Login | Register

University Supports for Open Access: A Canadian National Survey


University Supports for Open Access: A Canadian National Survey

Greyson, Devon, Vézina, Kumiko, Morrison, Heather, Taylor, Donald and Black, Charlyn (2009) University Supports for Open Access: A Canadian National Survey. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 39 (3). pp. 1-32. ISSN 0316-1218

Text (application/pdf)
University_Supports_for_OA.pdf - Published Version

Official URL: http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/cjhe/article/v...


The advent of policies at research-funding organizations requiring grantees to make their funded research openly accessible alters the life cycle of scholarly research. This survey-based study explores the approaches that libraries and research administration offi ces at the major Canadian universities are employing to support the research-production cycle in an open access era and, in particular, to support researcher adherence to funder open-access requirements. Responses from 21 universities indicated that librarians feel a strong sense of mandate to carry out open access-related activities and provide research supports, while research administrators have a lower sense of mandate and awareness and instead focus largely on assisting researchers with securing grant funding. Canadian research universities already contain infrastructure that could be leveraged to support open access, but maximizing these opportunities requires that research administration offi ces and university libraries work together more synergistically than they have done traditionally.

Divisions:Concordia University > Library
Item Type:Article
Authors:Greyson, Devon and Vézina, Kumiko and Morrison, Heather and Taylor, Donald and Black, Charlyn
Journal or Publication:Canadian Journal of Higher Education
Keywords:Open Access; University; Canada; Funding; Research; Librarian; Libraries; Administrators; Office of research, Mandate; CIHR
ID Code:6566
Deposited On:25 Mar 2010 15:37
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:29
Additional Information:French abstract -- L’apparition de politiques provenant d’organisations accordant des subventions à des récipiendaires, et qui requièrent de ceux-ci qu’ils rendent les résultats de leur recherche libre d’accès, affecte le cycle de vie de la recherche académique. Ce sondage national en ligne explore les mesures prises par les bibliothèques et les bureaux de la recherche des universités de recherche canadiennes pour appuyer le libre accès et en particulier pour aider les chercheurs à se conformer aux exigences d’accès libre de leur agence subventionnaire. Nous avons reçu des réponses de la part de 21 universités à travers le Canada, indiquant d’une part une forte implication des bibliothécaires dans des activités de soutien et d’information sur le libre accès, tandis que les administrateurs montrent un engagement moins élevé à cet égard et concentrent leurs efforts principalement à aider les chercheurs à obtenir des subventions. Les universités de recherche canadiennes possèdent déjà des infrastructures qui pourraient être exploitées pour soutenir le libre accès, mais il est essentiel de maximiser ces opportunités et cela ne sera possible que si les bibliothécaires et les administrateurs de la recherche travaillent beaucoup plus conjointement que cela a été le cas par le passé.


Austin, A. C., Heffernan, M. E., & David, N. (2008). Academic authorship, publishing agreements and open access: Survey results. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00013623/

Bailey, C. W., Jr., Coombs, K., Emery, J., Mitchell, A., Morris, C., Simons, S., et al. (2006). Institutional repositories (ARL SPEC Kit 292). Washington, DC:
Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec292web.pdf

Bettinghaus, E. P. (1986). Health promotion and the knowledge-attitudebehavior continuum. Preventive Medicine, 15(5), 475–491 [doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90025-3].

Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2007). Policy on access to research outputs. Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34846.html

Committee on International Scholarly Communication, Japan Association of National University Libraries, & National Institute of Informatics. (2006, March). Survey report on research activities and open access. Retrieved from

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. Retrieved from http://areadocenti.eco.unicas.it/virili/old/ApprofondimentiOSI/CIO%20issues/Technology%20acceptance/DavisMISQ89%20Perceived%20Usefulness%20Ease%20of%20Use%20OCR.pdf

De Beer, J. A. (2004). Open access in South Africa: Preliminary results of a survey. In SASLI & OSI Open Access Scholarly Communication Conference, Pretoria (South Africa). Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/2222/

Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94 [doi: 10.2307/2340521].

Fullard, A. (2007). South African responses to open access publishing: A survey of the research community. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 73(1), 40–50. Retrieved from http://ahero.uwc.ac.za/index.

Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probits, S. (2003). RoMEO studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 243-277.

Ghane, M. (2006). A survey of open access barriers to scholarly communication: Providing an appropriate pattern for scientific communication in Iran. Grey Journal: An International Journal on Grey Literature, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.greynet.org/images/GL7,_page_47.pdf

Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.

Hajjem, C., & Harnad, S. (2005). Accès libre aux articles scientifi ques et mouvement d’auto-archivage à l’UQÀM. Retrieved from http://www.crsc.uqam.ca/lab/chawki/Auto-archivaeuqam.pdf

Hood, A. K. (2007). Open access resources (ARL SPEC Kit 300). Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec300web.pdf

Joint Information Systems Committee. (2008). JISC open access publication charge surveys. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/aboutus/workinggroups/jiscoapubcharge.doc

Mann, F., Von Walter, B., Hess, T., & Wigand, R. (2009). Open access publishingin science. Communications of the ACM, 52(3), 135–139 [doi: 10.1145/1467247.1467279].

Palmer, K., Dill, E., & Christie, C. (in press). Survey of librarian attitudes about open access. College & Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/preprints/Palmer-Dill-Christie.pdf

Population Data BC. (2009). Privacy at Population Data BC. Retrieved from http://www.popdata.bc.ca

Rogers, E. M. (1995.) Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Sale, A. (2006). The acquisition of open access research articles. First Monday, 11(10). Retrieved from http://fi rstmonday.org/issues/issue11_10/sale/index.html

Schrader, P. G., & Lawless, K. A. (2004). The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Performance Improvement, 43(9), 8–15 [doi: 10.1002/pfi .4140430905].

Schroter, S., & Tite, L. (2006). Open access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(3), 141–148 [doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.3.141].

Shearer, K. (2006). The CARL institutional repositories project: A collaborative approach to addressing the challenges of IRs in Canada. Library Hi Tech, 24(2), 165–172 [doi: 10.1108/07378830610669547].

Suber, P. (2007). Open access overview. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm

Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004). JISC/OSI journal authors survey: Report. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/themes/infoenvironment/acf655.pdf

Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: An author study. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Open%20Access%2

Van de Mortel, T. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(8), 40–48. Retrieved from http://epubs.scu.edu.au/hahs_pubs/2/

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unifi ed view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. Retrieved from http://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/05-06/

Vézina, K. (2006). Libre accès à la recherche scientifique: Opinions et pratiques des chercheurs au Québec. The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 1(1). Retrieved from http://journal.lib.uoguelph.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Back to top Back to top