References:

Acharya, A. G., Gras, D., & Krause, R. 2022. Socially oriented shareholder activism targets: Explaining activists’ corporate target selection using corporate opportunity structures. Journal of Business Ethics, 178: 307–323.
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94: 291–309.
Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. 2015. Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9: 483–573.
Aguilera, R. V., Federo, R., & Ponomareva, Y. 2020. Gone global: The international diffusion of hedge fund activism. Oxford Handbook of Hedge Funds, 317–367.
Ahn, A. M., & Wiersema, M. 2021. Activist Hedge Funds: Beware the New Titans. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35: 96–122.
Appel, I. R., Gormley, T. A., & Keim, D. B. 2019. Standing on the shoulders of giants: The effect of passive investors on activism. Review of Financial Studies, 32: 2720–2774.
Aslan, H., & Kumar, P. 2016. The product market effects of hedge fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 119: 226–248.
Audia, P. G., Rousseau, H. E., & Brion, S. 2022. CEO power and nonconforming reference group selection. Organization Science, 33: 831–853.
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. 2013. The behavior of individual investors. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 2: 1533–1570.
Bebchuk, L. A., Brav, A., Jiang, W., & Keusch, T. 2020. Dancing with activists. Journal of Financial Economics, 137: 1–41.
Bebchuk, L.A., Brav, A., & Jiang, W. 2015. The long-term effects of hedge fund activism. Columbia Law Review, 115: 1085–1155.
Becht, M., Franks, J., Grant, J., & Wagner, H. F. 2017. Returns to hedge fund activism: An international study. Review of Financial Studies, 30: 2933–2971.
Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. 2009. Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 3093–3129.
Bednar, M. K. 2012. Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 131–150.
Belenzon, S., Shamshur, A., & Zarutskie, R. 2019. CEO’s age and the performance of closely held firms. Strategic Management Journal, 40: 917–944.
Benoit, D. 2014, November 25. CEOs’ test: Contending with activist investors; executives devise strategies to deal with shareholders, who are more assertive since financial crisis. Wall Street Journal.
Black, B. S., 1990. Shareholder passivity reexamined. Michigan Law Review, 89: 520–608.
Blank, S. 2017, October 30. Why GE’s Jeff Immelt lost his job: Disruption and activist investors. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2017/10/why-ges-jeff-immelt-lost-his-job-disruption-and-activist-investors.
Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. 2016. Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Academy of Management Annals, 10: 319–407.
Bowen, H. P., Wiersema, M. F. 2004. Modeling limited dependent variables: Guidelines for researchers of strategic management. In D. J. Ketchen Jr., & D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management: 87–134. JAI/Elsevier Press: Oxford, UK.
Boyson, N. M., & Mooradian, R. M. 2011. Corporate governance and hedge fund activism. Review of Derivatives Research, 14: 169–204.
Boyson, N. M., & Pichler, P. 2019. Hostile resistance to hedge fund activism. Review of Financial Studies, 32: 771–817.
Brav, A., Jiang, W., & Kim, H. 2010. Hedge fund activism: A review. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 4: 185–246.
Brav, A., Jiang, W., & Kim, H. 2015a. The real effects of hedge fund activism: Productivity, asset allocation, and labor outcomes. Review of Financial Studies, 28: 2723–2769.
Brav, A., Jiang, W., & Kim, H. 2015b. Recent advances in research on hedge fund activism: Value creation and identification. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7: 579–595.
Brav, A., Jiang, W., Ma, S., & Tian, X. 2018. How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? Journal of Financial Economics, 130: 237–264.
Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F., & Thomas, R. 2008. Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. Journal of Finance, 63: 1729–1775.
Brescoll, V. L. 2012. Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 622–641.
Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. 2008. Can an angry woman get ahead?: Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19: 268–275.
Brescoll, V. L., Dawson, E., & Uhlmann, E. L. 2010. Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations. Psychological Science, 21: 1640–1642.
Briscoe, F., & Gupta, A. 2016. Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10: 671–727.
Briscoe, F., Chin, M. K., & Hambrick, D. C. 2014. CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1786–1809.
Byron, K., & Post, C. 2016. Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24: 428–442.
Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Woo, H., & Semadeni, M. 2016. Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 2639–2657.
Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Akinola, M. 2019. Diversity thresholds: How social norms, visibility, and scrutiny relate to group composition. Academy of Management Journal, 62: 144–171.
Chen, G., Crossland, C., & Huang, S. 2016. Female board representation and corporate acquisition intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 303–313.
Chen, G., Meyer-Doyle, P., & Shi, W. 2021. Hedge fund investor activism and human capital loss. Strategic Management Journal, 42: 2328–2354.
Chen, J., & Jung, M. J. 2016. Activist hedge funds and firm disclosure. Review of Financial Economics, 29: 52–63.
Chen, S., & Feldman, E. R. 2018. Activist-impelled divestitures and shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 2726–2744.
Cheng, C. A., Huang, H. H., & Li, Y. 2015. Hedge fund intervention and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32: 392–421.
Cheng, C. A., Huang, H. H., Li, Y., & Stanfield, J. 2012. The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review, 87: 1493–1526.
Chin, M. K., & Semadeni, M. 2017. CEO political ideologies and pay egalitarianism within top management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1608–1625.
Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. 2013. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 197–232.
Cho, S. Y., Arthurs, J. D., Townsend, D. M., Miller, D. R., & Barden, J. Q. 2016. Performance deviations and acquisition premiums: The impact of CEO celebrity on managerial risk‐taking. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 2677–2694.
Christensen, D. M., Dhaliwal, D. S., Boivie, S., & Graffin, S. D. 2015. Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers’ personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1918–1938.
Clifford, C. P. 2008. Value creation or destruction? Hedge funds as shareholder activists. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14: 323–336.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P.,West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cook, A., & Glass, C. 2018. Women on corporate boards: Do they advance corporate social responsibility? Human Relations, 71: 897–924.
Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Larcker, D. F. 2008. The power of the pen and executive compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 1–25.
Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297–334.
Crooks, E. 2017, June 12. Immelt reshaped GE but failed to enthuse investors. Financial Times.
Daily, C. M., & Johnson, J. L. 1997. Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23: 97–117.
Dalziel, T., Gentry, R. J., & Bowerman, M. 2011. An integrated agency–resource dependence view of the influence of directors’ human and relational capital on firms’ R&D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1217–1242.
Datta, D. K., Musteen, M., & Herrmann, P. 2009. Board characteristics, managerial incentives, and the choice between foreign acquisitions and international joint ventures. Journal of Management, 35: 928–953.
David, T., Di Giuli, A., & Romec, A. 2023. CEO reputation and shareholder voting. Journal of Corporate Finance, 83: 1–23.
Davis, G. F., & Kim, E. H. 2007. Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 85: 552–570.
de la Merced, M. J. 2017, December 8. Activist hedge fund will push for changes at Alexion pharmaceuticals. New York Times.
de la Merced, M. J., & Stevenson, A. 2014, May 6. Sotheby’s yields to hedge fund mogul and allies. New York Times.
de Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. 2011. The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37: 1636–1663.
deHaan, E., Larcker, D., & McClure, C. 2019. Long-term economic consequences of hedge fund activist interventions. Review of Accounting Studies, 24: 536–569.
Denes, M. R., Karpoff, J. M., & McWilliams, V. B. 2017. Thirty years of shareholder activism: A survey of empirical research. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44: 405–424.
DesJardine, M. R., & Durand, R. 2020. Disentangling the effects of hedge fund activism on firm financial and social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 41: 1054–1082.
DesJardine, M. R., & Shi, W. 2023. The downside of displaying agentic values: Evidence from shareholder activism. Organization Science, 34: 1577–1601.
DesJardine, M. R., Marti, E., & Durand, R. 2021. Why activist hedge funds target socially responsible firms: The reaction costs of signaling corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 64: 851–872.
DesJardine, M. R., Shi, W., & Marti, E. 2024. The corporate opportunity structure for shareholder activism: How activist hedge funds exploit board demographic diversity. Organization Science, 35: 644–666.
DesJardine, M. R., Shi, W., & Sun, Z. 2022. Different horizons: The effects of hedge fund activism versus corporate shareholder activism on strategic actions. Journal of Management, 48: 1858–1887.
DesJardine, M. R., Zhang, M., & Shi, W. 2023. How shareholders impact stakeholder interests: A review and map for future research. Journal of Management, 49: 400–429.
Devers, C. E., Wuorinen, S., McNamara, G., Haleblian, J. (John), Gee, I. H., et al. 2020. An integrative review of the emerging behavioral acquisition literature: Charting the next decade of research. Academy of Management Annals, 14: 869–907.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.
Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. 2010. Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias. North Carolina Law Review, 89: 809–840.
Dwivedi, P., Misangyi, V. F., & Joshi, A. 2021. “Burnt by the spotlight”: How leadership endorsements impact the longevity of female leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106: 1885–1906.
Dyck, A., Volchkova, N., & Zingales, L. 2008. The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Finance, 63: 1093–1135.
Eagly, A. H. 1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109: 573–598.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. 2012. Social role theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 2: 458–476.
Economist. 2015a, February 5. An investor calls; activist funds. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com/briefing/2015/02/05/an-investor-calls
Economist. 2015b, February 5. Capitalism’s unlikely heroes: Why activist investors are good for the public company. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2015/02/05/capitalisms-unlikely-heroes
Edmans, A., Fang, V. W., & Zur, E. 2013. The effect of liquidity on governance. Review of Financial Studies, 26: 1443–1482.
Engelberg, J. E., & Parsons, C. A. 2011. The causal impact of media in financial markets. Journal of Finance, 66: 67–97.
England, G. W. 1967. Personal value systems of american managers. Academy of Management Journal, 10: 53–68.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301–325.
Fang, L. H., Peress, J., & Zheng, L. 2014. Does media coverage of stocks affect mutual funds' trading and performance?. Review of Financial Studies, 27: 3441–3466.
Fang, L., & Peress, J. 2009. Media coverage and the cross‐section of stock returns. Journal of Finance, 64: 2023–2052.
Feldman, E. R., Amit, R. (Raffi), & Chen, S. 2024. Hedge fund activism in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 45: 1273–1299.
Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 505–538.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. 2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fischhoff, M. 2020, June 17. Activist hedge funds hurt sustainability. Retrieved from: https://www.nbs.net/articles/activist-hedge-funds-hurt-sustainability
Fortado, L. 2017, December 26. Why activists are cheerleaders for corporate social responsibility. Financial Times.
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., Shen, Y., & Wu, Q. 2021. Do activist hedge funds target female CEOs? The role of CEO gender in hedge fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 141: 372–393.
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. 2008. Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95: 1450–1466.
Gantchev, N. 2013. The costs of shareholder activism: Evidence from a sequential decision model. Journal of Financial Economics, 107: 610–631.
Gantchev, N., Gredil, O. R., & Jotikasthira, C. 2019. Governance under the gun: Spillover effects of hedge fund activism. Review of Finance, 23: 1031–1068.
Gantchev, N., Sevilir, M., & Shivdasani, A. 2020. Activism and empire building. Journal of Financial Economics, 138: 526–548.
Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. 2007. The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19: 55–73.
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 107–156.
Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. V. 2014. Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 40: 1230–1268.
Graffin, S. D., Hubbard, T. D., Christensen, D. M., & Lee, E. Y. 2020. The influence of CEO risk tolerance on initial pay packages. Strategic Management Journal, 41: 788–811.
Graffin, S. D., Wade, J. B., Porac, J. F., & McNamee, R. C. 2008. The impact of CEO status diffusion on the economic outcomes of other senior managers. Organization Science, 19: 457–474.
Graf-Vlachy, L., Oliver, A. G., Banfield, R., König, A., & Bundy, J. 2020. Media coverage of firms: Background, integration, and directions for future research. Journal of Management, 46: 36–69.
Greenwood, R., & Schor, M. 2009. Investor activism and takeovers. Journal of Financial Economics, 92: 362–375.
Gupta, A. H., & Fisher, L. 2021, June 7. Surprise: Women and minorities are still underrepresented in corporate boardrooms. New York Times.
Gupta, A., Briscoe, F., & Hambrick, D. C. 2018. Evenhandedness in resource allocation: Its relationship with CEO ideology, organizational discretion, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1848–1868.
Gupta, A., Nadkarni, S., & Mariam, M. 2019. Dispositional sources of managerial discretion: CEO ideology, CEO personality, and firm strategies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64: 855–893.
Gupta, V. K., Han, S., Mortal, S. C., Silveri, S. (Dino), & Turban, D. B. 2018. Do women CEOs face greater threat of shareholder activism compared to male CEOs? A role congruity perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103: 228–236.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. 2007. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1199–1228.
Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. 2010. Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21: 484–497.
Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. 2010. The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 1145–1163.
Hayward, M. L., Rindova, V. P., & Pollock, T. G. 2004. Believing one's own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 637–653.
Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47: 153–161.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. 2002. Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28: 747–763.
Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. 2007. Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 941–952.
Hoetker, G. 2007. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 331–343.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hsu, T. 2017, December 15. Nelson Peltz appointed to P.&G. board, after all. New York Times.
Hubbard, T. D., Pollock, T. G., Pfarrer, M. D., & Rindova, V. P. 2018. Safe bets or hot hands? How status and celebrity influence strategic alliance formations by newly public firms. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1976–1999.
Hymowitz, C., Kochkodin, B., & Ruhle, S. 2016, March 8. Icahn, Loeb, and other activists overlook women for board seats. Bloomberg.
Ingersoll, A. R., Glass, C., Cook, A., & Olsen, K. J. 2019. Power, status and expectations: How narcissism manifests among women CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 158: 893–907.
Insightia. 2023. Shareholder activism in 2022: The definitive statistical analysis of shareholder activism with data compiled, analyzed. New York: Insightia.
ISS. 2017. The impact of shareholder activism on board refreshment trends at S&P 1500 firms. Retrieved from: https://www.issgovernance.com/activism-public-companies-erodes-gender-racial-ethnic-diversity/
J.P. Morgan. 2015. The activist revolution: Understanding and navigating a new world of heightened investor scrutiny. New York: J.P. Morgan.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. 2013. Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39: 232–262.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. 2008. Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3: 126–136.
Jung, H., Lee, Y. G., & Park, S. H. 2023. Just diverse among themselves: How does negative performance feedback affect boards’ expertise vs. ascriptive diversity? Organization Science, 34: 657–679.
Kahan, M., & Rock, E. B. 2007. Hedge funds in corporate governance and corporate control. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155: 1021–1093.
Kang, J., & Han Kim, A. Y. 2017. The relationship between CEO media appearances and compensation. Organization Science, 28: 379–394.
Kaniel, R., & Parham, R. 2017. WSJ category kings – The impact of media attention on consumer and mutual fund investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 123: 337–356.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110: 265–284.
Keusch, T., 2020. Activist involvement in CEO recruiting. Working paper.
Khurana, I. K., Li, Y., & Wang, W. 2018. The effects of hedge fund interventions on strategic firm behavior. Management Science, 64: 4094–4117.
Khurana, R. 2002. Searching for a corporate savior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
King, B. G. 2008. A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395–421.
Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Roth, K., Cavusgil, S. T., Perryy, M. Z., et al. 2011. Firm-specific assets, multinationality, and financial performance: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 47–72.
Kirsch, A. 2018. The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29: 346–364.
Klein, A., & Zur, E. 2009. Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. Journal of Finance, 64: 187–229.
Klein, A., & Zur, E. 2011. The impact of hedge fund activism on the target firm's existing bondholders. Review of Financial Studies, 24: 1735–1771.
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. 2013. The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26: 1561–1605.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137: 616–642.
Lazard. 2020. 2019 review of shareholder activism. Retrieved from: https://www.lazard.com/media/451141/lazards-2019-review-of-shareholder-activism-vf.pdf
Lazard. 2021, January 12. Annual review of shareholder activism 2020. Retrieved from: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/01/25/annual-review-of-shareholder-activism/
Liekefett, K. H. 2018, June 4. The hypocrisy of hedge fund activists. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Finanical Regulation. Retrieved from: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/06/04/the-hypocrisy-of-hedge-fund-activists/
Lippmann, W. 1922. Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
Lipton, M. 2013, February 26. Bite the apple; poison the apple; paralyze the company; wreck the economy. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation. Retrieved from: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/02/26/bite-the-apple-poison-the-apple-paralyze-the-company-wreck-the-economy/
Lorsch, J., & MacIver, E. 1989. Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Love, E. G., Lim, J., & Bednar, M. K. 2017. The face of the firm: The influence of CEOs on corporate reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 1462–1481.
Lovelace, J. B., Bundy, J., Hambrick, D. C., & Pollock, T. G. 2018. The shackles of CEO celebrity: Sociocognitive and behavioral role constraints on “star” leaders. Academy of Management Review, 43: 419–444.
Lovelace, J. B., Bundy, J., Pollock, T. G., & Hambrick, D. C. 2022. The push and pull of attaining CEO celebrity: A media routines perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 65: 1169–1191.
Mah, J., Kolev, K., McNamara, G., Pan, L., & Devers, C. E. 2023. Women in the c-suite: A review of predictors, experiences, and outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 17: 586–625.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. 2005. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60: 2661–2700.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. 2009. Superstar CEOs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124: 1593–1638.
Mariconda, S., & Lurati, F. 2014. Being known: A literature review on media visibility, public prominence and familiarity with implications for reputation research and management. Corporate Reputation Review, 17: 219–236.
Marquardt, C., & Wiedman, C. 2016. Can shareholder activism improve gender diversity on corporate boards? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24: 443–461.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. 1972. The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36: 176–187.
McDonnell, M.-H., & King, B. 2013. Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 387–419.
McKinsey & Company. 2021, October 21. Closing the gender and race gaps in North American financial services. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/closing-the-gender-and-race-gaps-in-north-american-financial-services#/
Merton, R. 1987. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42: 483–510.
Meyer, D. S., & Minkoff, D. C. 2004. Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces, 82: 1457–1492.
Mitra, A., Post, C., & Sauerwald, S. 2021. Evaluating board candidates: A threat-contingency model of shareholder dissent against female director candidates. Organization Science, 32: 86–110.
Murray, A. 2005, December 14. Hedge funds are the new sheriffs of boardroom. Wall Street Journal.
Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. 2010. The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18: 136–148.
Papadopoulos, K., Kalb, R., Valderrama, A., Balog, T. 2018, April 11. U.S. board study: Board diversity review. Institutional Shareholder Services. Retrieved from: https://www.issgovernance.com/file/publications/us-board-diversity-study.pdf.
Partnoy, F. S., & Thomas, R. S. 2007. Gap filling, hedge funds, and financial innovation. New financial instruments and institutions. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.
Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. 2007. LIWC 2007: Linguistic inquiry and word count. Austin, TX: liwc.net.
Peress, J. 2014. The media and the diffusion of information in financial markets: Evidence from newspaper strikes. Journal of Finance, 69: 2007–2043.
Perrault, E. 2015. Why does board gender diversity matter and how do we get there? The role of shareholder activism in deinstitutionalizing old boys’ networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 128: 149–165.
Petersen, M. A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 435–480.
Pfarrer, M. D., Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. 2010. A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1131–1152.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Picker, L. 2016, October 4. Hedge fund targets companies’ weakness: The gender gap. New York Times.
Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 631–642.
Pollock, T. G., Lashley, K., Rindova, V. P., & Han, J.-H. 2019. Which of these things are not like the others? Comparing the rational, emotional, and moral aspects of reputation, status, celebrity, and stigma. Academy of Management Annals, 13: 444–478.
Pollock, T. G., Mishina, Y., & Seo, Y. 2016. Falling stars: Celebrity, infamy, and the fall from (and return to) grace. In D. Palmer, K. Smith-Crowe, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), Organizational wrongdoing: Key perspectives and new directions: 235–269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pollock, T. G., Ragozzino, R., & Blevins, D. P. 2024. Not like the rest of us? How CEO celebrity affects quarterly earnings call language. Journal of Management, 50: 1198–1229.
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. 2011. Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50: 189–223.
Quigley, T. J., & Hambrick, D. C. 2015. Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America's attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 821–830.
Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. 2006. Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31: 50–71.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. 2004. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 157–176.
Schurman, R. 2004. Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe. Social Problems, 51: 243–268.
Serfling, M. A. 2014. CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25: 251–273.
Shi, W., Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ketchen, D. J. 2020. Portfolio spillover of institutional investor activism: An awareness–motivation–capability perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 63: 1865–1892.
Shi, W., Wajda, D., & Aguilera, R. V. 2022. Interorganizational spillover: A review and a proposal for future research. Journal of Management, 48: 185–210.
Shi, W., Zhang, Y., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2017. Ripple effects of CEO awards: Investigating the acquisition activities of superstar CEOs’ competitors. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 2080–2102.
Sidhu, J. S., Feng, Y., Volberda, H. W., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. J. 2021. In the shadow of social stereotypes: Gender diversity on corporate boards, board chair’s gender and strategic change. Organization Studies, 42: 1677–1698.
Singh, S. J. 2021, August 31. Boards need real diversity, not tokenism. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/08/boards-need-real-diversity-not-tokenism
Solal, I., & Snellman, K. 2019. Women don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board composition. Organization Science, 30: 1270–1288.
Sorkin, A. R. 2015, February 9. Do activist investors target female C.E.O.s? New York Times.
Soule, S. A. 2009. Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swigart, K. L., Anantharaman, A., Williamson, J. A., & Grandey, A. A. 2020. Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations. Journal of Management, 46: 1063–1091.
Tang, J., Crossan, M., & Rowe, W. G. 2011. Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1479–1503.
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. 2009. Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 320–337.
Tilly, C. 1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wade, J. B., Porac, J. F., Pollock, T. G., & Graffin, S. D. 2006. The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 643–660.
Wang, M., & Kelan, E. 2013. The gender quota and female leadership: Effects of the Norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 117: 449–466.
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 2013. A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. Academy of Management Annals, 7: 607–661.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. 2009. The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 679-692.
Wiersema, M., Ahn, A., & Zhang, Y. 2020. Activist hedge fund success: The role of reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 41: 2493–2517.
Wong, Y. T. F. 2020. Wolves at the door: A closer look at hedge fund activism. Management Science, 66: 2347–2371.
Wu, S. Y., & Chung, K. H. 2022. Hedge fund activism and corporate M&A decisions. Management Science, 68: 1378–1403.
Yim, S. 2013. The acquisitiveness of youth: CEO age and acquisition behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 108: 250–273.
Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. 1996. Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 64–90.
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., & Reger, R. K. 2017. Celebrity and infamy? The consequences of media narratives about organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 42: 461–480.
Zhang, J., & Luo, X. R. 2013. Dared to care: Organizational vulnerability, institutional logics, and MNCs’ social responsiveness in emerging markets. Organization Science, 24: 1742–1764.