Login | Register

An Analysis of the Primary Years Programme as a Socio-constructivist Curriculum Model


An Analysis of the Primary Years Programme as a Socio-constructivist Curriculum Model

Sandrin, Ann (2010) An Analysis of the Primary Years Programme as a Socio-constructivist Curriculum Model. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Sandrin_MA_S2011.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Sandrin_MA_S2011.pdf - Accepted Version


The purpose of the study was to determine whether the PYP curriculum contains the elements of an authentic socio-constructivist pedagogical model. Vygotsky’s historical-sociocultural research became the principal work through which the related principles of learning and teaching were identified. The theories that guided this study focused on the development of the child as a member of a learning community, the role of the teacher as a conduit for cognitive and metacognitive development, and the pedagogical elements of the classroom environment that contribute to developmentally appropriate practice (DAP). In order to undertake this research, the senior kindergarten (K2) level of Uptown Primary School was selected as the setting. In order to ascertain the PYP’s compatibility with socio-constructivism, several procedures were done that included a Comparison Chart of Perspectives (CCP), a Micro-analysis of a K2 Unit of Inquiry planner, and the assessment of the participants’ educational values and beliefs, in addition, to their perceptions of teacher practices. Findings from this study suggest that the PYP’s pedagogical framework is structured according to the philosophy and practices of an authentic socio-constructivist model, one that is based on the holistic development of the child, a child-centered and interactive pedagogy, and learning as a sociocultural endeavour.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Education
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Sandrin, Ann
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M.A.
Program:Child Study
Date:July 2010
Thesis Supervisor(s):Jacobs, Ellen
ID Code:7175
Deposited By: ANN SANDRIN
Deposited On:09 Jun 2011 15:00
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:30


Airasian, P. W., & Walsh, M. E. (1997). Constructivist cautions. The Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 444-449.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
Branscombe, N. A., Castle, K., Dorsey, A. G., Surbeck, E., & Taylor, J. B. (2000). Early childhood education: A constructivist approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development, In M. Gauvin & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 36- 43). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms (Rev. ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Brooks, M. (2004). Drawing: The social construction of knowledge. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 29, 41-49.
Brown, D. M. (2003). Learner-centered conditions that ensure students' success in learning. Education, 124, 99-107.
Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. New York: Random House.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Christenson, S. (2004). The family-school partnership: An opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Review, 33, 455-482.
Copple, C., Sigel, I. E., & Saunders, R. (1984). Educating the young thinker: Classroom strategies for growth. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Daiute, C., & Dalton, B. (1993). Collaboration between children learning to write: Can novices be masters? Cognition and Instruction, 10, 281-333.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
DeVries, R., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). Programs of early education: The constructivist view. New York: Longman.
Forman, G. E., & Kuschner, D. S. (1977). The child's construction of knowledge: Piaget for teaching children. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Fosnot, C. T. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Preface. In J. G. Brooks & M. G. Brooks (Eds.), In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms (pp. vii-viii). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hedges, H. (2000). Teaching in early childhood: Time to merge constructivist views so learning through play equals teaching through play. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25, 16-21.
Henson, K. T. (2003). Foundations for learner-centered education: A knowledge base. Education, 124, 5-16.
Jacobs, E., Vukelich, G., & Howe, N. (2006). Pathways to constructivism: A self-directed guide for educators. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Concordia University, Canadian Child Care Curriculum Study.
Jaramillo, J. A. (1996). Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education, 117, 133-140.
Kamii, C., & DeVries, R. (1980). Group games in early education: Implications of Piaget's theory. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53, 27-36.
Katz, L. G. (1999). Curriculum disputes in early childhood education. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDO-PS-99-13)
King, A. (1995). Designing the instructional process to enhance critical thinking across the curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 13-17.
Kozulin, A. (1999). Vygotsky's psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky's and Feuerstein's perspectives in a study of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 67-75.
Liaw, S.-S. (2001). Designing the hypermedia-based learning environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28, 43-56.
Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M. L. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; US.
Mayer, C., Akamatsu, C. T., & Stewart, D. (2002). A model for effective practice: Dialogic inquiry with students who are deaf. Exceptional Children, 68, 485-502.
Murdoch, K. (1998). Classroom connections: Strategies for integrated learning. Prahran, Victoria, Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Olsen, D. G. (1999). Constructivist principles of learning and teaching methods. Education, 120, 347-355.
Organization, I. B. (2007). Making the PYP happen: A curriculum framework for international primary education. Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom: Author
Oxford, R. L. (1997). Constructivism: Shape-shifting, substance, and teacher education applications. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 35-66.
Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227-241.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.
Patrikakou, E. N., & Weissberg, R. P. (2000). Parents' perceptions of teacher outreach and parent involvement in children's education. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 20, 103-119.
Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30, 83-92.
Perry, N., & Drummond, L. (2002). Helping young students become self-regulated researchers and writers. Reading Teacher, 56, 298-310.
Reynolds, R. E., Sinatra, G. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1996). Views of knowledge acquisition and representation: A continuum from experience centered to mind centered. Educational Psychologist, 31, 93-104.
Rice, M. L., & Wilson, E. K. (1999). How technology aids constructivism in the social studies classroom. Social Studies, 90, 28-33.
Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings (pp. 3-14). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Pianta, R. C., Cox, M. J., & Bradley, R. H. (2003). Teacher-rated family involvement and children's social and academic outcomes in kindergarten. Early Education and Development, 14, 179-198.
Saunders, R., & Bingham-Newman, A. M. (1984). Piagetian perspective for preschools: A thinking book for teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Selley, N. (1999). The art of constructivist teaching in the primary school: A guide for students and teachers. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Short, K. G., & Burke, C. (1991). Creating curriculum: Teachers and students as a community of learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Tappan, M. B. (1998). Sociocultural psychology and caring pedagogy: Exploring Vygotsky's "Hidden Curriculum". Educational Psychologist, 33, 23-33.
Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (1997). Child development and the purpose of education: A historical context for constructivism in teacher education. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings (pp. 15-37). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Vickers, H. S., & Minke, K. M. (1995). Exploring parent-teacher relationships: Joining and communication to others. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 133-150.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman & Eds., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Education/Prentice Hall, Inc.
Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Woodhead, M., & Faulkner, D. (2000). Subjects, objects or participants? Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 9-35). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model: Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 51, 52-57.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top