Abstract

Inverse optimization is a method to determine optimization model parameters from observed decisions. Despite being a learning method, inverse optimization is not part of a data scientist's toolkit in practice,
especially as many general-purpose machine learning packages are widely available as an alternative. In this dissertation, we examine and remedy two aspects of inverse optimization that prevent it from becoming more used by practitioners. These aspects include the alternative-based approach in inverse optimization modeling and the assumption that observations should be optimal.

In the first part of the dissertation, we position inverse optimization as a learning method in analogy to supervised machine learning. The first part of this dissertation provides a starting point toward identifying the characteristics that make inverse optimization more efficient compared to general out-of-the-box supervised machine learning approaches, focusing on the problem of imputing the objective function of a parametric convex optimization problem.

The second part of this dissertation provides an attribute-based perspective to inverse optimization modeling. Inverse attribute-based optimization imputes the importance of the decision attributes that result in minimally suboptimal decisions instead of imputing the importance of decisions. This perspective expands the range of inverse optimization applicability. We demonstrate that it facilitates the application of inverse optimization in assortment optimization, where changing product selections is a defining feature and accurate predictions of demand are essential.

Finally, in the third part of the dissertation, we expand inverse parametric optimization to a more general setting where the assumption that the observations are optimal is relaxed to requiring only feasibility. The proposed inverse satisfaction method can deal with both feasible and minimally suboptimal solutions. We mathematically prove that the inverse satisfaction method provides statistically consistent estimates of the unknown parameters and can learn from both optimal and feasible decisions.