Login | Register

Towards an Accurate Probabilistic Modeling and Statistical Analysis of Temporal Faults via Temporal Dynamic Fault-Trees (TDFTs)


Towards an Accurate Probabilistic Modeling and Statistical Analysis of Temporal Faults via Temporal Dynamic Fault-Trees (TDFTs)

Ammar, Marwan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-4924, Bany Hamad, Ghaith ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-2710, Ait Mohamed, Otmane ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-1443 and Savaria, Yvon (2019) Towards an Accurate Probabilistic Modeling and Statistical Analysis of Temporal Faults via Temporal Dynamic Fault-Trees (TDFTs). IEEE Access, 7 . pp. 29264-29276. ISSN 2169-3536

[thumbnail of Ammar-IEEE Access-2019.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Ammar-IEEE Access-2019.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902796


Fault tree (FT) is a standardized notation for representing relationships between a system's reliability and the faults and/or the events associated with it. However, the existing FT fault models are only capable of portraying permanent events in the system. This is a major hindrance since these models fail to reflect accurately the other classes of faults, such as soft-faults, which are often temporary events that usually disappear after the source of the interference is no longer present. This paper proposes a new fault tree modeling paradigm, to capture the impact of temporal events in systems, called temporal dynamic fault trees (TDFTs). TDFTs are utilized to model the characteristics and dependencies between different temporal events, soft-faults, and permanent faults. These features are integrated into the proposed probabilistic models of the temporal gates, which are modeled as priced-timed automata. This paper also proposes a new FT analysis methodology, based on statistical model checking, designed to circumvent the state-explosion problem that is inherent to other model-checking approaches. The proposed analysis is able to evaluate the impact of temporal faults in systems, as well as to estimate the reliability and availability of the system over extended periods of time. The experiments reported in this paper demonstrate the versatility and scalability of the proposed approach. For instance, the results display the impact that temporal events may have in a digital system. Our observations indicate that while regular soft-fault analyses tend to underestimate metrics such as system reliability, TDFT analysis shows remarkable consistency with radiation testing, with differences of under 2%, in the conducted analysis.

Divisions:Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Electrical and Computer Engineering
Item Type:Article
Authors:Ammar, Marwan and Bany Hamad, Ghaith and Ait Mohamed, Otmane and Savaria, Yvon
Journal or Publication:IEEE Access
  • Concordia Open Access Author Fund
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902796
Keywords:Fault tree, temporal events, radiation effects, single-event effects, statistical modelchecking, formal verification, system-level analysis, reliability, availability
ID Code:986161
Deposited By: Krista Alexander
Deposited On:06 Dec 2019 19:52
Last Modified:06 Dec 2019 19:52


1. W. E. Vesely et al., "Fault tree handbook", 1981, [online] Available: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1007/ML100780465.pdf.

2. H. Boudali, P. Crouzen, M. Stoelinga, "Dynamic fault tree analysis using input/output interactive Markov chains", Proc. IEEE/IFIP Int. Conf. Dependable Syst. Netw., pp. 708-717, Jun. 2007.

3. M. Walker et al., " Synthesis and analysis of temporal fault trees with PANDORA 1 : The time of Priority AND gates ", Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst., vol. 2, pp. 368-382, Jun. 2008.

4. P. G. Wijayarathna, M. Maekawa, "Extending fault trees with an AND-THEN gate", Proc. Int. Symp. Softw. Rel. Eng., pp. 283-292, Oct. 2000.

5. M. Walker et al., "Compositional temporal fault tree analysis" in Computer Safety Reliability and Security, Berlin, Germany:Springer, pp. 106-119, 2007.

6. M. Walker et al., "A hierarchical method for the reduction of temporal expressions in pandora", Proc. 1st Workshop Dyn. Aspects Dependability Models Fault-Tolerant Syst., pp. 7-12, Apr. 2010.

7. E. Ruijters, M. Stoelinga, "Fault tree analysis: A survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling analysis and tools", Comput. Sci. Rev., vol. 15, pp. 29-62, Mar. 2015.

8. K. D. Rao, V. Gopika, V. V. S. Rao, H. S. Kushwaha, A. K. Verma, A. Srividya, "Dynamic fault tree analysis using monte carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment", Rel. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 872-883, Apr. 2009.

9. J. Faulin et al., Simulation Methods for Releaty Availability Complex System, New York, NY, USA:Springer, 2010.

10. C. Dehnert et al., "A storm is coming: A modern probabilistic model checker", Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Aided Verification, pp. 592-600, Sep. 2017.

11. F. Arnold et al., "Dftcalc: A tool for efficient fault tree analysis", Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Saf. Rel. Secur., pp. 293-301, 2013.

12. M. Volk et al., Advancing dynamic fault tree analysis, 2016, [online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07474.

13. L. H. Mutuel, "Single event effects mitigation techniques report", 2016, [online] Available: https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/design_approvals/air_software/media/TC-15-62.pdf.

14. S. Mukherjee, Archit. Design for Soft Errors, Burlington, MA, USA:Morgan Kaufmann, 2011.

15. C. Bottoni et al., "Heavy ions test result on a 65nm sparc-v8 radiation-hard microprocessor", Proc. IEEE Int. Rel. Phys. Symp., pp. 58-75, Aug. 2014.

16. K. J. Sullivan et al., "The galileo fault tree analysis tool", Proc. 29th Annu. Int. Symp. Fault-Tolerant Comput., pp. 232-235, Jun. 1999.

17. S. J. Schilling, Contribution to temporal fault tree analysis without modularization and transformation into the state space, 2015, [online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04511.

18. S. Kabir, M. Walker, Y. Papadopoulos, E. Rüde, P. Securius, "Fuzzy temporal fault tree analysis of dynamic systems", Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol. 77, pp. 20-37, Oct. 2016.

19. Z. Peng et al., "Risk assessment of railway transportation systems using timed fault trees", Qual. Rel. Eng. Int., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 181-194, Feb. 2016.

20. A. David et al., "Uppaal SMC tutorial", Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 397-415, Aug. 2015.

21. E. Cheshmikhani, H. R. Zarandi, "Probabilistic analysis of dynamic and temporal fault trees using accurate stochastic logic gates", Microelectron. Rel., vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 2468-2480, Nov. 2015.

22. F. L. Kastensmidt et al., Fault-Tolerance Techniques for SRAM-Based FPGAs, New York, NY, USA:Springer, vol. 32, 2006.

23. P. Adell et al., "Analysis of single-event transients in analog circuits", IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2616-2623, Dec. 2000.

24. A. H. Johnston, G. M. Swift, T. F. Miyahira, L. D. Edmonds, "A model for single-event transients in comparators", IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2624-2633, Dec. 2000.

25. G. B. Hamad et al., "New insights into soft-faults induced cardiac pacemakers malfunctions analyzed at system-level via model checking", IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 62107-62119, 2018.

26. M. Kwiatkowska et al., "Performance analysis of probabilistic timed automata using digital clocks", Formal Methods Syst. Des., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 33-78, Aug. 2006.

27. S. Friedenthal et al., A Practical Guide to SysML: System Modeing Language, Burlington, MA, USA:Morgan Kaufmann, 2014.

28. F. Mhenni et al., "Automatic fault tree generation from sysml system models", Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatron., pp. 715-720, 2014.

29. A. Wald, "Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses", Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 117-186, 1945.

30. J. Bechta Dugan, S. J. Bavuso, M. A. Boyd, "Dynamic fault-tree models for fault-tolerant computer systems", IEEE Trans. Rel., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 363-377, Sep. 1992.

31. F. Piedad, M. Hawkins, High Availability: Design Technical Processes, New York, NY, USA:Prentice Hall, 2001.

32. G. K. Palshikar, "Temporal fault trees", Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 137-150, 2002.

33. A. Rae et al., "A behaviour-based method for fault tree generation", Proc. Int. Syst. Saf. Conf. Syst. Saf. Soc., pp. 289-298, 2004.

34. The SPARC Architecture Manual: Version 8, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA:Prentice-Hall, 1992.

35. M. Daněk et al., "The leon3 processor" in Exploring Fine-Grain Multi-Threading FPGAs, New York, NY, USA:Springer, pp. 9-14, 2013.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top