Login | Register

Winter and spring climatic conditions influence timing and synchrony of calving in reindeer


Winter and spring climatic conditions influence timing and synchrony of calving in reindeer

Paoli, Amélie, Weladji, Robert B., Holand, Øystein and Kumpula, Jouko (2018) Winter and spring climatic conditions influence timing and synchrony of calving in reindeer. PLOS ONE, 13 (4). e0195603. ISSN 1932-6203

[thumbnail of Weladji-PLOS-2018.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
Weladji-PLOS-2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195603


In a context of climate change, a mismatch has been shown to occur between some species’ reproductive phenology and their environment. So far, few studies have either documented temporal trends in calving phenology or assessed which climatic variables influence the calving phenology in ungulate species, yet the phenology of ungulates’ births affects offspring survival and population’s recruitment rate. Using a long-term dataset (45 years) of birth dates of a semi-domesticated reindeer population in Kaamanen, North Finland, we show that calving season has advanced by ~ 7 days between 1970 and 2016. Advanced birth dates were associated with lower precipitation and a reduced snow cover in April and warmer temperatures in April-May. Improved females’ physical condition in late gestation due to warmer temperatures in April-May and reduced snow conditions in April probably accounted for such advance in calving date. On the other hand, a lengthening of the calving season was reported following a warmer temperature in January, a higher number of days when mean temperature exceeds 0°C in October-November and a decreasing snow cover from October to November. By affecting the inter-individual heterogeneity in the plastic response of females’ calving date to better climatic conditions in fall and winter, climatic variability contributed to weaken the calving synchrony in this herd. Whether variability in climatic conditions form environmental cues for the adaptation of calving phenology by females to climate change is however uncertain, but it is likely. As such this study enhances our understanding on how reproductive phenology of ungulate species would be affected by climate change.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Biology
Item Type:Article
Authors:Paoli, Amélie and Weladji, Robert B. and Holand, Øystein and Kumpula, Jouko
Journal or Publication:PLOS ONE
  • Concordia Open Access Author Fund
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, (grant number 303807)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1371/journal.pone.0195603
ID Code:983952
Deposited By: Krista Alexander
Deposited On:13 Jun 2018 18:58
Last Modified:13 Jun 2018 18:58


1. Gochfeld M. Mechanisms and adaptative value of reproductive synchrony in colonial seabirds. In: Burger J, Olla B, editors. Behavior of marine animals. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation; 1980. pp. 207–270.

2. Findlay C, Cooke F. Breeding synchrony in the lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens). Evolution (N Y). 1982; 786–799.

3. Ims RA. The ecology and evolution of reproductive synchrony. Trends Ecol Evol. 1990;5: 135–140. pmid:21232341

4. Rutberg AT. Adaptative hypotheses of birth synchrony in ruminants: an interspecific test. Am Nat. 1987;130: 692–710.

5. Sinclair ARE, Mduma SAR, Arcese P. What determines phenology and synchrony of ungulate breeding in Serengeti? Ecology. 2000;81: 2100–2111.

6. Estes RD, Estes RK. The birth and survival of wildebeest calves. Z Tierpsychol. 1979;50: 45–95. pmid:494841

7. Rutberg AT. Birth synchrony in American bison (Bison bison): Response to predation or season? J Mammal. 1984;65: 418–423.

8. Estes RD. The significance of breeding synchrony in the wildebeest. Afr J Ecol. 1976;14: 135–152.

9. Festa-Bianchet M. Birthdate and survival in bighorn lambss (Ovis canadensis). J Zool. 1988;214: 653–661.

10. Post E, Bøving PS, Pedersen C, MacArthur MA. Synchrony between caribou calving and plant phenology in depredated and non-depredated populations. Can J Zool. 2003;81: 1709–1714.

11. Rachlow JL, Bowyer RT. Interannual variation in timing and synchrony of parturition in Dall’s sheep. Am Soc Mammal. 1991;72: 487–492.

12. Lent P. Calving and related social behaviour in the barren ground caribou. Z Tierpsychol. 1966;6: 701–756.

13. Linnell JDC, Andersen R. Timing and synchrony of birth in a hider species, the roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Zool Soc London. 1998;244: 497–504.

14. Bunnell FL. The lambing period of mountain sheep: synthesis, hypotheses, and tests. Can J Zool. 1982;60: 1–14.

15. Gaillard J-M, Delorme D, Tullien JM, Tatin D. Timing and synchrony of births in roe deer. Am Soc Mammal. 1993;74: 738–744.

16. Eloranta E, Nieminen M. Calving of the experimental reindeer herd in Kaamanen during 1970–85. Rangifer. 1986; 115–121.

17. Nieminen M, Norberg H, Maijala V. Calf mortality of semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in the Finnish reindeer-herding area. Rangifer. 2013; 79–90. http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/viewFile/2531/2395

18. Guinness FE, Gibson RM, Cluttonbrock TH. Calving times of red deer (Cervus elaphus) on Rhum. J Zool. 1978;185: 105–114.

19. Kumpula J, Nieminen M. Pastures, calf production and carcass weights of reindeer calves in the Oraniemi co-operative, Finnnish Lapland. Rangifer. 1992;12: 93–103.

20. Weladji RB, Holand Ø. Global climate change and reindeer: effects of winter weather on the autumn weight and growth of calves. Oecologia. 2003;136: 317–23. pmid:12707839

21. Visser ME, van Noordwijk AJ, Tinbergen JM, Lessells CM. Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1998;265: 1867–1870.

22. Visser ME, Both C, Lambrechts MM. Global climate change leads to mistimed avian reproduction. Adv Ecol Res. 2004;35: 89–110.

23. Post E, Forchhammer MC. Climate change reduces reproductive success of an Arctic herbivore through trophic mismatch. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2008;363: 2367–2373. pmid:18006410

24. Veiberg V, Loe LE, Albon SD, Irvine RJ, Tveraa T, Ropstad E, et al. Maternal winter body mass and not spring phenology determine annual calf production in an Arctic herbivore. Oikos. 2017;126: 980–987.

25. Lane JE, Kruuk LEB, Charmantier A, Murie JO, Dobson FS. Delayed phenology and reduced fitness associated with climate change in a wild hibernator. Nature. 2012;489: 554–557. pmid:22878721

26. Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V, Kie JG, Low . Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan moose: long-term versus proximal effects of climate. J Mammal. 1998;79: 1332–1344.

27. Dauphiné TC, McClure RL. Synchronous mating in Canadian barren-ground caribou. J Wildl Manage. 1974;38: 54–66.

28. Bergerud AT. The reproductive season of Newfoundland caribou. Can J Zool. 1975;53: 1213–1221. pmid:1146

29. Vors LS, Boyce MS. Global declines of caribou and reindeer. Glob Chang Biol. 2009;15: 2626–2633.

30. Weladji RB, Klein DR, Holand Ø, Mysterud A. Comparative reponse of Rangifer tarandus and other nothern ungulates to climatic variability. Rangifer. 2002;22: 33–50.

31. Weladji RB, Holand O. Influences of large-scale climatic variability on reindeer population dynamics: Implications for reindeer husbandry in Norway. Clim Res. 2006;32: 119–127.

32. Tyler NJC. Climate, snow, ice, crashes, and declines in populations of reindeer and caribou (Rangifer tarandus L.). Ecol Monogr. 2010;80: 197–219.

33. Thompson RW, Turner JC. Temporal geographic variation in the lambing season of bighorn sheep. Can J Zool. 1982;60: 1781–1793.

34. Skogland T. The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer. Oecologia. 1983;60: 156–168. pmid:28310482

35. Adams LG, Dale BW. Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan caribou. Am Soc Mammal. 1998;79: 287–294.

36. Serreze MC, Walsh JE, Chapin FSI, Osterkamp T, Dyurgerov M, Romanovsky V, et al. Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high- latitude environment. Clim Change. 2000;46: 159–207.

37. IPCC. Summary for policymakers. Parry , Canziani O, Palukitof J, Van Der Linden P, Hanson C, editors. Change Climate 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

38. Post E, Forchhammer MC, Bret-Harte MS, Callaghan T V, Christensen TR, Elberling B, et al. Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science (80-). 2009;325: 1355–1358. pmid:19745143

39. L’Italien L, Weladji RB, Holand Ø, Røed KH, Nieminen M, Côté SD. Mating group size and stability in reindeer Rangifer tarandus: The effects of male characteristics, sex ratio and male age structure. Ethology. 2012;118: 783–792.

40. Loe LE, Bonenfant C, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Langvatn R, Klein F, et al. Climate predictability and breeding phenology in red deer: timing and synchrony of rutting and calving in Norway and France. J Anim Ecol. 2005;74: 579–588.

41. Reimers E. Reproduction in wild reindeer in Norway. Can J Zool. 1983;61: 211–217.

42. Cameron RD, Smith WT, Fancy SG, Gerhart KL, White RG. Calving success of female caribou in relation to body weight. Can J Zool. 1993;71: 480–486.

43. Reimers E. Rangifer population ecology: a Scandinavian perspective. Rangifer. 1997;17: 105–118.

44. Flydal K, Reimers E. Relationship between calving time and physical condition in three wild reindeer Rangifer tarandus populations in southern Norway. Wildlife Biol. 2002;8: 145–151. http://www.wildlifebiology.com/Downloads/Article/368/En/8_2_flydal.pdf

45. Cook J, Johnson B., Cook R., Riggs R., Delcurto T, Bryant L., et al. Effects of summer-autumn nutrition and parturition date on reproduction and survival of elk. Wildl Monogr. 2004;155: 1–61.

46. Holand Ø, Røed KH, Mysterud A, Kumpula J, Nieminen M, Smith ME, et al. The effect of sex ratio and male age structure on reindeer calving. J Wildl Manage. 2002;67: 25–33.

47. Mysterud A, Coulson T, Stenseth NC. The role of males in the dynamics of ungulate populations. J Anim Ecol. 2002;71: 907–915.

48. Kumpula J, Colpaert A. Effects of weather and snow conditions on reproduction and survival of semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Polar Res. 2003;22: 225–233.

49. Nussey DH, Clutton-Brock TH, Elston DA, Albon SD, Kruuk LEB. Phenotypic plasticity in a maternal trait in red deer. J Anim Ecol. 2005;74: 387–396.

50. Feder C, Martin JGA, Festa-Bianchet M, Bérubé C, Jorgenson J. Never too late? Consequences of late birthdate for mass and survival of bighorn lambs. Oecologia. 2008;156: 773–781. pmid:18443828

51. Montgomery DC, Peck EA. Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: Wiley; 1992.

52. Anderson DR, Link WA, Johnson DH, Burnham KP. Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. J Wildl Manage. 2001;65: 373–378.

53. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2002.

54. Mazerolle MJ. R package AICcmodavg [Internet]. 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg

55. Grueber CE, Nakagawa S, Laws RJ, Jamieson IG. Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J Evol Biol. 2011;24: 699–711. pmid:21272107

56. Symonds MRE, Moussalli A. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65: 13–21.

57. Schielzeth H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1: 103–113.

58. Gelman A. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat Med. 2008;27: 2865–2873. pmid:17960576

59. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012. http://www.r-project.org

60. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2014; 1–51.

61. Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, GF E. Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1999;266: 1655–1661.

62. Milner JM, Elston DA, Albon SD. Estimating the contributions of population density and climatic fluctuations to interannual variation in survival of Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol. 1999;68: 1235–1247.

63. Plard F, Gaillard JM, Coulson T, Hewison AJM, Delorme D, Warnant C, et al. Long-lived and heavier females give birth earlier in roe deer. Ecography (Cop). 2013;37: 241–249.

64. Mysterud A, Røed KH, Holand Ø, Yoccoz NG, Nieminen M. Age-related gestation length adjustment in a large iteroparous mammal at northern latitude. J Anim Ecol. 2009;78: 1002–6. pmid:19426256

65. Ropstad E. Reproduction in female reindeer. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;60–61: 561–570. pmid:10844224

66. Festa-bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Bérubé CH, Portier C, Wishart WD. Body mass and survival of bighorn sheep. Can J Zool. 1997;75: 1372–1379.

67. Weladji RB, Holand O, Steinheim G, Lenvik D. Sex-specific preweaning maternal care in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2003;53: 308–314.

68. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24: 127–135. pmid:19185386

69. Réale D, McAdam AG, Boutin S, Berteaux D. Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2003;270: 591–596. pmid:12769458

70. Moyes K, Nussey DH, Clements MN, Guinness FE, Morris A, Morris S, et al. Advancing breeding phenology in response to environmental change in a wild red deer population. Glob Chang Biol. 2011;17: 2455–2469.

71. Pettorelli N, Weladji RB, Holand O, Mysterud A, Breie H, Stenseth NC. The relative role of winter and spring conditions: linking climate and landscape-scale plant phenology to alpine reindeer body mass. Biol Lett. 2005;1: 24–26. pmid:17148119

72. Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Gilles Yoccoz N, Anker Ims R, Aanes R, Arild Høgda K. What regulate and limit reindeer populations in Norway? Oikos. 2007;116: 706–715.

73. Parker KL, Robbins CT. Thermoregulation in ungulates. In: Hudson R, White R, editors. Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press; 1985. pp. 161–182.

74. Putman RJ, Langbein J, Hewison AJM, Sharma SK. Relative roles of density-dependent and density-independent factors in population dynamics of British deer. Mamm Rev. 1996;26: 81–101.

75. Parker KL, Robbins CT, Hanley TA. Energy expenditure for locomotion by mule deer and elk. J Wildl Manage. 1984;48: 474–488.

76. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aaasa A, Ahas R, et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol. 2006;12: 1969–1976.

77. Epstein HE, Walker MD, Chapin FS, Starfield AM. A transient, nutrient-based model of Arctic plant community response to climatic warming. Ecol Appl. 2000;10: 824–841.

78. Hughes L. Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15: 56–61. pmid:10652556

79. Baskin LM. Reindeer ecology and behavior. Moscow: Nauka AS USSR; 1970.

80. Parker KL, White RG, Gillingham MP, Holleman DF. Comparison of energy metabolism in relation to daily activity and milk consumption by caribou and muskox neonates. Can J Zool. 1990;68: 106–114.

81. Reimers E, Klein DR, Sørumgård R. Calving time, growth rate, and body size of Norwegian reindeer on different ranges. Arct Alp Res. 1983;15: 107–118. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1550986

82. Parker KL, Barboza PS, Michael P. Nutrition integrates environmental responses. Funct Ecol. 2009;23: 57–69.

83. Caro SP, Schaper S V, Hut RA, Ball GF, Visser ME. The case of the missing mechanism: How does temperature influence seasonal timing in endotherms? PLoS Biol. 2013;11. pmid:23565055

84. Rowell JE, Shipka MP. Variation in gestation length among captive reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Theriogenology. 2009;72: 190–197. pmid:19344943

85. Clements MN, Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB. Gestation length variation in a wild ungulate. Funct Ecol. 2011;25: 691–703.

86. Marshall FHA. On the change over in the oestrous cycle in animals after transference across the Equator, with further observations on the incidence of the breeding seasons and the factors controlling sexual periodicity. Proc R Soc London Ser B, Biol Sci. 1937;122: 413–428.

87. Amoroso EC, Marshall FHA. External factors in sexual periodicity. In: Parkes AS, editor. Marshall’s physiology of reproduction. London: Longmans, Green; 1960. pp. 707–800.

88. Sadleir RMFS. The ecology of reproduction in wild and domestic mammals. London: Methuen; 1969.

89. Langvatn R, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Yoccoz NG. Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short northern summers. Am Nat. 2004;163: 763–772. pmid:15122493

90. Scott IC, Asher GW, Archer JA, Littlejohn RP. The effect of conception date on gestation length of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;109: 206–217. pmid:18178346

91. Berger J. Faciliation of reproductive synchrony by gestation adjustment in gregarious mammals: a new hypothesis. Ecol Soc Am. 1992;73: 323–329.

92. Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Henaug C, Yoccoz NG. An examination of a compensatory relationship between food limitation and predation in semi-domestic reindeer. Oecologia. 2003;137: 370–376. pmid:12955491

93. Wilson AJ, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Overall ADJ, Byrne K a, et al. Selection on mothers and offspring: whose phenotype is it and does it matter? Evolution (N Y). 2005;59: 451–463.

94. Weladji RB, Gaillard J-M, Yoccoz NG, Holand O, Mysterud A, Loison A, et al. Good reindeer mothers live longer and become better in raising offspring. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2006;273: 1239–1244. pmid:16720397

95. Skogland T. The effects of food and maternal conditions on fetal growth and size in wild reindeer. Rangifer. 1984;4: 39–46.

96. Reimers E. Calving time and foetus growth among wild reindeer in Norway. Rangifer. 2002;22: 61–66.

97. Bårdsen B-J, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Langeland K, Yoccoz N, Ims RA. Experimental evidence of a risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-lived mammal. Ecology. 2008;89: 829–837. pmid:18459345

98. Post E, Stenseth NC. Climatic variability, plant phenology, and northern ungulates. Ecology. 1999;80: 1322–1339.

99. Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Henaug C, Yoccoz N. Adaptive regulation of body reserves in reindeer, Rangifer tarandus: a feeding experiment. Oikos. 2004;107: 583–591.

100. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C. Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2000;31: 367–393. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/221737

101. Gaillard JM, Boutin J, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Duncan P, Lebreton J-D. Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations. Oecologia. 1997;112: 502–513. pmid:28307627

102. Gienapp P, Teplitsky C, Alho JS, Mills JA, Merilä J. Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol Ecol. 2007;17: 167–178.

103. Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003;421: 37–42. pmid:12511946

104. Root T, Price J, Hall K, Schneider S. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature. 2003;421: 57–60. pmid:12511952

105. Forchhammer MC, Clutton-Brock TH, Lindström J, Albon SD. Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. J Anim Ecol. 2001;70: 721–729.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top