Loader, Alison Reiko (2018) Willful Spectacles: The Splendid Camera Obscuras & Popular Observatories of Miss Maria Short. PhD thesis, Concordia University.
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
23MBLoader_PhD_S2018.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Abstract
Histories of old media generally locate women on view and in the audience, but rarely position them as owners or operators in control of a screen. An archival study of the forgotten founding of Edinburgh’s Camera Obscura by Maria Theresa Short addresses this shortcoming and explores a device that is itself marginalized by media scholarship. Whereas most accounts abstract the camera obscura as a teleological forerunner and foundational component of inscriptive optical media, or as a metaphor of disembodied and distantiated vision, they overlook its use as a nineteenth-century exhibition apparatus, especially in connection to women and scientific spectacles. Yet one of the foremost and oldest purpose-built attractions in Edinburgh boasts an extraordinary history that speaks directly to such absences. In a towertop walk-in optical device, spectators stand in the dark around a touchable tabular screen while operators manipulate the capture and projection of a live, vivid and moving image of the city, which they present as a virtual guided tour. My research, pursued from a perspective of feminist media studies, explores how an unknown but willful spinster came to display this splendid apparatus and exhibit “the sublime truths of science” before the mid-nineteenth-century emergence of public museums and in defiance of municipal leaders, who would see to the demolition of her first venture. It comprises an in-depth inspection of Scottish archives that details the tactics, tensions and controversies surrounding the mysterious Miss Short and her popular observatories, and uncovers a history of scientific ambition and struggle that helps illustrate the culture in which they operated. Like the optical devices it investigates, “Willful Spectacles” reveals a complex and miniaturized monad that stands in for a shifting world where public space, its views and viewers were gendered, classed, and open to contestation.
Divisions: | Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Communication Studies |
---|---|
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) |
Authors: | Loader, Alison Reiko |
Institution: | Concordia University |
Degree Name: | Ph. D. |
Program: | Communication |
Date: | February 2018 |
Thesis Supervisor(s): | Sawchuk, Kim |
Keywords: | camera obscura, feminist media history, microhistory, nineteenth-century Edinburgh, popularization and professionalization, science and spectacle, screen studies |
ID Code: | 983807 |
Deposited By: | ALISON R LOADER |
Deposited On: | 05 Jun 2018 14:15 |
Last Modified: | 05 Jun 2018 14:15 |
References:
Ahmed, Sara. Willful Subjects. Durham: Duke UP, 2014.Altick, Richard Daniel. The Shows of London. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1978.
Aubin, David, Charlotte Bigg, and Heinz Otto Sibum, eds. The Heavens on Earth: Observatories and Astronomy in Nineteenth-Century Science and Culture. Durham [N.C.]: Duke UP, 2010.
Bennett, Tony. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London; New York: Routledge, 1995.
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette, and Christine Blondel. Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment. Aldershot, Eng.; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008.
Breitenbach, Esther et al. Scottish Women: A Documentary History, 1780-1914. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2013.
Britton, John. Modern Athens, Displayed in a Series of Views; Or, Edinburgh in the Nineteenth Century. Bronx, N.Y: B. Blom, 1969.
Brück, Hermann A. The Story of Astronomy in Edinburgh from Its Beginnings until 1975. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1983.
Brück, Mary. Women in Early British and Irish Astronomy: Stars and Satellites. Dordrecht; London: Springer, 2009.
Bruno, Giuliana. Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, and Film. London ; New York: Verso, 2002.
Brusati, Celeste. Artifice and Illusion: The Art and Writing of Samuel van Hoogstraten. University of Chicago P, 1995.
Bubb, Martine. La Camera Obscura: Philosophie D’un Appareil. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2010.
Candlin, Fiona. Art, Museums and Touch. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 2010.
Kaplan, Caren. Aerial Aftermaths: Wartime from Above. Duke UP, 2018.
Clarke, T. N., A. D. Morrison-Low, and A.D.C. Simpson. Brass & Glass: Scientific Instrument Making Workshops in Scotland as Illustrated by Instruments from the Arthur Frank Collection at the Royal Museum of Scotland. Edinburgh: National Museums of Scotland, 1989.
Classen, Constance. The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2012
Crary, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1990.
Davidson, Caroline. A Woman’s Work Is Never Done: A History of Housework in the British Isles, 1650-1950. London: Chatto & Windus, 1982.
Doane, Mary Ann. The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2002.
Dubrofsky, Rachel E., and Shoshana Amielle Magnet, eds. Feminist Surveillance Studies. Durham and London: Duke UP, 2015.
Farge, Arlette. The Allure of the Archives. Trans. Thomas Scott-Railton. New Haven: Yale UP, 2013.
Foster, Hal, ed. Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay, 1988.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage, 1995.
---. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Vintage, 2010.
Friedberg, Anne. The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2006.
Fyfe, Aileen, and Bernard V. Lightman, eds. Science in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century Sites and Experiences. Chicago: University of Chicago P, 2007.
Gernsheim, Helmut, and Alison Gernsheim. “The History of the Camera Obscura.” The History of Photography from the Camera Obscura to the beginning of the Modern Era. Revised and enlarged ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 1969. 1–19.
Ginzburg, Carlo, and Anna Davin. “Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific Method.” History Workshop 9 (1980): 5–36.
Gitelman, Lisa. Always Already New: Media, History and the Data of Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2006.
Gordon, Eleanor, and Gwyneth Nair. Public Lives: Women, Family, and Society in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale UP, 2003.
Griffiths, Alison. Shivers down Your Spine: Cinema, Museums, and the Immersive View. New York: Columbia UP, 2008.
Hammond, John H. The Camera Obscura: A Chronicle. Bristol: Hilger, 1981.
Hankins, Thomas L, and Robert J Silverman. Instruments and the Imagination. Princeton, N.J: Princeton UP, 1995.
Holmes, Richard. The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science. New York: Pantheon, 2009.
Jay, Martin. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California P, 1993.
Kemp, Martin. The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven: Yale UP, 1990.
Kofman, Sarah. Camera Obscura: Of Ideology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1999.
Lefèvre, Wolfgang. Inside the Camera Obscura: Optics and Art under the Spell of the Projected Image. Berlin: Max-Planck-Inst. für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 2007.
Lepore, Jill. “Historians Who Love Too Much: Reflections on Microhistory and Biography.” The Journal of American History 88.1 (2001): 129–144.
Lightman, Bernard V. Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences. Chicago: University of Chicago P, 2007.
Lyons, James, and John Plunkett, eds. Multimedia Histories: From the Magic Lantern to the Internet. Exeter: University of Exeter P, 2007.
Mannoni, Laurent. The Great Art of Light and Shadow: Archaeology of the Cinema. Trans. Richard Crangle. Exeter: University of Exeter P, 2000.
Markus, Thomas A., ed. Order in Space and Society: Architectural Form and Its Context in the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Mainstream, 1982.
Meller, Helen E. Patrick Geddes: Social Evolutionist and City Planner. Pbk. ed. London; New York: Routledge, 1993.
Miller, Karl. Cockburn’s Millennium. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1976.
Mirzoeff, Nicholas. The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2011.
Morrell, J. B. Science, Culture, and Politics in Britain, 1750-1870. Aldershot, UK; Brookfield, VT: Variorum, 1997.
Morus, Iwan Rhys. Frankenstein’s Children: Electricity, Exhibition, and Experiment in Early-Nineteenth-Century London. Princeton UP, 2014.
---. When Physics Became King. Chicago: University of Chicago P, 2005.
Oettermann, Stephan. The Panorama: History of a Mass Medium. New York: Zone, 1997.
Oleksijczuk, Denise. The First Panoramas: Visions of British Imperialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota P, 2011.
Parikka, Jussi. What Is Media Archaeology? Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity, 2012.
Popple, Simon, and Vanessa Toulmin, eds. Visual Delights: Essays on the Popular and Projected Image in the 19th Century. Trowbridge, Wiltshire, Eng.: Flicks, 2000.
Riskin, Jessica. Science in the Age of Sensibility: The Sentimental Empiricists of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago P, 2002.
Schiebinger, Londa L. The Mind Has No Sex: Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard UP, 1989.
Secord, James A. Visions of Science: Books and Readers at the Dawn of the Victorian Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Shapin, Steven. “‘Nibbling at the Teats of Science’: Edinburgh and the Diffusion of Science in the 1830s.” Metropolis and Province: Science in British Culture 1780-1850. Ed. Ian Inkster and Jack Morrell. London: Hutchinson Education, 1983. 151–178.
Shteir, Ann B., and Bernard V. Lightman, eds. Figuring It out: Science, Gender, and Visual Culture. 1st ed. Hanover, N.H: Dartmouth College Press : University Press of New England, 2006.
Silverman, Kaja. The Miracle of Analogy, Or, The History of Photography. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2015.
Smout, T. C. A Century of the Scottish People 1830-1950. London: Collins, 1986.
Stafford, Barbara Maria. Artful Science: Enlightenment Entertainment and the Eclipse of Visual Education. New edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1996.
Steedman, Carolyn Kay. Dust: The Archive and Cultural History. Rutgers UP, 2002.
Stevenson, Sara, and A. D. Morrison-Low. Scottish Photography: The First Thirty Years. Edinburgh: National Museums of Scotland, 2015.
Strauven, Wanda. “Early Cinema’s Touch(Able) Screens: From Uncle Josh to Ali Barbouyou.” NESCUS European Journal of Media Studies, Autumn 2012, http://www.necsus-ejms.org/early-cinemas-touchable-screens-from-uncle-josh-to-ali-barbouyou/.
Thompson, Lucy E. “Vermeer’s Curtain: Privacy, Slut-Shaming and Surveillance in ‘A Girl Reading a Letter.’” Surveillance & Society 15.2 (2017): 326–341.
Toulmin, Vanessa, and Simon Popple, eds. Visual Delights Two: Exhibition and Reception. Eastleigh : Bloomington, IN: John Libbey, 2005.
Van der Meulen, Emily, and Robert Heynen, eds. Expanding the Gaze: Gender and the Politics of Surveillance. Toronto ; Buffalo ; London: University of Toronto P, 2016.
van Herk, Aritha. “Invisibled Laundry.” Signs 27.3 (2002): 893–900.
Wallace, Veronica. “Maria Obscura.” Edinburgh Review 88 (1992): 101–109.
Weeden, Brenda. The Education of the Eye: History of the Royal Polytechnic Institution 1838-1881. Cambridge, UK: Granta, 2008.
Wilgus, Jack, and Beverly Wilgus. The Magic Mirror of Life: An Appreciation of the Camera Obscura. 2008, http://brightbytes.com/cosite/cohome.html.
Williams, Linda. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and The “Frenzy of the Visible.” Expanded pbk. ed. Berkeley: University of California P, 1999.
---, ed. Viewing Positions: Ways of Seeing Film. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers UP, 1994.
Zueblin, Charles. “The World’s First Sociological Laboratory.” American Journal of Sociology 4.5 (1899): 577–592.
Repository Staff Only: item control page