Login | Register

We Gain a lot…But What Are We Losing? A Critical Reflection on the Implications of Digital Design Technologies


We Gain a lot…But What Are We Losing? A Critical Reflection on the Implications of Digital Design Technologies

Soulikias, A., Cucuzzella, Carmela ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-8518, Nizar, Firdous ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-671X and Goubran, Sherif ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-0351 (2021) We Gain a lot…But What Are We Losing? A Critical Reflection on the Implications of Digital Design Technologies. Open House International . (In Press)

[thumbnail of PDF_Proof.PDF]
Text (application/pdf)
PDF_Proof.PDF - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0041


Purpose. Highly sophisticated digital technologies, have distanced architects and designers from intimate and immediate hand-drawing practices. Meanwhile the changes they rapidly bring come with undetected changes in cultural and social norms regarding the built environment. The growing dependence on computers calls for a more holistic, socially inclusive, and place-responsive design practice. This paper attempts to shed light on what we are losing in the design process as we rapidly transition to digital media used to communicate architecture. We contemplate the paradigms in which the human body and physical objects still play an important role in today's design environment. Approach. The paper looks at current trends in developing and establishing "computer imaging" within architectural education, and the architectural profession through parametric design and the area of sustainability. In order to reveal novel and hybrid ways of architectural image-making, it also looks into art forms that already experiment with bodily practices in design, taking an artisanal animation project as a case study. Findings. The renewed longing for craft, haptic environments, tactile experiences, and hand-crafted artefacts and artworks that engage the senses can be exemplified with the success of the documentary Last Dance on the Main, an animated film on the endangered layers of human presence in one of Montreal's downtown neighbourhoods. The open possibilities for creative hybridizations between the handmade and the digital in architecture practice and education are exposed. Originality. The influence of film on the perception and consequent design of cities is well documented. There is little literature, however, on how the materiality and process of artisanal film animation can provide alternative, if not additional, insights on how to communicate various aspects of the built environment, particularly those rooted in the human body. Furthermore, handmade film explores a broader understanding of sustainability, which includes considerations for social and cultural contexts.

Divisions:Concordia University > School of Graduate Studies > Individualized Program
Item Type:Article
Authors:Soulikias, A. and Cucuzzella, Carmela and Nizar, Firdous and Goubran, Sherif
Journal or Publication:Open House International
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0041
ID Code:988495
Deposited On:19 Apr 2022 19:57
Last Modified:19 Apr 2022 19:57


Open House International
AALTO, A., 1985. Instead of an Article [1958]. In: Alvar Aalto, ed. Göran Schildt, Sketches. Cambridge, Mass,
London, England
AL-QAWASMI, J., 2005. Digital media in architectural design education: reflections on the e-studio
pedagogy. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education. 4, 205-222.
ALLEN, S., 2009. Practice: architecture, technique + representation. Routledge, London.
ANDREW, F., 1991. Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
AWAN, N., SCHNEIDER, T. and TILL, J., 2013. Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture. Routledge.
BARKER, J.M, (2009) The tactile eye: touch and the cinematic experience. University of California Press,
Berkeley, CA.
BARRIOS HERNANDEZ, C. R., 2006. Thinking parametric design: introducing parametric Gaudi. Design
Studies. 27, 309-324.
BEDER, S., 1994. The role of technology in sustainable development. IEEE Technology and society magazine,
Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 14–19.
BENJAMIN, W. AND ARENDT, H., 2007. Illuminations, Schocken Books, New York, NY.
BRUNO, G., 2014. Surface. University of Chicago Press, London.
BUCHANAN, P., 2012. What’s wrong with architectural education? Almost everything. The Architectural
Review. URL https://www.architectural-review.com/today/1989-july-whats-wrong-with-architecturaleducation-almost-everything (accessed 11.5.20).
BURRY, M., 2013. Scripting cultures: architectural design and programming. Somerset, Wiley.
CESCHIN, F. AND GAZIULUSOY, I., 2016. “Evolution of design for sustainability: From Product design to
design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 47, pp. 118–163.
COLLINS, P., 1971. Architectural judgement. McGill-Queen’s University Press: Montreal.
CORMIER, A., 2020. Zoom-in, zoom-out – sustainability in the scale(s) of Architecture. In Cucuzzella, C. and
Goubran, S. Eds. Sustainable architecture – between measurement and meaning. Wilmington, Delaware,
Vernon Press, pp. 14–23.
CUCUZZELLA, C., 2020. Sustainable architecture as facticity, perception, and potential. In Cucuzzella, C. and
Goubran, S. Eds. Sustainable architecture – between measurement and meaning. Wilmington, Delaware,
Vernon Press, pp. 24–45.
CUCUZZELLA, C., CHUPIN, J.-P. AND HAMMOND, C., 2020. Eco-didacticism in art and architecture: design
as means for raising awareness. Cities. Vol. 102, p. 102728.
Open House International
CUCUZZELLA, C. AND GOUBRAN, S., 2019. Infrastructure as a deeply integrated sustainable urban project.
Journal of Sustainability Research. Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1–29.
CUCUZZELLA, C. AND GOUBRAN, S., 2020. Caught between measurement and meaning. In Cucuzzella, C.
and Goubran, S. Eds. Sustainable architecture – between measurement and meaning. Wilmington,
Delaware, Vernon Press, pp. 1–13.
DINO, I., 2012. Creative design exploration by parametric generative systems in architecture. METU Journal of
Faculty of Architecture, 29(1), 207–224.
EHRENFELD, J., 2009. Sustainability by design: a subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture.
Yale University Press, London.
EISENSTEIN, S. M., BOIS, Y.-A., AND GLENNY, M., 1989. Montage and architecture. Assemblage (10), 111-
ELLUL, J., 1964. The technological society. Vintage, New York, NY.
FARMER, G. AND GUY, S., 2004. Hybrid environments: the spaces of sustainable design. In Guy, S. and Moore,
S.A. (Eds.), Sustainable architectures: critical explorations of green building practice in Europe and
North America. 1st ed. New York: Spon Press Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 15–30.
FARMER, G. AND GUY, S., 2005. Reflection and engagement: towards pluralist practices of sustainable
architecture. In Guy, S. and Moore, S.A. Eds. Sustainable architectures: critical explorations of green
building practice in Europe and North America. 1st ed. New York: Spon Press Taylor & Francis Group.
GERO, J. S., 1996. Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(7), 435–448.
GOUBRAN, S., 2019. Sustainability in architectural design projects – a semiotic understanding. Social
Semiotics. Taylor & Francis, Vol. 0 No. 0, pp. 1–27.
GRAHAM, E. M., 2003. Studio design critique: student and faculty expectations and reality. Louisiana State
University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
GROSS, M., Do, E., 1999. Integrating digital media in design studio: Six paradigms. In: Proceedings of the
American College Schools of Architecture Conference. Minneapolis.
GUY, S. AND FARMER, G., 2000. Contested Constructions: The competing logics of green buildings and
ethics. In Fox, W. Ed. Ethics and The Built Environment. Routledge, London, pp. 73–87.
GUY, S. AND FARMER, G., 2001. Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: the place of
technology. Journal of Architectural Education. Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 140–148.
HAJER, M.A., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
HATTENHAUER, D. 1984. The rhetoric of architecture: a semiotic approach. Communication quarterly. Vol.
32 No. 1, pp. 71–77.
Open House International
HAZBEI, M. AND CUCUZZELLA, C., 2021. Coherence of interior and exterior formal qualities in
parametrically designed buildings. Int. J. Design Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.10–28.
HOLLAND, N., 2012. Inform form perform. Spaces & Flows: An International Journal of Urban & Extra
Urban Studies, 2(2), 177–190.
KARLE, D., AND KELLY, B., 2011. Parametric thinking. Proceedings of ACADIA Regional 2011 Conference,
KAVOUSI, S., MILLER, P. A., AND ALEXANDER, P. A., 2019. Modeling metacognition in design thinking
and design making. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
Last Dance on the Main, 2014. Directed by SOULIKIAS, A. [Film Animation]. Montreal: Mel Hoppenheim
School of Cinema. https://vimeo.com/99011728
LAWSON, B., 2002. CAD and creativity: does the computer really help? Leonardo. 35, 327-331.
LIU, Y.-T., AND LIM, C.-K., 2006. New tectonics: a preliminary framework involving classic and digital
thinking. Design Studies. 27, 267-307.
MARKS, L. U., 2000. The skin of the film : intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Duke University
Press, Durham, NC.
MCMINN, J. AND POLO, M. 2005. Sustainable Architecture as a Cultural Project. The 2005 World Sustainable
Building Conference. Tokyo. pp. 4537–4544.
MIESSEN, M., 2016. Crossbenching: Toward participation as critical spatial practice. Sternberg Press, Berlin.
MOOI, A. 2014. What will the architect be doing next? how is the profession of the architect evolving as the
focus of society shifts from sustainability to resilience or reactivist-driven design demands? Footprint.
No. 14, pp. 119–128.
OXMAN, R. AND GU, N., 2015. Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Education and Research
in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAAe), Vol. 33, , Vienna, Austria, pp. 477–482.
PALLASMAA, J., 2001. The Architecture of image: existential space in cinema. Rakennustieto, Helsinki.
PALLASMAA, J., 2009. The thinking hand: existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. Wiley, Chichester,
PALLASMAA, J. 2017a, “Architecture and Biophilic Ethics”, International Journal of Architectural Theory,
Vol. 22 No. 36, pp. 59–69.
PALLASMAA, J., 2017b. “Embodied and existential wisdom in architecture: The thinking hand”, Body &
Society, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp.96-111.
PARKS, C. F., 2020. Fluid frames: experimental animation with sand, clay, paint, and pixels. Routledge.
Open House International
PICON, A., 2010. Digital culture in architecture: an introduction for the design professions. Birkhäuser, Basel.
POLANYI, M., 2009. The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
POOLE, M. AND SHVARTZBERG, M., 2015. The politics of parametricism: digital technologies in
architecture. Bloomsbury Academic, London.
PYLA, P., 2008. Counter-histories of sustainability. Archis. April, pp. 1–13.
SENNETT, R., 2008. The craftsman. Yale University Press.
SCHNABEL, M. A., 2007. Parametric designing in architecture. In Computer-aided architectural design
futures, 237–250.
SCHÖN, D. A., 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco,:Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
SCHÖN, D. A., 1991. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Aldershot: Avebury
SCHUMACHER, P., 2008. Parametricism as style: parametricist manifesto.
http://www.patrikschumacher.com/Texts/Parametricism as Style.htm
SCHUMACHER, P. AND LEACH, N., 2009. Parametricism: a new global style for architecture and urban
design. Architectural Design. 79, 14-23.
TARKHAN, N. (2020), Technological trajectories: assessing the role of sensing in design. In Cucuzzella, C.
and Goubran, S. Eds. Sustainable architecture – between measurement and meaning. Wilmington,
Delaware, Vernon Press. pp. 46–69.
VANDEVYVERE, H. and HEYNEN, H., 2014. Sustainable development, architecture and Modernism: aspects
of an ongoing controversy. Arts. Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 350–366.
WALKER, S., 2006, Sustainable by design: exploration in theory and practice. Earthscan Publications,
WALKER, S., 2015, Designing sustainability: making radical changes in a material world. First Edit.,
Routledge, New York, NY.
WELLS, P., 1998, Understanding animation. Routledge, New York, NY.
WOODBURY, R. AND BURROW, A., 2006. Whither design space? Cambridge University Press, New York,
WOODBURY, R. F., 2010. Elements of parametric design. Routledge, London.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top