References:

Alam, A. & D. Houston. (2020). Rethinking care as alternate infrastructure. Cities 100, article 102662. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102662

Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social & Legal Studies 17 (3) : 311–331. DOI:10.1177/0964663908093966

Bresnihan, P. & M. Bryne. (2015). Escape into the city: Everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban-space in Dublin. Antipode 47 (1), 36–54.
DOI:10.1111/anti.12105

Davis, D. E. & S. F. Gray. (2019). Beyond appearances: Community activism and New York City’s High Line. Journal of Landscape Architecture 14 (3), 74–81.
DOI:10.1080/18626033.2019.1705586

Désilets, G. (2020). Consuming the neighbourhood? Temporary highly skilled migrants in Montreal’s Mile End. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, online first. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1732616

de Visscher, J.-P. (2019). Planning for commoning: Design research into the terrils of Charleroi. Journal of Landscape Architecture 14 (2), 70–81.
DOI:10.1080/18626033.2019.1673585

Federici, S. (2012). Feminism and the politics of the commons. In D. Bollier et S. Helfrich (Eds.), The wealth of the Commons: A world beyond market and state (pp. 35–45). Amherst MA: Levellers Press / Commons Strategies Group. Published
online: http://wealthofthecommons.org/contents

Groth, J. & E. Corijn. (2005). Reclaiming urbanity: Indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting. Urban Studies 42 (3), 503–526.
DOI:10.1080/00420980500035436

Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy & Society 38 (2), 180–197. DOI:10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797

Huron, A. (2015). Working with strangers in saturated space: reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode 47 (4), 963–979. DOI:10.1111/anti.12141

Les Amis du Champ des Possibles. (2020). Rapport d’activités. Montréal: s.n. Published online : https://champdespossibles.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/12/RapportActivite2020.pdf

Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Luka, N. (2017). « Midtown » florissant : La Petite-Patrie aux abords du chemin de fer. In J.-L. Klein & R. G. Shearmur (Eds.), Montréal : la cité des cités (pp. 169–190). Montréal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

McCay, B. J. & J. M. Acheson. (1987). The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Nightingale, A. J. (2020). Commoning for inclusion? Political communities, commons, exclusion, property and socio-natural becomings. International Journal of the Commons 13 (1), 16–35. DOI:10.18352/ijc.927.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Poteete, A. R., M. Janssen & E. Ostrom. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rittel, H. W. J. & M. M. Webber (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4 (2), 155–169. DOI:10.1007/BF01405730

Schlager, E. & M. Cox. (2017). The IAD Framework and the SES Framework: An introduction [to] and assessment of the Ostrom Workshop Frameworks. In C. M. Weible & P. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 215–252).
New York: Routledge.

Strohmayer, U. (2018). Dystopian dynamics at work: The creative validation of urban space. In K. Ward, A. E. G. Jonas, B. Miller & D. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on spaces of urban politics (pp. 542–554). New York: Routledge.

Termeer, C. J. A. M., A. Dewulf, G. Breeman & S. J. Stiller (2015). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration & Society, 47 (6), 680–710. DOI:10.1177/0095399712469195

Velicu, I. & G. García-López. (2018). Thinking the commons through Ostrom and Butler: boundedness and vulnerability. Theory, Culture & Society 35 (6): 55–73.
DOI:10.1177/0263276418757315