Smart, Harley (2023) Making Books with Generative AI. Masters thesis, Concordia University.
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
2MBSmart_Mdes_Spring2024.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Abstract
The advent of powerful generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the way we create and consume artistic works, including artists’ books. This research explores the impacts of generative AI on independent publishing and book arts.
Powerful new models like GPT-3 have the potential to transform creative workflows, raising questions around automation's role and preserving human craftsmanship. Through conceptual prototypes and speculative interfaces, this study reveals opportunities and critical challenges when adopting generative techniques. Integrating GPT-3, the prototypes demonstrate AI's capabilities for enhancing ideation and production, while highlighting issues like training bias. This research aims to contribute frameworks promoting thoughtful human-machine teamwork in this context. Drawing from computational creativity research, the prototypes are evaluated for different types of exhibited creativity. By exploring the partnerships between generative models and artisanal creation, findings uncover strategies for ethical co-invention. The speculative prototypes of creative bookworks encourage discussion on emerging impacts of automation on creative roles. By revealing the current limitations and potential of AI automation, this research provides a conceptual foundation and prompts further interdisciplinary work at the intersection of independent publishing, book arts, and artificial intelligence, further exploring the codex as a site for research and creation.
Divisions: | Concordia University > Faculty of Fine Arts > Design and Computation Arts |
---|---|
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
Authors: | Smart, Harley |
Institution: | Concordia University |
Degree Name: | M.Des. |
Program: | Design |
Date: | 1 December 2023 |
Thesis Supervisor(s): | Wright, Maia |
Keywords: | Generative AI, Artificial Intelligence, Design, Computation Arts, Book Publishing, Bookart, GPT, Large Language Models, Diffusion Models |
ID Code: | 993284 |
Deposited By: | HARLEY SMART |
Deposited On: | 04 Jun 2024 15:25 |
Last Modified: | 04 Jun 2024 15:25 |
References:
Agüera y Arcas, B. (2016). Art in the Age of Machine Intelligence. Medium. https://medium.com/artists-and-machine-intelligence/what-is-ami-ccd936394a83Allado-Mcdowell, K. (2020). Pharmako-AI. Ignota Books.
Ashby, W. Ross. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
Asilomar AI Principles (2017). Future of Life Institute. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/ai-principles/
Basile, Jonathan.(2015) Ph.D. Comparative Literature, Emory, UK. https://libraryofbabel.info/
Bender, M., et al (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?. Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, March 3-10, Virtual Event, Canada. ACM, New York.
Berger, S. (2020). The Undead: AI Can’t Die Because its Definition Keeps Changing. Fonolo. https://fonolo.com/blog/2018/10/the-undead-ai-cant-die-because-its-definition-keeps-changing/
Biron, B. (2023). Sex, Art Theft, and Privacy: Lensa Exploded Overnight — and Now the Avatar App is Dealing with Public Backlash. Yahoo News. https://shorturl.at/AJLW9
Boden, Margaret (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge.
49
Boden, Margaret. (1994). The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Boden, Margaret. (2010). Can Computer Models Help Us to Understand Human Creativity? National Humanities Center. https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/on-the-human/2010/05/can-computer-models-help-us-to-understand-human-creativity/
Borges, Luis. The Library of Babel, from the 1941 collection The Garden of Branching Paths
Borsuk, Amaranth. (2018). The Book. MIT Press Essential Knowledge series. MIT Press.
Bosuk, Amaranth. (2020). The Book, 101 Definitions. Center for Expanded Poetics, Concordia University. Anteism Books
Bringsjord, S., Bello, P. & Ferrucci, D. (2001). Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (Better) Lovelace Test. Minds and Machines. 11, 3–27.
Bringsjord, Selmer. (2015). Rensselaer Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (RAIR) Faculty: People. http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/pl/faculty-staff-cogsci/selmer-bringsjord.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. OpenAI, arXiv:2005.14165 [cs.CL].
Bunz, Mercedes. (2020). Aesthetics of New AI. Serpentine Gallery.
Carrión, Ulises. (1971). The New Art of Making Books. Self-published.
Chatonsky, Gregory. (2020). l’Artmeme 80, pg 22-24, Chronique des arts plastiques de la federation de Wallonie-Bruxelles.
50
Chatonsky, Gregory. (2020). Le livre des machines. Research-creation project text.
Collins, Billy. (2001). Sailing Alone Around the Room: New and Selected Poems. Random House.
Colton, S. and Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: The final frontier? ECAI
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Cucuzella, C., & Goubran, S. (2019). Infrastructure as a deeply integrated sustainable urban project. Hapres Journal of Sustainability Research.
Cucuzzella, Carmela. (2011). Design thinking and the precautionary principle: development of a theoretical model complementing preventive judgment for design for sustainability enriched through a study of architectural competitions adopting LEED. Université de Montréal.
Du Sautoy, Marcus. (2019). The Creativity Code: Art and Innovation in the Age of AI, Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
Einstein, Albert. (1929). What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck.The Saturday Evening Post, 26 Oct., pp. 17-19, 117-20.
Elgammal, A., & Mazzone, M. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts Journal.
Frampton, K.(1995). Studies in Tectonic Culture: The poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture. Ed. John Cava, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
51
Gaut, B. (2010). The Philosophy of Creativity. Philosophy Compass, 5(12), 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00351.x
Gaut, B. N. (2018). The Value of Creativity. In B. Gaut & M. Kieran (Eds.), Creativity and Philosophy (pp. 124–139). Routledge.
Gilbert, A. (2016). Publishing as Artistic Practice. Steinberg Press.
Godwin Ss (2019). Construction Materials from the Waste Plastic. Ramco Institute of Technology. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/335813728)
Gomez, Aiden. (2017). Attention Is All You Need. arXiv:1706.03762v5
Goodfellow, Ian. (2014). Generative Adversarial Networks. Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms.
Harper, Richard H. R. (2019). The Role of HCI in the Age of AI. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(15), 1331-1344.
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene & Leavy, Patricia. (2006). Emergent Methods in Social Research. Sage.
Ho, Karen. (2019). Getty Images Sues Stability. Art News.
Hu, Krystal. (2023). ChatGPT Sets Record for Fastest-Growing User Base. Reuters.
Johnston, David Jhave. (2019). ReRites. Anteism Books
52
Kelly, Kevin. (2006). Scan This Book! https://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/magazine/ 14publishing.html
Kelly, Samantha. (2023). ChatGPT ^Passes Exams from Law and Business Schools. CNN.
Khan, N. (2015). Towards a Poetics of Artificial Superintelligence. After Us.
Krawczyk, Jack. (2023). Interview. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/03/google-execs-say-in-all- hands-meeting-bard-ai-isnt-all-for-search-.html
Kurzweil, Ray. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking.
Lewis, Jason Edward, ed. (2020). Indigenous Protocol and Artificial Intelligence Position Paper. Honolulu, Hawaiʻi: The Initiative for Indigenous Futures and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
Ludovico, Alessandro. (2012). Post-Digital Print: The Mutation of Publishing Since 1894. Onomatopee. j.1747-9991.2010.00351.x)
Ludovico, Alessandro. (2015). Post-Digital Publishing, Hybrid and Processual Objects in Print.
Manovich, L. (2021) Artificial Intelligence Aesthetics, and a Future of Culture. . HSE Art and Design School, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6t6ZpNHYa5M
Mattei, Shanti Escalante-De. (2023). Artists Are Suing Artificial Intelligence Companies and the Lawsuit Could Upend Legal Precedents Around Art. https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/midjourney-ai-art-image-generators-lawsuit-1234665579/
53
Menabrea, Luigi Federico. (1843). Sketch of the Analytical Engine Invented by Charles Babbage ... with notes by the translator [Augusta Ada King, Countess of Lovelace]. Offprint from Scientific Memoirs III. London: Richard and John E. Taylor.
Merzazine. (2018, February 14). Love Letters Written by a Toaster. Medium. https:// medium.com/merzazine/love-letters-written-by-a-toaster-e9e795c6409f
Montreal Declaration for a Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence. (2018).
NatureMag. (2023). https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00191-1.
Latham, Alison. (2011). The Oxford Companion to Music. Oxford University Press.
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI.
Riedl, Mark. (2014). The Lovelace 2.0 Test of Artificial Creativity and Intelligence. arXiv, http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6142
Rishi Bommasani, Rishi. Et al. (2022) On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models.
Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) Stanford University.
Strauss, C. & Fuad-Luke, A. (2008). The Slow Design Principles. SlowLab.
Swift, Jonathan. (1726). Gulliver's Travels. Part 3, Chapter 5.
Subrahmanian, Eswaran, Yoram Reich, and Sruthi Krishnan. (2020).We Are Not Users: Dialogues, Diversity, and Design. The MIT Press.
Repository Staff Only: item control page