Login | Register

Development of an LC-MS assay for putative biomarkers of anaphylaxis: urinary 11β-prostaglandinF2α and leukotrieneE4

Title:

Development of an LC-MS assay for putative biomarkers of anaphylaxis: urinary 11β-prostaglandinF2α and leukotrieneE4

Gupta, Ankita (2019) Development of an LC-MS assay for putative biomarkers of anaphylaxis: urinary 11β-prostaglandinF2α and leukotrieneE4. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Gupta_MSc_F2019.pdf]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Gupta_MSc_F2019.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
3MB

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a hypersensitivity reaction that is rapid in onset and can be fatal. In recent years there has been a concerning increase in anaphylactic cases worldwide. Due to the limitations of currently used biomarkers of anaphylaxis such as narrow time collection window for blood and/or poor applicability to food-induced anaphylaxis, there is a need to assess new biomarkers of anaphylaxis. Urinary 11β-prostaglandinF2α (11β-PGF2α) and leukotrieneE4 (LTE4) were recently proposed as possible new biomarkers of anaphylaxis. However, these studies relied on immunoassay-based methods, which may not be able to distinguish all isomers, and small cohorts, thus requiring more rigorous follow-up studies. The objective of this project was to develop and validate a highly selective ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight (UHPLC-QTOF) method for the accurate analysis of urinary 11β-PGF2α and LTE4.
C18 reversed-phase chromatography was used for the separation of isomers. Mobile phase A was 0.02% acetic acid in water and mobile phase B was 0.02% acetic acid in acetonitrile/iso-propanol (90:10). The isocratic flow and shallow gradient of mobile phase B gave a baseline separation of PGF isomers and LTE4 isomers, respectively. Both positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) were tested for the ionization of LTE4. Negative ESI was selected based on the signal-to-noise ratio, which was 7x higher in negative ESI than positive ESI.
Solid phase extraction (SPE) was selected for sample preparation to achieve sufficient enrichment to enable the measurement of low endogenous levels of these two putative biomarkers. Three different SPE sorbents were tested for recovery of 11β-PGF2α and LTE4: mixed-mode strong anion-exchange, mixed-mode weak anion-exchange and reversed-phase C18. C18 SPE was selected for the sample preparation based on the analyte recovery and minimum extraction of interferences. Separate SPE elution of 11β-PGF2α and LTE4 was chosen as the best strategy to minimize background signal and improve the limits of detection of LTE4. A forced degradation study of LTE4 showed that LTE4 is not stable at a pH below 4 and hence strict control of pH was required throughout the procedure. The use of 6 μL of 30% glycerol in method (v/v) improved the method precision by reducing analyte losses in non-specific adsorption.
11β-PGF2α is also excreted as glucuronic acid conjugate in urine. Hence, to quantitate total endogenous 11β-PGF2α concentrations in urine, β-glucuronidase enzyme hydrolysis was used.
The method was validated for accuracy, precision, linearity, recovery, matrix effects and stability. The validation was performed using deuterated internal standards as surrogate analytes since both 11β-PGF2α and LTE4 are present endogenously. Intra-day accuracy for ranged from 90-111% and 86-108% for 11β-PGF2α-d4 and LTE4-d5, respectively. The method showed good intra-day precision (% RSD = 4.0-7.4% and % RSD = 6.8-14.9% for 11β-PGF2α-d4 and LTE4-d5 respectively). The method was linear from 9.8-5000 pg/mL concentration of both analytes. Inter-day accuracies were 91-100% (% RSD = 4.2-8.4%) for 11β-PGF2α-d4 and 93-113% (% RSD = 4.9-8.8%) for LTE4-d5. The lower limit of quantitation of both analytes was 15 pg/mL. The recoveries were 92-95% and 77-83% and the matrix effects were 83-88% and 99-115% for 11β-PGF2α-d4 and LTE4-d5, respectively in pooled urine from six different individuals. Recovery and matrix effects were also evaluated in nine individual urine lots. The 11β-PGF2α-d4 recovery ranged from 70-116% and LTE4-d5 recovery ranged from 61-99% across nine urine lots. Matrix effects for 11β-PGF2α-d4 ranged from 69-106% and matrix effects for LTE4-d5 ranged from 87-126% across nine urine lots, suggesting that slight matrix effects were present in individual samples as compared to matrix effects in pooled urine. 11β-PGF2α-d4 was stable for up to three freeze-thaw cycles whereas LTE4 was stable only up to one freeze-thaw cycle indicating that urine samples should be aliquoted and free-thaw cycles should be avoided for LTE4 quantitation. Both analytes were stable in the freezer for up to three-week period.
Overall, this novel validated and highly selective LC-MS method for urinary 11β-PGF2α and LTE4 can be used for anaphylaxis biomarker analysis in clinical studies and addresses some of the key shortcomings in other LC-MS assays reported in literature such as low LTE4 recovery and lack of data on isomer separation.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Chemistry and Biochemistry
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Gupta, Ankita
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M. Sc.
Program:Chemistry
Date:May 2019
Thesis Supervisor(s):Vuckovic, Dajana
Keywords:Anaphylaxis, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography, quadrupole-time-of-flight, reversed-phase chromatography, solid phase extraction, 11β-ProstaglndinF2α, leukotrieneE4, urine, biomarkers
ID Code:985601
Deposited By: Ankita Gupta
Deposited On:05 Feb 2020 02:29
Last Modified:22 Jun 2021 01:00

References:

1. Dworetzky, M., Cohen, S., Cohen, S. G. & Zelaya-Quesada, M. Portier, Richet, and the discovery of anaphylaxis: A centennial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 110, 331–336 (2002).
2. Simons, F. E. R., Ardusso, L. R. F. & Bilò, M. B. World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ. J. 2,13–37 (2011).
3. Simons, F. E. R. 9. Anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 121, 402–407 (2008).
4. Bloom, B., Simpson, J. L. Tables of Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Children: 2015 National Health Interview Survey. Natl. Cent. Heal. Stat. 7, 6 (2016).
5. Turner P.J., Gowland M.H., Sharma V., Ierodiakonou D., Harper N., Garcez T., Pumphrey R., Boyle R.J .Increase in anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: An analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992-2012. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 135, 956-963.e1 (2015).
6. Tejedor Alonso, M. A., Moro Moro, M., Múgica García, M. V. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis. Clin. Exp. Allergy 45, 1027–1039 (2015).
7. Hochstadter E., Clarke A., De Schryver S., LaVieille S., Alizadehfar R., Joseph L., Eisman H., Ben-Shoshan M. Increasing visits for anaphylaxis and the benefits of early epinephrine administration: A 4-year study at a pediatric emergency department in Montreal, Canada. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 137, 1888-1890e4 (2016).
8. Kindt, T. J., Goldsby, R. A., Osborne, B. A., Kuby, J. Kuby Immunology. Chapter 16 (W. H. Freeman, 2007).
9. Reber, L. L., Hernandez, J. D., Galli, S. J. The pathophysiology of anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 140, 335–348 (2017).
10. Chapman, J., Lalkhen, A. G. Anaphylaxis. in Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine 18, 16–21 (2017).
11. Stone, S. F., Brown, S. G. A. Mediators Released During Human Anaphylaxis. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 12, 33–41 (2012).
12. PerkinElmer. ChemDraw.
13. Kemp, S. F., Lockey, R. F. Anaphylaxis: A review of causes and mechanisms. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 110, 341–348 (2002).
14. Simons F.E., Frew A.J., Ansotegui I.J., Bochner B.S., Golden D.B., Finkelman F.D., Leung D.Y., Lotvall J., Marone G., Metcalfe D.D., Müller U., Rosenwasser L.J., Sampson H.A., Schwartz L.B., van Hage M., Walls A.F. Risk assessment in anaphylaxis: Current and future approaches. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 120, 2–24 (2007).
15. Phadia.com. ImmunoCAP Tryptase. (2012). Available at: http://www.phadia.com/da/Products/Allergy-testing-products/ImmunoCAP-Lab-Tests/ImmunoCAP-Tryptase/. (Accessed: 30th August 2017)
16. Cayman. Histamine EIA kit. Available at: https://www.caymanchem.com/product/589651. (Accessed: 20th August 2017)
17. Jahn, U., Galano, J.-M., Durand, T. Beyond prostaglandins--chemistry and biology of cyclic oxygenated metabolites formed by free-radical pathways from polyunsaturated fatty acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 5894–5955 (2008).
18. Balgoma D., Larsson J., Rokach J., Lawson J.A., Daham K., Dahlén B., Dahlén S.E., Wheelock C.E. Quantification of lipid mediator metabolites in human urine from asthma patients by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: Controlling matrix effects. Anal. Chem. 85, 7866–7874 (2013).
19. Jerschow, E., Lin, R. Y., Scaperotti, M. M. & McGinn, A. P. Fatal anaphylaxis in the United States, 1999-2010: Temporal patterns and demographic associations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 134, 1318-1328.e7 (2014).
20. Miyazaki, E., Kumamoto, T. Increased production of cysteinyl leukotrienes and prostaglandin D2 during human anaphylaxis. Clin. Exp. Allergy 39, 72–80 (2008).
21. Higashi N., Mita H., Ono E., Fukutomi Y., Yamaguchi H., Kajiwara K., Tanimoto H., Sekiya K., Akiyama K., Taniguchi M. Profile of eicosanoid generation in aspirin-intolerant asthma and anaphylaxis assessed by new biomarkers. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, 1084-1091.e6 (2010).
22. Cross, T. G. & Hornshaw, M. P. Can LC and LC-MS ever replace immunoassays? J. Appl. Bioanal. 2, 108–116 (2016).
23. Fernández-Peralbo, M. A., Luque de Castro, M. D. Preparation of urine samples prior to targeted or untargeted metabolomics mass-spectrometry analysis. TrAC - Trends Anal. Chem. 41, 75–85 (2012).
24. Arsenault, J. C. Beginner’s Guide to SPE : Solid-Phase Extraction. (Waters Corporation, 2012).
25. Karst, U. Wilfried M.A. Niessen: Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (Third edition). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389, (2007).
26. McMaster, M. C. LC MS - A Practical User’s Guide. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2005).
27. Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F. & Whitehouse, C. M. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science. 246, 64–71 (1989).
28. Niessen, W. M. A. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Third Edition. (CRC Press, 2006).
29. Agilent. Agilent 6200 Series TOF and 6500 Series Q-TOF LC / MS System Concepts Guide The Big Picture. (2014).
30. Sterz, K., Scherer, G. & Ecker, J. A simple and robust UPLC-SRM/MS method to quantify urinary eicosanoids. J. Lipid Res. 53, 1026–1036 (2012).
31. Armstrong M., Liu A.H., Harbeck R., Reisdorph R., Rabinovitch N., Reisdorph N. Leukotriene-E4 in human urine : Comparison of on-line purification and liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry to affinity purification followed by enzyme immunoassay. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 877, 3169–3174 (2009).
32. Hušek P., Švagera Z., Hanzlíková D., Řimnáčová L., Zahradníčková H., Opekarová I., Šimek P. Profiling of urinary amino-carboxylic metabolites by in-situ heptafluorobutyl chloroformate mediated sample preparation and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1443, 211–232 (2016).
33. Bouatra S., Aziat F., Mandal R., Guo A.C., Wilson M.R., Knox C., Bjorndahl T.C., Krishnamurthy R., Saleem F., Liu P., Dame Z.T., Poelzer J., Huynh J., Yallou F.S., Psychogios N., Dong E., Bogumil R., Roehring C., Wishart D.S. The human urine metabolome. PLoS One 8, e73076–e73076 (2013).
34. Gronwald W., Klein M.S., Zeltner R., Schulze B.D., Reinhold S.W., Deutschmann M., Immervoll A.K., Böger C.A., Banas B., Eckardt K.U., Oefner P.J. Detection of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease by NMR spectroscopic fingerprinting of urine. Kidney Int. 79, 1244–1253 (2011).
35. Kumlin M, Stensvad F, Larsson L, Dahlén B, Dahlén SE. Validation and application of a new simple strategy for measurements of urinary leukotriene E4 in humans. Clin. Exp. Allergy 25, 467–479 (1995).
36. Toewe, A., Balas, L., Durand, T., Geisslinger, G. & Ferreirós, N. Simultaneous determination of PUFA-derived pro-resolving metabolites and pathway markers using chiral chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1031, 185–194 (2018).
37. Lueke A.J., Meeusen J.W., Donato L.J., Gray A.V., Butterfield J.H., Saenger A.K. Analytical and clinical validation of an LC–MS/MS method for urine leukotriene E4: A marker of systemic mastocytosis. Clin. Biochem. 49, 979–982 (2016).
38. Sasaki A., Fukuda H., Shiida N., Tanaka N., Furugen A., Ogura J., Shuto S., Mano N., Yamaguchi H. Determination of ω-6 and ω-3 PUFA metabolites in human urine samples using UPLC/MS/MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407, 1625–1639 (2015).
39. US FDA Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. (2018).
40. Pugia, M. J., Lott, J. A., Wallace, J. F., Cast, T. K. & Bierbaum, L. D. Assay of creatinine using the peroxidase activity of copper-creatinine complexes. Clin. Biochem. 33, 63–70 (2000).
41. Monnin, C., Ramrup, P., Daigle-Young, C. & Vuckovic, D. Improving negative liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry lipidomic analysis of human plasma using acetic acid as a mobile-phase additive. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 32, 201–211 (2018).
42. 11b-PGF2a (HMDB0010199). Available at: http://www.hmdb.ca/metabolites/HMDB0010199. (Accessed: 12th May 2019)
43. Leukotriene E4 (HMDB0002200). Available at: http://www.hmdb.ca/metabolites/HMDB0002200. (Accessed: 12th May 2019)
44. LTE4, Cayman Chemicals. Available at: https://www.caymanchem.com/pdfs/20410.pdf. (Accessed: 12th May 2019)
45. Thakare, R., Chhonker, Y. S., Gautam, N., Alamoudi, J. A. & Alnouti, Y. Quantitative analysis of endogenous compounds. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 128, 426–437 (2016).
46. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). Available at: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/CLIA/Resources/IQCP/. (Accessed: 12th May 2019)
47. 11β-Prostaglandin F2α ELISA Kit, Cayman Chemicals. Available at: https://www.caymanchem.com/product/516521. (Accessed: 12th May 2019)
48. Willemsen M.A., Rotteveel J.J., de Jong J.G., Wanders R.J., IJlst L., Hoffmann G.F., Mayatepek E. Defective metabolism of Leukotriene B4 in the Sjögren–Larsson Syndrome. J. Neurol. Sci. 183, 61–67 (2001).
49. Cayman. Leukotriene E4 EIA Kit. Available at: https://www.caymanchem.com/pdfs/501060.pdf. (Accessed: 3rd December 2017)
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top