Login | Register

Hybrid Simulation for Construction Operations


Hybrid Simulation for Construction Operations

Alzraiee, Hani S. H. (2013) Hybrid Simulation for Construction Operations. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

Text (application/pdf)
Alzraiee_PhD_F2013.pdf - Accepted Version


Developing realistic and unbiased simulation models for construction operations require addressing the operational and strategic decision making levels. The dynamics and feedback processes observed in construction systems are responsible for the real behavior of such systems and drive the needs for hybrid and integrated simulation tools. The dominant simulation methods such as discrete event simulation (DES) and system dynamics (SD) are limited individually of capturing all the significant construction operation aspects that are responsible for generating the behaviour of realistic models. Therefore, this thesis presents a hybrid simulation method for simulating construction operations by utilizing the joint powerful features of the DES and SD methods.
The proposed method provides a framework to integrate DES and SD on single computational platform. Developing a hybrid simulation model commences by decomposing the construction project into units, form which simulation models (e.g. DES or SD) are developed. A unidirectional variables interaction from DES to SD models is used. The interfacing process among simulation models is achieved by defining three variables: sender, interface, and receiver. The mechanism that controls data mapping processes between variables is outlined in a new developed synchronization method. The variables interaction protocol is described using formalism. Finally, a Hybrid Simulation Application (HiSim) is coded in VB.NET to demonstrate a sequential implementation of the developed method.
A real-world earthmoving project is modeled and simulated to test the developed hybrid simulation method. The hybrid simulation structure uses unidirectional and sequential interactions between the components of DES and SD models. The simulation is run under three scenarios, is able to predict the real project completion duration with 92% accuracy, and captures the influences of the context level variables. The findings are expected to enhance hybrid simulation applications in construction and to allow for better understanding of the impact of various internal and external factors on the project schedule and its productivity performance.

Divisions:Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:Alzraiee, Hani S. H.
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Building Engineering
Date:12 August 2013
Thesis Supervisor(s):Zayed, Tarek and Moselhi, Osama
Keywords:Construction Operations, Discrete Event Simulation, System Dynamics, Project Management,Earthmoving
ID Code:977560
Deposited On:21 Nov 2013 19:27
Last Modified:18 Jan 2018 17:44


Abdel-Hamid, T., & Madnick, S. (1991). Software project dynamics: An integrated approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
AbouRizk, S. (2010). Role of simulation in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(10), 1140-1153.
AbouRizk, S., & Hague, S. (2009). An overview of the COSYE environment for construction simulation. Proceedings of the 41st Conference on Winter Simulation, Dec 13-16, Austin, TX. 2624-2634.
AbouRizk, S., & Hajjar, D. (1998). A framework for applying simulation in construction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(3), 604-617.
AbouRizk, S., Halpin, D., & Lutz, J. (1992). State of the art in construction simulation. In Proceedings of the 24th Winter Simulation Conference, Dec 13-16, 1271-1277.
Alvanchi, A., Lee, S. H., & AbouRizk, S. (2011). Modeling framework and architecture of hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation for construction. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(2), 77-91.
Alvanchi, A., Lee, S., & AbouRizk, S. (2009). Modeling architecture for hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation. Construction Research Congress - Building a Sustainable Future, April 5-7, Seattle, WA, United states. 1290-1299.
Alzraiee, H., Moselhi, O. and Zayed, T. (2012b) Dynamic planning of earth moving operations. International Symposium of Automation and Robotics in Construction, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (TU/e) June 26–29, 2012
Alzraiee, H., Moselhi, O. and Zayed, T. (2012c) Methodology for synchronizing DES and SD models. Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference C. Laroque, J. Himmelspach, R. Pasupathy, O. Rose, and A.M. Uhrmacher, eds. December 9-12, 2012 Hotel Intercontinental, Berlin, Germany.
Alzraiee, H., Moselhi, O., and Zayed, T. (2012a) A Hybrid framework for modeling construction operations using discrete event simulation and system dynamics. Proceedings of Construction Research Congress- ASCE- West Lafayette, IN, USA”1063-1073.
Amirkhanian, S., & Baker, N. (1992). Expert system for equipment selection for earthmoving operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 118 (2), 318-331
Baines, T., & Harrison, D. (1999). An opportunity for system dynamics in manufacturing system modeling. Production Planning & Control, 10(6), 542-552.
Banks, J., Nelson, B., & Nicol, D. (Eds.). (2000). Discrete-event system simulation (3rd ed.). New Jersey, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
Binder, T., Vox, A., Belyazid, S., Haraldsson, H., & Svensson, M. (2004). Developing system dynamics models from causal loop diagrams. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 25-29, Oxford.
Borshchev, A., Kolesov, Y., & Senichenkov, Y. (2000). Java engine for UML based hybrid state machines. In Proceedings of the 32 Nd Conference on Winter Simulation, Dec 10-13, Orlando, FL. 1888-1894.
Brailsford, S., & Hilton, N. (2001). A comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling health care systems. Proceedings of the 26th Meeting of the ORAHS Working Group, Glasgow, Scotland. 18-39.
Bryant, R. (1977). Simulation of Packet Communication Architecture Computer Systems.,
Borshchev, A. and Filippov. A, (2004). From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools. The 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 25 – 29, Oxford, England
Buss, A., & Jackson, L. (1998). Distributed simulation modeling: A comparison of HLA, CORBA, and RMI. Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Winter Simulation, December 13– 16, Washington, DC. 819-826.
Ceylan, B., & Ford, D. (2002). Using options to manage dynamic uncertainty in acquisition projects. Acquisition Review Quarterly, 9(4), 243-258.
Chahal, K., & Eldabi, T. (2008). A generic framework for hybrid simulation in healthcare. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Societ,y Miami, FL. 1469-1477.
Chan, A. P. C., Scott, D., & Chan, A. P. L. (2004). Factors affecting the success of a construction project. Journal of Construction Eng. and Management, 130(1), 153-155.
Chandy, K., & Misra, J. (1979). Distributed simulation: A case study in design and verification of distributed programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, (5), 440-452.
Chen, D., John, S. Cai, T, and Xiong, M. (2008). A decoupled federate architecture for high level architecture-based distributed simulation, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 68 (11), 1487-1503
Choi, K., Bae, D., & Kim, T. (2006). An approach to a hybrid software process simulation using the DEVS formalism. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 11(4), 373-383.
Chua, D., & Li, G. (2002). RISim: Resource-interacted simulation modeling in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(3), 195-203.
Cooper, K. (1980). Naval ship production: A claim settled and a framework built. Interfaces, 10(6), 20-36.
Cooper, K. (1993 a,b,c). The rework cycle: Why projects are mismanaged. Project Management Journal , 5-17.
Cooper, K. (1994). The $2,000 hour: How managers influence project performance through the rework cycle. Project Management Journal, 25(1), 11-11.
Coyle, R. (1985). Representing discrete events in system dynamics models: A theoretical application to modeling coal production. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(4), 307-318.
Dahmann, J. S., & Morse, K. L. (1998). High level architecture for simulation: An update. Distributed Interactive Simulation and Real-Time Applications, Proceedings. 2nd International Workshop on, 19-20 Jul, , 32-40.
Dahmann, J., Fujimoto, R., & Weatherly, R. (1998). The DoD high level architecture: An update. Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Winter Simulation, December 13 - 16, Washington, DC. 797-804.
Dissanayake, M., & AbouRizk, S. (2007). Qualitative simulation of construction performance using fuzzy cognitive maps. Proceedings of the 39th Conference on Winter Simulation, 9-12 Dec, Washington, D.C. 2134-2140.
Donald, B., & Boyd, P. (1984). Professional construction management (2nd edition ed.). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Science.
El-Rayes, K. and Moselhi, O. (2001). ”Impact of Rainfall on the Productivity of Highway Construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(2), 125–131.
El-Rayes, K., & Moselhi, O. (1998). Resource-driven scheduling of repetitive activities. Construction Management and Economics, 16(14), 433-446.
Elwakil, E. (2011). Knowledge discovery based simulation system in construction. Ph.D. Dissertation, Building, Civil and Environmental Dept., Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada).
Ford, D. (1995). The dynamics of project management: An investigation of the impacts of project process and coordination on performance. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
Ford, D., & Sterman, J. (1998). Dynamic modeling of product development processes. System Dynamics Review, 14(1), 31-68.
Ford, D., & Sterman, J. (2003). The liar's club: Concealing rework in concurrent development. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 11(3), 211-219.
Ford, D., Anderson, S., Damron, A., Casas, R., Gokmen, N., & and Kuennen, S. (2004). Managing constructability reviews to reduce highway project durations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), 33-42.
Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Forrester, J. (1965). Industrial dynamics (4th Ed. ed.). MA, USA: MIT Press.
Forrester, J. (1975). Industrial dynamics after the first decade. In (Chapter 8 in “Collected papers of Jay W. Forrester ed., ) Wright-Allen Press, Inc.
FPC user’s manual—Version 3.0. (1997). Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, Ill.
Fujii, S., Tsunoda, H., Ogita, A., & Kidani, Y. (1994) Distributed simulation model for computer integrated manufacturing. Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Winter Simulation, Dec 5–8, Orlando, FL. 946 - 953.
Fujimoto, R. (2000). Parallel and distributed simulation systems. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Fujimoto, R. (2001). Parallel simulation: Parallel and distributed simulation systems. Proceedings of the 33nd Conference on Winter Simulation, Dec 9-12, San Diego, CA. 147-157.
Fujimoto, R. (2003). Parallel simulation: Distributed simulation systems. Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Winter Simulation: Driving Innovation, Dec 7-10, New Orleans, LA. 124-134.
Hajjar, D., & AbouRizk, S. (1997). AP2-earth: A simulation based system for the estimating and planning of earth moving operations. Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Winter Simulation, Dec 7-10, Washington, DC, USA. 1103-1110.
Hajjar, D., & AbouRizk, S. (1999). Simphony: An environment for building special purpose construction simulation tools. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Winter Simulation, Phoenix, AZ , USA. , 2 998-1006.
Hajjar, D., & AbouRizk, S. (2002). Unified modeling methodology for construction simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2), 174-185.
Halpin, D. (1973). An investigation of the use of simulation networks for modeling construction operations. (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
Halpin, D. (1977). CYCLONE—method for modeling job site processes. Journal of the Construction Division, 103(3), 489-499.
Halpin, D., & Riggs, L. (1992). Planning and analysis of construction operations. New York, NY.: John Wiley and Sons.
Halpin, D., & Woodhead, R. (1997). Construction management (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Wiley.
Halpin, D., Jen, H., & Kim, J. (2003). A construction process simulation web service. In Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Winter Simulation, New Orleans, LA. , 2 1503-1509.
Han, S. (2008). A hybrid simulation model for understanding and managing non-value adding activities in large-scale design and construction projects. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL USA.
Hanna, A. S., C. S. Taylor, and K. T. Sullivan. (2005). Impact of Extended Overtime on Construction Labor Productivity. Journal Construction Engineering and Management, 131(6), pp 734-739.
Harel, D. (1987). Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming, 8(3), 231-274.
Helal, M. (2008). A hybrid system dynamics-discrete event simulation approach to simulating the manufacturing enterprise. Ph.D.Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Helal, M., Rabelo, L., Sepúlveda, J., & Jones, A. (2007). A methodology for integrating and synchronizing the system dynamics and discrete event simulation paradigms. International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 50th Anniversary Celebration, Boston.
Homer, J., Sterman, J., Greenwood, B., & Perkola, M. (1993). Delivery time reduction in pulp and paper mill construction projects: A dynamic analysis of alternatives. Cancun, Mexico. 212-221.
Horner, R. M. W., and Talhouni, B. T. (1995). Effects of accelerated working, delays, and disruptions on labour productivity, Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot, Berkshire, U.K
Huang, G., Lau, J., & Mak, K. (2003). The impacts of sharing production information on supply chain dynamics: A review of the literature. International Journal of Production Research, 41(7), 1483-1517.
Huang, R., & Halpin, D. (1994). Visual construction operation simulation: The DISCO approach. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(3), 175-184.
Hydro Quebec (2003) “Construction of the Sainte-Marguerite-3 Hydroelectric Development 1994-2002” Bibliothèque nationale du QuébecISBN 2-550-40297-9
Hydro-Quebec Web Site (1999). Sainte-Marguerite-3 Hydroelectric Project: in harmony with the environment.
Hydro-Quebec Web Site (2012). Discover new Sainte-Marguerite-3 Hydroelectric Project. ‹ http://www.hydrosustainability.org/getattachment/871c6bf5-1607-452f-94d3-1e7632330a5c/Sainte-Marguerite,-Canada.aspx›. (July 7th)
Ioannou, P. (1989). UM-CYCLONE user’s manual. Division of Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind,
Jefferson, D. (1985). Virtual time. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), 7(3), 404-425.
Kamat, V. R., and Martinez, J. C. (2001), “Visualizing simulated construction operations in 3D”, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 4, ASCE, Reston, VA, 329-337.
Kannan, G. 1999. A Methodology for the Development of a Production Experience Database for Earthmoving Operations using Automated Data Collection. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
Kelton, W., & Law, A. (2000). Simulation modeling and analysis (3rd Edition ed.) McGraw Hill.
Kowalewski, S., Stursberg, O., Fritz, M., Graf, H., Hoffmann, I., Preußig, J. Treseler, H. (1999). A case study in tool-aided analysis of discretely controlled continuous systems: The two tanks problem. Hybrid Systems V,163-185.
Kuhl, F., Weatherly, R., & Dahmann, J. (1999). Creating computer simulation systems: An introduction to the high level architecture. NJ, USA: Prentice Hall PTR.
Lane, D. (2000). You just don't understand me: Models of failure and success in the discourse between system dynamics and discrete event simulation. Working Paper, London School of Economics and Political Sciences, London, UK.
Lee, J., Zhou, M., & Hsu, P. (2004). A multi-paradigm modeling approach for hybrid dynamic systems. IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control Systems Design, Taipie, Tiwan,. 77-82.
Lee, S. (2006). Dynamic planning and control methodology: Understanding and managing iterative error and change cycles in large-scale concurrent design and construction projects. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lee, S., Han, S., & Pea-Mora, F. (2009). Integrating construction operation and context in large-scale construction using hybrid computer simulation. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2), 75-83.
Lee, S., Han, S., & Peña‐Mora, F. (2007). Hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation for construction management. Proceedings of the ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 232-239.
Lee, S., Peña-Mora, F., & Park, M. (2006). Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management. Automation in Construction, 15(1), 84-97.
Lee, Y., Cho, M., Kim, S., & Kim, Y. (2002). Supply chain simulation with discrete-continuous combined modeling. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43(1-2),375-392.
Levitt, R., Thomsen, J., Christiansen, T., Kunz, J., Jin, Y., & Nass, C. (1999). Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Management Science, 45(11), 1479-1495.
Lyneis, J., & Ford, D. (2007). System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynamics Review, 23(2‐3), 157-189.
Lyneis, J., Cooper, K., & Els, S. (2001). Strategic management of complex projects: A case study using system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 17(3), 237-260.
Mak, H. (1993). System dynamics and discrete event simulation modelling. Ph.D. Dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London, London, UK.
Maler, O., Manna, Z., & Pnueli, A. (1992). From timed to hybrid systems. in real-time: Theory in practice, eds. bakker, J.; huizing, C.; roever, W.; rozenberg, G.; springer-verlag,
Martin, R., & Raffo, D. (2001). Application of a hybrid process simulation model to a software development project. Journal of Systems and Software, 59(3), 237-246.
Martinez, J. (1996). Stroboscope: State and resource based simulation of construction processes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Michigan, MI, USA.
Martinez, J., & Ioannou, P. (1994). General purpose simulation with stroboscope. Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Winter Simulation, Dec 11-14, San Diego, CA, USA. 1159-1166.
Martinez, J., & Ioannou, P. (1999). General-purpose systems for effective construction simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(4), 265-276.
Martinez, J., Ioannou, P., & Carr, R. (1994). State and resource based constructio
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Back to top Back to top