welcoming, nonthreatening, and nonjudgmental learning environment that might encourage
WTC is a kindergarten classroom, where young children acquire group communicative, social, and academic skills. The goal of this longitudinal case study was to examine the impact of adult L2 learners’ experience in a kindergarten classroom as a means of enhancing their WTC. The
target participants included four female international university students from China of similar age, L2 proficiency, and English instruction background. Two students attended a local kindergarten classroom three times per week for five weeks, in addition to their regular
university ESL courses; the other two attended regular ESL instruction at the university, but did not visit the kindergarten classroom. All students were pre- and posttested using a willingness to communicate scale (McCroskey & Richmond, 1990) and evaluated through weekly language use logs (Ranta & Meckelborg, 2013). The experimental participants were observed through weekly kindergarten observations (Spada & Frohlich, 1995). Journals were completed by the students
after each visit, and exit interviews were conducted with the participants’ university professors. Results revealed a positive impact of the kindergarten environment on the students’ WTC (shown in both self-reports and observations) that has extended to the students’ L2 use outside the kindergarten context. These results support the use of communicatively rich, nonthreatening communities of practice as vehicles for increasing WTC. I discuss implications for WTC as a construct and for the use of volunteer opportunities to supplement regular L2 instruction.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Education
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Taylor, Kym
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M.A.
Program:Applied Linguistics
Date:September 2016
Thesis Supervisor(s):Trofimovich, Pavel
Keywords:Willingness to communicate, communities of practice, interaction
ID Code:981841
Deposited By: Kym Taylor
Deposited On:04 Nov 2016 19:28
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:53

References:

Abbott, M. (2002). Using music to promote L2 learning among adult learners. TESOL Journal,
11(1), 10-17.
Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct, and sequential. American Educator,
25(1), 24-28.
Brown, R., Salerno, R. A., & Sachs, J. (1972). Some characteristics of adults' speech to children.
(Report No. 6), University of Connecticut, Language Acquisition Laboratory.
Cameron, D. (2015). ‘In New Zealand I feel more confidence’: The role of context in the willingness to communicate (WTC) of migrant Iranian English language learners. International Journal of English Studies, 15(2), 61-80.
Cao, Y. (2006). Temporal fluctuation in situational willingness to communicate in a second language classroom. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 1-16.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.
Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468-479.
Catsambis, S., & Buttaro, A. (2012). Revisiting “Kindergarten as academic boot camp”: A
nationwide study of ability grouping and psycho-social development. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 483-515.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1997). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching?. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 141-152.
Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209.
D’Amico, M. L. (2012). L2 fluency and willingness to communicate: The impact of short-term study abroad versus at-home study. US-China Foreign Language, 10(10), 1608-1625.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.) The handbook of second language learning (pp. 313-348). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
de Saint Léger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for
willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269-285.
De Swaan, A. (2013). Words of the world: The global language system. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Donovan, L. A., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2004). Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self‐perceived competence. Communication Research Reports, 21(4), 420-427.
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The psychology of the language learner. New York: Routledge.
Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2011). Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, (pp. 95-116). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In C. Snow & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children (pp. 209-235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, C. A. (1982). Simplified registers and linguistic theory. In L. Obler & L. Menn (Eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics (pp. 49-66). New York: Academic Press.
Florin, A. (1998). From communication to verbalization: Language practices in kindergarten. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(3), 335-345.
Fomeche, S. (2014). Using poetry to enrich the vocabulary of adult English language learners in colleges and universities (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University).
Fry, R., & Lowell, B. L. (2003). The value of bilingualism in the US labor market. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 57(1), 128-140.
Gaies, S. J. (1976). ESL teachers’ classroom speech: Support for the L1=L2 hypothesis. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the New York State English to Speakers of Other Languages and Bilingual Education Association, 6th, Albany, NY, October 22-24, 1976.
Gallagher, H. C. (2013). Willingness to communicate and cross-cultural adaptation: L2 communication and acculturative stress as transaction. Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 53-73.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez‐Torres, M. J., & Fernández‐García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549-581.
Granowsky, S., & Krossner, W. J. (1970). Kindergarten teachers as models for children’s speech. The Journal of Experimental Education, 38(4), 23-28.
Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2013). Capitalizing on language learners' individuality: From premise to practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Griffiths, R. (1992). Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 385-391.
Hagiwara, A. (2015). Effect of visual support on the processing of multiclausal sentences. Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 455-472.
Harklau, L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 241-272.
Hart, T. M. (2014). Language development in kindergarten students using melodic learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.lib.rowan.edu
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. University of Hawai'i Second Language Studies Paper 20(2), 29-70.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319.
Housen, A. (2012). Time and amount of L2 contact inside and outside the school: Insights from The European schools. In Muñoz, C. (Ed.). Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (Vol. 65). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Hummel, K. M. (2013). Target-language community involvement: Second-language linguistic
self-confidence and other perceived benefits. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), 65-90.
Iino, A., & Yabuta, Y. (2015, August). The effects of video SCMC on English proficiency, speaking performance and willingness to communicate. In Critical CALL–Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy (p. 254).
Irvine, J. T. (1996). Language and community: Introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 6(2), 123-125.
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 131-161.
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.
Kelch, K. (1985). Modified input as an aid to comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(1), 81-89.
Kennedy, S. (2012). Exploring the relationship between language awareness and second language use. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 398-408.
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Fatemi, A. H., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to Communicate in English: A Microsystem Model in the Iranian EFL Classroom Context.
TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154-180.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, H., & Sung, K. (2014). WTC in EMI: Correlational factors and college learners’ perceptions. Foreign Languages Education, 21(2), 75-106.
Lewthwaite, M. (1996). A study of international students' perspectives on cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 19(2), 167-185.
Lu, Y., & Hsu, C. F. (2008). Willingness to communicate in intercultural interactions between Chinese and Americans. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37(2), 75-88.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135-142.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564-576.
MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clément, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 215-229.
MacIntyre, P., Baker, S., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness tocommunicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589-608.
Macintyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students’ willingness to communicate. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 81-96.
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The
Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System,
38(2), 161-171.
Macintyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect.
Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149-171.
Mady, C., & Arnott, S. (2010). Exploring the “situation” of situational willingness to communicate: A volunteer youth exchange perspective. Canadian Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 13(2), 1-26.
Matsuoka, R., & Evans, D. R. (2005). Willingness to communicate in the second language. J Nurs Studies, National College of Nursing, Japan, 4(1), 3-12.
McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Self-report measurement. In J. A. Daly & J. C. McCroskey, Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 81-94). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(2), 19-24.
Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 573-603.
Munezane, Y. (2013). Attitudes, affect and ideal L2 self as predictors of willingness to communicate. EUROSLA Yearbook, 13(1), 176-198.
Munezane, Y. (2015). Enhancing Willingness to Communicate: Relative Effects of Visualization
and Goal Setting. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 175-191.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech the role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 451-468.
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.
Oliver, R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 372-386.
Peng, J. E. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL classroom: A cultural perspective. English language teaching in China: New approaches, perspectives and standards, 2(1), 250-269.
Peng, J. E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203-213.
Peng, J. E., Zhang, L., and Chen, Y. (in press). The mediation of multimodal affordances on willingness to communicate in the English as a foreign language classroom. TESOL Quarterly.
Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.
Ranta, L., & Meckelborg, A. (2013). How much exposure to English do international graduate students really get? Measuring language use in a naturalistic setting. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), 1-33.
Roach, K. D. (1999). The influence of teaching assistant willingness to communicate and communication anxiety in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 166-182.
Rost, M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Listening in language learning. London: Routledge.
Rothman, R. (2011). Something in common: The Common Core standards and the next chapter in American education. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Schecter, S. R., & Bayley, R. (2004). Language socialization in theory and practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(5), 605-625.
Spada, N., & Frohlich, M. (1995). COLT Observation Scheme: Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching Coding Conventions. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Springer, S., & Collins, L. (2008). Interacting inside and outside of the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 39-60.
Sterling, E., Bravo, A., Porzecanski, A. L., Burks, R. L., Linder, J., Langen, T., ... & Bynum, N. (2016). Think Before (and After) You Speak: Practice and Self-Reflection Bolster Oral Communication Skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(6), 87.
Sun, C. (2015). The Cultivation of Cross-cultural Communication Competence in Oral English Teaching Practice. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 7.
Tanaka, K. (2007). Japanese students’ contact with English outside the classroom during study abroad. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 36-54.
Tedescoe, J., & Patterson, R. (2015). Efficacy of voice pedagogy training on communication apprehension and social facilitation. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 2(4), 95-102.
Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in Internet interest communities and online gaming. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 802-821.
Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualisation of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.
Yaman, Ş., & Özcan, M. (2015). Oral communication strategies used by Turkish students learning English as a foreign language. In M. Pawlak and E. Waniek-Klimczak (Eds.), Issues in teaching, learning, and testing speaking in a second language (pp. 143-158). New York: Springer.
Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2016). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research,
Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1362168816657851
Yashima, T., & Zenuk-Nishide, L. (2008). The impact of learning contexts on proficiency, attitudes, and L2 communication: Creating an imagined international community. System, 36(4), 566-585.
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a Low‐Anxiety Classroom Environment: What Does Language Anxiety Research Suggest?. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426-437.
Zhong, Q. M. (2013). Understanding Chinese learners' willingness to communicate in a New Zealand ESL classroom: A multiple case study drawing on the theory of planned behavior. System, 41(3), 740-751.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top