References:

Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (2002). Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 705–722.
Amenta, S. & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(232), 1-12.
Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1587-1596.
Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2013). Eye movements and parafoveal preview of compound words: Does morpheme order matter? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 505-526.
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of memory and language, 37(1), 94-117.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological review, 118(3), 438-481.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390- 412.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bauer, L. (2008). Les composés exocentriques de l’anglais. In D. Amiot (Ed.), La composition dans une perspective typologique (pp. 35-47). Arras: Artois Presses Université.
Bertram, R., Tønnessen, F. E., Strömqvist, S., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (2015). Cascaded processing in written compound word production. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9(207), 1-10.
Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 65(9), 1798-1819.
Beyersmann, E., Grainger, J., & Taft, M. (2020). Evidence for embedded word length effects in complex nonwords. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 235-245.
Beyersmann, E., Kezilas, Y., Coltheart, M., Castles, A., Ziegler, J. C., Taft, M., & Grainger, J. (2018). Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of cognition, 1(1), 1-13.
Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Kezilas, Y., & Grainger, J. (2016). Morpho-orthographic segmentation without semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 533-539.
Bölte, J., Dohmes, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2013). Interference and facilitation in spoken word production: effects of morphologically and semantically related context stimuli on picture naming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 255-280.
Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS one, 5(5), 1-13.
Brodeur, M. B., Guérard, K., & Bouras, M. (2014). Bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS) phase II: 930 new normative photos. PloS one, 9(9), 1-10.
Bueno, S., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2008). The activation of semantic memory: Effects of prime exposure, prime-target relationship, and task demands. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 882-898.
Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(3-4), 217-227.
Burani, C., Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological Structures and Lexical Access. Visible Language, 18(4), 342-352.
Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., & Laudanna, A. (1985). Reading mechanisms and the organisation of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive neuropsychology, 2(1), 81-114.
Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene- Lambertz, G., Hénaff, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123(2), 291-307.
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(1), 1-13.
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 83-99.
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2013). Seeing stems everywhere: position-independent identification of stem morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 510-525.
Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 159-190.
Davis, C., Libben, G. & Segalowitz, S. (2019). Compounding matters: Event-related potential evidence for early semantic access to compound words. Cognition, 184, 44- 52.
de Almeida, R. G., Di Nardo, J., Antal, C., & von Grünau, M. W. (2019). Understanding events by eye and ear: Agent and verb drive non-anticipatory eye movements in dynamic scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2162), 1-20.
de Almeida, R. G., Dumassais, S., & Antal, C. (2020) Morphological parsing by foveal split: Evidence from Anaglyphs. In S. Deninson, M. Mack, Y. Xu, & B. C. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3055-3061). Toronto, ON: Cognitive Science Society.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1990). The locus of the associative-priming ef- fect in the mental lexicon. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 101-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Diependaele, K., Grainger, J., & Sandra, D. (2012). Derivational morphology and skilled reading. In M. J. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 311-332). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Diependaele, K., Morris, J., Serota, R. M., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J. (2013). Breaking boundaries: Letter transpositions and morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 988-1003.
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37(6), 895-908.
Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2004). The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 203-212.
Domínguez, A., Segui, J., & Cuetos, F. (2002). The time-course of inflexional morphological priming. Linguistics, 40(2), 235-259.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1171-1176.
Dressler, W. U. (2006). Compound types. In G. Libben, & G. Jarema (Eds.), The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
El-Bialy, R., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2013). Processing of English compounds is sensitive to the constituents’ semantic transparency. The Mental Lexicon, 8(1), 75-95.
Feldman, L. B., Barac-Cikoja, D., & Kostić, A. (2002). Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory & Cognition, 30(4), 629-636.
Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Gvozdenović, V., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2012). Semantic similarity influences early morphological priming in Serbian: A challenge to form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 668-676.
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684-691.
Feldman, L. B., Milin, P., Cho, K. W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., & O’Connor, P. A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(111), 1-19.
Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 159-193.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (2000). The Mind Doesn’t Work that Way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28(1-2), 3-71.
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2015). Minds without meanings: An essay on the content of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forster, K. I. (1985) Special purpose computation: All is not one. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 9-11.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680-698.
Foss, D. J. (1988). Experimental psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 301-348.
Fruchter, J., & Marantz, A. (2015). Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 143, 81-96.
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2016). Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in English compound and pseudocompound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1489-1495.
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., Nisbet, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2018). Pseudo-morphemic structure inhibits, but morphemic structure facilitates, processing of a repeated free morpheme. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(10), 1252-1274.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 421-444.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 127- 131.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). A supralexical model for French derivational morphology. In E. Assink, & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 139-157). New York: Kluwer Academic.
Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E. (2017). Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiates morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 67(1), 285-317.
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in psychology, 2(54), 1-13.
Guasch, M., Haro, J., & Boada, R. (2017). Clustering words to match conditions: An algorithm for stimuli selection in factorial designs. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 38(1), 111- 131.
Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2019). Enter sandman: Compound processing and semantic transparency in a compositional perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(10), 1872-1882.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68(1-2), 362-369.
Kehayia, E., Jarema, G., Tsapkini, K., Perlak, D., Ralli, A., & Kadzielawa, D. (1999). The role of morphological structure in the processing of compounds: The interface between linguistics and psycholinguistics. Brain and Language, 68(1-2), 370-377.
Kim, S. Y., Yap, M. J., & Goh, W. D. (2019). The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2722-2732.
Kuperman, V. (2013). Accentuate the positive: Semantic access in English compounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(203), 1-10.
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2010). Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(2), 83-97.
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 876.
Lavric, A., Rastle, K., & Clapp, A. (2011). What do fully visible primes and brain potentials reveal about morphological decomposition?. Psychophysiology, 48(5), 676-686.
Lenth, R. V. (2022). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.7.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and lexical semantics (Vol. 104). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Libben, G. (1994). How is morphological decomposition achieved?. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 369-391.
Libben, G. (2003). Morphological parsing and morphological structure. In Reading Complex Words: Cross-Language Studies (pp. 221-239). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben, & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1-22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 8-25.
Libben, G. & de Almeida, R. G. (2002). Is there a morphological parser? In S. Bendjaballah, W. U. Dressler, O. E. Pfeiffer & M. D. Voeikova (Eds.), Morphology 2000 (pp. 213-225). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Libben, G., Derwing, B. L., & de Almeida, R. G. (1999). Ambiguous novel compounds and models of morphological parsing. Brain and Language, 68(1-2), 378-386.
Libben, G., Gallant, J., & Dressler, W. U. (2021). Textual effects in compound processing: A window on words in the world. Frontiers in Communication, 6(646454), 1-17.
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and language, 84(1), 50-64.
Libben, G., Goral, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). What does constituent priming mean in the investigation of compound processing?. The Mental Lexicon, 13(2), 269-284.
Libben, G., & Weber, S. (2014). Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables. In F. Rainer, U. Wolfgang, F. Gardani, W. U. Dressler, and H. C. Luschützky (Eds.), Morphology and meaning (pp. 205-222). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lo, S., & Andrews, S. (2015). To transform or not to transform: Using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1171), 1-16.
Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 26-41.
Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313-334.
Manelis, L., & Tharp, D. A. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory & Cognition, 5(6), 690-695.
Manouilidou, C., Nerantzini, M., Chiappetta, B. M., Mesulam, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2021). What language disorders reveal about the mechanisms of morphological processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(701802), 1-17.
Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds: A constituent priming study in Italian. The Mental Lexicon, 4(3), 430-454.
Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 644-664.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3-33.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 394-421.
Meunier, F., and Segui, J. (1999). Morphological priming effect: the role of surface frequency. Brain and Language. 68(1-2), 54-60.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407.
Melvie, T., Taikh, A., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2022). Constituent processing in compound and pseudocompound words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. Advance online publication.
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C. M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 457-471.
Murrell, G. A., & Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(6), 963-968.
Neophytou, K., Manouilidou, C., Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2018). Syntactic and semantic restrictions on morphological recomposition: MEG evidence from Greek. Brain and Language, 183, 11-20.
Osborne, J. (2002). Notes on the use of data transformations. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 8(6), 1-7.
Osborne, J. W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(6), 1-8.
Pavlovia (2020). Pavlovia.org
Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., Lindeløv, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods.
Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Stockall, L., & De Almeida, R. G. (2010). The interpretation of ambiguous trimorphemic words in sentence context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 88-94.
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R- project.org/.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7-8), 942-971.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive processes, 15(4-5), 507-537.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-305). New York: Psychology Press.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1090-1098.
Sahel, S., Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., & Weingarten, R. (2008). Written production of German compounds: Effects of lexical frequency and semantic transparency. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 211-227.
Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42(3), 529-567.
Shabani-Jadidi, P. (2016). Compound verb processing in second language speakers of Persian. Iranian Studies, 49(1), 137-158.
Schäfer, M. (2018). The semantic transparency of English compound nouns. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Schmidtke, D., & Kuperman, V. (2019). A paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word recognition. Cortex, 116, 250-267.
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V. (2017). Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1793-1820.
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2018). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments.
Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2010). Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 2042-2057.
Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2006). A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon, 1(1), 85-123.
Stockall, L., Manouilidou, C., Gwilliams, L., Neophytou, K., & Marantz, A. (2019). Prefix stripping re-re-revisited: MEG investigations of morphological decomposition and recomposition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1964), 1-17.
Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 20(3), 289-297.
Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Psychology Press.
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 271-294.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(4), 745-765.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638-647.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 607-620.
ten Hacken, P. (2016). The semantics of compounding. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47(3), 631-650.
Wickham, H., Chang, W., & Wickham, M. H. (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’. Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. Version, 2(1), 1-189.
Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.5499.
Winter, B. (2019). Statistics for linguists: An introduction using R. Abington, UK: Routledge.
Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341-368.
Zwitserlood, P., Bölte, J., & Dohmes, P. (2000). Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 563-591.
Zwitserlood, P., Bölte, J., & Dohmes, P. (2002). Where and how morphologically complex words interplay with naming pictures. Brain and Language, 81(1-3), 358-367.