Login | Register

Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition


Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition

Chakraborty, Tulika, Chauhan, Satyaveer S. and Ouhimmou, Mustapha (2018) Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition. International Journal of Production Economics . ISSN 09255273 (In Press)

Text (application/pdf)
Chauhan-2019.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 December 2021.
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.015


For the growing competition in the modern sophisticated business environment, there is an increasing trend to launch new products or to improve the quality of the end products in order to attract more consumers. But the rising costs or uncertainties for this innovation require firms to collaborate with each other. In this paper, we study how a retailer and each of two competing manufacturers can be benefited by collaborative product quality improvement strategies in a supply chain. In our model, two competing manufacturers invest in the quality improvement of their respective product and a common retailer sells those higher quality substitutable products to the end consumers. To incentivize the manufacturers in product quality improvement initiatives, we address cost-sharing mechanisms between the retailer level and the manufacturer level. To focus on the importance of collaborative product quality improvement, we study the quality improvement initiatives both in collaborative and non-collaborative scenarios. Through game-theoretic framework, we address mainly three different contract scenarios: (1) WP contract in which both manufacturers accept wholesale price contract, (2) CSC contract in which both manufacturers accept cost-sharing contract, and (3) WC contract in which only one manufacturer accepts cost-sharing contract and the other accepts wholesale price contract. Depending on the mechanism how the retailer decides its cost-sharing proportion with the manufacturer, we further develop and analyze two models of cost-sharing for each of CSC and WC contracts. Our results show that both cost-sharing contracts result in higher quality improvement levels and higher profits in the supply chain as compared to WP contract. In addition, the retailer can enhance his profit level by reducing the differentiation between retail prices (intense price competition) of two products. On the contrary, both manufacturers can sufficiently increase their profit levels by raising the differentiation between two products with respect to quality (lower quality competition). We further investigate those scenarios in which the retailer would be interested in sharing more quality investment costs with the manufacturers.

Divisions:Concordia University > John Molson School of Business > Supply Chain and Business Technology Management
Item Type:Article
Authors:Chakraborty, Tulika and Chauhan, Satyaveer S. and Ouhimmou, Mustapha
Journal or Publication:International Journal of Production Economics
Date:28 December 2018
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.015
Keywords:Supply chain management; Quality management; Competition; Coordination; Game theory
ID Code:984851
Deposited On:10 Jan 2019 14:52
Last Modified:10 Jan 2019 14:52


S. Baiman, P.E. Fischer, M.V. Rajan Information, contracting, and quality costs Manag. Sci., 46 (6) (2000), pp. 776-789

K.R. Balachandran, S. Radhakrishnan Quality implications of warranties in supply chain Manag. Sci., 51 (8) (2005), p. 1266-1277

R.D. Banker, I. Khosla, K.K. Sinha Quality and competition Manag. Sci., 44 (9) (1998), pp. 1179-1192

S.R. Bhaskaran, V. Krishnan Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development Manag. Sci., 55 (7) (2009), pp. 1152-1169

B. Bergman, B. Klefsj Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction (third ed.), Student literature, Lund (Sweden) (2010)

G. Cachon, S. Netessine Game theory in supply chain analysis D. Simchi-Levi, S. David Wu, Z.-J. (Max) Shen (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the EBusiness Era, Kluwer, Boston (2004), pp. 13-59

C. Chambers, P. Kouvelis, J. Semple Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable costs Manag. Sci., 52 (12) (2006), pp. 1884-1895

T. Chakraborty, S.S. Chauhan, N. Vidyarthi Coordination and competition in a common retailer channel: wholesale price versus revenue-sharing mechanisms Int. J. Prod. Econ., 166 (2015), pp. 103-118

G.H. Chao, S.M.R. Iravani, R.C. Savaskan Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost-sharing contracts Manag. Sci., 55 (7) (2009), pp. 1122-1138

J. Chen, L. Liang, F. Yang Cooperative quality investment in out sourcing Int. J. Prod. Econ., 162 (2015), p. 174-191

S.C. Choi Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer Market. Sci., 10 (4) (1991), pp. 271-296

S.C. Choi Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel J. Retailing, 72 (2) (1996), p. 117-134

P.B. Crosby Quality Is Free McGraw-Hill, New York (1979)

A. Dixit Quality and quantity competition Rev. Econ. Stud., 46 (1979), pp. 587-599

D.A. Durbin, T. Krisher Consumer Reports Says Ford's Quality Slips Associated Press (October 25, 2011)

F. El Ouardighi Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: a two-stage game approach Int. J. Prod. Econ., 156 (5) (2014), p. 260-268

U.K. Essays The Quality Improvement of Wal-Mart Management Essay Uni Assignment Centre (November 2013)

B. Giri, A. Chakraborty, T. Maity Quality and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain under multi-manufacturer competition Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 78 (2015), pp. 1927-1941

D. Ghosh, J. Shah Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract Int. J. Prod. Econ., 164 (2015), pp. 319-329

Y. He, Q. Xu, B. Xu, P. Wu Supply chain coordination in quality improvement with reference effects J. Oper. Res. Soc., 67 (9) (2016), p. 1158-1168

C.A. Ingene, M.E. Parry Channel coordination when retailers compete Market. Sci., 14 (4) (1995), pp. 360-377

A. Jeuland, S. Shugan Managing channel profits Market. Sci., 2 (1983), pp. 239-272

B. Kim, F. El Ouardighi Supplier-manufacturer collaboration on new product development S. Jrgensen, T. Vincent, M. Quincampoix (Eds.), Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications to Ecology and Economics, Birkhauser, Boston (2007)

R. Kohli, P. Heungsoo A cooperative game theory model of quantity discounts Manag. Sci., 35 (6) (1989), pp. 693-707

E. Lee, R. Staelin Vertical strategic interaction: implications for channel pricing strategy Market. Sci., 16 (3) (1997), pp. 185-207

W.S. Lim Producer-supplier contracts with incomplete information Manag. Sci., 47 (5) (2001), p. 709-715

J.C. Lu, Y.C. Tsao, C. Charoensiriwath Competition under manufacturer service and retail price Econ. Model., 28 (3) (2011), p. 1256-1264

K.S. Moorthy Product and price competition in a duopoly Market. Sci., 7 (2) (1988), pp. 141-168

M. Nagarajan, G. Sosic Game-theoretical analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: review and extensions Eur. J. Oper. Res., 187 (3) (2008), pp. 719-745

J. Nash The bargaining problem Econometrica, 18 (1950), pp. 155-162

J. Nash Two-person cooperative games Econometrica, 21 (1) (1953), pp. 128-140

R. Olbrich, H.C. Jansen Price-quality relationship in pricing strategies for private labels J. Prod. Brand Manag., 23 (6) (2014), pp. 429-438

D.J. Reyniers, C.S. Tapiero The delivery and control of quality in supplier- producer contracts Manag. Sci., 41 (1995), pp. 1581-1589

J. Rosevear Ford Beat Toyota in Quality: Why it Matters, Ford Outscored Nearly All Rivals in This Year's J.D. Power Initial Quality Study. Here's How Ford Improved and Why it Matters to Investors. J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (2017)

M. Singer, P. Donoso, P. Traverso Quality strategies in supply chain alliances of disposable items Omega, 31 (2003), pp. 499-509

A.M. Spence Monopoly, quality, and regulation Bell J. Econ., 6 (1975), pp. 417-429

A.A. Tsay, N. Agrawal Channel dynamics under price and service competition Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag., 2 (4) (2000), pp. 372-391

J. Wang, H. Shin The impact of contracts and competition on upstream innovation in a supply chain Prod. Oper. Manag., 24 (1) (2015), pp. 134-146

S. Wolfram The Mathematica Book (third ed.), Wolfram Media, Cambridge University Press (1996)

T.J. Xiao, D.Q. Yang, H.C. Shen Coordinating a supply chain with a quality assurance policy via a revenue-sharing contract Int. J. Prod. Res., 49 (1) (2011), p. 99-120

G. Xie, S. Wang, K.K. Lai Quality improvement in competing supply chains Int. J. Prod. Econ., 134 (2011), pp. 262-270

X.H. Yan Contract efficiency for a decentralized supply chain in the presence of quality improvement Int. Trans. Oper. Res., 22 (4) (2015), p. 713-734

K. Zhu, R.Q. Zhang, F. Tsung Pushing quality improvement along supply chains Manag. Sci., 53 (3) (2007), pp. 421-436
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top