Mayandi, Karthi
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0454-152X
(2026)
Beyond the Bloodline: When Do Non-Family CEOs Help Family Firms Thrive? The Role of Organizational Ambidexterity.
Masters thesis, Concordia University.
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
1MBMayandi_MSc_S2026.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access. |
Abstract
Family businesses make up a large share of the U.S. economy, yet many are approaching a critical turning point: deciding whether the next CEO should come from inside the family or from outside the family. This decision matters more because small cap family firms especially those in the S&P 600—operate with fewer resources and face greater vulnerability during disruptions like COVID 19. In these firms, leadership choices can quickly shape how well the business adapts, survives, and grows. This study examines 141 publicly listed family firms in the S&P SmallCap 600 index from 2017 to 2024 to understand when family or non family CEOs help firms perform better. Instead of asking which CEO type is “best,” the study focuses on how CEOs influence a firm’s ability to balance two essential activities: improving what the company already does well (exploitation) while also investing in new ideas and opportunities (exploration). This balance—called organizational ambidexterity—is known to support long term success. The findings show that CEO type does not directly determine performance, nor does it consistently change how much ambidexterity a firm develops. Instead, CEO type influences how effectively ambidexterity translates into results. Non family CEOs are more successful at turning this strategic balance into stronger operating performance (ROA), particularly during disruption (COVID-19) when rapid adaptation is critical. However, financial markets (Tobin’s Q) do not always reward these efforts in the short term. Overall, the study shows that succession decisions in family firms are not just about choosing a CEO—they are about choosing who can best help the firm balance exploitation and exploration when it matters most.
| Divisions: | Concordia University > John Molson School of Business > Management |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
| Authors: | Mayandi, Karthi |
| Institution: | Concordia University |
| Degree Name: | M. Sc. |
| Program: | Management |
| Date: | 20 March 2026 |
| Thesis Supervisor(s): | Fattoum-Guedri, Asma |
| Keywords: | Family Firm CEO Succession; Family Firms; CEO Type; Family CEO; Non‑Family CEO; Organizational Ambidexterity; Exploration and Exploitation; Firm Performance; S&P 600 Index; Small‑Cap Firms; Environmental Disruption; COVID‑19; Fixed Effects Model; Panel Data. |
| ID Code: | 996941 |
| Deposited By: | Karthi Mayandi |
| Deposited On: | 29 Jun 2026 15:17 |
| Last Modified: | 29 Jun 2026 15:17 |
References:
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00211.x
Bain & Company. (2019). The five trademarks of agile organizations. https://www.bain.com/insights/the-five-trademarks-of-agile-organizations/
Bandiera, O., Guiso, L., Prat, A., & Sadun, R. (2018). CEO behavior and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 128(4), 1325–1372. https://doi.org/10.1086/705204
Bammens, Y., & Voordeckers, W. (2022). Nonfamily CEOs in family firms: Governance conditions for effective leadership. Family Business Review, 35(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211043399
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Beck, S., Janssens, M., Debruyne, M., & Lommelen, T. (2020). Interactions of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity: A meta-analysis on organizational antecedents and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 114, 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.018
Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Bennedsen, M., Fan, J. P. H., Jian, M., & Yeh, Y. H. (2015). The family business map: Framework, selective survey, and evidence from Chinese family firm succession. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.002
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351–1408. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351
Blumentritt, T., Keyt, A., & Astrachan, J. H. (2007). Creating an environment for successful nonfamily executives in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(4), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00101.x
Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2167–2201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00601
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
Cennamo, C., De Massis, A., & Di Minin, A. (2023). Governance and innovation in family firms: The mediating role of ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 60(2), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12817
Chen, H. L., Hsu, W. T., & Huang, Y. S. (2014). Transparency and financing choices of family firms. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9489-5
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Wright, M. (2012). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207
Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centeredness in family firms: New perspectives on CEO heterogeneity and governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1235–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00535.x
Christofi, M., Hadjielias, E., Mahto, R. V., Tarba, S., & Dhir, A. (2024). Owner-manager emotions and strategic responses of small family businesses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(4), 2016-2057. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2193230
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2013). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0029
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2015). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 917–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12114
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Wright, M., & Frattini, F. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1199
De Massis, A., Rondi, E., & Kotlar, J. (2021). The future of family business research: A review and agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320976459
Deloitte. (2021). Driving organizational ambidexterity: Balancing innovation and efficiency. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/insights
Deloitte. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership: Key CEO traits in the digital era. Deloitte Insights. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/leadership/ambidextrous-leadership-ceo-traits-in-digital-era.html
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage Publications. https://books.google.ca/books?id=hXroN8btsN8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Dutta, Shantanu, Om Narasimhan, and Surendra Rajiv (1999), “Success in High-Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical? Marketing Science, 18 (4), 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.4.547
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.ca/books?id=8w1s60UhaU4C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 369–406). JAI Press. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Managerial-discretion:-A-bridge-between-polar-views-Hambrick-Finkelstein/e0e2d6da2b170ef7da390c4979079cc4b32b090b
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Introduction-to-Mediation-Moderation-and-Conditional-Process-Analysis/Andrew-Hayes/9781462549030/prior-editions
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute. (2018). Microcap Board Governance. Board Governance Research LLC. https://bpb-us w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.udel.edu/dist/8/12944/files/2022/07/FINAL-MicroCap-Governance-Study-Aug-1-2018.pdf
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Organizational antecedents of managerial ambidexterity: A meta-analysis. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100134
Jaskiewicz, P., & Dyer, W. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517700469
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Tarba, S. Y., & Weber, Y. (2013). The role of strategic agility in acquisitions. British Journal of Management, 24(4), 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00815.x
Kammerlander, N., Dessi, C., Bird, M., Floris, M., & Murru, L. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity in family-managed firms: The role of family involvement in top management. Family Business Review, 33(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520928357
Kassotaki, O. (2022). Review of organizational ambidexterity research. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082127
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00147.x
Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
Lefebvre, V. (2023). Human resources slack and profitability: SMEs, large firms, and the role of business group affiliation. Eurasian Business Review, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-023-00240-9
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to-medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Marques, L. D., Borba, V. R., & Leitão, J. (2014). Institutional context and corporate governance systems: A comparative analysis. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 14(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2013-0123
Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A. (2014). The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement: The role of values. Family Business Review, 27(3), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514539004
Mazzelli, A., Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2023). Capturing family firm heterogeneity in research on organizational goals: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 49(1), 44–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221093714
McKinsey & Company. (2026). CEO succession at family-owned businesses: Passing the baton. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/private-capital/our-insights/passing-the-baton-creating-value-through-ceo-succession-at-family-businesses
McKinsey & Company. (2020). The CEO’s guide to organizational agility. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-ceos-guide-to-organizational-agility
Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL8854570M/Managing_For_The_Long_Run
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00718.x
Miller, D., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2014). Is family leadership always beneficial? Strategic change as a function of CEO tenure in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1073–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2145
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2021). Family firm governance and succession: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0075
Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Patel, P. C., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12130
Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. (2014). The harder they fall, the faster they rise: Approach and avoidance focus in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 1981–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.007
Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. (2014). Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0681
Pérez-González, F. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559–1588. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1559
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1320561
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
PwC. (2022). Achieving sustainable growth through governance and strategic balance. https://www.pwc.com/
PwC. (2021). Family Business Survey: U.S. findings. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/private-company-services/family-business-survey.html
Quigley, T. J., & Graffin, S. D. (2017). Reaffirming the CEO’s role in corporate social responsibility: Review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 43(2), 554–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315587542
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Raisch, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). Ambidexterity: The emergence of a new paradigm of strategic management? Organization Science, 31(3), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1345
Rondi, E., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2021). Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family firms’ innovation strategies. California Management Review, 63(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620955791
S&P Dow Jones Indices. (2026). S&P SmallCap 600® [Factsheet]. https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-600/
Sadun, R. (2023). The behavior of CEOs: Time allocation and performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=58289
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2001). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Family Business Review, 14(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00235.x
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00001.x
Sharma, P., & Manikutty, S. (2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00084.x
Skorodziyevskiy, V., Markin, E., Reuber, A. R., & Autio, E. (2024). The family business CEO: A review of insights and research opportunities. Journal of Family Business Management, 14(4), 642–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2284912
Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Lee, C. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity in family firms: Navigating disruption and renewal. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 14(2), 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2023.100456
Spencer Stuart. (2024). 2024 CEO Transitions: The measure of the market. Spencer Stuart Board & CEO Transitions Report. https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/2024-ceo-transitions
Spencer Stuart. (2024). S&P 1500 CEO transitions and trends. https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Tri-Council Policy Statement. (2022). Ethical conduct for research involving humans (TCPS2). Government of Canada. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2022.html
Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 firms. Organization Science, 20(6), 1055–1074. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0424
Van Essen, M., Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E. R., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2015). How does family control influence firm strategy and performance? A meta-analysis of US publicly listed firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12080
Venkatraman, N., Lee, C. H., & Iyer, B. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in software firms: Evidence from product and service innovations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2006(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.22898604
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Wenzel, M., Stanske, S., & Lieberman, M. B. (2021). Strategic responses to crisis. Strategic Management Journal, 42(2), O16–O27. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3161
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=cdBPOJUP4VsC
Yoshikawa, T., & Rasheed, A. A. (2010). Family control and ownership monitoring in family-controlled firms in Japan. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00891.x
Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x
Zellweger, T. (2017). Managing the family business: Theory and practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 527 pp. https://www.scribd.com/document/583264407/Managing-the-Family-Business-Theory-and-Practice-Zellweger-Thomas-M-2017
Zellweger, T. M., & Nason, R. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210030203
Zhao, M., & Lee, D. (2024). Leadership identity and strategic ambidexterity: A longitudinal analysis of small-cap public firms. Strategic Management Journal, 45(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3567
Repository Staff Only: item control page


Download Statistics
Download Statistics