Login | Register

Structural Performance Model for Subway Networks


Structural Performance Model for Subway Networks

Semaan, Nabil (2011) Structural Performance Model for Subway Networks. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Semaan_PhD_F2011.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Semaan_PhD_F2011.pdf - Accepted Version


The Transit Federal Administration (FTA) reported that transit use increased by 25% between 1995 and 2005 in North America. Current communities are anticipating a high quality of life where people will be able to move freely with an affordable, reliable and efficient public transit. In 2009, the FTA estimated that 15.8 billion USD is needed annually to maintain and 21.6 billion USD is needed to improve the US transit network to satisfactory conditions. Moreover, the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) estimated that 140 Billion CAD are required for maintaining, rehabilitating and replacing the subway infrastructure between 2010 and 2014. It is apparent that subway management planning is of extreme importance in order to maintain the safety of infrastructure.
Subway management plans consist of assessing the structural performance of subway networks, predicting future performance, planning future maintenance and repair policies and optimizing budget allocation. Most transit authorities lack tools/models for assessing the structural performance of subway network. Therefore, the present research assists in developing the SUbway PERformance (SUPER) model, which assesses structural performance of different components in a subway network and develops performance curves of subway components, systems, lines and the entire network.
The developed SUPER model performs the following steps in order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives: (1) identifies and studies network hierarchy, (2) performs structural physical, functional and integrated performance assessment at the component level, and (3) constructs performance curves at the component, line and network levels. The SUPER model uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in order to assess the integrated components’ performance. It also utilizes a reliability-based cumulative Weibull function to construct the performance curves of components. In addition, series/parallel system modeling techniques are adopted to evaluate and construct the performance models of the systems, lines and network. Finally, a software application based upon the SUPER model is developed, entitled the ‘SUPER Model Software’.
Data are collected from the Société de Transport de Montréal (STM) inspection reports and through questionnaires. The questionnaires target transit authority managers and experienced structural engineers in both Canada and the USA. The developed SUPER model is applied to a network segment of the STM subway network. Results show that system deterioration rates are between 2% and 3% per year. The remaining useful service life are predicted to be until the year 2076 for renovated stations, 2030 for tunnels and between 2024 and 2040 for auxiliary structures. This research is relevant to industry practitioners (managers, engineers and field inspectors) and researchers since it develops structural performance assessment models and curves for subway networks.

Divisions:Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:Semaan, Nabil
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Building Engineering
Date:13 July 2011
Thesis Supervisor(s):Zayed, Tarek
Keywords:Subway Networks, Structural Performance Modeling, Strucutral Performance Assessment, Weibull Reliability Function
ID Code:7753
Deposited By: NABIL SEMAAN
Deposited On:21 Nov 2011 20:27
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:31


Abu-Mallouh M., Model for Station Rehabilitation and Planning (MSRP), (1999), PHD Thesis, Polytechnic University, Construction Engineering and Management Department, Civil Engineering, USA.

American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 2009, Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, www.asce.org/reportcard/2009, surfed on 1st March 2010.

ASTM Standard E1480-92R04, 2004, “Standard Terminology of Facility Management”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, www.astm.org.

Baik H., Jeong H. S., and Abraham D., (2006), “Estimating Transition Probabilities in Markov-Chain-Based Deterioration Models for Management of Wastewater Systems”, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 15-24.

Brans J.P., and Mareschal B., (1986), How to Decide with PROMETHEE, ULB and VUB Brussels Free Universities, http://smg.ulb.ac.be, surfed on 21st March 2010.

Butt A.A., Shahin M.Y., Feighan K.J., and Carpenter S.H., (1987), “Pavement Performance Prediction Model Using the Markov Process”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1123, TRB, Washington, D.C., pp. 12-19.

Canadian Urban Transit Association, CUTA, 2010, Transit Infrastructure Needs for the Period 2010-2014, Toronto, ON, Canada, www.cutaactu.ca, surfed on 18th March 2011.

Chugtai F., and Zayed T., (2008), “Infrastructure Condition Prediction Models for Sustainable Sewer Pipelines”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 333-341.

Collins L., (1972), An Introduction to Markov Chain Analysis, CATMOG, Geo Abstracts Ltd., University of East Anglia, Norwich, U.K.

Concrete Bridge Development Group (CBDG), “Guide to Testing and Monitoring the Durability of Concrete Structures,” (2002), Technical Guide No. 2, The Concrete society, London, UK.

Cox S., and Trait R., (1998), Safety, Reliability, and Risk Management; An Integrated Approach, 2nd Edition, Butterworth-Heinmann, Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd., Great Britain.

CSA Standard A23.3-04, Concrete Design Handbook, (2006), 3rd Edition, Cement Association of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

Denton S., (2002), “Data Estimates for Different Maintenance Options for Reinforced Concrete Cross-Heads”, (Personal Communication for Highways Agency, U.K.), Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd., Bristol, U.K.

DeStephano P.D., and Grivas D.A., (1998), “Method for Estimating Transition Probability in Bridge Deterioration Models”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 56-62.

Elhakeem A., An Asset Management Framework for Educational Buildings with Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, (2005), PHD Thesis, Waterloo University, Civil Engineering, Canada.

Farran M., Life Cycle Cost for Rehabilitation of Public Infrastructure: Application to Montreal Metro System, (2006), MaSc. Thesis, Concordia University, Faculty of Civil, Environmental and Computer Engineering, Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Canada.

Farran M., and Zayed T., (2009), “Comparative Analysis of Life-Cycle Costing for Rehabilitating Infrastructure Systems’, Journal of Performance of constructed Facilities, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 320-326.

Frangopol D. and Das P., (1999), “Management of Bridge Stocks Based on Future Reliability and Maintenance Costs”, Bridge Design, Construction and Maintenance, Institution of Civil Engineers, Thomas Telford, London, pp. 45-58.

Frangopol D., and Neves L., (2004), “Probabilistic Life-Cycle Analysis of Deteriorating Structures under Multiple Performance Constraints”, Proceedings of the 2004 Structures Congress and Exposition, ASCE, May 22-28, Nashville, Tennessee.

Estes A., and Frangopol D., “Reliability-Based Condition Assessment”, In Ratay T. (2005), Structural Condition Assessment, John Wiley and sons, The University of Michigan, pp. 1-66.

Frangopol D., Kong J., and Gharaibeh E., (2001), “Reliability-Based Life-Cycle Management of Highway Bridges”, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 27-34.

Golabi K., and Shepard R., (1997), “Pontis: A System for Maintenance Optimization and Improvement of U.S. Bridge Networks”, Interfaces, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 71-88.

Grussing M.N., Uzarski D.R., and Marrano L.R., (2006), “Condition and Reliability Models using the Weibull Probability Distribution”, Proceedings of the 9th Application of Advanced Technology in Transportation (AATT) Conference, August 13-16, Chicago, IL.

Hillier, F. S., and Lieberman, G. J., (1967). Introduction to Operation Research, Holden-Day, London.

Hong F., and Prozzi J., (2006), “Estimation of Pavement Performance Deterioration Using Bayesian Approach”, Journal of Infrastructure Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 77-86.

Hovde P. J., (2005), “The Factor Method – A Simple Tool to Service Life Estimation”, 10DBMC International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Lyon, France, 17-20 April.

Hovde, P. J. and Moser, K. (2004), Performance based methods for service life prediction. State of the art reports, Part A and Part B. CIB Report: Publication 294. CIB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Hudson W.R., Hass R., and Uddin W., (1997), Infrastructure Management, McGraw Hill, New York, USA.

InfraGuide (2005), “Strategies for Implementing Transit Priority”, Best Practice Report, Federation of Canadian Municipalities and National Research Council.

Jardine A., Tsang A., (2006), Maintenance, Replacement and Reliability; Theory and Applications, CRC press, Taylor and Francis Group, Florida, USA.

Kong J., and Frangopol D., (2003), “Life-Cycle Reliability-Based Maintenance Cost Optimization of Deteriorating Structures with Emphasis on Bridges”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 818-828.

Lalonde E., and Bergeron C., (2004), “A Decision Support Methodology for Asset Management”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, July 13-16, 2003, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Lounis Z., Lactase M.A., Vanier D. J., and Kyle B.R., (1998), “Towards Standardization of Service Life Prediction of Roofing Membranes”. Roofing Research and Standards Development: 4th Volume. ASTM, STP 1349, PA, USA.

Liu M., (2006), Bridge Network Lifetime Maintenance Optimization under Uncertainty, PhD Thesis, University of Colorado, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, USA.

Liu M., Frangopol D., (2005), “Time-Dependent Bridge Network Reliability: Novel Approach”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 329-337.

Madanat S., (1993), “Optimal Infrastructure Management Decisions under Uncertainty”, Transportation Research, Part C, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 77-88.

Madanat, S. and Ibrahim, W. H. W., (1995), "Poisson Regression Models of Infrastructure Transition Probabilities", Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 267-272.

Madanat S., Karlaftis M., and McCarthy P.S., (1997), “Probabilistic Infrastructure Deterioration Models with Panel Data”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 4-9.

Mailvaganam N., Gratta-Bellew P., and Pernica G., Deterioration of Concrete: Symptoms, Causes and Investigation, (2000), National Research Council, Institute of Research in Construction Publication, Ottawa, Canada.

McDonald D., (2005), Part of Transportation Research Board (TRB), “Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems”, Conference Proceedings 36, August 22-24, Irvine, California, USA.

Milne I., Ritchie R. O., and Karihaloo B., (2003), Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Elsevier, San Diego, USA.

Morcous G., (2006), “Performance Prediction of Bridge Deck Systems Using Markov Chains”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 146-155.

Neves, L. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004). “Condition, Safety and Cost Profiles for Deteriorating Structures with Emphasis on Bridges”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 89, pp. 185-198.

Ortiz-Garcia J., Costello S.B., and Snaith M.S., (2006), “Derivation of Transition Probability Matrices for Pavement Deterioration Modeling”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, Issue 2, pp. 141-161.

Petcherdchoo A., Neves L., and Frangopol D., (2006), “Optimizing Lifetime Condition and Reliability of Deteriorating Structures with Emphasis on Bridges”, Proceedings of the 17th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conference, May 18-21, St. Louis, Missouri.

Roy B., Present M., and Silhol D., (1986), “A Programming method for determining which Paris Metro Stations should be renovated”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 24, Issue 2, pp. 318-334.

Saaty T., (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill, New York, USA.

Sarja A., and Vesikari E., Durability Design of Concrete Structures, (1996), RILEM Report 14, Technical Research Center of Finland, E & FN Spon.

Semaan N., Subway Station Diagnosis Index (SSDI): A Condition Assessment Model, (2006), MaSc. Thesis, Concordia University, Faculty of Civil, Environmental and Computer Engineering, Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Canada.

Semaan N., and Zayed T., (2009), “Subway Station Diagnosis Index Condition Assessment Model”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 222-231.

Semaan N., and Zayed T., (2010), “A Stochastic Model for Subway Stations’, Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 25, pp. 32-41.

Sharabah A., Setunge S., and Zeephongsekul P., (2006), “Use of Markov Chain for Deterioration Modeling and Risk Management of Infrastructure Assets”, IEEE, ICIA, pp. 384-388.

Sianipar P.M.M., and Adams T.M., (1997), “Fault-Tree Model of Bridge Element Deterioration due to Interaction”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 103-110.

Société de Transport de Montreal (1992), “Evaluation of structural deterioration Guide”, Report No. 890725, Montreal.

Thompson P., Small E., Johnson M., and Marshall A., (1998), “The Pontis Bridge Management System”, Structural Engineering International, (IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland), Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 303-308.

Tolliver Heidi, (1996), A Tail of Four Cities, ‘Transit Operation Massachusetts Transit’, pp. 22-74, Boston, USA.

Tran H. D., Investigation of Deterioration Models for Storm Water Pipe Systems, (2000), PHD Thesis, Victoria University, School of Architectural, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Science, Australia.

Van Noortwijk J., and Frangopol D., (2004a), “Deterioration and Maintenance Models for Insuring Safety of Civil Infrastructure at Lowest Life-Cycle Cost”, Published in Frangopol D., Brühwiler E., Faber M.H., and Adey B., editors, Life-Cycle Performance of Deteriorating Structures: Assessment, Design, and Management, pp. 384-391, Reston, Virginia, ASCE.

Van Noortwijk, J. M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004b). “Two probabilistic life-cycle maintenance models for deteriorating civil infrastructure.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 345–359.

Wang Y., Zayed T., and Moselhi O., (2009), “Prediction Models for Annual Break of Water Mains”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 47-54.

Wirahadikusumah R., (1999), “Sewer Management Life Cycle Cost Approach”, PHD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, USA.

Yang J., Gunaratne M., Lu J.J., and Dietrich B., (2005), “Use of Recurrent Markov Chains for Modeling the Crack Performance of Flexible Pavements”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, Issue 11, pp. 861-872.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top