Login | Register

Comparing Cosmopolitan Discourses Across Sexual Landscapes: Montreal’s Gay Village and Mile End District


Comparing Cosmopolitan Discourses Across Sexual Landscapes: Montreal’s Gay Village and Mile End District

Moreno Pina, Daniel (2015) Comparing Cosmopolitan Discourses Across Sexual Landscapes: Montreal’s Gay Village and Mile End District. Masters thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Pina_MSc_S2016.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Pina_MSc_S2016.pdf - Accepted Version


Gay spaces have long been a part in the urban landscape of major metropolitan areas in advanced capitalist societies. These urban forms were largely produced in the 1970s and 1980s as safe spaces where LGBTQ individuals could go to escape societal homophobia. In the following decades, these neighbourhoods underwent major urban restructuring associated with broader neoliberal processes of city remaking. In the beginning of the 2000s, a new wave of studies began correlating the neoliberal urban restructuring of gaybourhoods to the production of cosmopolitan spaces. The cosmopolitan discourse has been a driving force in the remaking of major metropolitan areas that wish to attract capital and compete in a global market formed by creative and diversified cities. According to contemporary literature on creative cities, gay neighbourhoods are an essential component in any global city, as they represent diversity and progressiveness. Alongside traditional gay neighbourhoods, new patterns of intra-urban migration among LGBTQ individuals led to the formation of neighbourhoods where sexual identities are not the main marker of the space but queer individuals are welcomed and an active part of the neighbourhood's life. Queer-friendly neighbourhoods are now a reality in the landscapes of major metropolitan areas. In the case of Montreal, the city’s queer-friendly neighbourhood (Mile End) is also home to a creative, young and middle-class population, marking it also as a cosmopolitan space. This research interrogates and compares what kind of cosmopolitan discourses residents of both the gay Village and the Mile End are enacting, producing and performing. The findings of this research indicate that cosmopolitanism is indeed being performed and actively (re)shaping both neighbourhoods. To what extent and what kind of cosmopolitan discourse is employed differs from one space to another and is directly liked to other social and spatial process such as gentrification, safety and urban sexual identities.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Geography, Planning and Environment
Item Type:Thesis (Masters)
Authors:Moreno Pina, Daniel
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:M. Sc.
Program:Geography, Urban & Environmental Studies
Date:20 December 2015
Thesis Supervisor(s):Podmore, Julie and Rutland, Ted
Keywords:gay neighbourhoods; queer-friendly neighbourhoods; cosmopolitanism; cosmopolitan discourses; gay cosmopolitanism
ID Code:980928
Deposited On:17 Jun 2016 14:07
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:52


Adler, S., & Brenner, J. (1992). Gender and Space: Lesbians and Gay Men in the City*. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(1), 24-34.
Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. The British journal of sociology, 57(1), 1-23.
Bélisle, S. (2011, July 25). La communauté gaie n’est plus confinée au Village. TVA Nouvelles. Retrieved from: http://tvanouvelles.ca/lcn/infos/regional/archives/2011/07/20110725-201507.html
Binnie, J. (2014). Relational Comparison, Queer Urbanism, and Worlding Cities. Geography Compas, 8(8), 590-599.
Binnie, J., & Skeggs, B. (2004). Cosmopolitan knowledge and the production and consumption of sexualized space: Manchester's gay village. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 39-61.
Bouthillette, A.M. (1994). Gentrification by gay male communities. In Whittle, S. (Eds), The Margins of the City: Gay Men’s Urban lives (pp. 65-83). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bouthillette, A.M. (1997). Queer and gendered housing. In Ingram, G.B. & Bouthillette, A.M. & Retter, Y. (Eds), Queers in Space (pp. 213-232). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
Brown, G. (2005). Cosmopolitan camouflage: (post-)gay space in Spitalfields, East London. In Binnie, J. & Holloway, J. & Millington, S. & Young, C. (Eds), Cosmopolitan Urbanism (pp. 130-145). London: Routledge.
Brown, G. (2009). Thinking beyond homonormativity: performative explorations of diverse gay economies. Environment and planning A, 41(6), 1496-1510.
Brown, M. (2013). Gender and sexuality II: There goes the gayborhood?. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 457-465.
Brown-Saracino, J. (2011). From the lesbian ghetto to ambient community: The perceived costs and benefits of integration for community. Social Problems, 58(3), 361-388.
Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 47-60.
Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.
Casey, M. (2004). De-dyking queer space (s): Heterosexual female visibility in gay and lesbian spaces. Sexualities, 7(4), 446-461.
Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: a cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Castells, M. & Murphy, K. (1982). Cultural Identity and Urban Structure: The Spatial Organization of San Francisco’s Gay Community. In: Fainstein, N. I. & Fainstein, S. S. (Eds), Urban Policy Under Capitalism (pp. 237-259). London: Sage Publications.
Cheah, P. (1998). Introduction Part II: The Cosmopolitical – Today. In Cheah, P. & Robbins, B. (Eds), Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, (pp. 20-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Cohen, C. (1997). Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: the radical potential of queer politics?. GLQ 3, 437-465
CultMtl (2013 June, 13). Best of Mtl 2014: Nightlife. CultMtl. Retrieved from: http://cultmontreal.com/2013/06/best-of-mtl-2013-nightlife/
CultMtl (2014, May 5). Best of Mtl 2014: Nightlife. CultMtl. Retrieved from: http://cultmontreal.com/2014/05/best-of-mtl-2014-nightlife/
Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: the sexual politics of neoliberalism. In: Castronovo, R. & Nelson, D. D. (Eds), Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics (pp. 175-194). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality: an introduction, volume 1. New York: Vintage Books.
Freyre, G., & De Onís, H. (1980). The mansions and the shanties: the making of modern Brazil. Greenwood Pub Group.
Germain, A., & Radice, M. (2005). Cosmopolitanism by default: Public sociability in Montreal. In Binnie, J. & Holloway, J. & Millington, S. & Young, C. (Eds), Cosmopolitan Urbanism (pp. 120-130). London: Routledge.
Ghaziani, A. (2011). Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems, 58(1), 99-125.
Ghaziani, A. (2014). There goes the gayborhood?. Oxford: Princenton University Press.
Giraud Colin. (2013). Le “Village Gai” de Montréal. Une aventure urbaine minoritaire. Espaces et societies, 154, 33-48.
Gorman-Murray, A. W., & Waitt, G. R. (2009). Queer-friendly neighbourhoods: interrogating social cohesion across sexual difference in two Australia neighbourhoods. Environment and Planning A, 4, 2885-2873.
Hanhardt, C. B. (2008). Butterflies, whistles, and fists: Gay safe streets patrols and the new gay ghetto, 1976-1981. Radical History Review, 2008(100), 61-85.
Hanhardt, C. B. (2013). Safe Space: Gay Neighborhood History and the Politics of Violence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography, 3-17.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. New York. NY: Routledge.
Hubbard, P. (2008). Here, there, everywhere: The ubiquitous geographies of heteronormativity. Geography Compass, 2(3), 640-658.
Hubbard, P. (2013). Kissing is not a universal right: sexuality, law and the scales of citizenship. Geoforum, 49, 224-232.
Hunt, M., & Zacharias, J. (2008). Marketing the Imaginary of Montréal's (Gay) Village. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 17(1), 28-57.
Jackson, W. (1999). Methods: Doing social research (2nd edition). Scarborough, ON: Prentice Hall Allyn and Bacon Canada.
Jensen, O. B. (2006). ‘Facework’, Flow and the City: Simmel, Goffman, and Mobility in the Contemporary City. Mobilities, 1(2), 143-165.
Kesselring, S. (2006). Pioneering mobilities: new patterns of movement and motility in a mobile world. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 269-279.
Knopp, L. (1997). Gentrification and gay neighborhood formation in New Orleans. In Gluckman, N. & Reed, B. (Eds), Homo Economics (pp. 45-64). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lauria, M. & Knopp, L. (1985). Toward an analysis of the role of gay communities in the urban renaissance. Urban geography, 6(2), 152-169.
Levine, M. (1979). Gay ghetto. In: Levine, M (Eds), Gay men: the sociology of male homosexuality (pp. 182-204). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Lewis, N. M. (2013). Ottawa’s Le/The village: Creating a ‘gaybourhood’ amidst the death of the village. Geoforum, 49, 233-242.
Ley, D. (1980). Liberal ideology and the postindustrial city. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 238-258.
Ley, D. (1986). Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: a Canadian assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(4), 521-535.
McCarthy, M. (2011, August 17). Out of the Montreal Village and into the world. XTRA! Canada’s Gay and Lesbian News. Retrieved from: http://www.xtra.ca/public/National/Out_of_the_Montreal_Village_and_into_the_world-10639.aspx
McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–42.
Molz, J. G. (2006). Cosmopolitan bodies: Fit to travel and travelling to fit. Body & Society, 12(3), 1-21.
Myslik, W. D. (1996). Gay communities as safe havens or sites of resistance? In Duncan, N. (Ed.). BodySpace: destabilising geographies of gender and sexuality (pp. 155-169). New York, NY: Routledge.
Nash, C. J. (2006). Toronto's gay village (1969–1982): plotting the politics of gay identity. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 50(1), 1-16.
Nash, C. J. (2013a). The age of the “post-mo”? Toronto’s gay Village and a new generation. Geoforum, 49, 243-252.
Nash, C. J. (2013b). Queering neighbourhoods: Politics and practice in Toronto. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 12(2), 193-219.
Nash, C. J. & Gorman-Murray, A. (2014). LGBTQ Neighbourhoods and New ‘Mobilities’: Towards Understanding Transformations in Sexual and Gendered Urban Landscapes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 756-72.
Nero, C. (2005). Why are gay ghettos white?. In Johnson, E. P. & Henderson, M. (Eds.), Black Queer Studies: A Critical Anthology (pp. 228-248). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Oswin, N. (2005). Towards radical geographies of complicit queer futures. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 3(2), 79-86.
Oswin, N. (2008). Critical geographies and the use of sexuality: deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Society, 32(1), 89-103
Podmore, J. (2006). Gone ‘underground’? Lesbian visibility and the consolidation of queer space in Montréal. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(4), 595-625.
Podmore, J. (2013b). Lesbians as Village ‘Queers’: The transformation of Montréal’s Lesbian Nightlife in the 1990’s. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 12(2), 220-249.
Podmore, J. (2015). From Contestation to Incorporation: LGBT Activism and Urban Politics in Montréal. In Trembley, M (Ed), Queer Mobilizations: Social Movement Activism and Canadian Public Policy (p 187-207). Vancouver: UBC Press.
Puar, J. K. (2006). Mapping US homonormativities. Gender, place and culture, 13(1), 67-88.
Radice, M. (2010). Everyday Cosmopolitan Place Making: Multiethnic Commercial Streets in Montréal Neighbourhoods (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://espace.inrs.ca/99/
Ray, B. (2004). A diversity paradox: Montréal’s gay village. In Andrew, C (Eds), Our Diverse Cities (pp. 72-75). Montreal, QC: Metropolis Canada.
Ray, B., & Rose, D. (2000). Cities of the everyday: Socio-spatial perspectives on gender, difference, and diversity. In Bunting, T. & Filion, P. (Eds), Canadian Cities in Transition: The Twentieth Century (pp. 502-524). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Rantisi, N. M. et al. (2006). Placing the creative economy: scale, politics, and the material. Environment and Planning A, 38(10), 1789-1797.
Rantisi, N. M. & Leslie, D. (2010). Materiality and creative production: the case of the Mile End neighborhood in Montréal. Environment and planning A, 42(12), 2824-2841.
Richardson, D. (2005). Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalisation. Antipode, 37(3), 515-535.
Remiggi, F. W. (1998). Le Village gai de Montréal: entre le ghetto et l’espace identitaire. In Demczuk I. & Remiggi, F. W. (Eds), Sortir de l’ombre: histoires des communautés lesbienne et gaie de Montréal (pp. 267-289). Montreal, QC: VLB Éditeur.
Robbins, B. (1998) ‘Introduction Part I: Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism’. In Cheah, P. & Robbins, B. (Eds), Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, (pp. 1–19). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rose, D. (1984). Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of marxist urban theory. Environment and Planning D, 2, 47–74.
Rose, D. (1995). Le Mile-End, un modèle cosmopolite ?. In Germain, A. & Blanc, B. & Charbonneau, J. & Dansereau, F. & Rose, D. (Eds), Cohabitation ethnique et vie de quartier (pp. 53-94). Montreal, QC: Gouvernement du Québec, ministère des Affaires internationales, de l’Immigration et des Communautés culturelles.
Rose, D. (1996). Economic restructuring and the diversification of gentrification in the 1980s: a view from a marginal metropolis. In: Caulfield, J. & Peake, L. (Eds), City Lives and City Forms: Critical Research and Canadian Urbanism (pp. 131-172). Toronto. ON: University of Toronto Press.
Rushbrook, D. (2002). Cities, queer space, and the cosmopolitan tourist. GLQ: A journal of lesbian and gay studies, 8(1), 183-206.
Ross, B. (2012). Tracing lines of horizontal hostility. Sexualities 15, 604–621.
Schulman, S. (2012). The gentrification of the mind: Witness to a lost imagination. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Skeggs, B. (1999). Matter out of place: Visibility and sexualities in leisure spaces. Leisure studies, 18(3), 213-232.
Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography, 58(2), 139-155.
Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. New York, NY: Routledge.
Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427-450.
Smith, N. (2006). Gentrification Generalized: From Local Anomaly to Urban 'Regeneration' as Global Urban Strategy. In Fisher, M. S. & Downey, G. (Eds.), Frontiers of Capital: Ethnographic Reflections on the New Economy (pp. 191-208). Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 191-208.
Sothern, M. 2004. (Un)queer patriarchies: Or, “what we think when we fuck”. Antipode, 36, 183-191.
Tucker, A. (2009). Queer Visibilities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Valentine, G. (2002). Queer bodies and the production of space. In Richardson, D. & Seidman, S., Handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 145-160). London: Sage.
Visser G (2003) Gay men, leisure space and South African cities. Geoforum 34, 127–137.
Ward, K. (2008). Editorial: Toward a comparative (re) turn in urban studies? Some reflections. Urban Geography, 29(5), 405-410.
Zizek, S. (1997). Multiculturalism, or, the cultural logic of multinational capitalism. New Left Review, 28-51.
Zukin, S. (1998). Urban lifestyles: diversity and standardisation in spaces of consumption. Urban studies, 35(5-6), 825-839.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top