Reilly, Rosemary C. (2008) Is expertise a necessary precondition for creativity? A case of four novice learning group facilitators. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3 (1). pp. 59-76. ISSN 1871-1871
|PDF (Post-print: final draft post-refereeing) - Accepted Version|
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.02.002
Many North American theorists conceptualize expertise as preceding creativity. The rationale is, that in order to be truly creative, one must master a field so remarkable contributions can be made. Therefore, in order to be truly creative one must be an expert in a structured and codified
domain. This inquiry attempted to examine the relationship between expert thinking skills and creativity in an ill-defined domain, embedded in the community of practice of group facilitation whose goal was to support learning. Using an instrumental case study approach to explore a
unique system embedded in a naturalistic context, the case was comprised of a team of four female novice group facilitators, functioning as teaching assistants for learning task groups of university students. Various sources were drawn upon in order to map this group as a coherent knowing system. Debriefing sessions and interviews were transcribed and coded using a category string method in order to retain a holistic sensibility to the analysis. The codes revealed that the system displayed characteristics of shared expertise and social creativity. The overall pattern of creative response closely followed those of expertise. The codes for expertise generally preceded those instances of creativity, suggesting that creativity does need to rely on expert thinking skills. However, this inquiry suggests expanding the notion of expertise, in that it need not be situated in a single person, but can emerge from a system of shared expertise.
|Divisions:||Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Applied Human Sciences|
|Authors:||Reilly, Rosemary C.|
|Journal or Publication:||Thinking Skills and Creativity|
|Keywords:||Expert thinking skills; Shared expertise; Social creativity; Group facilitation; Collective zone of proximal development|
|Deposited By:||ROSEMARY REILLY|
|Deposited On:||18 Nov 2009 14:03|
|Last Modified:||02 Nov 2012 15:59|
Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Angrasino, M., & Mays de Perez, K. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 673–702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aquila, F., & Parish, R. (1989). The clash of cultures: Instructional technology and the craft of teaching. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 22(2), 49–56.
Ashley, K., Chi, M., Pinkus, R., & Moore, J. (2004). Modeling learning to reason with cases in engineering ethics: A test domain for intelligent assistance (NSF Proposal Grant Number NSF-LIS 9720341).
Baltes, P., & Staudinger, U. (1993). The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 75–80.
Barrett, F. (1999). Knowledge creating as dialogic accomplishment: A constructivist perspective. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity, Vol. 1 (pp. 133–151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Bateson, M. (1999). Ordinary creativity. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity Vol. 1 (pp. 153–171). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.
Cohen, L. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 169–183.
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Craft, A. (1998). Educator perspectives on creativity: An English study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 244–257.
Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education. London: Continuum.
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. New York: Routledge.
Craft, A. (2006). Fostering creativity with wisdom. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 337–350.
Cropley, A. (1997). Creativity and mental health in everyday life. In M. Runco & R. Richards (Eds.), Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health (pp. 231–246). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego: Academic.
Dimock, H. (1993). How to observe your group (3rd ed.). North York, ON: Captus.
Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 175–200). New York: Teachers College Press.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Duran, R., & Szymanski, M. (1993). Construction of learning and interaction of language minority children in cooperative learning (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 365106).
Ericsson, K., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits of the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1–38). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fraser, R., & Mathews, A. (1999). An evaluation of the desirable characteristics of a supervisor. Australian Universities’ Review, 42(1), 5–7.
Gardner, H. (2000). The giftedness matrix: A developmental perspective. In R. Friedman & B. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 77–88).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Garner, R. (1992). Self-regulated learning, strategy shifts, and shared expertise: Reactions to Palincsar and Klenk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 226–229.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In I. Taylor & J. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 90–116). Chicago: Aldine.
Gibbons, J., & Grey, M. (2004). Critical thinking as integral to social work practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(1/2), 19–38.
Glaser, R., & Chi, M. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.
Gruber, H. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D. Wallace & H. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies (pp. 3–24). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gruber, H. (1997). Creative altruism, cooperation, and world peace. In M. Runco & R. Richards (Eds.), Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health (pp. 463–479). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Gruber, H., & Wallace, D. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, S. (2004). The supervisor in the project-organized groupwork should participate in developing the students’ project competencies. European Journal of Engineering
Education, 29, 451–459.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331–348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Herzberg, F. (1987). Innovation: Where is the relish? Journal of Creative Behavior, 21, 179–192.
Hmelo, C. (1998). Problem-based learning: Effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. The Journal for the Learning Sciences, 7, 173–208.
Hunter, D., Bailey, A., & Taylor, B. (1995). The art of facilitation. Tucson, AZ: Fischer.
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jausovec, N. (1994). Metacognition in creative problem-solving. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 77–95). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30, 77–87.
Johnson, E. (1988). Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 209–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1987). Research shows the benefits of adult cooperation. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 27–30.
John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
John-Steiner, V., & Meehan, T. (2000). Creativity and collaboration in knowledge construction. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krauss, R., & Fussell, S. (1991). Constructing shared communicative environments. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 172–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, B. (1985). Intellectual origins of Vygotsky’s semiotic analysis. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 66–93). New York:
Lesgold, A. (1988). Problem-solving. In R. Sternberg & E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp.188–213). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Levine, H. (1993). Context and scaffolding in developmental studies of mother-child problem solving dyads. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 306–326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Meador, K., Hunsaker, S., & Kearney, K. (1999). Qualitative research methods for studying creativity. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating
creativity in youth: Research and methods (pp. 239–261). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1999). Social creativity: Introduction. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity Vol. 1 (pp. 1–45). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mumford, M., & Gustafson, S. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.
Mumford, M., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp.3–39). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Mumford, M., Baughman, W., & Sager, C. (2003). Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. In M. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative
processes (pp. 19–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Neçka, E. (2003). Creative interaction: A conceptual schema for the process of producing ideas and judging outcomes. In M. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 115–127).
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Novemsky, L. (1998). Second teaching: An exploration of cognitive factors in small group physics learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences) 59(5-A).
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pavlovic, S., & Friedland, B. (1997). Reflectivity in supervision and teaching (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 406115).
Perkins, D. (1988). Creativity and the quest for mechanism. In R. Sternberg & E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 309–336). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, C. (Ed.). (2002). Group process consultation workshop manual. Alexandria, VA: NTL Institute.
Posner, M. (1988). Introduction: What is it to be an expert? In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xxix–xxxvi). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Raelin, J. (2000). Work-based learning: The new frontier of management development. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reddy, W. B. (1994). Intervention skills. Toronto: Pfeiffer & Company.
Reilly, R. C. (2005). The synergistic confluence of social creativity, values and the development of shared expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Resnick, L. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Richards, R. (1996). Beyond Piaget: Accepting divergent, chaotic, and creative thought. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 67–86.
Rogers, K. (1999). Is creativity quantitatively measurable? A paradigm for creativity research. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. (pp. 217–237). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Runco, M., & Bahleda, M. (1989). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93–98.
Runco, M., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Sawyer, R. (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport, CT: Ablex.
Schein, E. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schwarz, R. (1994). The skilled facilitator: Practical wisdom for developing effective groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
Shore, B. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. Friedman & B. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Simonton, D. (1985). Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of ten distinguished psychologists. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 21, 241–254.
Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sternberg, R. (Ed.). (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11–20.
Sternberg, R. (2000). Giftedness as developing expertise. In K. Heller, F. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 55–66). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Sternberg, R., & Frensch, P. (1992). On being an expert: A cost-benefit analysis. In R. Hoffman (Ed.), The psychology of expertise (pp. 191–204). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. (1999). The concepts of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stough, L. (1994). Skilled performance in individuals with developmental disabilities (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 450500).
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, C. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological approaches (pp. 99–121). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse tools and reasoning: Essays in situated cognition (pp. 361–384). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (1997). Collegiality in schools: Its nature and implications for problem-solving (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 413285).
Torrance, E. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Repository Staff Only: item control page