Jarrahi, Farshad (2025) Hegel and the Modern Debate of Historicism in Art: A Contemporary Reading of Hegel’s Ideal of Art through the Musical Form. Masters thesis, Concordia University.
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
962kBJarrahi_MA_F2025.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Abstract
The aim of this inquiry is to contribute an interpretation of Hegel’s Ideal of art, suggesting that historical context is one of the factors that determines the form of an artwork, if it is an actualization of the Ideal of art. I motivate my approach through locating Hegel's view in an unresolved contemporary debate, between two views in the domain of the ontology of music. The first view, representing the pure structuralist or formalist argument, taking more or less a Platonic line, maintains that a great deal of Western notated art music, consists of “abstract” entities, i.e., types, existing as pure and eternal sound structures. The opposing view, known as contextualist, holds that the musico-historical context of the composer of a musical work is, among other factors, determinative of the artistic and aesthetic properties of the work. I aim to argue that Hegel’s account of the Ideal of art can be interpreted in favor of the contextualist view, in so far as it holds that the ideal form of art is not, and cannot be, examined in abstraction from the broader context of its external world. I focus this study for a contextualist interpretation of Hegel through examining what Hegel means by the external determinacy of the Ideal in the Lectures on Aesthetics.
| Divisions: | Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Philosophy |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
| Authors: | Jarrahi, Farshad |
| Institution: | Concordia University |
| Degree Name: | M.A. |
| Program: | Philosophy |
| Date: | 11 August 2025 |
| Thesis Supervisor(s): | Angelova, Emilia |
| Keywords: | Philosophy of Music, Ontology of Music, Hegelian Ideal Art, Philosophy of Art, Aesthetic |
| ID Code: | 996273 |
| Deposited By: | farshad jarrahi |
| Deposited On: | 04 Nov 2025 17:23 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Nov 2025 17:23 |
References:
Bowie, Andrew (2003): Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. 2nd ed., completely re-written and updated. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Currie, Gregory (1989): An Ontology of Art (London: St Martin’s)
Currie, Gregory (1991): “Work and Text,” Mind 100, 325–340
Danto, Arthur (1964): ‘The Artworld’, Error! Main Document Only.Journal of Philosophy, 61, 571-84.
Danto, Arthur (1991): Transfiguration of the Commonplace (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Davies, David (2024): An Ontology of Multiple Artworks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024, notes taken from graduate seminar in Metaphysics, audited in Winter semester 2023.
Dickie, George (1964): “The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude.” American Philosophical Quarterly 1, no. 1: 56–65.
Dodd, Julian (2004): ‘Types, Continuants, and the Ontology of Music’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 44.4, 342– 360.
Dodd, Julian (2007): Works of Music: An Essay in Ontology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Dodd, Julian (2012): “Defending the Discovery Model in the Ontology of Art: A Reply to Amie Thomasson on the Qua Problem,” British Journal of Aesthetics 52, 75–95.
Dodd, Julian (2013): “Adventures in the Meta-ontology of Art: Local Descriptivism, Artefacts, and Dreamcatchers,” Philosophical Studies 165: 1047–1068.
Dutton, Denis (1979): ‘Artistic crimes: the problem of forgery in the arts,’ British Journal of Aesthetics 19.4, 304-14.
Hegel, G.W.F. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art Translated by T. M. Knox Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press, 1975. 2 volumes, 1289 pp.
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. (E. Matthews, Trans., P. Guyer, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kivy, Peter (1983): “Platonism in Music: A Kind of Defense,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 19 (1), 109–29.
Kivy, Peter (1987): “Platonism in Music: Another Kind of Defense,” American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 245-52.
Kivy, Peter (1988): ‘Orchestrating Platonism’, in T. Anderberg, T Nilstun, and I Persson (eds), Aesthetic Distinction (Lund: Lund University Press), 42-55.
Levinson, Jerrold (1980): “What a Musical Work Is,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1), 5–28. Reprinted in Music, Art, and Metaphysics (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press), 63-88. Page references are to the reprinted version.
Levinson, Jerrold (1990a): “What a Musical Work Is Again”, in Music, Art, and Metaphysics (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press), 215-63.
Levinson, Jerrold (1990b): ‘Authentic Performance and Performance Means’, in Music, Art, and Metaphysics (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press), 393-408.
Rohrbaugh, Guy (2003): “Artworks as Historical Individuals,” European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2), 177–205.
Rohrbaugh, Guy (2013): "The Ontology of Art." In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, third edition, edited by Berys Gaut and Dominic Lopes, 235–45. New York: Routledge.
Wollheim, Richard (1980): Art and its Objects 2nd edition, with 6 supplementary essays, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). First edition 1968.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1975): “Towards an Ontology of Art Works” Noûs 9 (2), 115–42.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1980): Works and Worlds of Art (Oxford: Clarendon).
Young, James O. (2016): “How Classical Music Is Better than Popular Music.” Philosophy 91, no. 358: 523–40.
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Download Statistics
Download Statistics