Carillo, Kevin and Okoli, Chitu (2011) Generating quality open content: A functional group perspective based on the time, interaction, and performance theory. Information & Management, 48 (6). pp. 208-219. ISSN 03787206
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
508kBCarillo_&_Okoli_2011_distro.pdf |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.04.004
Abstract
We applied the Input-Process-Output approach and Time, Interaction, and Performance theory to examine the input factors (organisational, group-related, and individual) and process factors (group production, group well-being, and member support) that yield group effectiveness, measured as high-quality articles in Wikipedia. The results provided evidence of the positive effects of: group size and shared experience on both group process variables and group effectiveness; group heterogeneity on group production; organisational support and member activeness on group well-being; member activeness on member support; and organisational support and member activeness on group effectiveness.
Divisions: | Concordia University > John Molson School of Business > Decision Sciences and Management Information Systems |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article |
Refereed: | Yes |
Authors: | Carillo, Kevin and Okoli, Chitu |
Journal or Publication: | Information & Management |
Date: | August 2011 |
Funders: |
|
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.1016/j.im.2011.04.004 |
Keywords: | Group research; Input-Process-Output approach; Time, Interaction, and Performance theory; open content; virtual communities; Wikipedia |
ID Code: | 7748 |
Deposited By: | CHITUANYA OKOLI |
Deposited On: | 02 Dec 2011 20:46 |
Last Modified: | 18 Jan 2018 17:31 |
Additional Information: | This is Kevin Carillo's 2005 master's thesis from Concordia (DSMIS Department), supervised by Chitu Okoli. |
References:
[1] A.M. Aladwani, A. Rai, R. Arkalgud, Formal participation and performance of the system development group: The role of group heterogeneity and group-based rewards. Database for Advances in Information Systems 31 (4), 2000, pp. 25–41.[2] M. Alonzo, M. Aiken, M. Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems 36 (3), 2004, pp. 205–213.
[3] R. Barkhi, V.S. Jacob, H. Pirkul, The influence of communication mode and incentive structure on GDSS process and outcomes. Decision Support Systems 37 (2), 2004, pp. 287–305.
[4] R.S. Batenburg, F.J. Bongers, The role of GSS in participatory policy analysis. A field experiment, Information & Management 39 (1), 2001, pp. 15–30.
[5] I. Benbasat, L.H. Lim, The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems, Small Group Research 24 (4), 1993, pp. 430–462.
[6] K. Burke, L. Chidambaram, Development in Electronically-Supported Groups: A Preliminary Longitudinal Study of Distributed and Face-to-face Meetings, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1994, pp. 104–113.
[7] C. Cheshire, J. Antin, The social psychological effects of feedback on the production of Internet information pools, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (3), 2008, pp. 705–727.
[8] A.R. Dennis, B.A. Reinicke, Beta versus VHS and the acceptance of electronic brainstorming technology, MIS Quarterly 28 (1), 2004, pp. 1–20.
[9] G. Desanctis, R.B. Gallupe, A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Management Science 33 (5), 1987, pp. 589–609.
[10] G. Easton, A. Easton, M. Belch, An experimental investigation of electronic focus groups, Information & Management 40 (8), 2003, pp. 717–727.
[11] J. Fjermestad, S.R. Hiltz, An assessment of group support systems experiment research: Methodology and results, Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (3), 1999, pp. 7–15.
[12] D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16(5), 2005, pp. 91–109.
[13] J.R. Hackman, C.G. Morris, Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration, In, L. Berkowitz, ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, 1975, pp. 45–99.
[14] J.R. Hackman, The design of work teams, In, J.W. Lorsch, ed., Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987, pp. 315–342.
[15] W.W. Huang, K.K. Wei, R.T. Watson, B.C.Y. Tan, Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: An empirical investigation, Decision Support Systems 34 (6), 2003, pp. 359–367.
[16] I. Jahnke, Dynamics of social roles in a knowledge management community, Computers in Human Behavior, 2009.
[17] C.B. Jarvis, S.B. MacKenzie, P.M. Podsakoff, A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research 30, 2003, pp. 199–218.
[18] Y. Kim, S.R. Hiltz, M. Turoff, Coordination structures and system restrictiveness in distributed group support systems, Group Decision and Negotiation 11 (5), 2002, pp. 379–404.
[19] R.E. Kraut, Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work, In, J.M. Carroll, ed., HCI Models, Theories, & Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, 2003.
[20] J. Kutsko, J.Y. Smith, Effectiveness measures for distributed teams using electronic meeting technology: the Larson/Lafasto instrument, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1991, pp. 458–470.
[21] J. Lerner, J. Tirole, Some simple economics of open source, Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (2), 2002, pp. 197–234.
[22] J.S. Lurey, M.S. Raisinghani, An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams, Information & Management 38 (8), 2001, pp. 523–544.
[23] J.E. McGrath, Groups: Interaction and performance, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984.
[24] S.M. Miranda, R.P Bostrom, The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management, Journal of Management Information Systems 10 (3), 1993, pp. 63–95.
[25] M.M. Montoya-Weiss, A.P. Massey, M. and Song, Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams, Academy of Management Journal 44 (6) 2001, pp. 1251–1262.
[26] J.G. Oetzel, Self-construals, communication processes, and group outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups, Small Group Research 32 (1), 2001, pp. 19–54.
[27] C. Okoli, W. Oh, Investigating recognition-based performance in an open content community: A social capital perspective. Information & Management 44 (3), 2007, pp. 240–252.
[28] S. Paul, S. Priya, S. Imad, P.M. Peter, Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams, Information & Management 41 (3), 2004, pp. 303–321.
[29] D.J. Pauleen, An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members, Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (3), 2003, pp. 227–256.
[30] M.S. Poole, A.B. Hollingshead, J.E. McGrath, R.L. Moreland, J. Rohrbaugh, Interdisciplinary perspectives on small groups, Small Group Research 35 (3), 2004, pp. 3–16.
[31] C. Ridings, M.M.L. Wasko, Online discussion group sustainability: Investigating the interplay between structural dynamics and social dynamics over time, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11 (2), 2010, pp. 95–120.
[32] I.D. Steiner, Group process and productivity, Academic Press, New York, 1972.
[33] K.R. Walsh, M.H. Dickey, Structured modelling group support systems: a product design theory, Information & Management 41 (5), 2004, pp. 655–667.
[34] G.M. Wittenbaum, A.B. Hollingshead, A.B., P.B. Paulus et al., The functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups, Small Group Research 35 (1), 2004, pp. 17–43.
[35] C.G. Wu, J.H. Gerlach, C.E. Young, An empirical analysis of open source software developers’ motivations and continuance intentions, Information & Management 44 (3), 2007, pp. 253–262.
Repository Staff Only: item control page