References:

Abramov, O. Y., Medvedev, A. V., & Rychagov, V. Y. (2019). Evaluation of the effectiveness of modern TRIZ based on practical results in new product development. Paper presented at the International TRIZ Future Conference.

Adunka, R. (2007). Lessons Learned in the Introduction of TRIZ at Siemens A&D. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th ETRIA World Conference 2007.

Adunka, R. (2008). Teaching TRIZ within Siemens. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the TRIZ-future conference.

Assi, M. D., Eshah, N. F., & Rayan, A. (2022). The Relationship Between Mindfulness and Conflict Resolution Styles Among Nurse Managers: A Cross-Sectional Study. SAGE Open Nursing, 8, 23779608221142371.

Azlan, A. D., Ariz, B., & Yusof, K. M. (2014). Perceptions on TRIZ by Current TRIZ Experts in the Industry: A review in Malaysia. Paper presented at the 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering.

Baldussu, A., Becattini, N., & Cascini, G. (2011). Network of contradictions analysis and structured identification of critical control parameters. Procedia Engineering, 9, 3-17.

Becattini, N., Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. (2013). A TRIZ-based CAI framework to guide engineering students towards a broad-spectrum investigation of inventive technical problems. The International journal of engineering education, 29(2), 318-333.

Belski, I. (2009). Teaching thinking and problem solving at university: A course on TRIZ. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(2), 101-108.

Belski, I., Baglin, J., & Harlim, J. (2013). Teaching TRIZ at university: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 346-354.

Belski, I., & Belski, I. (2015). Application of TRIZ in improving the creativity of engineering experts. Procedia Engineering, 131, 792-797.

Belski, I., Hourani, A., Valentine, A., & Belski, A. (2014). Can simple ideation techniques enhance idea generation? Paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: Engineering the Knowledge Economy: Collaboration, Engagement & Employability.

Bertoncelli, T., Mayer, O., & Lynass, M. (2016). Creativity, learning techniques and TRIZ. Procedia CIRP, 39, 191-196.

Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 432-455.

Binz, M., & Schulz, E. (2023). Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2012). Evaluating the impact of TRIZ creativity training: an organizational field study. R&D Management, 42(4), 315-326.

Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: the cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co. In: Inc.

Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. (2012). Investigating the patterns of value-oriented innovations in blue ocean strategy. International Journal of Innovation Science, 4(3), 123-142.

Borgianni, Y., Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F. S., & Rotini, F. (2021). The process for individuating TRIZ Inventive Principles: deterministic, stochastic or domain-oriented? Design Science, 7, e12.

Borgianni, Y., & Maccioni, L. (2020). Review of the use of neurophysiological and biometric measures in experimental design research. AI EDAM, 34(2), 248-285.

Borgianni, Y., & Matt, D. T. (2015). Axiomatic design and TRIZ: deficiencies of their integrated use and future opportunities. Procedia CIRP, 34, 1-6.

Borgianni, Y., & Matt, D. T. (2016). Applications of TRIZ and axiomatic design: A comparison to deduce best practices in industry. Procedia CIRP, 39, 91-96.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Qualitative Research in Psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3(2), 77-101.

Bukhman, I. (2021). Technology for Innovation: How to Create New Systems, Develop Existing Systems and Solve Related Problems: Springer Nature.

Bultey, A., Yan, W., & Zanni, C. (2015). A proposal of a systematic and consistent Substance-Field Analysis. Procedia Engineering, 131, 701-710.

Caligiana, G., Liverani, A., Francia, D., Frizziero, L., & Donnici, G. (2017). Integrating QFD and TRIZ for innovative design. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 11(2), JAMDSM0015-JAMDSM0015.

Cano-Moreno, J. D., Arenas Reina, J. M., Sánchez Martínez, F. V., & Cabanellas Becerra, J. M. (2021). Using TRIZ10 for enhancing creativity in engineering design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-26.

Cascini, G. (2012). TRIZ-based anticipatory design of future products and processes. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 16(3), 29-63.

Cascini, G., & Rissone, P. (2004). Plastics design: integrating TRIZ creativity and semantic knowledge portals. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(4), 405-424.

Cascini, G., Rotini, F., & Russo, D. (2009). Functional modeling for TRIZ-based evolutionary analyses. Paper presented at the DS 58-5: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 5, Design Methods and Tools (pt. 1), Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.-27.08. 2009.

Cascini, G., Saliminamin, S., Parvin, M., & Pahlavani, F. (2015). OTSM-TRIZ games: enhancing creativity of engineering students. Procedia Engineering, 131, 711-720.

Cavallucci, D., & Eltzer, T. (2011). Structuring knowledge in inventive design of complex problems. Procedia Engineering, 9, 694-701.

Cavallucci, D., & Khomenko, N. (2007). From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: addressing complexity challenges in inventive design. International Journal of Product Development, 4(1-2), 4-21.

Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., & Zanni, C. (2010). Initial situation analysis through problem graph. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(4), 310-317.

Cavallucci, D., & Weill, R. D. (2001). Integrating Altshuller's development laws for technical systems into the design process. CIRP annals, 50(1), 115-120.

Chaki, D., Bouguettaya, A., & Mistry, S. (2020). A conflict detection framework for iot services in multi-resident smart homes. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS).

Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. asmedigitalcollection, 1.

Chang, H.-T., & Chen, J. L. (2004). The conflict-problem-solving CAD software integrating TRIZ into eco-innovation. Advances in Engineering Software, 35(8-9), 553-566.

Chang, Y.-S., Chien, Y.-H., Yu, K.-C., Chu, Y.-H., & Chen, M. Y.-c. (2016). Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 112-122.

Chechurin, L. (2016). TRIZ in science. Reviewing indexed publications. Procedia CIRP, 39, 156-165.

Chechurin, L., & Borgianni, Y. (2016). Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications. Computers in Industry, 82, 119-134.

Chen, L., Jing, Q., Tsang, Y., Wang, Q., Sun, L., & Luo, J. (2024). DesignFusion: Integrating Generative Models for Conceptual Design Enrichment. Journal of Mechanical Design, 146(11).

Chen, L., Song, Y., Ding, S., Sun, L., Childs, P., & Zuo, H. (2024). TRIZ-GPT: An LLM-augmented method for problem-solving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05897.

Chen, L., Tsang, Y., Jing, Q., & Sun, L. (2024). A LLM-augmented Morphological Analysis Approach for Conceptual Design. design research society.

Cheong, S., Lenyashin, V. A., Kynin, A. T., Feygenson, N. B., Lee, Y., & Han, S. (2008). TRIZ and innovation culture at Samsung Electro-Mechanics Company. Paper presented at the Proceedings of theFourth TRIZ Symposium in Japan.

Collins, K., Forster, F., Dolan, S., Bowyer, A., & Megill, W. (2008). Kinematics and force characterization of a knifefish-inspired mechanical propulsor. Proc. Biological Approaches to Engineering, 30-33.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage publications.

Crilly, N. (2015). Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies, 38, 54-91.

Cross, N. (2006). Understanding design cognition. Designerly Ways of Knowing, 77-93.

Czinki, A., & Hentschel, C. (2016). Solving complex problems and TRIZ. Procedia CIRP, 39, 27-32.

Czinki, A., & Hentschel, C. (2019). The Adaptive Problem Sensing and Solving (APSS) Model and Its Use for Efficient TRIZ Tool Selection. In Advances in Systematic Creativity (pp. 71-85): Springer.

Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation science, 4(1), 1-15.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know: Harvard Business Press.

Delgado-Maciel, J., Cortés-Robles, G., Alor-Hernández, G., Alcaráz, J. G., & Negny, S. (2018). A comparison between the Functional Analysis and the Causal-Loop Diagram to model inventive problems. Procedia CIRP, 70, 259-264.

Delgado-Maciel, J., Cortés-Robles, G., Sánchez-Ramírez, C., García-Alcaraz, J., & Méndez-Contreras, J. M. (2020). The evaluation of conceptual design through dynamic simulation: A proposal based on TRIZ and system dynamics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106785.

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.

Domb, E., & Mann, D. (2001). TRIZ in the knowledge era: Achieving profitable e-commerce. Paper presented at the PICMET'01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol. 1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No. 01CH37199).

Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.

Dortheimer, J., Martelaro, N., Sprecher, A., & Schubert, G. (2024). Evaluating large-language-model chatbots to engage communities in large-scale design projects. AI EDAM, 38, e4.

Dubois, S., Tate, D., Conrardy, C., Nguyen, T. A., de Guioa, R., & Gaik-Wad, A. (2012). Comparing the strategies and outputs of designers using Algorithm of Inventive Problem Solving, Axiomatic Design, or Environment-Based Design. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 16(3), 89-110.

Duflou, J. R., & Dewulf, W. (2011). On the complementarity of TRIZ and axiomatic design: From decoupling objective to contradiction identification. Paper presented at the Procedia Engineering Conference.

Dumas, D., & Schmidt, L. (2015). Relational reasoning as predictor for engineering ideation success using TRIZ. Journal of Engineering Design, 26(1-3), 74-88.

Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D. G., & Gerber, E. M. (2018). The logic of design research. Learning: Research and Practice, 4(2), 131-160.

Ehrlenspiel, K. (2003). On the Importance of the Unconscious and the Cognitive Economy in Design. In Human Behaviour in Design (pp. 25-41): Springer.

Eppinger, S. D., & Browning, T. R. (2012). Design structure matrix methods and applications: MIT press.

Faludi, J., Hoffenson, S., Kwok, S. Y., Saidani, M., Hallstedt, S. I., Telenko, C., & Martinez, V. (2020). A research roadmap for sustainable design methods and tools. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19), 8174.

Fang, M., Deng, S., Zhang, Y., Shi, Z., Chen, L., Pechenizkiy, M., & Wang, J. (2024). Large language models are neurosymbolic reasoners. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Farber, B., Martynov, A., & Kleyn, I. (2018). Creation of new medical drugs based on TRIZ and computer mathematical modeling. Annals of Mechnikov's Institute(4), 15-34.

Faria, N. (2019). Visualization of the Inventive Principle of TRIZ to Improve Problem-Solving Ability in Design Processs. Paper presented at the 2019 International Conference on Engineering, Science, and Industrial Applications (ICESI).

Feniser, C., Burz, G., Mocan, M., Ivascu, L., Gherhes, V., & Otel, C. C. (2017). The evaluation and application of the TRIZ method for increasing eco-innovative levels in SMEs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(7), 1125.

Fey, V., & Rivin, E. (2005). Innovation on demand: new product development using TRIZ: Cambridge University Press.

Filmore, P., & Thomond, P. (2005). Why reinvent the wheel? The efficacy of systematic problem solving method TRIZ and its value for innovation in engineering and its implications for engineering management. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, Hong Kong Institute of Value Management, Hong Kong.

Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F. S., & Rotini, F. (2018a). Enhancing functional decomposition and morphology with TRIZ: Literature review. Computers in Industry, 94, 1-15.

Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F. S., & Rotini, F. (2018b). Supporting systematic conceptual design with TRIZ. Paper presented at the DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference.

Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F. S., Rotini, F., Conti, L., & Rossi, G. (2021). Adapted use of the triz system operator. Applied Sciences, 11(14), 6476.

Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F. S., Rotini, F., & Tomassini, M. (2018). Exploiting TRIZ Tools for enhancing systematic conceptual design activities. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(6), 259-290.

Firdausi, Y., Sujadi, I., & Nurhasanah, F. (2021). Students’ Creative Thinking Process in Solving Ill-Structured Problem at Eight Grade Students with High Ability. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Frillici, F., Rotini, F., & Fiorineschi, L. (2016). Re-design the design task through TRIZ tools. Paper presented at the DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference.

Frillici, F. S., Fiorineschi, L., & Cascini, G. (2015). Linking TRIZ to conceptual design engineering approaches. Procedia Engineering, 131, 1031-1040.

Gericke, K., Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2022). Elements of a design method–a basis for describing and evaluating design methods. Design Science, 8, e29.

Gero, J. S. (2011). Fixation and commitment while designing and its measurement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 108-115.

Gero, J. S., Jiang, H., & Williams, C. B. (2013). Design cognition differences when using unstructured, partially structured, and structured concept generation creativity techniques. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(4), 196-214.

Gero, J. S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Design Studies, 25(4), 373-391.

Gomez, A. P., Krus, P., Panarotto, M., & Isaksson, O. (2024). Large language models in complex system design. Proceedings of the Design Society, 4, 2197-2206.

Gronauer, B., & Naehler, H. (2016). TRIZ as an amplifier for corporate creativity and corporate innovation ability. Procedia CIRP, 39, 185-190.

Gualini, E., & Bianchi, I. (2015). Space, politics and conflicts: A review of contemporary debates in urban research and planning theory. Planning and Conflict, 37-55.

Gutierrez, R., Zeng, Y., Sun, X., Tan, S., Deng, X., & Zhou, F. (2014). Conflict identification in conceptual design: Algorithm and case study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing, ICIDM 2014.

Hacker, W. (1989). On the utility of procedural rules: conditions of the use of rules in the production of operation sequences. Ergonomics, 32(7), 717-732.

Haines-Gadd, L. (2015). Does TRIZ change people? Evaluating the impact of TRIZ training within an organisation: Implications for theory and practice. Procedia Engineering, 131, 259-269.

Han, J., Shi, F., Chen, L., & Childs, P. R. (2018). The Combinator–a computer-based tool for creative idea generation based on a simulation approach. Design Science, 4, e11.

Han, Y., & Moghaddam, M. (2021). Eliciting attribute-level user needs from online reviews with deep language models and information extraction. Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(6), 061403.

Hanifi, M., Chibane, H., Houssin, R., & Cavallucci, D. (2022). Problem formulation in inventive design using Doc2vec and Cosine Similarity as Artificial Intelligence methods and Scientific Papers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 109, 104661.

Harlim, J., & Belski, I. (2015). On the effectiveness of TRIZ tools for problem finding. Procedia Engineering, 131, 892-898.

Hazelrigg, G. A. (1996). Systems engineering: an approach to information-based design: Pearson College Division.

Health, U. D. o., & Services, H. (2018). Qualitative methods in implementation science. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Cancer Institute, 1-31.

Hentschel, C. (2018). Konzeptionelle Produktentwicklung als Impulsgeber für radikale Innovation: TRIZ in der Konstruktionssystematik des VDI. In Marktorientiertes Produkt-und Produktionsmanagement in digitalen Umwelten (pp. 75-84): Springer.

Hentschel, C., Thurnes, C. M., & Zeihsel, F. (2018). GamiTRIZation–Gamification for TRIZ Education. Paper presented at the International TRIZ Future Conference.

Hernandez, N. V., Schmidt, L. C., & Okudan, G. E. (2013). Systematic ideation effectiveness study of TRIZ. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(10), 101009.

Hiltmann, K., Thurnes, C., Adunka, R., Mayer, O., Koltze, K., Livotov, P., & Müller, W. (2015). VDI standard 4521: Status. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the TFC 2015-TRIZ Future 2015.
Hmina, K., Sallaou, M., Taleb, A. A., & Lasri, L. (2019). TRIZ The theory of Inventif Problem Solving State of the art. Paper presented at the 2019 5th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA).

Hu, Z., Li, X., Pan, X., Wen, S., & Bao, J. (2023). A question answering system for assembly process of wind turbines based on multi-modal knowledge graph and large language model. Journal of Engineering Design, 1-25.

Hua, Z., Yang, J., Coulibaly, S., & Zhang, B. (2006). Integration TRIZ with problem-solving tools: a literature review from 1995 to 2006. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 1(1-2), 111-128.

Hyun, J. S., & Park, C. J. (2015). Logical interpretation about problem types and solution strategies of the Butterfly model for the automation of contradiction-based provlem solving. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering: Learning for the Future Now, TALE 2014.

Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33(2-3), 30-37.

Ilona, S., Birgit, D., Petra, B.-S., & Udo, L. (2007). Evaluation of a methodological training in design education. Guidelines for a Decision Support Method Adapted to NPD Processes.

Iryani, S. W., & Murtiwidayanti, S. Y. (2017). Empowering family with social-psychology problem through Family Care Unit (FCU). International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(2), 53-63.

Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., Zarghami, H. R., & Asgari, N. (2013). Exploring the effectiveness of inventive principles of TRIZ on developing researchers' innovative capabilities: A case study in an innovative research center. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(5), 747-767.

Jia, W., von Wegner, F., Zhao, M., & Zeng, Y. (2021). Network oscillations imply the highest cognitive workload and lowest cognitive control during idea generation in open-ended creation tasks. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 24277.

Jiang, S., & Luo, J. (2024). AutoTRIZ: Artificial Ideation with TRIZ and Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13002.

Jones, E., Mann, D., Harrison, D. D., & Stanton, P. N. (2001). An Eco‐innovation Case Study of Domestic Dishwashing through the Application of TRIZ Tools. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(1), 3-14.

Just, J. (2024). Natural language processing for innovation search–Reviewing an emerging non-human innovation intermediary. Technovation, 129, 102883.

Kan, J. W., Gero, J. S., & Tang, H.-H. (2011). Measuring cognitive design activity changes during an industry team brainstorming session. In Design computing and cognition’10 (pp. 621-640): Springer.

Kannengiesser, U., & Gero, J. S. (2019). Design thinking, fast and slow: a framework for Kahneman’s dual-system theory in design. Design Science, 5, e10.

Kelly, N., & Gero, J. S. (2021). Design thinking and computational thinking: A dual process model for addressing design problems. Design Science, 7, e8.

Keong, C. S., Yip, M. W., Swee, N. S. L., Toh, G. G., & Tai, S. C. (2017). A review of TRIZ and its benefits & challenges in stimulating creativity in problem solving of pre-university students: A TARUC case study. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 247-263.

Khademi, B., Elfvengren, K., & Chechurin, L. (2017). TRIZ popularity, challenges and strategies to make it work in Finland. Journal of the European TRIZ Association(4), 161-185.

Khanolkar, P. M., Vrolijk, A., & Olechowski, A. (2023). Mapping artificial intelligence-based methods to engineering design stages: a focused literature review. AI EDAM, 37, e25.

Kim, H. J. (2003). How to apply TRIZ at SAMSUNG. Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT).

Kim, S., & Yoon, B. (2012). Developing a process of concept generation for new product-service systems: a QFD and TRIZ-based approach. Service Business, 6, 323-348.

Kim, S. D., & Park, Y. T. (2002). Application of TRIZ to inventory management. Asian Journal on Quality, 3(1), 91-97.

Kluender, D. (2011). TRIZ for software architecture. Procedia Engineering, 9, 708-713.

Koh, E. C. (2023). Using a Large Language Model to generate a Design Structure Matrix. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04134.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Kumar, B., & Gero, J. (1993). Designing for conflicting constraints. Computing Systems in Engineering, 4(1), 75-86.

Lee, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., Li, F., & Shie, A.-J. (2020). Customized and knowledge-centric service design model integrating case-based reasoning and TRIZ. Expert Systems with Applications, 143, 113062.

Lee, L. J.-H., Leu, J.-D., & Huang, Y.-W. (2015). A value engineering based method of configuring ICT-based customer service centers. Paper presented at the 2015 2nd international conference on information science and control engineering.

Lim, C., Yun, D., Park, I., & Yoon, B. (2018). A systematic approach for new technology development by using a biomimicry‐based TRIZ contradiction matrix. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(4), 414-430. doi:10.1111/caim.12273


Lin, Y.-S., & Chen, M. (2021). Implementing TRIZ with Supply Chain Management in New Product Development for Small and Medium Enterprises. Processes, 9(4), 614.

Liu, P., Zhu, H., & Jin, N. (2012). A symbolic approach for detecting conflicts in Verilog's non blocking assignments. Paper presented at the ICSICT 2012 - 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, Proceedings.

Liu, Q., & Lu, F. (2008). Conflict and Innovation Practice of China Agricultural Chain The Case Study of" Wen's" Cultivation Service Value Chain. Paper presented at the 2008 International Conference on Risk Management & Engineering Management.

Liu, Z., Feng, J., & Wang, J. (2020). Resource-constrained innovation method for sustainability: application of morphological analysis and TRIZ inventive principles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3), 917.

Livotov, P. (2008). TRIZ and innovation management. TRIZ-europe. com (Accessed March 8 2012).

López-Mesa, B., & Thompson, G. (2006). On the significance of cognitive style and the selection of appropriate design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(4), 371-386.

Luo, J. (2015). The united innovation process: integrating science, design, and entrepreneurship as sub-processes. Design Science, 1, e2.

Ma, K., Grandi, D., McComb, C., & Goucher-Lambert, K. (2023). Conceptual Design Generation Using Large Language Models. Paper presented at the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.

Ma, L., Wang, Y., Xu, C., & Li, X. (2022). Online robotics technology course design by balancing workload and affect. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 26(2), 131-158.

Maftuna, G. (2021). Effective ways to Use Triz (The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) in Elementary School. Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT, 9, 85-88.

Mann, D. (2002). Assessing the accuracy of the contradiction matrix for recent mechanical inventions. The TRIZ Journal, 4(1), 1-9.

Mann, D. (2004). Hands-On Systematic Innovation for Business and Management. In: Clevedon: IFR Press.

Mann, D., & Domb, E. (1999). 40 inventive (business) principles with examples. The TRIZ Journal, 9, 67-83.

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science, 6, 1-12.

Mohamed, Y., & AbouRizk, S. (2005). Application of the theory of inventive problem solving in tunnel construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1099-1108.

Mohammadi, A., & Forouzanfar, A. (2021). Application of TRIZ in Literature; an Algorithm for Systematic Story Writing Based on mega Problems. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 6(4), 1-17.

Mohammadi, A., Yang, J., Borgianni, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2024). Barriers and enablers of TRIZ: a literature analysis using the TASKS framework. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 4, 1206-1230.

Montagna, F., & Cantamessa, M. (2019). Unpacking the innovation toolbox for design research and practice. Design Science, 5, e8.

Mumford, M. D., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Creative thinking processes: The past and the future. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 317-322.

Nakagawa, T. (2011). Education and training of creative problem solving thinking with TRIZ/USIT. Procedia Engineering, 9, 582-595.

Nakaishi, K., & Hukushima, K. (2022). Absence of phase transition in random language model. Physical Review Research, 4(2), 023156.

Nguyen, T. A., & Zeng, Y. (2012). A theoretical model of design creativity: Nonlinear design dynamics and mental stress-creativity relation. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 16(3), 65-88.

Nguyen, T. A., & Zeng, Y. (2017). A theoretical model of design fixation. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(3-4), 185-204.

Ning, W., Goodman-Deane, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2019). Addressing cognitive challenges in design–a review on existing approaches. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design.

Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition: Basic books.

Ogot, M., & Okudan, G. E. (2006). Integrating systematic creativity into first-year engineering design curriculum.

Okes, D. (2019). Root cause analysis: The core of problem solving and corrective action: Quality Press.

Orloff, M. A. (2016). ABC-TRIZ: introduction to creative design thinking with modern TRIZ modeling: Springer.

Ozkaramanli, D., Desmet, P. M., & Özcan, E. (2016). Beyond resolving dilemmas: Three design directions for addressing intrapersonal concern conflicts. Design Issues, 32(3), 78-91.

Ozkaramanli, D., Desmet, P. M., & Özcan, E. (2018). From teatime cookies to rain-pants: Resolving dilemmas through design using concerns at three abstraction levels. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6(3-4), 169-184.

Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1988). Engineering design: a systematic approach. Nasa Sti/recon Technical Report A, 89, 47350.

Palaniappan, A. K. (2008). Influence of Intelligence on the Relationship between Creativity and Academic Achievement: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Learning, 15(7).

Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. D. (2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP).

Petrov, V. (2019). TRIZ. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving: Level 1: Springer.

Pin, S. C., Haron, F., Sarmady, S., Talib, A. Z., & Khader, A. T. (2011). Applying TRIZ principles in crowd management. Safety Science, 49(2), 286-291.

Poppe, G., & Gras, B. (2002). TRIZ in the process industry. Paper presented at the European TRIZ Association Conference
Prushinskiy, V., Zainiev, G., & Gerasimov, V. (2005). Hybridization: the New Warfare in the Battle for the Market: Ideation International, Incorporated.

Qi, M., & Shangguan, B. (2008). Design of the knowledge management integrated system based on TRIZ. Paper presented at the 2008 International Symposium on Electronic Commerce and Security.

Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training.

Rakić, A., Milošević, I., & Filipović, J. (2021). Standards and Standardization Practices: Does Organization Size Matter? Engineering Management Journal, 34(2), 291-301.

Rantanen, K., Conley, D. W., & Domb, E. R. (2017). Simplified TRIZ: New problem solving applications for technical and business professionals: Taylor & Francis.

Rantanen, K., & Domb, E. (2002). Simplified TRIZ: New problem-solving applications for engineers and manufacturing professionals: CRC press.

Razavi, S., Yang, J., Yang, Y., Akgunduz, A., Bhuiyan, N., & Zeng, Y. (2024). Environment-driven evolution analysis of a product: A case study of braking system evolution. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 27(2), 135-150.

Regazzoni, D., & Russo, D. (2011). TRIZ tools to enhance risk management. Procedia Engineering, 9, 40-51.

Robles, G. C., Negny, S., & Le Lann, J. M. (2009). Case-based reasoning and TRIZ: A coupling for innovative conception in Chemical Engineering. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 48(1), 239-249.

Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2012). Counting highly cited papers for university research assessment: conceptual and technical issues.

Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of information science, 33(2), 163-180.

Salustri, F., & Venter, R. (1992). An axiomatic theory of engineering design information. Engineering with Computers, 8, 197-211.

Sam Carter, D. M. (2001). The application of TRIZ to economy class aircraft cabin design. TRIZ Case studies. Retrieved from https://the-trizjournal.com/case-study-application-triz-economy-class-aircraft-cabin-design/

Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving: CRC press.

Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students' achievement? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 47-72.

Schmidt, A., Elagroudy, P., Draxler, F., Kreuter, F., & Welsch, R. (2024). Simulating the Human in HCD with ChatGPT: Redesigning Interaction Design with AI. Interactions, 31(1), 24-31.

Schneider, S., Meissner, M., & Lindemann, U. (2006). A survey about the use of methods in german industry.

Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111-134.

Shai, O., & Reich, Y. (2004). Infused design. i. theory. Research in Engineering Design, 15, 93-107.

Sharma, P., Khanna, R. R., & Bhatnagar, V. (2016). A literature survey and classification framework of TRIZ methodology. Paper presented at the 2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT).

Shealy, T., Gero, J., Hu, M., & Milovanovic, J. (2020). Concept generation techniques change patterns of brain activation during engineering design. Design Science, 6.

Sheng, I. L. S., & Howa, K. B. (2016). The impact of different TRIZ tools on the creative output of students. Paper presented at the TRIZfest-2016.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of management Journal, 46(6), 703-714.

Shirwaiker, R. A., & Okudan, G. E. (2008). Triz and axiomatic design: a review of case-studies and a proposed synergistic use. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(1), 33-47.

Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial intelligence, 4(3-4), 181-201.

Song, W., & Sakao, T. (2016). Service conflict identification and resolution for design of product–service offerings. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 98, 91-101.

Souchkov, V. (2005). Root conflict analysis (RCA+): structured problems and contradictions mapping. Paper presented at the proceedings of TRIZ future conference, Graz, Austria.

Souchkov, V. (2019, 05/08). A Brief History of TRIZ. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332935983_A_Brief_History_of_TRIZ

Spreafico, C. (2021). Quantifying the advantages of TRIZ in sustainability through life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126955.

Spreafico, C., & Russo, D. (2016). TRIZ industrial case studies: a critical survey. Procedia CIRP, 39, 51-56.

Stepanova, O., & Saldert, H. (2022). Knowledge use analysis as a way to understand planning conflicts. Two cases from Gothenburg, Sweden. Cities, 124, 103606.

Stratton, R., & Mann, D. (2003). Systematic innovation and the underlying principles behind TRIZ and TOC. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 139(1-3), 120-126.

Su, C., Akgunduz, A., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Design education: Learning design methodology to enrich project experience. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).
Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic design: advances and applications: Oxford University Press, USA.

Sun, X., Houssin, R., Renaud, J., & Gardoni, M. (2016). Integrating User Information into Design Process to Solve Contradictions in Product Usage. Paper presented at the Procedia CIRP.

Suri, G., Slater, L. R., Ziaee, A., & Nguyen, M. (2024). Do large language models show decision heuristics similar to humans? A case study using GPT-3.5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(4), 1066.

Tang, D., Zhang, G., & Dai, S. (2009). Design as integration of axiomatic design and design structure matrix. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 25(3), 610-619.

Taskin, B., Basoglu, N., & Daim, T. (2017). A comparison of two innovation tools: Application on smart kitchen design. Paper presented at the 2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).

Teplov, R., Chechurin, L., & Podmetina, D. (2014). What is known about TRIZ in Innovation Management? Paper presented at the ISPIM Conference Proceedings.

Tian, Y., Liu, A., Dai, Y., Nagato, K., & Nakao, M. (2024). Systematic synthesis of design prompts for large language models in conceptual design. CIRP annals, 73(1), 85-88.

Tiuc, D., & Draghici, G. (2016). TRIZ model used for complaint management in the automotive product development process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 414-422.

Tomlinson, M., Walsh, V., Green, K., & McMeekin, A. (2002). Innovation by demand: An interdisciplinary approach to the study of demand and its role in innovation: Manchester University Press.

Trapp, S., & Warschat, J. (2024). LLM-based Extraction of Contradictions from Patents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14258.

Ulita, N., & Hananto, B. A. (2022). Implementation of Design Thinking Method in Visual Communication Design. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 2(8), 1.458-451.468.

Van Acker, B. B., Conradie, P., Vlerick, P., & Saldien, J. (2019). Employee acceptability of wearable mental workload monitoring in Industry 4.0: a pilot study on motivational and contextual framing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design.

Vincent, J. F., Bogatyreva, O., Pahl, A. K., Bogatyrev, N., & Bowyer, A. (2005). Putting biology into TRIZ: a database of biological effects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 66-72.

Vinodh, S., Kamala, V., & Jayakrishna, K. (2014). Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ, and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(11-12), 2758-2770.

Wang, B., Zuo, H., Cai, Z., Yin, Y., Childs, P., Sun, L., & Chen, L. (2023). A Task-Decomposed AI-Aided Approach for Generative Conceptual Design. Paper presented at the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.

Wang, F.-K., & Chen, K.-S. (2010). Applying Lean Six Sigma and TRIZ methodology in banking services. Total Quality Management, 21(3), 301-315.

Wang, F.-K., Yeh, C.-T., & Chu, T.-P. (2016). Using the design for Six Sigma approach with TRIZ for new product development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 98, 522-530.

Wang, M., & Zeng, Y. (2009). Asking the right questions to elicit product requirements. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(4), 283-298.

Wang, M., & Zhang, D. (2019). Screening of general innovation principles for management conflict resolution. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.

Wen, Z., Teng, M. F., Han, L., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Working Memory Models and Measures in Language and Bilingualism Research: Integrating Cognitive and Affective Perspectives. Brain Sciences, 12(6), 729.

Weyrauch, T., Herstatt, C., & Tietze, F. (2021). The Objective–Conflict–Resolution Approach: A Novel Approach for Developing Radical and Frugal Innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(3), 699-712.

Wits, W. W., Vaneker, T. H., & Souchkov, V. (2010). Full immersion TRIZ in education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th ETRIA World Conference.

Wong, Y. L., & Siu, K. W. M. (2012). A model of creative design process for fostering creativity of students in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 437-450.

Wu, Y., Zhou, F., & Kong, J. (2020). Innovative design approach for product design based on TRIZ, AD, fuzzy and Grey relational analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106276.

Yamashina, H., Ito, T., & Kawada, H. (2002). Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ. International Journal of Production Research, 40(5), 1031-1050.

Yan, B. (2013). A systematic study of design conflict: Modeling, representation, resolution, and application. Concordia University, Retrieved from https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/978615/

Yang, C.-M., Liu, T.-H., Zheng, Y.-Y., & Man, H.-T. T. (2019). A study on design thinking based creative product design process in a design project. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 5(3).

Yang, J., Quan, H., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Knowledge: the good, the bad, and the ways for designer creativity. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(12), 945-968.

Yang, J., Yang, L., Quan, H., & Zeng, Y. (2021). Implementation Barriers: A TASKS Framework. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 25(3-4), 134-147.

Yang, J., & Zeng, Y. (2020). Sustainability: Design, Making, and Technologies. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 24(2), 1-3.

Yang, J., Zeng, Y., Ekwaro-Osire, S., Nispel, A., & Ge, H. (2022). Environment-based life cycle decomposition (eLCD): Adaptation of EBD to sustainable design. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 24(2), 5-28.

Yang, L., Shewchuk, B., Shang, C., Lee, J., & Gehlert, S. (2022). Transdisciplinary Team Science in Health Research, Where Are We? Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 26(3-4), 307-316.

Yao, W., Zhaowei, C., & Zhang, B. (2020). The effectiveness of TRIZ from the perspective of comprehensive benefits of technological innovation. Paper presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.

Yasin, R. M., & Yunus, N. S. r. (2014). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of creativity approaches in technology and engineering education. Asian Social Science, 10(3), 242-252.

Yeh, C., Huang, J. C., & Yu, C. (2011). Integration of four-phase QFD and TRIZ in product R&D: a notebook case study. Research in Engineering Design, 22, 125-141.

Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2015). How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines. Design Science, 1, e4.

Yoshikawa, H. (1981). General design theory and a CAD system. Man-machine Communication in CAD/CAM, 35.

Zeng, Y. (2002). Axiomatic theory of design modeling. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 6(3), 1-28.

Zeng, Y. (2003). Formalization of design requirements. Integrated Design and Process Technologies, IDPT-2003, Austin, Texas.

Zeng, Y. (2004). Environment-based formulation of design problem. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 8(4), 45-63.

Zeng, Y. (2008). Recursive object model (ROM)—Modelling of linguistic information in engineering design. Computers in Industry, 59(6), 612-625.

Zeng, Y. (2015). Environment-based design (EBD): A methodology for transdisciplinary design+. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 19(1), 5-24.

Zeng, Y. (2020). Environment: The first thing to look at in conceptual design. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 24(1), 45-66.

Zeng, Y., & Cheng, G. (1991). On the logic of design. Design Studies, 12(3), 137-141.

Zeng, Y., & Gu, P. (1999). A science-based approach to product design theory Part I: Formulation and formalization of design process. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 15(4), 331-339.

Zeng, Y., & Gu, P. (1999). A science-based approach to product design theory Part II: Formulation of design requirements and products. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 15(4), 341-352.

Zeng, Y., & Gu, P. (2001). An environment decomposition-based approach to design concept generation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design'01.

Zeng, Y., & Jing, J. (1996). Computational model for design. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Computer-Aided Design and Computer Graphics.

Zhao, M., Jia, W., Yang, D., Nguyen, P., Nguyen, T. A., & Zeng, Y. (2020). A tEEG framework for studying designer’s cognitive and affective states. Design Science, 6, e29.

Zhao, X. (2005). Integrated TRIZ and six sigma theories for service/process innovation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ICSSSM'05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005.

Zhao, Y., Hong, H., Jiang, G., Chen, W., & Wang, H. (2015). Conflict Resolution for Product Performance Requirements Based on Propagation Analysis in the Extension Theory. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 6, 589345.

Zhou, Z., Li, J., Zhang, Z., Yu, J., & Duh, H. (2024). Examining How the Large Language Models Impact the Conceptual Design with Human Designers: A Comparative Case Study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-17.

Zhu, Q., & Luo, J. (2023). Generative transformers for design concept generation. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 23(4), 041003.

Zlotin, B., Zusman, A., & Hohnjec, M. (2023). TRIZ-based software as a front-end to AI Chatbots. ITC 2023, 2023, 30.

Zlotin, B., Zusman, A., Kaplan, L., Visnepolschi, S., Proseanic, V., & Malkin, S. (2001). TRIZ beyond technology: The theory and practice of applying TRIZ to nontechnical areas. The TRIZ Journal, 6(1), 25-89.

Zoller, U. (1987). The fostering of question-asking capability: A meaningful aspect of problem-solving in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 510.

Zouaoua, D., Crubleau, P., Mathieu, J.-P., Thiéblemont, R., & Richir, S. (2010). TRIZ and the difficulties in marketing management applications. Paper presented at the PICMET 2010 Technology Management for Global Economic Growth.