Pradeep, Amal (2025) Dynamic Amplification Effect on Bridges under Traffic Loads: Parametric Study and Novel Design Integration Approach. Masters thesis, Concordia University.
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
3MBPradeep_MASc_S2025.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Abstract
Bridges are critical infrastructure that significantly contribute to connectivity and economic growth. Ensuring their durability necessitates addressing dynamic effects from traffic loads, quantified through the Dynamic Amplification Factor (DAF). This factor, influenced by bridge and vehicle parameters, poses challenges for accurate assessment due to the complex interplay of these factors.
This study undertook a comparative analysis of analytical models and revealed that DAF can be reliably estimated using bridge parameters. Results highlighted notable DAF variations even among bridges with similar spans and frequencies, exposing limitations in current design codes. While dynamic amplification generally decreased with increasing bridge span, the reduction also depended on bridge frequency. Higher vehicle velocities elevated DAF, but no consistent trend emerged due to the influence of bridge characteristics.
A 3D Finite Element Model in Abaqus, incorporating skew angles through the Vdload subroutine, showed minimal DAF variation for skew angles up to 30°, with a 20% increase observed at 45°. These findings emphasize the significance of skew angles on dynamic amplification.
The study proposes a DAF estimation approach based on bridge span and frequency. Validation against dynamic load test data showed consistency in 15 of 17 cases, with an error margin below 5%. A regression-based formula was developed, demonstrating alignment with existing codes while identifying inadequacies in DAF values for short to medium-span bridges.
Divisions: | Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering |
---|---|
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
Authors: | Pradeep, Amal |
Institution: | Concordia University |
Degree Name: | M.A. Sc. |
Program: | Civil Engineering |
Date: | 21 January 2025 |
Thesis Supervisor(s): | Bagchi, Ashutosh |
Keywords: | Dynamic Amplification Factor (DAF), Bridge parameters, Moving load method, Finite element analysis (FEA), Skew angle impact, Vehicle velocity, Parametric study, Regression analysis. |
ID Code: | 995042 |
Deposited By: | Amal Pradeep |
Deposited On: | 17 Jun 2025 17:23 |
Last Modified: | 17 Jun 2025 17:23 |
References:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications (6th ed.)American Association of State Highway Officials. (1962). The AASHO Road Test [report].: Pavement research (No. 816). National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.
Australian Standard, A. (2004). 5100: Bridge Design. Standards Australia International (SAI): Sydney.
Azimi, H., Galal, K., & Pekau, O. A. (2011). A modified numerical VBI element for vehicles with constant velocity including road irregularities. Engineering structures, 33(7), 2212-2220.
Bakht, B., & Pinjarkar, S. G. (1989). Dynamic testing of highway bridges--a review. Transportation Research Record, (1223).
Billing, J. R., & Green, R. (1984). Design provisions for dynamic loading of highway bridges. Transportation research record, (950).
Brady, S. P., O'Brien, E. J., & Žnidarič, A. (2006). Effect of vehicle velocity on the dynamic amplification of a vehicle crossing a simply supported bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 11(2), 241-249.
Cai, C. S., Shi, X. M., Araujo, M., & Chen, S. R. (2007). Effect of approach span condition on vehicle-induced dynamic response of slab-on-girder road bridges. Engineering Structures, 29(12), 3210-3226.
Campbell, T. I., Agarwal, A. C., & Csagoly, P. E. (1971). Bridge vibraiton study. MTC Research and Development Rep, 172.
Canadian Standards Association. (2019). Canadian highway bridge design code (CSA S6-19). Mississauga, ON: Canadian Standards Association
Cantieni, R. (1983). Dynamic load tests on highway bridges in Switzerland. Rep, 211.
Cebon, D. (1999). Handbook of vehicle-road interaction.
Chang, D., & Lee, H. (1994). Impact factors for simple-span highway girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(3), 704-715.
Congress, I. R. (2017). Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges. In Indian Roads Congress (pp. 1-89).
Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., Plesha, M. E., & Witt, R. J. (2002). Concepts and applications of finite element analysis (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Deng, L., Yu, Y., Zou, Q., & Cai, C. S. (2015). State-of-the-art review of dynamic impact factors of highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 20(5), 04014080.
EN 1991-2. (2003). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures–Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. CEN-European Committee for Standardization.
Frýba, L. (1972). Vibration of solids and structures under moving loads. Noordhoff International.
González, A. (2010). Vehicle-bridge dynamic interaction using finite element modelling. Sciyo.
Hossain, K. A., & Amanat, K. M. (2011). Effect of span length on the dynamic amplification factor in the deck of concrete box girder bridges. Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB), 39(1), 59-75.
Kalin, J., Žnidarič, A., Anžlin, A., & Kreslin, M. (2022). Measurements of bridge dynamic amplification factor using bridge weigh-in-motion data. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(8), 1164-1176.
Kalin, J., Žnidarič, A., & Kreslin, M. (2015). Using weigh-in-motion data to determine bridge dynamic amplification factor. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 24, p. 02003). EDP Sciences.
Liu, C., Huang, D., & Wang, T. L. (2002). Analytical dynamic impact study based on correlated road roughness. Computers & structures, 80(20-21), 1639-1650.
Ludescher, H., & Brühwiler, E. (2009). Dynamic amplification of traffic loads on road bridges. Structural engineering international, 19(2), 190-197.
Malekjafarian, A., Corbally, R., & Gong, W. (2022, October). A review of mobile sensing of bridges using moving vehicles: Progress to date, challenges and future trends. In Structures (Vol. 44, pp. 1466)
Manning, D. G. (1981). Effects of traffic-induced vibrations on bridge-deck repairs. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice, (86).
McLean, D. I., & Marsh, M. L. (1998). Dynamic impact factors for bridges (Vol. 266). Transportation Research Board.
New Zealand Transport Agency. (2013). Bridge manual (3rd ed.). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Transport Agency.
O'Brien, E. J., Znidaric, A., Baumgärtner, W., González, A., & McNulty, P. (2001). Weighing-in-motion of axles and vehicles for Europe (WAVE) WP1. 2: Bridge WIM systems. University College Dublin.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation. (1991). Ontario highway bridge design code (3rd ed.). Downsview, ON: Ontario Ministry of Transportation
Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications. (1983). Ontario highway bridge design code (2nd ed.). Downsview, ON: Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1998). Dynamic interaction between vehicles and infrastructure experiment (DIVINE).
Paeglite, I., & Paeglitis, A. (2013). The dynamic amplification factor of the bridges in Latvia. Procedia Engineering, 57, 851-858.
Patra BK, Pradeep A, Bagchi A. (2024). Seismic analysis of skew deck slab bridges. In: Fourth International Bridge Seismic Workshop (4IBSW); Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Patra, B. K., Kumar, R., & Kumar, V. (2013). Analysis of skew deck slab bridge by analytical methods. Journal of Structural and Transportation Engineering (JSTE), 1(4), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.26634/jste.1.4.2138
Pradeep, A., and Bagchi, A. (2024). Determination of Dynamic Amplification Factor in Bridges using Simple Analytical Models. Canadian Society of Civil Engineering (CSCE) Annual Conference, Niagara Falls, Ontario.
Paultre, P., Chaallal, O., & Proulx, J. (1992). Bridge dynamics and dynamic amplification factors—a review of analytical and experimental findings. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(2), 260-278.
Sadeghi Eshkevari, S., Matarazzo, T. J., & Pakzad, S. N. (2020). Simplified vehicle–bridge interaction for medium to long-span bridges subject to random traffic load. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 10, 693-707.
Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architektenverein. (1988). Einwirkungen auf Tragwerke: Entwurf (SIA 160E). Zurich, Switzerland: Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architektenverein.
Shokravi, H., Vafaei, M., Samali, B., & Bakhary, N. (2024). In‐fleet structural health monitoring of roadway bridges using connected and autonomous vehicles’ data. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering.
Wekezer, J. W., & Taft, E. E. (2023). Dynamic load allowance for reinforced concrete bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 45(2), 123-134.
Wright, D. T., & Green, R. (1964). Highway Bridge Vibrations: Part II, Ontario Test Programme. Department of Civil Engineering, Queen's University.
Yang, Y. B., & Chang, K. C. (2009). Extraction of bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle enhanced by the EMD technique. Journal of sound and vibration, 322(4-5), 718-739.
Zhou, Y., Ma, Z. J., Zhao, Y., Shi, X., & He, S. (2015). Improved definition of dynamic load allowance factor for highway bridges. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 54(3), 561-577.
Repository Staff Only: item control page