Login | Register

Supporting the Possibilities of Urban Commoning in Montréal’s Champ des Possibles: Progress Report


Supporting the Possibilities of Urban Commoning in Montréal’s Champ des Possibles: Progress Report

Trost, Karlo, Luka, Nik, Poteete, Amy R., Samoylenka, Valentina, Boulet-Garuk, Dominique and Forrest, Camille (2021) Supporting the Possibilities of Urban Commoning in Montréal’s Champ des Possibles: Progress Report. Project Report. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)

[thumbnail of poteete_et_al._2021_report_en.pdf]
Text (application/pdf)
poteete_et_al._2021_report_en.pdf - Other
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.


A former railyard, the Champ des Possibles has regenerated and is now a protected green space co-managed by the Plateau-Mont-Royal council and a community organization, Les Amis du Champ des Possibles. This documents provides an overview of findings from an online survey about the Champ des Possibles conducted during the summer of 2020 by researchers at Concordia and McGill Universities in partnership with Les Amis du Champ des Possibles as part of a SSHRC funded project , "Supporting the Possibilities of Urban Commoning in Montreal's Champ des Possibles." After introducing the project, the report highlights survey findings related to current and past use of the Champ, values associated with the Champ, and perceptions of and interest in participating it the site's management and governance.

Divisions:Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Political Science
Item Type:Monograph (Project Report)
Authors:Trost, Karlo and Luka, Nik and Poteete, Amy R. and Samoylenka, Valentina and Boulet-Garuk, Dominique and Forrest, Camille
Contributors:Poteete, Amy R. and Trost, Karlo and Luka, Nik and Poteete, Amy R. (Research team head, Author, Author, Author)
Institution:Loyola Sustainability Research Centre, Concordia University and School of Planning, McGill University
Date:August 2021
  • “Supporting the Possibilities of Urban Commoning in Montreal’s Champ des Possibles.”
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada Partnership Engagement Grant (892-2019-2045)
Keywords:commoning; commons; urban space; informal urban space; community management; survey research; Champ des Possibles; Montreal
ID Code:991254
Deposited By: Amy Poteete
Deposited On:01 Nov 2022 17:57
Last Modified:01 Nov 2022 17:57
Related URLs:


Alam, A. & D. Houston. (2020). Rethinking care as alternate infrastructure. Cities 100, article 102662. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102662

Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social & Legal Studies 17 (3) : 311–331. DOI:10.1177/0964663908093966

Bresnihan, P. & M. Bryne. (2015). Escape into the city: Everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban-space in Dublin. Antipode 47 (1), 36–54.

Davis, D. E. & S. F. Gray. (2019). Beyond appearances: Community activism and New York City’s High Line. Journal of Landscape Architecture 14 (3), 74–81.

Désilets, G. (2020). Consuming the neighbourhood? Temporary highly skilled migrants in Montreal’s Mile End. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, online first. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1732616

de Visscher, J.-P. (2019). Planning for commoning: Design research into the terrils of Charleroi. Journal of Landscape Architecture 14 (2), 70–81.

Federici, S. (2012). Feminism and the politics of the commons. In D. Bollier et S. Helfrich (Eds.), The wealth of the Commons: A world beyond market and state (pp. 35–45). Amherst MA: Levellers Press / Commons Strategies Group. Published
online: http://wealthofthecommons.org/contents

Groth, J. & E. Corijn. (2005). Reclaiming urbanity: Indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting. Urban Studies 42 (3), 503–526.

Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy & Society 38 (2), 180–197. DOI:10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797

Huron, A. (2015). Working with strangers in saturated space: reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode 47 (4), 963–979. DOI:10.1111/anti.12141

Les Amis du Champ des Possibles. (2020). Rapport d’activités. Montréal: s.n. Published online : https://champdespossibles.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/12/RapportActivite2020.pdf

Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Luka, N. (2017). « Midtown » florissant : La Petite-Patrie aux abords du chemin de fer. In J.-L. Klein & R. G. Shearmur (Eds.), Montréal : la cité des cités (pp. 169–190). Montréal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

McCay, B. J. & J. M. Acheson. (1987). The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Nightingale, A. J. (2020). Commoning for inclusion? Political communities, commons, exclusion, property and socio-natural becomings. International Journal of the Commons 13 (1), 16–35. DOI:10.18352/ijc.927.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Poteete, A. R., M. Janssen & E. Ostrom. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rittel, H. W. J. & M. M. Webber (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4 (2), 155–169. DOI:10.1007/BF01405730

Schlager, E. & M. Cox. (2017). The IAD Framework and the SES Framework: An introduction [to] and assessment of the Ostrom Workshop Frameworks. In C. M. Weible & P. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 215–252).
New York: Routledge.

Strohmayer, U. (2018). Dystopian dynamics at work: The creative validation of urban space. In K. Ward, A. E. G. Jonas, B. Miller & D. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on spaces of urban politics (pp. 542–554). New York: Routledge.

Termeer, C. J. A. M., A. Dewulf, G. Breeman & S. J. Stiller (2015). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration & Society, 47 (6), 680–710. DOI:10.1177/0095399712469195

Velicu, I. & G. García-López. (2018). Thinking the commons through Ostrom and Butler: boundedness and vulnerability. Theory, Culture & Society 35 (6): 55–73.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top