Geith, Rana and Goubran, Sherif 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-0351
(2022)
Creativity, Adaptability, Transition: Advancing Sustainable Development in the Built Environment through Transdisciplinary Architectural Design.
In: The fourth edition of the Artem international conference on Organizational Creativity and Sustainability (ARTEM OCC), March 2022, Nancy, France.
(Submitted)
Preview |
Text (Extended abstract accepted to conference) (application/pdf)
293kBFINAL.pdf Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Official URL: https://artemocc2022.sciencesconf.org/
Abstract
The link between creativity, design thinking, and interdisciplinarity has been explored by Darbellay
et al. (2017). They proposed that the three dimensions are not contradictory, but instead, they form triadicfeedback loops that cannot be resolved in a unified synthesis. This triadic model underscores that, in fact,
the creative, interdisciplinary (or transdisciplinary) design thinking is an outcome of dialectic, or even
dialogical (Lybeck, 2010), processes among disciplines, stakeholders, the problem at hand, and the variety
of possible design solutions. Harvey (2014) proposes that this type of creative synthesis can only generate
breakthrough ideas if it integrates multiple understandings for the same problem. Specifically, in Harvey’s
(2014) model, breakthrough ideas require a context where ideas are enacted, similarities are built upon, and
collective attention is secured – and it is only through a sort of reflection in action (Schön, 1984) that
creative synthesis can generate exemplars that are iteratively improved until breakthrough.
With global population growth and urbanization trends rising (Department of Economic and Social Affairs
(Population Division), 2017; United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population
Division, 2018), it is now imperative that we move towards a state of creative sustainability in the built
environment. The publication of the 2030 Agenda and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) (United
Nations, 2015) has signalled a new course for practitioners, scholars, and designers by institutionalizing a
more comprehensive understanding of sustainable development, which is supported by clear targets and
indicators (Pedersen, 2018). While the SDGs are global in scope, their application requires action to be
taken on individual project levels, including building projects, on the local scale (T. Walker & Goubran,
2020). Most importantly, the SDGs enabled sustainability action to remain reliant on the interpretation of
the problems, along with the framing of the design problem (Goubran & Cucuzzella, 2019). Thus, it can be
argued that the SDGs have reframed the sustainable built environment challenge as a complex design
problem, open for interpretation, judgment, and theorization and leading to multiple solutions and
innovations (Nelson & Stolterman, 2012), that requires the synthesis of knowledge between a multitude of
disciplines (Kroes et al., 2008).
In this paper, we argue that architecture, as a field of research and practice, is both inductive and inclusive
of the creative transdisciplinary approaches needed to tackle sustainable development challenges in the
built environment (Goubran, 2018). The paper presents a theoretical development, followed by a synthesis
supported by published case studies. In essence, the paper capitalizes on the value of architecture as a transdisciplinary field that allows for transformative sustainable practices within the building and
construction industries. Thus, it establishes a scheme where architectural design, as a transdisciplinary field,
is an inclusive thinking process that has the potential to push boundaries of “just building” to “building
for”.
| Divisions: | Concordia University > School of Graduate Studies > Individualized Program |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
| Refereed: | No |
| Authors: | Geith, Rana and Goubran, Sherif |
| Date: | 2022 |
| ID Code: | 990428 |
| Deposited By: | SHERIF NADER AL GOUBRAN |
| Deposited On: | 31 May 2022 21:06 |
| Last Modified: | 31 May 2022 21:06 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Additional Information: | This is an extended abstract which was accepted to the conference and has been invited to be featured in a journal. |
References:
Alexander, C. (1968). Systems Generating Systems. Architectural Design, 38(December 1968), 605–610.Andersen, H. (2013). The Second Essential Tension: On Tradition and Innovation in Interdisciplinary
Research. Topoi, 32(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9133-z
Baue, B. (2019). Compared to What? A Three-Tiered Typology of Sustainable Development Performance
Indicators - From Incremental to Contextual to Transformational (No. 5; Sustainable Development
Performance Indicators, Issue October). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development
(UNRISD).
Bursztyn, M., & Drummond, J. (2014). Sustainability science and the university: pitfalls and bridges to
interdisciplinarity. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 313–332.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.780587
Cavanagh, T. (2008). Diverse designing: Sorting out function and intention in artifacts. Philosophy and
Design: From Engineering to Architecture, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-
0_23
Chupin, J.-P. (2011). Judgment by Design: Towards a Model for Studying and Improving the
Competition Process in Architecture and Urban Design. The Scandinavian Journal of Management,
27(1 (Special topic forum on Architectural Competitions)), 173–184.
Crabbé, A. (2019). Interdisciplinarity and Sustainable Development. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of Sustainability in Higher Education (pp. 998–1006). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_215
Cross, N. (2018). Developing design as a discipline. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(12), 691–708.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1537481
Cross, N. (2019). Editorial: Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 65, 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.002
Cucuzzella, C. (2015). Judging in a World of Expertise: When the Sum of the Parts is Less than the
Whole. In J.-P. Chupin, C. Cucuzzella, & B. Helal (Eds.), Architecture Competitions and the
Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge - An International Inquiry (pp. 145–161). Potential
Architecture Books.
Cucuzzella, C., & Goubran, S. (2019). Infrastructure as a Deeply Integrated Sustainable Urban Project.
Journal of Sustainability Research, 1(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20190005
Cucuzzella, C., & Goubran, S. (2020). Caught between measurement and meaning. In C. Cucuzzella & S.
Goubran (Eds.), Sustainable Architecture – Between Measurement and Meaning (pp. 1–13). Vernon
Press.
Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., & Lubart, T. (2017). Introduction. In F. Darbellay, Z. Moody, & T. Lubart
(Eds.), Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity (pp. xi–xxii). Springer Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7
Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Population Division). (2017). World Population Prospects -
The 2017 Revision Key Findings and Advance Tables. In World Population Prospects. United
Nations. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Fei, W., Opoku, A., Agyekum, K., Oppon, J. A., Ahmed, V., Chen, C., & Lok, K. L. (2021). The critical
role of the construction industry in achieving the sustainable development goals (Sdgs): Delivering
projects for the common good. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16), 9112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169112
Goubran, S. (2018). Architecture: A pluripotent stem field. In L. Martin & J. Lachance (Eds.), Du
potentiel de l’hétéronomie et de l’autonomie en architecture / On the Potential of Heteronomy and
Autonomy in Architecture (Vol. 2, pp. 98–99). Potential Architecture Books.
Goubran, S. (2019). On the Role of Construction in Achieving the SDGs. Journal of Sustainability
Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20190020
Goubran, S. (2021). Sustainability in architectural design projects – a semiotic understanding. Social
Semiotics, 31(4), 625–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1681062
Goubran, S., & Cucuzzella, C. (2019). Integrating the Sustainable Development Goals in Building
Projects. Journal of Sustainability Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20190010
Guy, S., & Moore, S. A. (2007). Sustainable Architecture and the Pluralist Imagination. Journal of
Architectural Education, 60(4), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00104.x
Harvey, S. (2014). Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity. Academy
of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0224
Institute of Architecture and Technology (KADK), The Danish Association of Architects, & The UIA
Commission on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. (2018). An architecture guide to the UN 17
Sustainable Development Goals (N. Mossin, S. Stilling, T. C. Bøjstrup, V. G. Larsen, M. Lotz, & A.
Blegvad (Eds.); Vol. 1). KADK.
Institute of Architecture and Technology (KADK), The Danish Association of Architects, & The UIA
Commission on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. (2020). An Architecture Guide to the UN
17 Sustainable Development Goals (N. Mossin, S. Stilling, T. C. Bøjstrup, V. G. Larsen, M. Lotz, &
A. Blegvad (Eds.); Vol. 2). Royal Danish Academy.
Jacobs, J. (2018). Intersections in design thinking and art thinking: Towards interdisciplinary innovation.
Creativity, 5(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0001
Jones, S. A., & Laquidara-Carr, D. (Eds.). (2018). World Green Building Trends 2018 - Smart market
report. In Smart Market Report (p. 80). Dodge Data & Analytics. www.construction.com
Kagan, S. (2011). Aesthetics of Sustainability: A Transdisciplinary Sensibility for Transformative
Practices. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 2, 65-73.
https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/00014
Kroes, P., Vermaas, P. E., Light, A., & Moore, S. A. (2008). Design in engineering and architecture:
Towards an integrated philosophical understanding. Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to
Architecture, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_1
Love, T. (2002). Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs:
Some philosophical issues. Design Studies, 23(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-
694X(01)00043-6
Lybeck, E. R. (2010). The Critical Theory of Lewis Mumford. International Journal of Interdisciplinary
Social Sciences, 5(1), 91–102.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=66385101&lang=hu&site=ehostlive
Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 5–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014
Morin, E. (2008). On Complexity. Hampton Press, Inc.
Muratovski, G. (2017). Towards Evidence-Based Research and Cross-Disciplinary Design Practice. In D.
F., M. Z., & L. T. (Eds.), Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the
Twenty First Century (pp. 3–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_1
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World
(2nd ed.). The MIT Press.
Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a Great Gift to Business!
Procedia CIRP, 69, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.01.003
Sabre, R. M. (2018). Semeiotic logic or, deduction, induction, and semeiotic. Semiotica, 2018(222), 81–
85. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0164
Schön, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic
books.
Tarkhan, N. (2020). Technological trajectories: Assessing the role of sensing in design. In C. Cucuzzella
& S. Goubran (Eds.), Sustainable Architecture – Between Measurement and Meaning (pp. 46–69).
Vernon Press.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United
Nations. sustainabledevelopment.un.org
United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. (2018). World
Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). United Nations.
Walker, S. (2006). Sustainable by Design: Exploration in Theory and Practice. Earthscan Publications.
Walker, S. (2015). Designing sustainability: making radical changes in a material world (First Edit).
Routledge.
Walker, T., & Goubran, S. (2020). Sustainable Real Estate: Transitioning Beyond Cost Savings. In D. M.
Wasieleski & J. Weber (Eds.), Sustainability (Vol. 4, pp. 141–161). Emerald Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920200000004008
Welch, F. (1984). On Juries and Jurying: Standing in Judgement of Architecture. Texas Architect, 38–39.
http://files/622/Welch - 1984 - On Juries and Jurying Standing in Judgement of Ar.pdf
Wen, B., Musa, S. N., Onn, C. C., Ramesh, S., Liang, L., Wang, W., & Ma, K. (2020). The role and
contribution of green buildings on sustainable development goals. Building and Environment,
185(Iii), 107091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107091
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Download Statistics
Download Statistics