Rasoulivalajoozi, Mohsen 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1991-4174, Cucuzzella, Carmela ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-8518 and Farhoudi, Morteza ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3130-4528
(2025)
Perceived Inclusivity in Mobility Aids Use: A Qualitative Study in Iran.
Disabilities, 5
(1).
p. 15.
ISSN 2673-7272
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
579kBdisabilities-05-00015-v2 (6).pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities5010015
Abstract
Despite inclusive design focusing on improving environmental accessibility for mobility aid (MA) users, it often fails to ensure true inclusivity due to mismatches between interventions and user perceptions. Therefore, understanding MA users’ perceptions of inclusivity is essential for advancing disability studies and design, as it highlights key interventions for more effective practices. This study aims to explore perceived inclusivity in MAs’ usage and identifies gaps in users’ needs, classifying their needs and offering recommendations to meet them. First, the DARE-Inclusive Design Framework was used to develop interview guidelines and interpret results. Next, using a qualitative descriptive research, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 experienced physiotherapists in Iran. Finally, an inductive thematic analysis was applied to identify and present the emerging themes. Four themes were identified: 1. Perceived Financial Value: Assessing Worth, 2. Objective Enhancements: Optimizing Environments and MAs, 3. Subjective Enhancements: Trustworthiness, Support, and Hope, and 4. Contextual Factors: Interpretations and Representations. The four interconnected themes provide guidelines for inclusivity-oriented interventions, emphasizing financial assessment, high-tech integration, and aesthetic and symbolic considerations in MA design. Physiotherapists can also mediate emotional responses and enhance inclusion during rehabilitation. Additionally, social context and disability etiology impact users’ acceptance and use of MAs.
| Divisions: | Concordia University > School of Graduate Studies > Individualized Program |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Authors: | Rasoulivalajoozi, Mohsen and Cucuzzella, Carmela and Farhoudi, Morteza |
| Journal or Publication: | Disabilities |
| Date: | 31 January 2025 |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.3390/disabilities5010015 |
| Keywords: | mobility aids; social inclusion; physiotherapy; inclusive design; user experiences |
| ID Code: | 995330 |
| Deposited By: | Mohsen Rasoulivalajoozi |
| Deposited On: | 07 Apr 2025 17:53 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Apr 2025 17:53 |
References:
Desai, R.H.; Hollingsworth, H.; Stark, S.; Putnam, M.; Eyler, A.; Wehmeier, A.; Morgan, K. Social Participation of Adults Aging with Long-Term Physical Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Study Investigating the Role of Transportation Mode and Urban vs Rural Living. Disabil. Health J. 2023, 16, 101503.Harris, F.; Yang, H.-Y.; Sanford, J. Physical Environmental Barriers to Community Mobility in Older and Younger Wheelchair Users. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil. 2015, 31, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, K.; Zhao, P.; Qin, K.; Kwan, M.-P.; Wang, N. Towards Healthcare Access Equality: Understanding Spatial Accessibility to Healthcare Services for Wheelchair Users. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 2024, 108, 102069.
Unsworth, C.A.; Rawat, V.; Sullivan, J.; Tay, R.; Naweed, A.; Gudimetla, P. “I’m Very Visible but Seldom Seen”: Consumer Choice and Use of Mobility Aids on Public Transport. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2017, 14, 122–132.
Barker, D.J.; Reid, D.; Cott, C. The Experience of Senior Stroke Survivors: Factors in Community Participation among Wheelchair Users. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 2006, 73, 18–25.
Herrera-Saray, P.; Peláez-Ballestas, I.; Ramos-Lira, L.; Sánchez-Monroy, D.; Burgos-Vargas, R. Usage Problems and Social Barriers Faced by Persons with a Wheelchair and Other Aids. Qualitative Study from the Ergonomics Perspective in Persons Disabled by Rheumatoid Arthritis and Other Conditions. Reumatol. Clin. 2013, 9, 24–30.
Kim, J.; Park, G.-R.; Namkung, E.H. The Link between Disability and Social Participation Revisited: Heterogeneity by Type of Social Participation and by Socioeconomic Status. Disabil. Health J. 2024, 17, 101543.
Oishi, M.M.K.; Mitchell, I.M.; Loos, H.F.M.V.d. Design and Use of Assistive Technology: Social, Technical, Ethical, and Economic Challenges; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-1-4419-7030-5.
Barlew, L.; Secrest, J.; Guo, Z.; Fell, N.; Haban, G. The Experience of Being Grounded: A Phenomenological Study of Living with a Wheelchair. Rehabil. Nurs. J. 2013, 38, 193.
Costa, V.; de, S.P.; Melo, M.R.A.C.; Garanhani, M.L.; Fujisawa, D.S. Social Representations of the Wheelchair for People with Spinal Cord Injury. Rev. Lat. Am. Enferm. 2010, 18, 755–762.
Krantz, O.; Edberg, A.-K.; Persson, D. The Experience of Active Wheelchair Provision and Aspects of Importance Concerning the Wheelchair Among Experienced Users in Sweden. Rev. Disabil. Stud. (RDS) 2011, 7, 2.
Barker, D.J.; Reid, D.; Cott, C. Acceptance and Meanings of Wheelchair Use in Senior Stroke Survivors. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2004, 58, 221–230.
Emerson, E.; Fortune, N.; Llewellyn, G.; Stancliffe, R. Loneliness, Social Support, Social Isolation and Wellbeing among Working Age Adults with and without Disability: Cross-Sectional Study. Disabil. Health J. 2021, 14, 100965.
Lidwell, W.; Holden, K.; Butler, J. Universal Principles of Design: 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Teach Through Design; [25 Additional Design Principles]; Rev. and Updated.; Rockport Publ: Beverly, MA, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-1-59253-587-3.
Rousseau-Harrison, K.; Rochette, A.; Routhier, F.; Dessureault, D.; Thibault, F.; Cote, O. Perceived Impacts of a First Wheelchair on Social Participation. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2012, 7, 37–44.
Newell, A. Inclusive Design or Assistive Technology. In Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population; Clarkson, J., Keates, S., Coleman, R., Lebbon, C., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2003; pp. 172–181. ISBN 978-1-4471-0001-0.
Yaldiz, N.; Agarwal, H.; Chakrabarti, A. Assessment of Inclusivity in a Product Life Cycle. In Proceedings of the Design in the Era of Industry 4.0, Volume 2; Chakrabarti, A., Singh, V., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 747–760.
Schifferstein, H.N.J.; Hekkert, P. (Eds.) Product Experience, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science: San Diego, CA, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-08-045089-6.
Heylighen, A.; Van der Linden, V.; Van Steenwinkel, I. Ten Questions Concerning Inclusive Design of the Built Environment. Build. Environ. 2017, 114, 507–517.
Patrick, V.M.; Hollenbeck, C.R. Designing for All: Consumer Response to Inclusive Design. J. Consum. Psychol. 2021, 31, 360–381.
Barbareschi, G.; Carew, M.T.; Johnson, E.A.; Kopi, N.; Holloway, C. “When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”—Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 4272.
Grue, J. The Social Meaning of Disability: A Reflection on Categorisation, Stigma and Identity. Sociol. Health Illn. 2016, 38, 957–964.
Human Right Watch “I am Equally Human”. Available online: https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/06/27/i-am-equally-human/discrimination-and-lack-accessibility-people-disabilities-iran (accessed on 2 August 2024).
Sahoo, S.K.; Choudhury, B.B. Wheelchair Accessibility: Bridging the Gap to Equality and Inclusion. Decis. Mak. Adv. 2023, 1, 63–85.
Perangin-Angin, R.; Tavakoli, R.; Kusumo, C. Inclusive Tourism: The Experiences and Expectations of Indonesian Wheelchair Tourists in Nature Tourism. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2023, 48, 955–968.
Physiopedia Assistive Devices. Available online: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Assistive_Devices (accessed on 9 February 2024).
UNICEF; WHO. Assistive Technology for Children with Disabilities: Creating Opportunities for Education, Inclusion and Participation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
Hossen Sajib, S. Identifying Barriers to the Public Transport Accessibility for Disabled People in Dhaka: A Qualitative Analysis. Trans. Transp. Sci. 2022, 13, 5–16.
Widehammar, C.; Lidström, H.; Hermansson, L. Environmental Barriers to Participation and Facilitators for Use of Three Types of Assistive Technology Devices. Assist. Technol. 2019, 31, 68–76.
Basiri, A. Inclusivity and Diversity of Navigation Services. J. Navig. 2021, 74, 269–272.
Basiri, A. Open Area Path Finding to Improve Wheelchair Navigation. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2011.03850. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03850 (accessed on 18 July 2024).
Bodaghi, N.B.; Zainab, A.N. Accessibility and Facilities for the Disabled in Public and University Library Buildings in Iran. Inf. Dev. 2013, 29, 241–250.
Vice, J.; Barstow, B.A.; Bowman, S.; Mehta, T.; Padalabalanarayanan, S. Effectiveness of the International Symbol of Access and Inclusivity of Other Disability Groups. Disabil. Health J. 2020, 13, 100836.
Holmes, K.; Maeda, J. Mismatch: How Inclusion Shapes Design; Reprint Edition.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2020; ISBN 978-0-262-53948-7.
Turk, M.A.; Mitra, M. The Evolution of Disability and Health Research and Practice. Disabil. Health J. 2023, 16, 101450.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Available online: https://social.desa.un.org/issues/disability/crpd/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-crpd (accessed on 13 December 2024).
Tracy, S.J. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-4051-9202-6. [Google Scholar]
Nussbaumer, L.L. Inclusive Design: A Universal Need, 1st ed.; Fairchild Books: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-1-56367-921-6.
Jamshed, S. Qualitative Research Method-Interviewing and Observation. J. Basic. Clin. Pharm. 2014, 5, 87–88.
Longhurst, R. Interviews: In-Depth, Semi-Structured. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography; Kitchin, R., Thrift, N., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 580–584. ISBN 978-0-08-044910-4.
Pohlmeyer, A.E. How Design Can (Not) Support Human Flourishing. In Positive Psychology Interventions in Practice; Proctor, C., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 235–255. ISBN 978-3-319-51787-2.
Chartered Society Of Physiotherapy Disabled, Not Defeated. Available online: https://www.csp.org.uk/frontline/article/disabled-not-defeated (accessed on 9 February 2024).
Fugard, A.J.B.; Potts, H.W.W. Supporting Thinking on Sample Sizes for Thematic Analyses: A Quantitative Tool. Int. J. Social. Res. Methodol. 2015, 18, 669–684.
Tong, A.; Sainsbury, P.; Craig, J. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2007, 19, 349–357.
Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Thematic Analysis. In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological; APA Handbooks in Psychology®; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 57–71. ISBN 978-1-4338-1005-3.
Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101.
Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis. Qual. Psychol. 2022, 9, 3–26.
UChicago Library The Holy Defense—The Graphics of Revolution and War—The University of Chicago Library. Available online: https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/collex/exhibits/graphics-revolution-and-war-iranian-poster-arts/holy-defense/ (accessed on 8 April 2024).
Colizzi, M.; Lasalvia, A.; Ruggeri, M. Prevention and Early Intervention in Youth Mental Health: Is It Time for a Multidisciplinary and Trans-Diagnostic Model for Care? Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 2020, 14, 23.
Rasoulivalajoozi, M.; Touir, G. Spinal Fusion Surgery for High-Risk Patients: A Review of Hospitals Information. Social. Determ. Health 2023, 9, 1–12.
Boden, I.; Robertson, I.K.; Neil, A.; Reeve, J.; Palmer, A.J.; Skinner, E.H.; Browning, L.; Anderson, L.; Hill, C.; Story, D.; et al. Preoperative Physiotherapy Is Cost-Effective for Preventing Pulmonary Complications after Major Abdominal Surgery: A Health Economic Analysis of a Multicentre Randomised Trial. J. Physiother. 2020, 66, 180–187.
Gowran, R.J.; Bray, N.; Goldberg, M.; Rushton, P.; Barhouche Abou Saab, M.; Constantine, D.; Ghosh, R.; Pearlman, J. Understanding the Global Challenges to Accessing Appropriate Wheelchairs: Position Paper. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 3338.
EtemadOnline The Price of a Wheelchair Has Increased at Least 3 Times/56% of Disabled People in Tehran Receive a Pension. Available online: https://shorturl.at/coCXY (accessed on 5 May 2024).
WHO-Asssitive Assistive Technology. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology (accessed on 4 January 2022).
White, K. An Introduction to the Sociology of Health and Illness; SAGE Publications: London, UK; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002; ISBN 978-0-7619-6399-8.
Matin, P. Introductionn of Medical Annthropology, 1st ed.; Farhameh: Tehran, Iran, 2021; ISBN 978-600-94057-1-8.
Skempes, D.; Kiekens, C.; Malmivaara, A.; Michail, X.; Bickenbach, J.; Stucki, G. Supporting Government Policies to Embed and Expand Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Europe: A Framework for Action. Health Policy 2022, 126, 158–172.
Kapsalis, E.; Jaeger, N.; Hale, J. Disabled-by-Design: Effects of Inaccessible Urban Public Spaces on Users of Mobility Assistive Devices—A Systematic Review. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2022, 19, 604–622.
Faraji, A.; Valajoozi, M.R. Interactive Foot Orthosis (IFO) for People with Drop Foot. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 464, 129–134.
Mohebbi, V.; Dianat, I.; Castellucci, H.I. Psychometric Properties of the Iranian Version of the Wheelchair Seating Discomfort Assessment Tool (WcS-DAT)—Section II: A Revised Two-Dimensional Structure of Comfort and Discomfort to Improve Inclusive Design Practice. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2023, 19, 1351–1357.
Domingues, I.; Pinheiro, J.; Silveira, J.; Francisco, P.; Jutai, J.; Correia Martins, A. Psychosocial Impact of Powered Wheelchair, Users’ Satisfaction and Their Relation to Social Participation. Technologies 2019, 7, 73.
Soetemans, J.K.; Jackson, L.M. The Influence of Accessibility on Perceptions of People with Disabilities. Can. J. Disabil. Stud. 2021, 10, 185–206.
Sadeghzadeh, C. Disabled Push for a Better Life in Iran. BBC News. 2015. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34071843 (accessed on 29 August 2015).
EIDD. European Institute for Design and Disability in Stockholm, EIDD Stockholm Declaration 2004. Available online: https://dfaeurope.eu/what-is-dfa/dfa-documents/the-eidd-stockholm-declaration-2004/ (accessed on 22 July 2024).
BCA Code on Accessibility in the Built Environment 2019. Available online: https://www1.bca.gov.sg/about-us/about-bca (accessed on 22 July 2024).
Andrade, C.C.; Devlin, A.S. Stress Reduction in the Hospital Room: Applying Ulrich’s Theory of Supportive Design. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 41, 125–134.
Wade, A. Q & A: Reality Check. Engineer 2020, 300, 30–31.
Goold, S.D. Trust, Distrust and Trustworthiness. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2002, 17, 79–81.
Cucuzzella, C.; Rasoulivalajoozi, M.; Farzamfar, G. Spatial Experience of Cancer Inpatients in the Oncology Wards: A Qualitative Study in Visual Design Aspects. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2024, 70, 102552.
Douglass, T.; Calnan, M. Trust Matters for Doctors? Towards an Agenda for Research. Soc. Theory Health 2016, 14, 393–413.
Sousa-Duarte, F.; Brown, P.; Mendes, A.M. Healthcare Professionals’ Trust in Patients: A Review of the Empirical and Theoretical Literatures. Sociol. Compass 2020, 14, e12828.
Mokdad, M.; Mebarki, B.; Bouabdellah, L.; Mokdad, I. Emotional Responses of the Disabled Towards Wheelchairs. In Proceedings of the Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design; Chung, W., Shin, C.S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 86–96.
Jutai, J.; Day, H. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technol. Disabil. 2002, 14, 107–111.
Shinohara, K.; Wobbrock, J.O. Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 2016, 8, 5.
Hernández, R.J.; Cooper, R.; Tether, B.; Murphy, E. Design, the Language of Innovation: A Review of the Design Studies Literature. She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innov. 2018, 4, 249–274.
Norman, D.A. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-465-05135-9.
Shi, A.; Huo, F.; Hou, G. Effects of Design Aesthetics on the Perceived Value of a Product. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 670800.
Interaction Design Foundation What Is Aesthetics? Available online: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/aesthetics (accessed on 28 July 2024).
dos Santos, A.D.P.; Ferrari, A.L.M.; Medola, F.O.; Sandnes, F.E. Aesthetics and the Perceived Stigma of Assistive Technology for Visual Impairment. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2022, 17, 152–158.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Download Statistics
Download Statistics