Karimi, Mohammad (2019) Cooperative Traffic Control Framework for Mixed Vehicular Flows. PhD thesis, Concordia University.
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
5MBKarimi_PhD_S2020.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Abstract
A prompt revolution is foreseen in the transportation sector, when the current conventional human-driven vehicles will be replaced by fully connected and automated vehicles. As a result, there will be a transition period where both types will coexist until the later type is fully adopted in the traffic networks. This new mix of traffic flow on the existing transportation network will require developing a new ecosystem able to accommodate both types of vehicles in traffic network environments of the future. A major challenging issue related to the emerging mixed transportation ecosystem is the lack of an adequate model and control framework. This is especially important for modeling traffic safety and operations at network bottlenecks such as highway merging areas. Therefore, the main goal of this thesis is to develop a microscopic modeling and hierarchical cooperative control framework specifically for mixed traffic at highway on-ramps. In this thesis, a two-level hierarchical traffic control framework is proposed for mixed traffic at highway merging areas. In this regard, for the lower level of the proposed framework, this thesis establishes a set of fundamental trajectory-based cooperative control algorithms for different merging scenarios under mixed traffic conditions. We identify six scenarios, consisting of triplets of vehicles, defined based on the different combinations of CAVs and conventional vehicles. For each triplet, different consecutive movement phases along with corresponding desired distance and velocity set-points are defined. Via the movement phases, the CAVs engaged in each triplet cooperate to calculate their optimal-smooth trajectories aiming at facilitating the merging maneuver while complying with the realistic constraints related to the safety and comfort of vehicle occupants. The vehicles in each triplet are modeled by a distinct system, and a Model Predictive Control scheme is employed to calculate the cooperative optimal control inputs (acceleration values) for CAVs, accounting for conventional vehicles’ uncertainties.
In the next step of the thesis, for the higher level of the proposed framework, a merging sequence determination and triplets’ formation methodology is developed based on predicting the arrival time of vehicles into the merging area and according to the priority in choosing different triplet types. To model the merging maneuvers when two consecutive triplets share a vehicle, the interactions between triplets of vehicles are also investigated. In order to develop a microscopic traffic simulator, we analytically formulate different vehicles’ driving behaviors under cooperative (i.e., the proposed traffic control framework) and non-cooperative (i.e., normal) operation modes and discuss the switching conditions between these driving modes.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, first, each triplet is simulated in MATLAB and evaluated for different sets of system initial values. Without a need for readjusting the algorithm for different initial values, the simulation results show that the proposed cooperative merging algorithms ensure smooth merging maneuvers while satisfying all the prescribed constraints, e.g., speed limits, safe distances, and comfortable acceleration and jerk values. Moreover, a simulator is developed in MATLAB for the entire framework (including both the higher and lower level of the framework) to evaluate the impact of all the triplets on continuous mixed traffic flow. Different penetration rates of CAVs under different traffic flow conditions are evaluated through the developed simulator. The simulation results show that the proposed cooperative methodology, comparing to the non-cooperative operation, can improve the average travel time of merging vehicles without disturbing the mainstream flow, provide safer merging maneuvers by avoiding the merging vehicles to stop at the end of the acceleration lane, and guarantee smooth motion trajectories for CAVs (i.e., derivable position and speed along with limited changes in acceleration values).
Generally, the results emphasize that the proposed cooperative traffic control framework can improve the mixed traffic conditions in terms of both traffic safety and operations. Moreover, the simulator provides a tool for the transportation community to evaluate their existing infrastructures under different penetration rates of CAVs and examine different traffic control plans for a mixed traffic environment. As the merging maneuver is only one application of gap-acceptance models, other types of maneuvers (e.g., lane changing, vehicle turning, etc.) can be similarly modelled. Thus, we can extend the proposed framework to the multi-lane highways, roundabouts, and urban area intersections. Furthermore, the arrival time prediction of the vehicles can be improved to elevate the performance of the proposed framework during the very congested traffic conditions.
| Divisions: | Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) |
| Authors: | Karimi, Mohammad |
| Institution: | Concordia University |
| Degree Name: | Ph. D. |
| Program: | Civil Engineering |
| Date: | 29 November 2019 |
| Thesis Supervisor(s): | Alecsandru, Ciprian |
| Keywords: | Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs), cooperative merging maneuver, optimal traffic control, mixed traffic flow |
| ID Code: | 986388 |
| Deposited By: | Mohammad Karimi |
| Deposited On: | 25 Jun 2020 18:18 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Jun 2020 18:18 |
References:
[1] J. Rios-Torres and A. A. Malikopoulos, “A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1066–1077, 2017.[2] Standing Senate Committee report 2018, “Transport and Communications (TRCM Automated Vehicles 2018),” 2018.
[3] R. Bishop, “A Survey of intelligent Vehicle Application‖,” in Proceedings of IEEE intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2000.
[4] M. Kyriakidis, R. Happee, and J. C. F. de Winter, “Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, vol. 32, pp. 127–140, 2015.
[5] G. Rempel and D. Michelson, “Connected and Automated Vehicle Activities in Canada,” in TRB-TR News, (317), 2018, no. 317, pp. 10–18.
[6] C. Rödel, S. Stadler, A. Meschtscherjakov, and M. Tscheligi, “Towards autonomous cars: the effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2014, pp. 1–8.
[7] D. J. Fagnant and K. Kockelman, “Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 77, pp. 167–181, 2015.
[8] B. S. Kerner, “Effect of Automatic Driving on Probability of Breakdown in Traffic Networks,” in Breakdown in Traffic Networks, Springer, 2017, pp. 275–295.
[9] A. Talebpour and H. S. Mahmassani, “Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 71, pp. 143–163, 2016.
[10] R. Bertini and S. Malik, “Observed dynamic traffic features on freeway section with merges and diverges,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 1867, pp. 25–35, 2004.
[11] L. C. Davis, “Effect of cooperative merging on the synchronous flow phase of traffic,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 361, no. 2, pp. 606–618, 2006.
[12] H. Yi and T. E. Mulinazzi, “Urban freeway on-ramps: Invasive influences on main-line operations,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2023, no. 1, pp. 112–119, 2007.
[13] W. Cao, M. Mukai, T. Kawabe, H. Nishira, and N. Fujiki, “Cooperative vehicle path generation during merging using model predictive control with real-time optimization,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 34, pp. 98–105, 2015.
[14] National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “NHTSA Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles,” 2013.
[15] S. L. Poczter and L. M. Jankovic, “The Google Car: driving toward a better future?,” Journal of Business Case Studies (Online), vol. 10, no. 1, p. 7, 2014.
[16] P. Varaiya, “Smart cars on smart roads: problems of control,” IEEE Transactions on automatic control, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 195–207, 1993.
[17] W. J. Schakel and B. Van Arem, “Improving traffic flow efficiency by in-car advice on lane, speed, and headway,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1597–1606, 2014.
[18] C. Roncoli, M. Papageorgiou, and I. Papamichail, “Traffic flow optimisation in presence of vehicle automation and communication systems–Part II: Optimal control for multi-lane motorways,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 57, pp. 260–275, 2015.
[19] S. Kato, S. Tsugawa, K. Tokuda, T. Matsui, and H. Fujii, “Vehicle control algorithms for cooperative driving with automated vehicles and intervehicle communications,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 155–161, 2002.
[20] R. Rajamani, H.-S. Tan, B. K. Law, and W.-B. Zhang, “Demonstration of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for the operation of automated vehicles in platoons,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 695–708, 2000.
[21] S. Tsugawa, S. Kato, T. Matsui, H. Naganawa, and H. Fujii, “An architecture for cooperative driving of automated vehicles,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2000. Proceedings. 2000 IEEE, 2000, pp. 422–427.
[22] A. Bose and P. A. Ioannou, “Analysis of traffic flow with mixed manual and semiautomated vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 173–188, 2003.
[23] Y.-M. Yuan, R. Jiang, M.-B. Hu, Q.-S. Wu, and R. Wang, “Traffic flow characteristics in a mixed traffic system consisting of ACC vehicles and manual vehicles: A hybrid modelling approach,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 388, no. 12, pp. 2483–2491, 2009.
[24] D. Ngoduy, “Application of gas-kinetic theory to modelling mixed traffic of manual and ACC vehicles,” Transportmetrica, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–60, 2012.
[25] B. Van Arem, C. J. G. Van Driel, and R. Visser, “The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 429–436, 2006.
[26] A. Uno, T. Sakaguchi, and S. Tsugawa, “A merging control algorithm based on inter-vehicle communication,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE/IEEJ/JSAI International Conference on, 1999, pp. 783–787.
[27] M. Antoniotti, A. Desphande, and A. Girault, “Microsimulation analysis of multiple merge junctions under autonomous ahs operation,” in Intelligent Transportation System, 1997. ITSC’97., IEEE Conference on, 1997, pp. 147–152.
[28] B. Ran, S. Leight, and B. Chang, “A microscopic simulation model for merging control on a dedicated-lane automated highway system,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 369–388, 1999.
[29] X.-Y. Lu, H.-S. Tan, S. E. Shladover, and J. K. Hedrick, “Automated vehicle merging maneuver implementation for AHS,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 85–107, 2004.
[30] X.-Y. Lu and J. K. Hedrick, “Longitudinal control algorithm for automated vehicle merging,” International Journal of Control, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 2003.
[31] H. Park, C. S. Bhamidipati, and B. L. Smith, “Development and evaluation of enhanced intellidrive-enabled lane changing advisory algorithm to address freeway merge conflict,” Transportation research record, vol. 2243, no. 1, pp. 146–157, 2011.
[32] W. Daamen, B. van Arem, and I. Bouma, “Microscopic dynamic traffic management: Simulation of two typical situations,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on, 2011, pp. 1898–1903.
[33] S. Sivaraman, M. M. Trivedi, M. Tippelhofer, and T. Shannon, “Merge recommendations for driver assistance: A cross-modal, cost-sensitive approach,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2013 IEEE, 2013, pp. 411–416.
[34] J. Wei, J. M. Dolan, and B. Litkouhi, “Autonomous vehicle social behavior for highway entrance ramp management,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2013 IEEE, 2013, pp. 201–207.
[35] Y. Wang, E. Wenjuan, W. Tang, D. Tian, G. Lu, and G. Yu, “Automated on-ramp merging control algorithm based on Internet-connected vehicles,” IET Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 371–379, 2013.
[36] T. Awal, L. Kulik, and K. Ramamohanrao, “Optimal traffic merging strategy for communication-and sensor-enabled vehicles,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC), 2013 16th International IEEE Conference on, 2013, pp. 1468–1474.
[37] J. Wei, J. M. Dolan, and B. Litkouhi, “A prediction-and cost function-based algorithm for robust autonomous freeway driving,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2010 IEEE, 2010, pp. 512–517.
[38] W. Levine and M. Athans, “On the optimal error regulation of a string of moving vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 355–361, 1966.
[39] J. Rios-Torres and A. A. Malikopoulos, “Automated and cooperative vehicle merging at highway on-ramps,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 780–789, 2017.
[40] Z. Wang, L. Kulik, and K. Ramamohanarao, “Proactive traffic merging strategies for sensor-enabled cars,” in Automotive Informatics and Communicative Systems: Principles in Vehicular Networks and Data Exchange, IGI Global, 2009, pp. 180–199.
[41] R. Scarinci, B. Heydecker, and A. Hegyi, “Analysis of traffic performance of a merging assistant strategy using cooperative vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2094–2103, 2015.
[42] R. Scarinci, A. Hegyi, and B. G. Heydecker, “Cooperative ramp metering—A study of the practicality of a ramp metering development using intelligent vehicles,” in 45th Annual UTSG Universities’ Transport Study Group Conference, 2013.
[43] I. A. Ntousakis, I. K. Nikolos, and M. Papageorgiou, “Optimal vehicle trajectory planning in the context of cooperative merging on highways,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 71, pp. 464–488, 2016.
[44] B. Moaveni and M. Karimi, “Subway Traffic Regulation Using Model-Based Predictive Control by Considering the Passengers Dynamic Effect,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 3021–3031, 2017.
[45] L. Makarem and D. Gillet, “Model predictive coordination of autonomous vehicles crossing intersections,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC), 2013 16th International IEEE Conference on, 2013, pp. 1799–1804.
[46] K.-D. Kim and P. R. Kumar, “An MPC-Based Approach to Provable System-Wide Safety and Liveness of Autonomous Ground Traffic.,” IEEE Trans Automat Contr, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 3341–3356, 2014.
[47] C. Letter and L. Elefteriadou, “Efficient control of fully automated connected vehicles at freeway merge segments,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 80, pp. 190–205, 2017.
[48] J. Rios-Torres, A. Malikopoulos, and P. Pisu, “Online optimal control of connected vehicles for efficient traffic flow at merging roads,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on, 2015, pp. 2432–2437.
[49] J. Rios-Torres and A. A. Malikopoulos, “Impact of connected and automated vehicles on traffic flow,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on, 2017, pp. 1–6.
[50] B. Ciuffo, V. Punzo, and M. Montanino, “Thirty years of Gipps’ car-following model: Applications, developments, and new features,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2315, pp. 89–99, 2012.
[51] L. C. Davis, “Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on mixed traffic flow near an on-ramp,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 379, no. 1, pp. 274–290, 2007.
[52] R. Pueboobpaphan, F. Liu, and B. van Arem, “The impacts of a communication based merging assistant on traffic flows of manual and equipped vehicles at an on-ramp using traffic flow simulation,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on, 2010, pp. 1468–1473.
[53] M. Zhou, X. Qu, and S. Jin, “On the impact of cooperative autonomous vehicles in improving freeway merging: a modified intelligent driver model-based approach,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1422–1428, 2017.
[54] M. Treiber, A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing, “Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations,” Physical review E, vol. 62, no. 2, p. 1805, 2000.
[55] L. Zhao, A. Malikopoulos, and J. Rios-Torres, “Optimal control of connected and automated vehicles at roundabouts: An investigation in a mixed-traffic environment,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 73–78, 2018.
[56] R. Scarinci and B. Heydecker, “Control concepts for facilitating motorway on-ramp merging using intelligent vehicles,” Transport reviews, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 775–797, 2014.
[57] K. I. Ahmed, “Modeling drivers’ acceleration and lane changing behavior,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA., 1999.
[58] D. C. Gazis, R. Herman, and R. B. Potts, “Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow,” Operations research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 499–505, 1959.
[59] D. C. Gazis, R. Herman, and R. W. Rothery, “Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow,” Operations research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 545–567, 1961.
[60] R. Herman, “Car-following and steady state flow,” in Theory of Traffic Flow Symposium Proceedings, 1959, pp. 1–13.
[61] G. Lee, “A generalization of linear car-following theory,” Operations Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 595–606, 1966.
[62] S. Bexelius, “An extended model for car-following,” Transportation Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 1968.
[63] H. N. Koutsopoulos and H. Farah, “Latent class model for car following behavior,” Transportation research part B: methodological, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 563–578, 2012.
[64] S. Hamdar, M. Treiber, H. Mahmassani, and A. Kesting, “Modeling driver behavior as sequential risk-taking task,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2088, pp. 208–217, 2008.
[65] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” in Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, World Scientific, 2013, pp. 99–127.
[66] A. Hanken and T. H. Rockwell, “A model of car following derived empirically by piece-wise regression analysis.,” in Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic FlowOperations Research Society of America, 1967.
[67] G. F. Newell, “Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following,” Operations research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 209–229, 1961.
[68] M. Bando, K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, and Y. Sugiyama, “Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation,” Physical review E, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 1035, 1995.
[69] M. Bando, K. Hasebe, K. Nakanishi, and A. Nakayama, “Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay,” Physical Review E, vol. 58, no. 5, p. 5429, 1998.
[70] W. Helly, “Simulation of bottlenecks in single-lane traffic flow,” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow Research Laboratories, General Motors, pp. 207-238). New York: Elsevier, 1959.
[71] J. F. Gabard, J. J. Henry, J. Tuffal, and Y. David, “Traffic responsive or adaptive fixed time policies? A critical analysis with SITRA-B,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Road Traffic Signalling. Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1982, pp. 89–92.
[72] W. Helly, “Simulation of bottlenecks in single-lane traffic flow,” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Tra�c Flow Research Laboratories, General Motors, p. 207±238). New York: Elsevier, 1959.
[73] R. F. Benekohal and J. Treiterer, “CARSIM: Car-following model for simulation of traffic in normal and stop-and-go conditions,” Transportation research record, no. 1194, 1988.
[74] P. Hidas, “Modelling lane changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 351–371, 2002.
[75] Q. Yang and H. N. Koutsopoulos, “A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 113–129, 1996.
[76] P. G. Gipps, “A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 1981.
[77] Z. Zheng, “Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 60, pp. 16–32, 2014.
[78] T. Toledo, “Integrated driving behavior modeling.” Northeastern University, 2002.
[79] D. J. Sun and L. Elefteriadou, “Lane‐Changing Behavior on Urban Streets: An ‘In‐Vehicle’ Field Experiment‐Based Study,” Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 525–542, 2012.
[80] S. Wolfram, “Statistical mechanics of cellular automata,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 55, no. 3, p. 601, 1983.
[81] C. F. Daganzo, “In traffic flow, cellular automata= kinematic waves,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 396–403, 2006.
[82] R. D. Worrall, A. G. Bullen, and Y. Gur, “An elementary stochastic model of lane-changing on a multilane highway,” Highway Research Record, no. 308, 1970.
[83] K. Singh and B. Li, “Estimation of traffic densities for multilane roadways using a markov model approach,” IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 4369–4376, 2012.
[84] P. G. Gipps, “A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 403–414, 1986.
[85] R. Herman and G. Weiss, “Comments on the highway-crossing problem,” Operations Research, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 828–840, 1961.
[86] A. J. Miller, “Nine estimators of gap-acceptance parameters,” Publication of: Traffic Flow and Transportation, 1971.
[87] D. R. Drew, L. R. LaMotte, J. H. Buhr, and J. A. Wattleworth, “Gap acceptance in the freeway merging process,” Highway research record, vol. 208, pp. 1–36, 1967.
[88] B. S. Kerner and S. L. Klenov, “Deterministic microscopic three-phase traffic flow models,” Journal of Physics A: mathematical and general, vol. 39, no. 8, p. 1775, 2006.
[89] M. Sarvi and M. Kuwahara, “Microsimulation of freeway ramp merging processes under congested traffic conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 470–479, 2007.
[90] M. J. Cassidy and S. Ahn, “Driver turn-taking behavior in congested freeway merges,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1934, no. 1, pp. 140–147, 2005.
[91] Z. Wang, L. Kulik, and K. Ramamohanarao, “Robust traffic merging strategies for sensor-enabled cars using time geography,” in Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 2009, pp. 362–371.
[92] L. Li, F.-Y. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Cooperative driving at lane closures,” in 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2007, pp. 1156–1161.
[93] I. A. Ntousakis, K. Porfyri, I. K. Nikolos, and M. Papageorgiou, “Assessing the impact of a cooperative merging system on highway traffic using a microscopic flow simulator,” in ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2014, p. V012T15A024-V012T15A024.
[94] S. Huang and T. H. Lee, Applied predictive control. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
[95] E. F. Camacho and C. B. Alba, Model predictive control. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
[96] A. Kondyli and L. Elefteriadou, “Driver behavior at freeway-ramp merging areas: focus group findings,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2124, pp. 157–166, 2009.
[97] M. Brackstone and M. McDonald, “Car-following: a historical review,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 181–196, 1999.
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Download Statistics
Download Statistics