Login | Register

Eco-Nudging: Interactive Digital Design to Solicit Immediate Energy Actions in The Built Space

Title:

Eco-Nudging: Interactive Digital Design to Solicit Immediate Energy Actions in The Built Space

Goubran, Sherif ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-0351, Cucuzzella, Carmela ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-8518 and Ouf, Mohamed M. (2021) Eco-Nudging: Interactive Digital Design to Solicit Immediate Energy Actions in The Built Space. In: 9th International Conference of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design. (In Press)

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
D1P2S2-29.pdf
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
457kB

Abstract

In the built space, building occupants, their behaviours and control actions are research areas that have gained a lot of attention. This is well justified since energy behaviours can result in differences of up to 25% in building energy consumption. Previous research recommends exploring ways to influence occupants' energy behaviour – through eco-feedback and by directly engaging occupants with building controls. Very little attention has been given to the role digital art and design can play in soliciting and changing human energy-related actions and behaviours in the built space. This paper proposes a new process that combines eco-feedback, gamification, and ecological digital art to trigger occupants to take immediate and precise control actions in the built space. We design, deploy and test this by creating an immersive human-building-interaction apparatus, which we place in a month-long exhibition. This experimental interface was informed by a novel vision for engagement-based human-building interactions deeply rooted in aesthetics, digital art and design. It also uses digital art to mediate between the occupants and energy-performance of spaces by redefining their relationship with and perception of energy – moving from metrics and quantities understanding to one that is art and emotion-based. The analysis reveals that this new type of human-engagement-based interactive building-control mechanism can add a significant layer of influence on energy-related actions – without revoking the individuals' ability to control their environment. It also highlights digital design and art's power in guiding actions and interactions with the built space.

Divisions:Concordia University > School of Graduate Studies > Individualized Program
Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Refereed:Yes
Authors:Goubran, Sherif and Cucuzzella, Carmela and Ouf, Mohamed M.
Date:2021
ID Code:988131
Deposited By: SHERIF NADER AL GOUBRAN
Deposited On:01 Apr 2021 21:36
Last Modified:01 Apr 2021 21:36

References:

ARYAL, A. and BECERIK-GERBER, B. (2018), “Energy consequences of Comfort-driven temperature setpoints in office buildings”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 177, pp. 33–46.

BUCHANAN, K., RUSSO, R. and ANDERSON, B. (2014), “Feeding back about eco-feedback: How do consumers use and respond to energy monitors?”, Energy Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 73, pp. 138–146.

CHEN, H.M., LIN, C.W., HSIEH, S.H., CHAO, H.F., CHEN, C.S., SHIU, R.S., YE, S.R., ET AL. (2012), “Persuasive feedback model for inducing energy conservation behaviors of building users based on interaction with a virtual object”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 45, pp. 106–115.

COLE, R.J. and BROWN, Z. (2009), “Reconciling human and automated intelligence in the provision of occupant comfort”, Intelligent Buildings International, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 39–55.

CUCUZZELLA, C. (2019), “Eco-didactic design in the public realm”, in Mambretti, S. and i Garcia, J.L.M. (Eds.), The Sustainable City XIII, Vol. 238, Sustainable City, Valencia, Spain, pp. 283–289.

CUCUZZELLA, C., HAMMOND, C.I., GOUBRAN, S. and LALONDE, C. (Eds.). (2019), “Du Didactisme en Architecture / On Didacticism in Architecture”, Cahiers de Recherche Du LEAP, Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, QC.

DARBY, S.J. (2014), “Smart energy technologies in everyday life. Smart Utopia?”, Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 1, pp. 240–241.

DAY, J.K., MCILVENNIE, C., BRACKLEY, C., TARANTINI, M., PISELLI, C., HAHN, J., O’BRIEN, W., ET AL. (2020), “A review of select human-building interfaces and their relationship to human behavior, energy use and occupant comfort”, Building and Environment, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 178 No. April, p. 106920.

DE DEAR, R. (2011), “Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia”, Building Research & Information, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 108–117.

DEUBLE, M.P. and DE DEAR, R.J. (2012), “Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link?”, Building and Environment, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 56, pp. 21–27.

EICHLER, A., DARIVIANAKIS, G. and LYGEROS, J. (2017), “Humans in the Loop: A Stochastic Predictive Approach to Building Energy Management in the Presence of Unpredictable Users”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 14471–14476.

FLORIDI, L. (2008), “Artificial intelligence’s new frontier: Artificial companions and the fourth revolution”, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 39 No. 4–5, pp. 651–655.

GULBINAS, R. and TAYLOR, J.E. (2014), “Effects of real-time eco-feedback and organizational network dynamics on energy efficient behavior in commercial buildings”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 84, pp. 493–500.

GUNAY, H.B., O’BRIEN, W., BEAUSOLEIL-MORRISON, I. and PERNA, A. (2014), “On the behavioral effects of residential electricity submetering in a heating season”, Building and Environment, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 81, pp. 396–403.

GUPTA, S.K. and KAR, K. (2018), “Human-in-the-Loop Thermal Management for Smart Buildings”, in J., W. and Mishra, S. (Eds.), Intelligent Building Control Systems, Springer, Cham, pp. 191–217.

JAIN, R.K., TAYLOR, J.E. and PESCHIERA, G. (2012), “Assessing eco-feedback interface usage and design to drive energy efficiency in buildings”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier B.V., Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, S.W. Mudd Building, 500 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, United States, Vol. 48, pp. 8–17.

JANDA, K.B. (2011), “Buildings don’t use energy: People do”, Architectural Science Review, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 15–22.

KHOSROWPOUR, A., JAIN, R.K., TAYLOR, J.E., PESCHIERA, G., CHEN, J. and GULBINAS, R. (2018), “A review of occupant energy feedback research: Opportunities for methodological fusion at the intersection of experimentation, analytics, surveys and simulation”, Applied Energy, Elsevier, Vol. 218 No. September 2017, pp. 304–316.

KUMAR, P., BRAR, G.S., SINGH, S., NIKOLOVSKI, S., BAGHAEE, H.R. and BALKIĆ, Z. (2019), “Perspectives and intensification of energy efficiency in commercial and residential buildings using strategic auditing and demand-side management”, Energies, MDPI AG, Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab 147004, India, Vol. 12 No. 23, available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234539.

O’BRIEN, W. and GUNAY, H.B. (2014), “The contextual factors contributing to occupants’ adaptive comfort behaviors in offices - A review and proposed modeling framework”, Building and Environment, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 77, pp. 77–87.

ORLAND, B., RAM, N., LANG, D., HOUSER, K., KLING, N. and COCCIA, M. (2014), “Saving energy in an office environment: A serious game intervention”, Energy and Buildings, OZCELIK, G., BECERIK-GERBER, B. and CHUGH, R. (2019), “Understanding human-building interactions under multimodal discomfort”, Building and Environment, Elsevier, Vol. 151 No. December 2018, pp. 280–290.

PARK, J.Y., OUF, M.M., GUNAY, B., PENG, Y., O’BRIEN, W., KJÆRGAARD, M.B. and NAGY, Z. (2019), “A critical review of field implementations of occupant-centric building controls”, Building and Environment, Elsevier, Vol. 165 No. May, p. 106351.

PFADENHAUER, M. (2015), “The Contemporary Appeal of Artificial Companions: Social Robots as Vehicles to Cultural Worlds of Experience”, Information Society, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 284–293.

RITTEL, H.W.J. and WEBBER, M.M. (1973), “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4 No. December 1969, pp. 155–169.

RODGERS, J. and BARTRAM, L. (2011), “Exploring ambient and artistic visualization for residential energy use feedback”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE, Vol. 17 No. 12, pp. 2489–2497.

STAZI, F., NASPI, F. and D’ORAZIO, M. (2017), “A literature review on driving factors and contextual events influencing occupants’ behaviours in buildings”, Building and Environment, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 118, pp. 40–66.

SWAMINATHAN, S., WANG, X., ZHOU, B. and BALDI, S. (2018), “A University Building Test Case for Occupancy-Based Building Automation”, Energies, Vol. 11 No. 11, p. 3145.

TAMAS, R., OUF, M.M. and O’BRIEN, W. (2020), “A field study on the effect of building automation on perceived comfort and control in institutional buildings”, Architectural Science Review, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 74–86.

TIEFENBECK, V., WÖRNER, A., SCHÖB, S., FLEISCH, E. and STAAKE, T. (2019), “Real-time feedback promotes energy conservation in the absence of volunteer selection bias and monetary incentives”, Nature Energy, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 35–41.

VANDEVYVERE, H. and HEYNEN, H. (2014), “Sustainable Development, Architecture and Modernism: Aspects of an Ongoing Controversy”, Arts, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 350–366.

ZHUANG, X. and WU, C. (2019), “The effect of interactive feedback on attitude and behavior change in setting air conditioners in the workplace”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 183, pp. 739–748.

Available Versions of this Item

All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top