Login | Register

L2 writers’ use of outside sources and the related challenges

Title:

L2 writers’ use of outside sources and the related challenges

Neumann, Heike ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-7219, Leu, Sarah and McDonough, Kim (2019) L2 writers’ use of outside sources and the related challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes . ISSN 14751585 (In Press)

[img]
Text (application/pdf)
Neumann-2019.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 2 February 2021.
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
1MB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.002

Abstract

Researchers have called for the development of new pedagogical strategies to help students learn how to integrate source information into their own texts effectively (Casanave, 2017; Hu, 2015). Since these strategies are tied to particular pedagogical contexts, their development has to be preceded by a careful examination of the context where they will be implemented. To that end, the current study examined how students use sources in their own writing at an English-medium university in Canada and what challenges they face in doing so. Notes and essays written by English for Academic Purposes (EAP) students (N = 73) were analyzed in terms of how they used source text information. A subset of the students and five experienced instructors were interviewed to gain insight into students’ challenges with the source-based writing tasks required in the EAP program. The findings indicate that students face difficulty with both the reading and writing phases of source-based writing, which has implications for the development of pedagogical strategies to address these difficulties.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Education
Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Authors:Neumann, Heike and Leu, Sarah and McDonough, Kim
Journal or Publication:Journal of English for Academic Purposes
Date:2 February 2019
Funders:
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.002
ID Code:984986
Deposited By: MICHAEL BIRON
Deposited On:12 Feb 2019 23:02
Last Modified:06 Jun 2019 17:55

References:

Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 221-233. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.010

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (Sixth edition. ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Armstrong, G., Kotler, P., Trifts, V., & Buchwitz, L. A. (2012). Marketing: An introduction (4th ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Canada.

Asención Delaney, Y. (2008). Investigating the reading-to-write construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 140-150. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.04.001

Badger, E. (2013, August 29). How poverty taxes the brain. Atlantic Cities. Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/life/2013/08/how-poverty-taxes-brain/6716/

Basham, C., Ray, R., & Whalley, E. (1993). Cross-cultural perspectives on task representation in reading to write. In J. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 299-314). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Bi, F. (2013, September 9). Better data can help colleges fight cheating. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Better-Data-Can-HelpColleges/141485

Borg, E. (2009). Local plagiarisms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 415- 426. doi:10.1080/02602930802075115

Cammish, N. K. (1997). Through a glass darkly: Problems of studying at advanced level through the medium of English. In D. McNamara & R. Harris (Eds.), Overseas students in higher education: Issues in teaching and learning up (pp. 143-155). London: Routldege.

Casanave, C. P. (2017). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instructions (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Cumming, A. (2013). Assessing integrated writing tasks for academic purposes: Promises and perils. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(1), 1-8. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.622016

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5-43. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001

Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47-58. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002

Currie, P. (1998). Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 1-18. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060- 3743(98)90003-0

Davis, M. (2013). The development of source use by international postgraduate students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 125-135. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.008

Davis, M., & Morley, J. (2015). Phrasal intertextuality: The responses of academics from different disciplines to students’ re-use of phrases. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 20-35. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.004

Esmaeili, H. (2002). Integrated reading and writing tasks and ESL students' reading and writing performance in an English language test. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), 599-622.

Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 440-465. doi:10.1093/applin/amm031

Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2009). Investigating source use, discourse features, and process in integrated writing tests. Spaan Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 7, 47-84.

Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2013). Toward a transparent construct of reading-to-write tasks: The interface between discourse features and proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(1), 9-27. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.642040

Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2016). Source-based tasks in academic writing assessment: Lexical diversity, textual borrowing and proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 78-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.001

Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2012). Performance in the Citing Behavior of Two Student Writers. Written Communication, 29(1), 55-103. doi:10.1177/0741088311424133

Hirvela, A., & Du, Q. (2013). “Why am I paraphrasing?”: Undergraduate ESL writers' engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 87-98. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005

Howard, R. M. (1992). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11(2), 233-245.

Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788-806. doi:10.2307/378403

Howard, R. M., Serviss, T., & Rodrigue, T. K. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing & Pedagogy, 2(2), 177-192. doi:10.1558/wap.v2i2.177

Hu, G. (2015). Research on plagiarism in second language writing: Where to from here? Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 100-102. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.004

Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2012). Investigating chinese university students' knowledge of and attitudes toward plagiarism from an integrated perspective. Language Learning, 62(3), 813-850. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00650.x

Johns, A. M., & Mayes, P. (1990). An analysis of summary protocols of university ESL students. Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 253-271. doi:10.1093/applin/11.3.253

Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261-278. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006

Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25(0), 4-22. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005

Kirkland, M. R., & Saunders, M. A. P. (1991). Maximizing student performance in summary writing: Managing cognitive load. TESOL Quartelry, 25(1), 105-121. doi:10.2307/3587030

Knoch, U., & Sitajalabhorn, W. (2013). A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes. Assessing Writing, 18(4), 300-308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003

Li, Y., & Casanave, C. P. (2012). Two first-year students’ strategies for writing from sources: Patchwriting or plagiarism? Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 165-180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.002

Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317-345. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004

Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4-29. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004

Pecorari, D. (2010). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. London: Continuum.

Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Pecorari, D. (2015). Plagiarism in second language writing: Is it time to close the case? Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 94-99. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.003

Pecorari, D. (2018). Can plagiarism be defined? In D. Pecorari & P. Shaw (Eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education: Reflections on teaching practice (pp. 12-27). New York: Routledge.

Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (2012). Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 149-164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.006

Pennycook, A. (1994). The complex contexts of plagiarism: A reply to Deckert. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 277-284. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90020-5

Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13(2), 111-129. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001

Plakans, L. (2009a). Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment. Language Testing, 26(4), 561-587. doi:10.1177/0265532209340192

Plakans, L. (2009b). The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 252-266. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.05.001

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 18-34. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2013). Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 217- 230. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.02.003

Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2016). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York, NY: Routledge.

Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 307-323. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_8

Sandel, M. J. (2012, April). What isn't for sale. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/04/what-isnt-for-sale/308902/

Sawaki, Y., Quinlan, T., & Lee, Y.-W. (2013). Understanding learner strengths and weaknesses: Assessing performance on an integrated writing task. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(1), 73-95. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.633305

Schmitt, D., & Schmitt, N. (2005). Focus on vocabulary: Mastering the academic word list. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Shi, L. (2004). Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication, 21(2), 171-200. doi:10.1177/0741088303262846

Shi, L. (2012). Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 134-148. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.003

Solomon, M., Bamossy, G., & Askegaard, S. (2002). Consumer behaviour: A European perspective. New York: Prentice Hall Europe.

Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005). Pandora's box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 83-95. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17-37). London: Sage.

Thompson, C., Morton, J., & Storch, N. (2013). Where from, who, why and how? A study of the use of sources by first year L2 university students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 99-109. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.004

Wette, R. (2017). Source text use by undergraduate post-novice L2 writers in disciplinary assignments: Progress and ongoing challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 46-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.015

Wette, R. (2018). Source-based writing in a health sciences essay: Year 1 students' perceptions, abilities and strategies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 61-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.006

Wolfersberger, M. (2013). Refining the construct of classroom-based writing-from-readings assessment: The role of task representation. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(1), 49- 72. doi:10.1080/15434303.2012.750661
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top