Login | Register

The Conflicting Politics of Commoning – Property Relations and Political Practices of Community Gardens in East Harlem, NYC, in the Context of the Affordable Housing Plan

Title:

The Conflicting Politics of Commoning – Property Relations and Political Practices of Community Gardens in East Harlem, NYC, in the Context of the Affordable Housing Plan

Gailloux, Chantal ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-8514 (2020) The Conflicting Politics of Commoning – Property Relations and Political Practices of Community Gardens in East Harlem, NYC, in the Context of the Affordable Housing Plan. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Gailloux_PhD_F2020.pdf]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Gailloux_PhD_F2020.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
27MB

Abstract

This dissertation examines the property relations and political practices of eight community gardens in East Harlem, New York City, that are threatened with eviction by “Housing New York,” a citywide affordable housing plan, leading to a contentious land use conflict.

Property relations in community gardens take place among a broad set of actors, like gardeners, passers-by, and neighbours, but also developers, city officials, and city workers who all interact regularly and throughout the eviction process. These property relations consequently reveal how such urban spaces are contested. Keeping with Verdery (2001), Moore (2001), and Riles (2004), property relations – intertwined with power relations – point to the political practices to represent and assert their claims to a property in formal institutions and public review processes but also during daily interactions or direct actions.

During the yearlong multi-sited ethnography I executed in 2016-2017, I examined the gardeners’ property relations to better understand the contention between the City’s formal legal ownership rights versus the gardeners’ embodied and moral sense of ownership of the same space, which are two competing and asymmetrical authorities pitted against each other. To do so, I inquired how gardeners negotiate normative conceptions of property aesthetics and liberal citizenship while also scrutinizing the City-led land use public review process. I argue property relations are a way of negotiating power, be they on private, collective or commons property. Negotiating power here means as much producing or maintaining power as it does mitigating it.

As such, this dissertation illustrates how race has been and still is at the heart of American property (Bhandar, 2018; Roy, 2017; Harris, 1993). Community gardens have acted as spaces at the margins in the sense suggested by both Das (2004) and hooks (1989). Commoning gardens are community-led margins that act simultaneously as sites of resistance and repression and engage in partnerships with the State for self-creation and maintenance. Thus, community gardens as margins are an ideal vantage point from which to explore the inner workings of the State and the capitalist public-private production of the urban space.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Sociology and Anthropology
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:Gailloux, Chantal
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Social and Cultural Analysis
Date:28 May 2020
Thesis Supervisor(s):Hetherington, Kregg
Keywords:Community gardens; Property Relations; Land Use Conflict; Political Practices; Affordable Housing; East Harlem; New York City
ID Code:987355
Deposited By: CHANTAL GAILLOUX
Deposited On:25 Nov 2020 15:33
Last Modified:25 Nov 2020 15:33
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top