Login | Register

The Influence of Operational Sex Ratio on the Intensity of Competition for Mates


The Influence of Operational Sex Ratio on the Intensity of Competition for Mates

Weir, Laura K., Grant, James W.A. and Hutchings, Jeffrey A. (2011) The Influence of Operational Sex Ratio on the Intensity of Competition for Mates. The American Naturalist, 177 (2). pp. 167-176. ISSN 00030147

[thumbnail of Grant_AmericanNaturalist_2011.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Grant_AmericanNaturalist_2011.pdf - Published Version

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/657918


The evolution and maintenance of secondary sexual characteristics and behavior are heavily influenced by the variance in mating success among individuals in a population. The operational sex ratio (OSR) is often used as a predictor of the intensity of competition for mates, as it describes the relative number of males and females who are ready to mate. We investigate changes in aggression, courtship, mate guarding, and sperm release as a function of changes in the OSR using meta-analytic techniques. As the OSR becomes increasingly biased, aggression increases as competitors attempt to defend mates, but this aggression begins to decrease at an OSR of 1.99, presumably due to the increased costs of competition as rivals become more numerous. Sperm release follows a similar but not significant trend. By contrast, courtship rate decreases as the OSR becomes increasingly biased, whereas mate guarding and copulation duration increase. Overall, predictable behavioral changes occur in response to OSR, although the nature of the change is dependent on the type of mating behavior. These results suggest considerable flexibility of mating system structure within species, which can be predicted by OSR and likely results in variation in the strength of sexual selection.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Biology
Item Type:Article
Authors:Weir, Laura K. and Grant, James W.A. and Hutchings, Jeffrey A.
Journal or Publication:The American Naturalist
Date:February 2011
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1086/657918
Keywords:mating system , operational sex ratio , contest competition , sperm competition , courtship , mate guarding
ID Code:7113
Deposited By: Danielle Dennie
Deposited On:02 Mar 2011 17:19
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:30


Abouheif, E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1:895–909.

Alcock, J. 1994. Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annual Review of Entomology 39:1–21.

Alonso-Pimentel, H., and D. R. Papaj. 1996. Operational sex ratio versus gender density as determinants of copulation duration in the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 39:171–180.

Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. In J. R. Krebs and T. Clutton-Brock, eds. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Arnqvist, G. 1992. Pre-copulatory fighting in a water strider: inter-sexual conflict or mate assessment? Animal Behaviour 43:559–567.

Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368.

Begg, C. R., and M. Mazumdar. 1994. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101.

Bradbury, J. W., and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1977. Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats. III. Mating systems. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2:1–17.

Brown, J. L. 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bulletin 76:160–169.

Byrne, P. G., and J. D. Roberts. 2004. Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behavioral Ecology 15:872–882.

Candolin, U., and J. D. Reynolds. 2002a. Adjustments of ejaculation rates in response to risk of sperm competition in a fish, the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:1549–1553.

———. 2002b. Why do males tolerate sneakers? tests with the European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:146–152.

Clutton-Brock, T. H. 2009. Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour 77:3–11.

Clutton-Brock, T. H., and G. A. Parker. 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 67:437–456.

Clutton-Brock, T. H., and A. J. Vincent. 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58–60.

Colwell, M. A., and L. W. Oring. 1988. Sex ratios and intrasexual competition in a sex-role reversed shorebird, Wilson’s phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22:165–173.

Crawley, M. J. 2007. The R book. Wiley, Chichester.

Crespi, B. J., and M. J. Fulton. 2004. Molecular systematic of Salmonidae: combined nuclear data yields a robust phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31:658–679.

Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Debuse, V. J., J. T. Addison, and J. D. Reynolds. 1999. The effects of sex ratio on sexual competition in the European lobster. Animal Behaviour 58:473–481.

———. 2003. Effects of breeding site density on competition and sexual selection in the European lobster. Behavioral Ecology 14:396–402.

delBarco-Trillo, J., and M. H. Ferkin. 2006. Male meadow voles respond differently to risk and intensity of sperm competition. Behavioral Ecology 17:581–585.

Dewsbury, D. A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. American Naturalist 119:601–610.

Emlen, S. T. 1976. Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 283:283–313.

Emlen, S. T., and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223.

Forsgren, E., T. Amundsen, A. A. Borg, and J. Bjelvenmark. 2004. Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 429:551–554.

Fugiwara, M., J. Inafuku, A. Takeda, A. Watanabe, A. Fujiwara, S. Kohno, and S. Kubota. 2009. Molecular organization of 5S rDNA in bitterlings (Cyprinidae). Genetica 135:355–365.

Grant, J. W. A., and P. E. Foam. 2002. Effect of operational sex ratio on female-female versus male-male competitive aggression. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:2242–2246.

Grant, J. W. A., C. L. Gaboury, and H. L. Levitt. 2000. Competitor-to-resource ratio, a general formulation of operational sex ratio, as a predictor of competitive aggression in Japanese medaka (Pisces: Oryziidae). Behavioral Ecology 11:670–675.

Gwynne, D. T., J. T. Bailey, and A. Annells. 1998. The sex in short supply varies over small spatial scales in a katydid (Kawanaphila nartee, Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42:157–162.

Harrison, F., Z. Barta, I. Cuthill, and T. Székeley. 2009. How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? a meta-analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22:1800–1812.

Head, M. L., and R. Brooks. 2006. Sexual coercion and the opportunity for sexual selection in guppies. Animal Behaviour 71:515–522.

Hertwig, S. T. 2008. Phylogeny of the Cyprinodontiformes (Teleostei, Atherinomorpha): the contribution of cranial soft tissue characters. Zoologica Scripta 37:141–174.

Huxley, J. S. 1938. Darwin’s theory of sexual selection and the data subsumed by it, in the light of recent research. American Naturalist 72:416–473.

Iribarne, O., M. Fernandez, and D. Armstrong. 1995. Precopulatory guarding-time of the male amphipod Eogammarus oclairi: effect of population structure. Marine Biology 124:219–223.

Jirotkul, M. 1999. Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Animal Behaviour 58:287–294.

Jones, K. S., S. Nakagawa, and B. Sheldon. 2009. Environmental sensitivity in relation to size and sex in birds: meta-regression analysis. American Naturalist 174:122–133.

Jormalainen, V. 1998. Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Quarterly Review of Biology 73:275–304.

Jormalainen, V., and M. Shuster. 1999. Female reproductive cycle and sexual conflict over precopulatory mate-guarding in Thermosphaeroma (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology 105:233–246.

Joy, J. E., and D. Crews. 1985. Social dynamics of group courtship behaviour in male red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). Journal of Comparative Psychology 99:145–149.

Kamio, M., S. Matsunaga, and N. Fusetani. 2003. Observation on the mating behaviour of the helmet crab Telmessus cheiragonus (Brachyura: Cheiragonidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83:1007–1013.

Kanoh, Y. 2000. Reproductive success associated with territoriality, sneaking, and grouping in male rose bitterlings, Rhodeus ocellatus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 57:143–154.

Klemme, I., H. Ylönen, and J. A. Eccard. 2007. Reproductive success of male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus): the effect of operational sex ratio and body size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61:1911–1918.

Klug, H., J. Heuschele, M. D. Jennions, and H. Kokko. 2010. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:447–462.

Kodric-Brown, A. 1988. Effects of sex-ratio on territoriality and spawning success of male pipefish, Cyprinodon pecosensis. Animal Behaviour 36:1136–1144.

Kokko, H., and M. D. Jennions. 2008. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:919–948.

Kokko, H., and P. Monaghan. 2001. Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecology Letters 4:159–165.

Kvarnemo, C., and I. Ahnesjö. 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:404–408.

Kvarnemo, C., E. Forsgren, and C. Magnhagen. 1995. Effects of sex ratio on intra- and inter-sexual behaviour in sand gobies. Animal Behaviour 50:1455–1461.

Lindström, K. 2001. Effects of resource distribution on sexual selection and the cost of reproduction in sandgobies. American Naturalist 158:64–74.

Lipsey, M. W., and D. B. Wilson. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Lott, D. L. 1984. Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. Behaviour 88:266–325.

Mathews, L. M. 2002. Tests of the mate-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: does population density, sex ratio, or female synchrony affect behaviour of male snapping shrimp (Alpheus angulatus)? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:426–432.

Mayden, R. L., K. L. Tang, R. M. Wood, W.-J. Chen, M. K. Agnew, K. W. Conway, L. Yang, et al. 2008. Inferring the tree of life of the order Cypriniformes, the earth’s most diverse clade of freshwater fishes: implications of varied taxon and character sampling. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46:424–438.

McKellar, A. E., M. M. Turcotte, and A. P. Hendry. 2009. Environmental factors influencing adult sex ratio in Trinidadian guppies. Oecologia (Berlin) 159:735–745.

Mills, S. C., and J. D. Reynolds. 2003. Operational sex ratio and alternative reproductive behaviours in the European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54:98–104.

Moore, A. J. 1987. The behavioural ecology of Libellula luctuosa (Burmeister) (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). I. Temporal changes in the population density and the effects on male territorial behavior. Ethology 75:246–254.

Nakagawa, S., N. Ockendon, G. O. S. Gillespie, B. J. Hatchwell, and T. Burke. 2007. Assessing the function of house sparrow’s bib size using a flexible meta-analysis method. Behavioral Ecology 18:831–840.

Nakatsuru, K., and D. L. Kramer. 1982. Is sperm cheap? limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science 216:753–755.

Parker, G. A. 1974. Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48:157–184.

Parker, G. A., M. A. Ball, P. Stockley, and M. J. G. Gage. 1996. Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:1291–1297.

———. 1997. Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 264:1793–1802.

Pilastro, A., M. Scaggiante, and M. B. Rasotto. 2002. Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:9913–9915.

Reeve, J., and E. Abouheif. 2003. Phylogenetic independence. Ver. 2.0. http://biology.mcgill.ca/faculty/abouheif/programs_pi.htm.

Reynolds, J. D. 1993. Should attractive individuals court more? theory and a test. American Naturalist 141:914–927.

———. 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:68–72.

Rondeau, A., and B. Sainte-Marie. 2001. Variable mate-guarding time and sperm allocation by male snow crabs (Chionecetes opilio) in response to sexual competition, and their impact on the mating success of females. Biological Bulletin 201:204–217.

Schaus, J. M., and S. K. Sakaluk. 2001. Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games. Behavioral Ecology 12:740–745.

Selander, R. K. 1972. Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. Pages 180–230 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago.

Shine, R., T. Langkilde, and R. T. Mason. 2003. The opportunistic serpent: male garter snakes adjust courtship tactics to mating opportunities. Behaviour 140:1509–1526.

Shuster, S. M. 2009. Sexual selection and mating systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106(suppl.):10009–10016.

Sih, A., and J. J. Krupa. 1995. Interacting effects of predation risk and male and female density on male/female conflicts and mating dynamics of stream water striders. Behavioral Ecology 6:316–325.

Smith, C. C. 2007. Independent effect of male and female density on sexual harassment, female fitness, and male competition for mates in the western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61:1349–1358.

Souroukis, K., and W. H. Cade. 1993. Reproductive competition and selection on male traits at varying sex ratios in the field cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus. Behaviour 126:45–62.

Spence, R., and C. Smith. 2005. Male territoriality mediates density and sex ratio effects on oviposition in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Animal Behaviour 69:1317–1323.

Tejedo, M. 1988. Fighting for females in the toad Bufo calamita is affected by the operational sex ratio. Animal Behaviour 36:1765–1769.

Thornhill, R., and J. Alcock. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 136–179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago.

Verrell, P. 1982. The sexual behavior of the red spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Amphibia, Urodela, Salamandridae). Animal Behaviour 30:1224–1236.

Wada, S., K. Tanaka, and S. Goshima. 1999. Precopulatory mate guarding in the hermit crab, Pagurus middendorffii (Brandt) (Decopoda: Paguridae): effects of population parameters on male guarding duration. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 239:289–298.

Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:313–320.

Weir, L. K., and J. W. A. Grant. 2010. Courtship signals fertility in an externally fertilizing fish. Biology Letters 6:727–731.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top