Login | Register

Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected versus student selected groupings.


Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected versus student selected groupings.

Mitchell, Sidney N., Reilly, Rosemary C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-4488, Bramwell, Gillian, Slonosky, Anthony and Lilly, Frank R. (2004) Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected versus student selected groupings. Journal of Instructional Psychology (31). pp. 20-32. ISSN 0094-1956

[thumbnail of Publisher's version]
Text (Publisher's version) (application/pdf)
Instructional Psych.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.


This study represents a collaborative school university partnership. Using a mixed-method approach, the authors report on the motivational and psychological consequences of students choosing their groupmates in cooperative learning triads. 139 students in five science classes participated in this study. Classes were randomly assigned to condition: Teacher-selected or student-selected. In teacher-selected classes, the teacher chose the members of each group; in student-selected classes, the students chose their groupmates. Results revealed a decrease in willingness to choose one's groupmates. Focus group data indicated that students felt obligated to choose friends as groupmates, and low-achieving students questioned the value of working with similar others. Teachers should be aware that when permitting students to choose their groupmates that friendships and status hierarchies exert strong influences on choice of partner.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Applied Human Sciences
Item Type:Article
Authors:Mitchell, Sidney N. and Reilly, Rosemary C. and Bramwell, Gillian and Slonosky, Anthony and Lilly, Frank R.
Journal or Publication:Journal of Instructional Psychology
Date:March 2004
Keywords:Friendship, Selection, Group Membership, Teacher Responsibility, Student Responsibility, High School Students, Science Instruction, Focus Groups, Cooperative Learning, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Heterogeneous Grouping, Homogeneous Grouping, Peer Relationship, Social Influences, Social Status, Reputation
ID Code:984772
Deposited By: Rosemary Reilly
Deposited On:17 Dec 2018 20:27
Last Modified:17 Dec 2018 20:27
Additional Information:ERIC Number: EJ774034


Abrami, P., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., DeSimone, C., d'Apolionia, S., Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Montreal: Harcourt Brace,

Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. New York: Routledge.

Brown, L., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women 's psychology and girls' development. New York: Ballantine.

Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963/1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Hopewell, NJ: Houghton Mifflin.

Cohen, E. (1984). Talking and working together: Status, interaction, and learning. In P. Peterson, L. Wilkenson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.), Instructional groups in the classroom: Organization and processes (pp. 171-187). Orlando, FL: Academic.

Cohen, E. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.), New York: Teachers College Press.

Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (1995). Producing equal status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (1996). A guide to teaching practice (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Cooper, J. (Ed.). (1999). Classroom teaching skills (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relationships among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-165.

Eder, D. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Elliott, J. (1988). Teachers as researchers. In J. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 78-81). New York: Pergamon.

Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgov, C., Newschatty, M., Uzzi, B., & Alonzo, J. (1994). The paradox of critical mass of women in science. Science, 266, 51-54.

Evans, K. (1996). Creating spaces for equity?: The role of positioning in peer-led literature discussions. Language Arts, 73, 193-202.

Gilligan, C. (1990). Teaching Shakespeare's sister: Notes from the underground of female adolescence. In C. Gilligan, N. Lyons, & T. Hanmer (Eds.), Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School (pp. 6-29). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Gillies, R. (1997). Interactions of children in classroom-based workgroups. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408 272)

Gillies, R., & Ashman, A. (1995). Promoting cooperative and helping behaviors in student work groups through training in small group processes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED388 923)

Guzzetti, B., & Williams, W. (1996). Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 5-20.

Hurley, J. (1996). Ratings of interpersonal conduct in small groups by aggregated peers and self: Replicated factor analysis. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 597-611.

Johnson, E. (1997). Cultural norms affect oral communication in the classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 70, 47-52.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (1991). Joining together: Group theory, and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1992). Advanced cooperative learning. (rev.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1993). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book.

Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (1994). The structural approach: Six keys to cooperative learning. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 115-133). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Kaplan, A., Klein, R., & Gleason, N. (1991). Women's self development in late adolescence. In J. Jordan, A. Kaplan, J.B. Miller, I. Stiver, & J. Surrey (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings front the Stone Center (pp. 122-140). New York: Guilford.

Kemmis, S. (1988). Action research. In J. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp.42-49). New York: Pergamon.

King, L. (1989). Student classroom perceptions and cooperative learning groups. (Technical Report No. 475). Columbia, MO: University of Missouri, Center for Research in Social Behavior.

Lafrance, M. (1991). School for scandal: Different educational experiences for females and males. Gender and Education, 3, 3-13.

Light, R. (1990). Explorations with students and faculty about teaching, learning, and student life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lou, Y., Abrami, P., Spence, J., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458.

McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. New York: Routledge.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mulyran, C. (1995). Fifth and sixth graders' involvement and participation in cooperative small groups in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 297-310.

Oakes, J. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12-21.

Oakes, J., Ormseth, R., & Camp, P. (1994). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on students' opportunities to leant mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

Orlich, D., Harder, R., Callahan, R., & Gibson, H. (1998). Teaching strategies: A guide to better instruction (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballantine.

Pollack, W. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.

Rehling, L. (1996). Writing together: Gender's effect on collaboration. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, 163-176.

Rosser, S. (1997). Re-engineering female friendly science. New York: Teachers College Press.

Schofield, J. (1981). Complementary and conflicting identities: Images and interaction in an interracial school. In S. Asher & J. Gottman (Eds.), The development of children's friendships (pp. 53-90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992a). Group investigation: Expanding cooperative learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992b). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.

Shulman, J., Lotan, R., & Whitcomb, J. (Eds.). (1998). Group work in diverse classrooms: A casebook for educators. New York: Teachers College Press.

Slavin, R. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Slavin, R. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 535552.

Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Sommers, E. (1992). Peer groups in evolution.: Inventing classroom communities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED345 290).

Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (3 ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stringer, E. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Townsend, M., & Hicks, L. (1995). Classroom goal structures, social satisfaction and the perceived value of academic tasks. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED387 762)

Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Webb, N., & Palinscar, A. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 841-873). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Webb, N., Baxter, G., & Thompson, L. (1997). Teachers' grouping practices in fifth-grade science classrooms. The Elementary, School Journal, 98, 91-113.

Weisfeld, G., Omark, D., & Cronin, C. (1980). A longitudinal and cross-sectional study of dominance in boys. In D. Omark, F. Strayer, & D. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations (pp.205-216). New York: Garland.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top