Hlobil, Ulf (2015) There Are Diachronic Norms of Rationality. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 4 (1). pp. 38-45.
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
46kBHLOTAD.1.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tht3.155
Abstract
Some philosophers have recently argued that there are no diachronic norms of epistemic rationality, that is, that there are no norms regarding how you should change your attitudes over time. I argue that this is wrong on the grounds that there are norms governing reasoning.
| Divisions: | Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Philosophy |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Authors: | Hlobil, Ulf |
| Journal or Publication: | Thought: A Journal of Philosophy |
| Date: | 2015 |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.1002/tht3.155 |
| Keywords: | time-slice rationality; epistemic rationality; diachronic norms; reasoning; inference |
| ID Code: | 983497 |
| Deposited By: | ULF HLOBIL |
| Deposited On: | 08 Feb 2018 14:56 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Feb 2018 14:56 |
References:
Carr, J. Don't Stop Believing, 2014. URL: http://web.mit.edu/jrcarr/www/pdfs/dontstopbelieving.pdfChristensen, D. “Diachronic Coherence Versus Epistemic Impartiality.” Philosophical Review 109 (2000): 349–71.
Hedden, B. Reasons Without Persons: Rationality, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Hedden, B.. “Time-Slice Rationality.” Mind (2015). Epub March 12, 2015.
Turri, J. “On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2010): 312–26.
Whitehead, A. N. and B. Russell. Principia Mathematica. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Download Statistics
Download Statistics